Article Sidebar

Analysis of musharakah agreement due to the bank’s negligence in implementing prudential banking principle The case of jurisprudence at the Supreme Court Cassation Verdict Number 624 KAg2017
Submitted
January 9, 2023
Accepted
July 24, 2023
Published
December 26, 2023
Download
PDF Review Reports Originality Report
Statistic
Read Counter : 105 Download : 94

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study analyzed the Supreme Court Cassation Verdict Number 624 K/Ag/2017, regarding the musyarakah agreement between the customer and PT. Bank Sumut Padangsidimpuan Branch, in which the latter had disbursed financing to the customer before the issuance of a life insurance policy letter. The focus of the research was to investigate the settlement of the musharakah agreement due to the negligence of the bank which resulted in the customer’s obligation to pay the remaining debt based on the Supreme Court Cassation Verdict Number 624 K/Ag/2017. The study used a qualitative research approach with a case approach, statute approach, and conceptual approach. This study concludes that based on the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law (Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah or KHES) Articles 209-210 if one of the parties in the agreement dies, the contract ends, and the loss caused by the death of the mudharib is borne by the owner of the capital. Therefore, even though in a musyarakah contract there is a mix of assets of both customers and Islamic banks. However, because the bank was negligent in their prudential banking principles practice and this action was against the law, then in regards to the legal protection theory, the losses experienced from the musyarakah contract should have been borne by the bank as a form of punishment for the unlawful act due to negligence in implementing the prudential banking principle.

Keywords

cassation verdict Islamic bank musharakah agreement prudential banking principle Supreme Court

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Sri Armaini, Muhammad Said

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Armaini, S., & Said, M. (2023). An analysis of musharakah agreement due to the bank’s negligence in implementing prudential banking principle: The case of jurisprudence at the Supreme Court Cassation Verdict Number 624 K/Ag/2017. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 9(2), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol9.iss2.art6
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Abdussalam, & Shodiq, A. (2022). Maqashid as-syariah perspektif Imam Al-Ghazali; Studi literasi maslahah mursalah [Maqashid as-syariah from Imam Al-Ghazali’s perspective: A literature study of maslahah mursalah]. Moderasi : Journal of Islamic Studies, 2(2), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.54471/moderasi.v2i2.32

  2. Ahyunani, A. (2017). Tinjauan hukum Islam tentang penarikan uang kembalianuntuk program donasi (Studi pada Alfamart Prasanti II Bandar Lampung) [Review of Islamic law regarding withdrawing money for donation programs (Study at Alfamart Prasanti II Bandar Lampung)] [Bachelor’s thesis, UIN Raden Intan Lampung]. http://repository.radenintan.ac.id/1599/

  3. Amri, M. (2018). Konsep maslahat dalam penetapan hukum Islam (Telaah kritis pemikiran hukum Islam Najamuddin At- Thufi) [The concept of benefit in determining Islamic law (Critical study of Najamuddin At-Thufi’s Islamic legal thought)]. Et-Tijarie: Jurnal Hukum Dan Bisnis Syariah, 5(2), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.21107/ete.v5i2.4585

  4. Bank Indonesia. (1999, May 12). Surat Keputusan Direksi Bank Indonesia Nomor 32/34/KEP/DIR tanggal 12 Mei 1999 tentang Bank Umum Berdasarkan Prinisip Syariah [Decree of the Board of Directors of Bank Indonesia Number 32/34/KEP/DIR dated 12 May 1999 concerning Commercial Banks Based on Sharia Principles]. https://www.jariungu.com/peraturan_detail.php?Surat-Keputusan-Direksi-Bank-Indonesia-No--32-34-KEP-DIR-tahun-1999-tentang-Bank-Umum-Berdasarkan-Prinsip-Syariah&idPeraturan=13054

  5. Bapepam-LK. (2007, December 10). Keputusan Ketua Bapepam-LK Nomor: PER-03/BL/2007 tentang Kegiatan Perusahaan Pembiayaan Berdasarkan Prinsip Syariah [Decision of the Chairman of Bapepam-LK Number: PER-03/BL/2007 concerning Financing Company Activities Based on Sharia Principles]. https://ojk.go.id/id/kanal/iknb/regulasi/lembaga-jasa-keuangan-khusus/peraturan-bapepam/Pages/keputusan-ketua-bapepam-lk-nomor-per-03-bl-2007.aspx

