Article Sidebar

Comparison of Rahn Contracts from the Perspective of Islamic Law and Indonesian Guarantee Law
Submitted
August 25, 2022
Accepted
October 14, 2022
Published
November 17, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 733 Download : 738

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper analyzed pawn in comparison between the Civil Code and Islamic law. It examined the specific differences between pawn contracts in Islamic law and Indonesian positive law to compare two contract theories. The method used in this paper is a qualitative approach. The type used in writing this article is library research. The author examines, observes and looks for data from reference books that can be accounted for. The result of the research in this paper is that the term pawn in Islamic law is called ar-rahn. The difference between rahn and pawn in positive law, among others, is regarding the maintenance of the collateral. In Islamic law the pawnbroker is not subject to the term interest or additional costs outside the pawn agreement, but there is only an additional maintenance fee for the collateral. Whereas in positive law, in addition to the cost of maintaining goods, there is also an additional cost called 'interest' that must be borne by the lender. In Islamic law collateral goods are not limited to movable goods, but also immovable goods, while in positive law the collateral object is only limited to movable goods.

Keywords

Collateral Law Indonesian Guarantee Law Islamic Law Pawn Rahn

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Aang Asari , Muhammad Irkham Firdaus

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Asari , A., & Firdaus, M. I. . (2022). Comparison of Rahn Contract from the Perspective of Islamic Law and Indonesian Guarantee Law. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 8(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol8.iss2.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Adjie, H., & Saputro, E. H. (2015). Perlindungan hukum bagi pemilik objek gadai atas pelelangan objek gadai [Legal protection for the owner of the object of pawn over the auction of the object of pawning]. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 1(1), 52-65. https://doi.org/10.33121/hukumbisnis.v1i1.57
  2. Aji, K., Anam, S., & Fauzi, R. A. (2021). Studi komparasi jaminan barang bergerak dan tidak bergerak dalam gadai perspektif hukum Islam dan hukum perdata [Comparative study of movable and immovable property collateral in the perspective of Islamic law and civil law]. Ulumuna: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 7(2), 214-230. http://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/madura/index.php/ulumuna/article/view/5257
  3. Anshori, A. G. (2005). Gadai syariah di Indonesia [Islamic pawnshops in Indonesia]. Gadjah Mada Press.
  4. Antonio, M. S. (2008). Bank syariah dari teori ke praktik [Islamic banking from theory to practice]. Gema Insani Press.
  5. Ashibly. (2018). Hukum jaminan [Guarantee law]. MIH Unihaz.
  6. Basyir, A. A. (2000). Principles of muamalat (Islamic civil law). UII Press.
  7. Bawono, A. C. (2012, January 12). Kedudukan KUH Pidana dan KUH Perdata dalam hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan [The position of the Criminal Code and the Civil Code in the hierarchy of laws and regulations]. Hukum Online. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/kedudukan-kuh-pidana-dan-kuh-perdata-dalam-hierarki-peraturan-perundang-undangan-lt4f1e71d674972
  8. Choirunnisak, C., & Handayani, D. L. (2020). Gadai dalam Islam [Pawn in Islam]. Ekonomica Sharia: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pengembangan Perbankan Syariah, 6(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.36908/esha.v6i1.141
  9. Dalimunthe, D. (2018). Objek gadai dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (BW) [Pawn objects in the Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie)]. Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, 4(1), 50-66. http://jurnal.iain-padangsidimpuan.ac.id/index.php/yurisprudentia/article/view/1497
  10. Dewan Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia. (2006). Himpunan Fatwa Dewan Syariah [Collection of Fatwas of Sharia Council]. Gaung Persada Press.
  11. Febriani, A. Y., & Arsika, I. M. B. (2014). Tanggung jawab kreditor atas hilanya barang gadai [Responsibility of creditors for the loss of pawn goods]. Khertha Semaya, 2(6), 1–5. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthasemaya/article/view/10645
  12. Firdaus, M. I. (2022). Criticism analysis of the effectiveness of Indonesia’s economic criminal policy in the perspective of Islamic law. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 8(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.3376/jch.v8i1.570
  13. Firdaus, M. I., & Fitiyani, M. (2022). Shariah perspective on investing in islamic capital market: A qualitative study. Journal of Islamic Economic and Business Research, 2(1), 66-75. https://doi.org/10.18196/jiebr.v2i1.45
