Main Article Content

Abstract

The legal framework for land acquisition in Indonesia has not systematically integrated Social Impact Assessment (SIA), thus, protection against the social impacts of development has not been optimally implemented. Unlike Indonesia, which is still developing SIA regulations, Malaysia and New South Wales, Australia have implemented SIA in the land acquisition process for development. This research aims to analyze SIA regulations in these two jurisdictions and identify relevant norms for strengthening SIA regulations in Indonesia. This research is a normative legal study using a statute approach and a comparative approach. The collected data were analyzed qualitatively. The research findings indicate that strengthening SIA regulations in Indonesia requires a legal basis at the statutory level, making amendments to Law Number 2 of 2012 urgently necessary. These regulations also need to be supplemented with implementing regulations, such as Ministerial Regulations and SIA Guidelines, to further regulate the technical provisions for SIA implementation. These include the classification of projects that require SIA based on their social risk level, the implementation of SIA from the land acquisition planning stage, information provision mechanisms that combine public displays and digital platforms, diverse, inclusive, and meaningful public participation, and proportional, efficient, and risk-based monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. These findings provide a normative basis for developing SIA regulations to strengthen the protection of the rights of affected communities, particularly vulnerable groups and indigenous communities, in realizing more responsive, participatory, inclusive, and equitable land acquisition.

Keywords

Social Impact Assessment Sustainable and Equitable Development Land Acquisition Responsive Law

Article Details

How to Cite
Dewi, A. M., Ginting, A. S., & Aina, D. S. (2026). Social Impact Assessment di Malaysia dan New South Wales, Australia: Pembelajaran bagi Pengaturan di Indonesia pada Masa Mendatang (Social Impact Assessment in Malaysia and New South Wales, Australia: Lessons for Future Regulation in Indonesia). Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 33(2), 444–480. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol33.iss2.art8

References

  1. Abdul Rani, Yusnaim, and Gobi Krishna Sinniah. Social Impact Assessment Monitoring Mechanism in Development Projects: A Review on Malaysian Practices”. PLANNING MALAYSIA 23 (July 18, 2025). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i36.1763.

  2. Antwi, Effah Kwabena, John Boakye-Danquah, Denyse Donna Mary Nadon, et al. “Socioeconomic Framework and Indicators for Assessing Cumulative Effects of Resource Development on Indigenous Nations.” The Extractive Industries and Society 24 (December 2025): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2025.101735.

  3. Asa, Agam Ibnu, Misnal Munir, and Rr. Siti Murti Ningsih. “Nonet and Selznick’s Responsive Law Concept in A Historical Philosophy Perspective.” CREPIDO 3, no. 2 (2021): 96–109. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.3.2.96-109.

  4. Aziz, TPr Herlina Ab. “Social Impact Assessment In Malaysia.” International Conference on Social Impact Assessment (Jakarta), 2024.

  5. Azzuhra, Fanny. “The Application of Social Impact Assessment to One of Industrial Estates in Jakarta Metropolitan Area (Case of the Jababeka Industrial Estate).” Thesis, University of Groningen, 2015.

  6. Dalimunte, Siti Nurul Intan Sari, and Taupiqqurrahman. “Problematika Mekanisme Pengadaan Tanah Di Indonesia: Tinjauan Terhadap Regulasi Dan Aktualisasi.” Simbur Cahaya 30, no. 1 (2023): 117. https://doi.org/10.28946/sc.v30i1.2748.

  7. Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure of New South Wales. Social Impact Assessment Guideline for State Significant Projects. Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure of New South Wales, 2026.

  8. Department of Planning and Environment New South Wales. Community Consultative Committee Guideline. Department of Planning and Environment New South Wales, 2023.

  9. Department of Planning and Environment New South Wales. Social Impact Management Toolbox for State Significant Projects. Department of Planning and Environment New South Wales, 2023.

  10. Hardianto, Djanggih dan Salle. “Aspek Hukum Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum.” Research Law Journal 12, no. 2 (2017): 165–72.

  11. Hassan, Mohammad Mujaheed. “Social Impact Assessment (SIA): A Review of SIA Procedure in Malaysia.” International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention 5, no. 4 (2018): 4550–57. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v5i4.02.

  12. Hatman, Reza Amirul dan Lego Karjoko. “Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Tanah Terkait Dalam Pembangunan Bandara Bagi Kepentingan Umum di Kabupaten Kulonprogo.” Jurnal Discretie: Jurnal Bagian Hukum Administrasi Negara 3, no. 3 (2022): 149-159, https://doi.org/10.20961/jd.v3i3.57274.

  13. IFC. Performance Standard 5 Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement. 2012. https://www.ifc.org/content/dam/ifc/doc/2010/2012-ifc-performance-standard-5-en.pdf.