  6. Darmawati, D. (2018). Akad dalam transaksi ekonomi syari’ah [Contracts in sharia economic transactions]. Sulesana: Jurnal Wawasan Keislaman, 12(2), 143–167. https://doi.org/10.24252/sulesana.v12i2.7578

  7. Dewan Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia. (2000, April 13). Fatwa No. 08/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 tentang Pembiayaan Musyarakah [Fatwa No. 08/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 concerning Musharakah Financing]. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxTl-lNihFyzUXk1MXdDa241QUE/view?pli=1&resourcekey=0-IdZe1HAEmh5htzyEDYIkIg

  8. Ghofur, R. A. (2010). Akibat hukum dan terminasi akad dalam fiqh muamalah [Legal consequences and contract termination in muamalah fiqh]. ASAS : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 2(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24042/asas.v2i2.1626

  9. Hamid, A. M. (2020). Perspektif etika bisnis Islam dalam upaya pengawasan praktik monopoli dan persaingan usaha tidak sehat [Perspective of Islamic business ethics in efforts to monitor monopolistic practices and unfair business competition]. Dar El-Ilmi : Jurnal Studi Keagamaan, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 7(2), 33–61. https://doi.org/10.52166/dar

  10. Harahap, I., Nuruddin, A., Batubara, C., Syahnan, M., & Sukiati, S. (2019, October 29). Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), Islamic bank, and religiosity. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Economics, Management, Accounting and Business, ICEMAB 2018, 8-9 October 2018, Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia. https://eudl.eu/doi/10.4108/eai.8-10-2018.2288721

  11. Hassan, H. (2002). Contracts in Islamic law: The principles of commutative justice and liberality. Journal of Islamic Studies, 13(3), 257–297. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26198407

  12. Hattu, L., Juanda, J., & Adianto, H. (2023). Hak anak atas pelayanan kesehatan (Analisis perlindungan hukum imunisasi anak) [Children’s rights to health services (Analysis of legal protection for child immunization)]. Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum, 11(8), 1921–1934. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2023.v11.i08.p15

  13. Herlinda, S. (2021). Efforts to protect adolescents in early marriage through the generation planning program maslahah mursalah Najamuddin Al-Thufi theory perspective (Studi BKKBN Jambi Province). Al-’`Adalah : Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum Islam, 6(1), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.31538/adlh.v6i1.1408

  14. Hudiyani, Z. (2019). Kontribusi maslahah Al-Thufi dalam pembaharuan hukum Islam di era kontemporer [Maslahah Al-Thufi’s contribution to the renewal of Islamic law in the contemporary era]. TERAJU: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 1(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.35961/teraju.v1i02.45

  15. Husna, N. (2019). Analysis of Islamic law on the practice of multiple contracts on pawned rice fields. JURISTA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(1), 54–87. https://doi.org/10.1234/jurista.v3i1.39

  16. Islami, A. (2021). Analisis jaminan dalam akad-akad bagi hasil (akad mudharabah dan akad musyarakah) di perbankan syariah [Analysis of collateral in profit sharing contracts (mudharabah contracts and musyarakah contracts) in sharia banking]. Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 4(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.30595/jhes.v4i1.9903

  17. Janah, I. M., & Fanani, S. (2020). The sharia compliance analysis of musyarakah financing in Islamic Rural Bank of Amanah Sejahtera Gresik. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori Dan Terapan, 7(1), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.20473/vol7iss20201pp151-161

  18. Jufri, K. A. A., Awang, M. S., & Sahid, M. M. (2021). Maqasid syariah menurut Imam Al-Ghazali dan aplikasinya dalam penyusunan undang-undang Islam di Indonesia: Maqasid of sharia according to Imam Al-Ghazali and its application in the compilation of Islamic law in Idonesia. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 9(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol9no2.315

  19. Kurniawan, A., & Hudafi, H. (2021). Konsep maqashid syariah Imam Asy-Syatibi dalam kitab Al-Muwafaqat [Imam Asy-Syatibi’s concept of maqashid sharia in the book Al-Muwafaqat]. Al-Mabsut : Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial, 15(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.56997/almabsut.v15i1.502

