Bilah Samping Artikel

Telah diserahkan
September 5, 2025
Diterima
September 20, 2025
Diterbitkan
September 30, 2025
Unduh
pdf
Statistik
Baca Penghitung : 342 Unduh : 354

Isi Artikel Utama

Abstrak

Meningkatnya jumlah lansia di Indonesia membawa konsekuensi terhadap kebutuhan sistem pendukung yang mampu menjamin keamanan dan kesejahteraan mereka, terutama bagi lansia yang hidup sendiri. Kondisi hidup sendiri meningkatkan kerentanan lansia terhadap risiko jatuh, sakit mendadak, maupun keadaan darurat memerlukan bantuan orang lain. Sampai saat ini, pemanfaatan teknologi darurat sederhana yang ramah lansia di tingkat komunitas masih terbatas. Kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat di Kelurahan Purbayan Kota Yogyakarta menginisiasi pengembangan Gelang Emergensi untuk Lansia Hidup Sendiri (GEULIS) sebagai solusi inovatif berbasis teknologi Internet of Things (IoT). Prototipe gelang ini dirancang dengan sistem tombol darurat sederhana yang dapat mengirimkan pesan melalui aplikasi WhatsApp kepada anggota keluarga atau kader, ketika lansia membutuhkan pertolongan. Kegiatan pengabdian meliputi identifikasi kebutuhan lansia, perancangan dan pengembangan prototipe, serta uji coba pada lansia hidup sendiri. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa perangkat berfungsi dengan baik dalam mengirimkan sinyal darurat. Desain cukup wearable dan user-friendly namun masih memerlukan pengembangan untuk kemudahan penggunaan. Program ini membuka peluang pengembangan lanjutan agar dapat digunakan secara lebih luas di komunitas.

Kata Kunci

gelang emergensi Internet of Things lansia perangkat wearable

Rincian Artikel

Lisensi

Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Riana Rahmawati, Kern Cesarean Ahnaf, Muhammad Pudail

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Cara Mengutip
Rahmawati, R., Ahnaf, K. C., & Pudail, M. . (2025). Pengembangan GEULIS: Prototipe Gelang Emergensi Lansia sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Keamanan Lansia Hidup Sendiri: Indonesia. Jurnal Abdimas Madani Dan Lestari (JAMALI), 7(02), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.20885/jamali.vol7.iss2.art23
Unduh Sitasi
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

Referensi

  1. Andayani, S. (2025). Exploring the Lived Experience of Using Wearable Cardiac Monitoring Devices Among Older Adults Living Independently at Home in Urban Java, Indonesia. Journal of Digital Health Innovation and Medical Technology, 1(8), 328–337.
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Statistik Penduduk Lanjut Usia Tahun 2024. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2024/12/31/a00d4477490caaf0716b711d/statistik-penduduk-lanjut-usia-2024.html
  3. Banharak, S., Prasankok, C., & Lach, H. W. (2020). Factors related to a delay in seeking treatment for acute myocardial infarction in older adults: An integrative review. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 24(4), 553–568.
  4. Dorri, S., Zabolinezhad, H., & Sattari, M. (2023). The application of internet of things for the elderly health safety: a systematic review. Advanced Biomedical Research, 12(1), 109.
  5. Ismail, N. (2024). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi untuk Lansia di Indonesia: Sebuah Studi Literatur. Jurnal JTIK (Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi), 8, 285–296.
  6. Jo, T. H., Ma, J. H., & Cha, S. H. (2021). Elderly perception on the internet of things-based integrated smart-home system. Sensors, 21(4), 1284.
  7. Kekade, S., Hseieh, C.-H., Islam, M. M., Atique, S., Khalfan, A. M., Li, Y.-C., & Abdul, S. S. (2018). The usefulness and actual use of wearable devices among the elderly population. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 153, 137–159.
  8. Lage, I., Braga, F., Almendra, M., Meneses, F., Teixeira, L., & Araújo, O. (2023). Older people living alone: A predictive model of fall risk. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(13), 6284.
  9. Mendonça, F. M., Dantas, M. A. R., Fortunato, W. T., Oliveira, J. F. S., Souza, B. C., & Filgueiras, M. Q. (2020). Wearable devices in healthcare: Challenges, current trends and a proposition of affordable low cost and scalable computational environment of internet of things. Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering, 1301–1308.
  10. Moore, K., O’Shea, E., Kenny, L., Barton, J., Tedesco, S., Sica, M., Crowe, C., Alamäki, A., Condell, J., & Nordström, A. (2021). Older adults’ experiences with using wearable devices: qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 9(6), e23832.
  11. Mostaghel, R. (2016). Innovation and technology for the elderly: Systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4896–4900.
  12. Nugroho, E. P., Tanudjaja, H., & Indriati, K. (2020). Geriatric e-Homecare Information System. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(5).
  13. Schicktanz, S., & Schweda, M. (2021). Aging 4.0? Rethinking the ethical framing of technology-assisted eldercare. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 43(3), 93.
  14. Stavropoulos, T. G., Papastergiou, A., Mpaltadoros, L., Nikolopoulos, S., & Kompatsiaris, I. (2020). IoT wearable sensors and devices in elderly care: A literature review. Sensors, 20(10), 2826.
  15. Surya, Y. W. I., Wahyudi, I., Septiani, D., & Isnaini, S. (2025). Digital Literacy and Smartphone Consumption Patterns in the Elderly Group of Indonesia and Pakistan. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 10(1), 99–106.
  16. Susanti, H., Mukhtar, H., Cahyadi, W. A., Nugroho, B. S., Setiyadi, S., Afrinaldi, N. A., Husnul, N., & Ardian, F. (2023). Implementasi Alat Pemantauan Aktivitas dan Pelacakan Lokasi Jatuh (E-Care) Untuk Lansia di Daerah Cikutra Kota Bandung. Panrita Abdi-Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat, 7(1), 99–109.
  17. Tyler, M., De George-Walker, L., & Simic, V. (2020). Motivation matters: Older adults and information communication technologies. Studies in the Education of Adults, 52(2), 175–194.
  18. Widhowati, S. S., Chen, C.-M., Chang, L.-H., Lee, C.-K., & Fetzer, S. (2020). Living alone, loneliness, and depressive symptoms among Indonesian older women. Health Care for Women International, 41(9), 984–996.
  19. Yazdani-Darki, M., Rahemi, Z., Adib-Hajbaghery, M., & Izadi-Avanji, F. S. (2020). Older adults’ barriers to use technology in daily life: A qualitative study. Nursing and Midwifery Studies, 9(4), 229–236.
  20. Yusif, S., Soar, J., & Hafeez-Baig, A. (2016). Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 94, 112–116.
  21. Zainal, A., Aziz, N. F. A., Ahmad, N. A., Razak, F. H. A., Razali, F., Azmi, N. H., & Koyou, H. L. (2023). Usability measures used to enhance user experience in using digital health technology among elderly: a systematic review. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 12(3), 1825–1832.
  22. Zanella, A., Mason, F., Pluchino, P., Cisotto, G., Orso, V., & Gamberini, L. (2020). Internet of things for elderly and fragile people. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2006.05709.
  23. Zhang, B., & Li, Y. (2017). Wearable medical devices acceptance and expectance of senior population in China. Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Electronic Business, 241–251.