  14. Firdaus, M. I., Tifani, M. A. A., Putri, S. F. R. A., & Zulfikri. (2022). Implementation of the qardh agreement on the financial technology lending platform in the development of small and medium enterprises (SME) in Indonesia. Al-Iktisab: Journal of Islamic Economic Law, 6(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826186867.0006
  15. Ghafar, A. A., & Purwoadmojo, J. (2019). Pemanfaatan barang gadai dalam perjanjian hutang di bawah tangan [Utilization of pawn goods in private debt agreements]. Notarius, 12(1), 484–499. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v12i1.28899
  16. Ghazaly, A. R., Ihsan, G., & Shidiq, S. (2010). Fiqh muamalat [Fiqh muamalah]. Prenadamedia Group.
  17. Hadi, M. S. (2003). Pegadaian syariah [Sharia pawnshop]. Salemba Diniyah.
  18. Haryanto, B. S. (2010). Kedudukan gadai syariah (rahn) dalam sistem hukum jaminan Indonesia [The position of sharia pawning (rahn) in the Indonesian guarantee legal system]. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 10(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2010.10.1.133
  19. Hindi, A., & Rahmah, S. (2019). Tinjauan hukum Islam terhadap praktek gadai sawah tanpa batas waktu di Desa Barumbung Kecamatan Matakali [Review of Islamic law on the practice of pawning rice fields without a time limit in Barumbung Village, Matakali District]. J-ALIF Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Dan Sosial Budaya Islam, 4(2), 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.35329/jalif.v4i2.1714
  20. Kashadi, P. P. (2001). Hukum jaminan (Edisi revisi dengan UUHT) [Guarantee law (Revised edition with Mortgage Law)]. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.
  21. Kelibia, M. U. (2021). Studi komparasi konsep biaya pemeliharaan barang jaminan dan konsep bunga dalam prespektif hukum ekonomi syariah (Pegadaian syariah dan pegadaian konvensional di Ambon) [Comparative study of the concept of the cost of maintaining collateral and the concept of interest in the perspective of sharia economic law (Sharia pawnshops and conventional pawnshops in Ambon)]. AMAL: Journal of Islamic Economic and Business (JIEB), 3(1), 48–75. https://iainambon.ac.id/ojs/ojs-2/index.php/amal/article/view/2391
  22. Khoirunnazilah, Nurwanti, & Larasati, A. (2022). Perkembangan konsep rahn dalam pegadaian [The development of the concept of rahn in pawnshops]. Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi dan Bisnis Syariah, 4(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.15575/aksy.v4i1.17099
  23. Kusuma, R. S. W. S. (2014). Dinamika personal dan corporate guarantee di dunia perbankan di Indonesia [The dynamics of personal and corporate guarantees in the banking industry in Indonesia]. Jurnal Repertorium, 1(2), 38-43. https://jurnal.hukum.uns.ac.id/index.php/repertorium/article/view/563
  24. Lastriyah, & Nasution, A. D. (2018). Analysis of soil pawn farming practices in oyotan systems in Ngemplak Village, Windusari District, Magelang District (Perspective of Sharia Economic Law Compilation). Prosiding Business and Economics Conference in Utilizing of Modern Technology. https://journal.unimma.ac.id/index.php/conference/article/view/3643
  25. Mulyati, E., & Dwiputri, F. A. (2018). Prinsip kehati-hatian dalam menganalisis jaminan kebendaan sebagai pengaman perjanjian kredit perbankan [The precautionary principle in analyzing material guarantees as a safeguard for bank credit agreements]. ACTA DIURNAL: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 1(2), 134-148. http://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/acta/article/view/164
  26. Prapti, Rahayu, D., & Sulaiman. (2020). Metode penelitian hukum [Legal research methods]. Thafa Media.
  27. Sarwat, A. (2018). Ensiklopedia Fikih Indonesia: Muamalat [Encyclopedia of Indonesian Fiqh: Muamalat]. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  28. Satrio, J. (1991). Hukum jaminan: Hak-hak jaminan kebendaan [Guarantee law: Guaranteed property rights]. PT. Citra Aditya Bhakti.
  29. Subekti, R., & Tjitrosudibio. (2008). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata [Code of Civil Law]. PT. Pradnya Paramita.
  30. Surepno. (2018). Studi implementasi akad rahn (gadai syariah) pada lembaga keuangan syariah [Study of the implementation of the rahn (sharia pawn) contract in Islamic financial institutions]. Tawazun: Journal of Sharia Economic Law, 1(2), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.21043/tawazun.v1i2.5090
  31. Syafi’i, R. (2000). Fiqih Muamalah [Fiqh Muamalah]. CV Pustaka Setia.
  32. Tirana, G., Abubakar, L., & Handayani, T. (2019). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pembeli piutang atas jaminan hak guna bangunan dalam perjanjian kredit sindikasi [Legal protection for buyers of receivables for collateral for building use rights in syndicated credit agreements]. ACTA DIURNAL: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 2(32), 267-285. http://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/acta/article/view/213