  20. Lestari, D. M. (2021). Kritik terhadap implementasi akad musyarakah di perbankan syariah: Criticism of musyaraka contract implementation at sharia baking. NISBAH: Jurnal Perbankan Syariah, 7(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.30997/jn.v7i1.3115

  21. Lestari, S., Renfiana, L., & Arianti, F. (2022). Prudential banking principle implementation in murabahah financing on PT. Sumut Sharia Bank Branch Padangsidimpuan. Journal of Islamic Financial Technology, 1(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.24952/jiftech.v1i2.6688

  22. Mahkamah Agung. (2008). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor. 02 Tahun 2008 tentang Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah [Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number. 02 of 2008 concerning the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law]. Mahkamah Agung.

  23. Mahkamah Agung. (2017, October 25). Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 624 K/Ag/2017 [Supreme Court Decision Number 624 K/Ag/2017]. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/57a8c5144872f29a4c0e883a68f53348.html

  24. Mohammed, N. (1988). Principles of Islamic contract law. Journal of Law and Religion, 6(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.2307/1051062

  25. Naitboho, Y. R. (2020). Pencatatan perkawinan dalam hukum kekeluargaan di indonesia dan relevansinya dengan teori maslahah Al-Syatibi [Marriage registration in family law in Indonesia and its relevance to Al-Syatibi’s maslahah theory]. SANGAJI : Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah Dan Hukum, 4(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.52266/sangaji.v4i1.444

  26. Nasution, A. W., Siregar, R. A., & Harahap, I. (2022). Monopoli dalam perspektif ekonomi Islam [Monopoly from an Islamic economic perspective]. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 22(2), 920–925. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v22i2.2090

  27. Novenanty, W. M. (2018). The legal aspect of credit without collateral in Indonesia (Aspek hukum kredit tanpa agunan di Indonesia). Veritas et Justitia, 4(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v4i1.2838

  28. Nurhayati, Y., Ifrani, I., Barkatullah, A. H., & Said, M. Y. (2019). The issue of copyright infringement in 4.0 Industrial Revolution: Indonesian case. Jurnal Media Hukum, 26(2), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.20190128

  29. Pengadilan Agama Medan. (2013, June 18). Putusan PA Medan Nomor 967/Pdt.G/2012/PA.Mdn [Medan Religious Court Decision Number 967/Pdt.G/2012/PA.Mdn]. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/50b5efcc5547d3a17b5167da2bcbffbb.html

  30. Piryanti, M. (2014). Akibat hukum perjanjian (akad) dan terminasi akad [Legal consequences of the agreement (contract) and termination of the contract]. At-Tahdzib: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Muamalah, 2(1), 82–107. https://ejournal.staiat-tahdzib.ac.id/tahdzib/article/view/25

  31. Puneri, A. (2021). Comparison of the law of contract between Islamic law and Indonesian law. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 2(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v2i1.39036

  32. Rahardjo, S. (2014). Ilmu hukum [Legal studies] (8th edition). Citra Aditya Bakti.

  33. Rahayu, R., & Hasbi, M. Z. N. (2022). Teori dan konsep akad musyarakah dan penerapannya dalam perbankan syariah [Theory and concept of musyarakah contracts and their application in sharia banking]. Jurnal Keislaman, 5(2), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.54298/jk.v5i2.3436

  34. Rahman, N. N. A., Ramli, M. A., Salleh, S. M. S. B. S. M., & Rosale, M. I. (2018). Relevansi teori al-maslahah menurut Al-Syatibi dalam menangani isu probatan masa kini [The relevance of the al-maslahah theory according to Al-Syatibi in dealing with contemporary personal medicine issues]. Al-Risalah, 13(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.30631/al-risalah.v13i01.446

  35. Saleh, N. (1998). Origins of the sanctity of contracts in Islamic law. Arab Law Quarterly, 13(3), 252–264. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3382010

  36. Sarifudin, S. (2019). Hukum Islam progresif: Tawaran teori maslahat At-Thufi sebagai epistemologi untuk pembangunan hukum nasional di Indonesia [Progressive Islamic law: Offering At-Thufi’s theory of benefits as an epistemology for developing national law in Indonesia]. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 3(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v3i2.269