  14. Imperiale, Angelo Jonas, and Frank Vanclay. “Using Social Impact Assessment to Strengthen Community Resilience in Sustainable Rural Development in Mountain Areas.” Mountain Research and Development 36, no. 4 (2016): 431–42. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-16-00027.1.

  15. Independent Planning Commission New South Wales. Independent Planning Commission NSW Annual Report 2019–2020. n.d.

  16. Independent Planning Commission New South Wales. “Understand Our Decision-Making Process.” https://www.ipcn.nsw.gov.au/engage-with-us/our-processes.

  17. Istanto, Sugeng. Penelitian Hukum. Cetakan Kesatu. Yogyakarta. CV Ganda, 2007.

  18. Ishihara, Sotoshi. “Country System to Manage Social Risks of Investment Projects.” Social Impact Assessment: A Corner Stone of Sustainable and Equitable Development: “Implementing Better Land Acquisition in Challenging Tenurial Settings: Balancing Acceleration, Certainty, and Fairness (Jakarta), 2024.

  19. Khairi, Ameera Nazeerah Ahmad, Zakiah Ponrahono, and Syazwani Sahrir. “Evaluation of Social Impact Assessment (SIA) Practices Using SWOT Analysis: A Case Study in India.” Planning Malaysia 20, no. 3 (2022): 196–204. https://doi.org/10.21837/PM.V20I22.1138.

  20. Koch-weser, Maritta, and Scott Guggenheim. Social Development in the World Bank. In Social Development in the World Bank. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57426-0.

  21. M. Suaree, Nur Atheefa Sufeena and Muhamad Nafi Uz Zaman. “Public Participation in Social Impact Assessment: Comparative Human Rights Legal Approaches in Malaysia and Indonesia.” LAW REFORM 21, no. 2 (2025): 419–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v21i2.69408.

  22. M Suaree, Nur Atheefa Sufeena and Nurhafilah Musa. “Analisa Perkembangan Kerangka Perundangan Penilaian Impak Sosial Di Malaysia.” Jurnal Undang-Undang Dan Masyarakat 35, no. 1 (2025): 95–112. https://doi.org/10.17576/juum-2025-3501-08.

  23. M Suaree, Nur Atheefa Sufeena, Sharifah Zubaidah Syed Abdul Kader, and Mariana Mohamed Osman. “Social Impact Assessment: A Comparison of The Legal Frameworks in Malaysia and New Zealand.” PLANNING MALAYSIA 22 (August 2024). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i33.1542.

  24. M. Suaree, Nur Atheefa Sufeena, Sharifah Zubaidah Syed Abdul Kader, and Mariana Mohamed Osman. “The Implementation of Public Participation for SIA and EIA in Malaysia.” PLANNING MALAYSIA 22 (February 2024). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i30.1420.

  25. M. Suaree, Nur Atheefa Sufeena, Sharifah Zubaidah Syed Abdul Kader, Mariana Mohamed Osman, Zati Ilham Abdul Manaf, and Wan Khubaib Akram Wan Jaffree. “A Comparative Analysis of The Legal Frameworks for SIA and EIA in Malaysia.” PLANNING MALAYSIA 21 (November 2023). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i30.1388.

  26. M. Suaree, Nur Atheefa Sufeena, Sharifah Zubaidah Syed Abdul Kader, Mariana Mohamed Osman, and Zati Ilham Abdul Manaf. “The Development of Policy and Legal Framework for Social Impact Assessment in Malaysia.” Planning Malaysia 20, no. 3 (2022): 295–305. https://doi.org/10.21837/PM.V20I22.1146.

  27. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revisi. Prenadamedia Group, 2011.

  28. Nonet, Philippe and Philip Selznick. Hukum Responsif. Terjemahan Raisul Muttaqien. Penerbit Nusa Media, 2015.

  29. Novikasari, Siti Rahma, and Nurmalita Ayuningtyas Harahap. “Pemenuhan Hak Atas Informasi Masyarakat Dalam Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Tanah: Studi Pengadaan Tanah Taman Budaya Sleman.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 28, no. 2 (2021): 418–434. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss2.art9.

  30. Nugroho, Agung. “Kementerian ATR/BPN Pelajari Pedoman Social Impact Assessment dari PLAN Malaysia.” https://indonesiaparlemen.com/2023/06/08/kementerian-atr-bpn-pelajari-pedoman-social-impact-assessment-dari-planmalaysia/.

  31. Pamuncak, Aristya Windiana. “Perbandingan Ganti Rugi Dan Mekanisme Peralihan Hak Menurut Peraturan Presiden Nomor 65 Tahun 2006 Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012.” Law and Justice 1, no. 1 (2016): 1. https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v1i1.2699.

  32. Parsons, Richard. “Balancing Speed and Fairness in SIA: Case Study of New South Wales, Australia.” Social Impact Assessment: A Corner Stone of Sustainable and Equitable Development: “Implementing Better Land Acquisition in Challenging Tenurial Settings: Balancing Acceleration, Certainty, and Fairness (Jakarta), 2024.

  33. Parsons, Richard. “Forces for Change in Social Impact Assessment.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 38, no. 4 (2020): 278–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1692585.

  34. Parsons, Richard E. D., and Lara K. Mottee. “Exploring Equity in Social Impact Assessment.” Current Sociology 72, no. 4 (2024): 732–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921231203170.

  35. PLANMalaysia. Executive Summary PPSIA (Guidance for the Implementation of Social Impact Assessment for Development Projects. PLANMalaysia, 2023.

  36. Putria, Nora Eka; Helmi, Melinda Noer, and Yossyafra. “Social Risk Assessment of Land Acquisition for The Construction of The Sicincin-Padang Toll Road Section, West Sumatra, Indonesia.” Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 45, no. 1 (2023): 167–80. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2024.45.1.18.

  37. Rosmidah, Rosmidah, Adeb Davega Prasna, and Arjun Deswal. “Public Interest, State Control, and Proportional Compensation: Constitutional Tensions in Indonesia’s Land Acquisition Regime.” Indonesia Private Law Review 7, no. 1 (2026): 67–76. https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v7i1.5043.

  38. Sari, Embun. “Penguatan Kebijakan Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum Melalui Penilaian Dampak Sosial.” Hak Atas Pembangunan Dan Keadilan Sosial Dalam Kebijakan Pengadaan Tanah (Yogyakarta), 2024.

  39. Sari, Embun, Joyo Winoto, Endriatmo Soetarto, Zaenal Asikin, Sri Fajar Ayu, and Meutia Nauly. “‘Livelihood Vulnerability Index of Resettled Peasants Displaced by Land Acquisition of An Airport.’” Journal of Human, Earth, and Future 5, no. 4 (2024): 629–42. https://doi.org/10.28991/HEF-2024-05-04-07.

  40. Sibawaih, Yusran, and Dwi Ambarwati. “Paradigma Tiga Tipe Hukum Menurut Philippe Nonet Dan Philippe Selznick Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Pengelolaan Negara.” Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie 7, no. 2 (2025): 79–94. https://doi.org/10.34005/jhj.v7i2.190.

  41. Smyth, Eddie, and Frank Vanclay. Social Impacts of Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Restrictions on Land Use. In Edward Elgar Publishing. 2024. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802208870.00033.

  42. Sumardjono, Maria S. W. “Social Impact Assessment (SIA): Jembatan Menuju Keseimbangan Antara Keadilan, Kepastian Hukum Dan Akselerasi Pengadaan Tanah.” Social Impact Assessment: A Corner Stone of Sustainable and Equitable Development: “Implementing Better Land Acquisition in Challenging Tenurial Settings: Balancing Acceleration, Certainty, and Fairness (Jakarta), 2024.

  43. Suwardi dan Widyawati Boediningsih. “Kajian Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Pembangunan Kepentingan Umum.” SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik, dan Hukum 2, no. 5 (2023): 471–479. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v2i5.940.

  44. Swu, Niloto, and Suparna Roy. “Land, Identity, and Economic Stability: Examining the Shift from Community to Private Ownership in Naga Society.” Heritage & Society, February 28, 2025, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2025.2470074.

  45. Syafiq, A. K., A. M. Azima, Abd. Hair Awang, M. S. Sarmila, and Mohd Fuad Mat Jali. “Customary Land Ownership Rights Need: Land Change Model Application.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, ahead of print, August 1, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s3p94.

  46. Utomo, Setiyo. “Problematika Proses Pengadaan Tanah.” Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial 5, no. 2 (2020): 20. https://doi.org/10.22373/justisia.v5i2.8452.

  47. Vanclay, Frank. “After 50 Years of Social Impact Assessment, Is It Still Fit for Purpose?” Current Sociology Monograph 72, no. 4 (2024): 774–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921231203189.

  48. Vanclay, Frank. “International Principles For Social Impact Assessment.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 21, no. 1 (2003): 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154603781766491.

  49. Vanclay, Frank. “Project-Induced Displacement and Resettlement: From Impoverishment Risks to an Opportunity for Development?” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 35, no. 1 (2017): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2017.1278671.

  50. Vanclay, Frank. “Reflections on Social Impact Assessment in the 21st Century.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 38, no. 2 (2020): 126–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1685807.

  51. Vanclay, Frank, Ana Maria Esteves, Ilse Aucamp, and Daniel M. Franks. Social Impact Assessment: Guidance for Assessing and Managing the Social Impacts of Projects. In International Association for Impact Assessment, vol. 1. no. April. 2015.

  52. Zakie, Mukmin. “Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum (Perbandingan Antara Malaysia Dan Indonesia).” Jurnal Hukum 18 (2011): 187–206.

  53. Ziller, Alison. Social Impact Assessment: The Good, the Bad and the Unbelievable: A Guide for Reviewers. Australia Street Company, 2021.