  37. Sholihah, N. A., & Suhendar, F. R. (2019). Konsep akad dalam lingkup ekonomi syariah [The concept of contracts in the scope of sharia economics]. Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 4(12), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v4i12.805

  38. Siregar, N. H. (2019). Tinjauan hukum perjanjian syariah terhadap klausul meninggal dunia dalam kontrak pembiayaan bank syariah [Sharia agreement legal review of death clauses in sharia bank financing contracts]. Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, 5(2), 168–195. https://doi.org/10.24952/yurisprudentia.v5i2.1878

  39. Siregar, S., Hidayat, Y., & Suartini, S. (2023). Akad pembiayaan musyarakah pada Bank Syariah Manidiri sebuah analisis keadilan hukum [Musyarakah financing agreement at Bank Syariah Mandiri, an analysis of legal justice]. Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.36722/jmih.v5i2.789

  40. Sjofjan, L. (2015). Prinsip kehati-hatian (prudential banking principle) dalam pembiayaan syariah sebagai upaya menjaga tingkat kesehatan bank syariah [The prudential banking principle in sharia financing is an effort to maintain the soundness of sharia banks]. PALAR (Pakuan Law Review), 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v1i2.927

  41. Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat [Normative legal research: A brief overview] (17th edition). Rajawali Pers.

  42. Sugiarto, S., Samsuri, A., & Sari, R. E. C. (2022). Penerapan fatwa DSN–MUI Nomor: 08/DSN–MUI/IV/2000 dalam praktik akad pembiayaan musyarakah di perbankan syariah (Studi kasus di PT. BPRS Tanmiya Artha Kediri) [Application of DSN–MUI fatwa Number: 08/DSN–MUI/IV/2000 in the practice of musyarakah financing contracts in sharia banking (Case study at PT. BPRS Tanmiya Artha Kediri)]. Al-Muraqabah: Journal of Management and Sharia Business, 2(2), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.30762/almuraqabah.v2i2.274

  43. Suhendi, H. (2013). Fiqh muamalah [Muamalah fiqh]. Raja Grafindo Persada.

  44. Sup, D. F. A., Hartanto, S., & Muttaqin, R. (2020). Konsep terminasi akad dalam hukum Islam [The concept of contract termination in Islamic law]. Ijtihad, 14(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.21111/ijtihad.v14i2.4684

  45. Syuhud, H. & Kawakib. (2022). Maslahah dan kebebasan dalam fiqih: Telaah filosofis konsep maslahah al-mursalah perspektif Al-Ghazali: Problems and freedom in fiqih: Philosophy of the concept of maslahah al-mursalah Al-Ghazali’s Perspective. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Agama Dan Filsafat, 1(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrafi.v1i1.129

  46. Tirtakoesoemah, A. J., & Arafat, M. R. (2020). Penerapan teori perlindungan hukum terhadap hak cipta atas penyiaran [Application of the theory of legal protection to copyright for broadcasting]. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v18i1.1084

  47. Wafa, F. E. (2022). Implikasi teori maqasid al-syari’ah Al-Syatibi terhadap perilaku konsumen [Implications of Al-Syatibi’s maqasid al-syari’ah theory for consumer behavior]. Jurnal Hadratul Madaniyah, 9(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.33084/jhm.v9i1.3717

  48. Witasari, A., & Musthofa, W. I. (2018). Overview theory of legal protection against the driver responsibility partners (Partners PT. Go-Jek Indonesia) under Law No. 8 of 1999 on consumer protection. The 4th International and Call for Paper, 1(1), 358–372. https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/pdih4/article/view/3680

  49. Zamakhsyari. (2013). Teori-teori hukum Islam dalam fiqih dan ushul fiqih [Theories of Islamic law in fiqh and ushul fiqh]. Citapustaka Media Perintis.

  50. Zubair, M. K. (2010). Signifikansi modifikasi akad dalam transaksi muamalah [The significance of contract modifications in muamalah transactions]. MUQTASID Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 1(2), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.18326/muqtasid.v1i2.245-257

  51.