Main Article Content

Abstract

Palm oil development in Jambi cause problems of society. This study was to estimate the economic loss of indigenous cultural communities palm oil development area. Economic concepts need to take into account cultural values consisting of value to direct and indirect use values which become elements of the construction costs. Direct use value from the perspective of the user community was estimated using TCM. Indirect use value is estimated using techniques CVM. The results obtained by the loss of indigenous cultural values of Rp4.517,4 million - Rp17.107,4 million. Area of research offers benefits to tourists and potential to become an eco-tourism destination nationally advanced culture to international efforts if it were made innovative improvements. This cultural value estimated using the lowest number based on population in Jambi Province alone, and do not take into account the population of other provinces in Indonesia as well as the population in the world. Increased public awareness of the importance of cultural and environmental preservation, cultural and environmental value benefits can go beyond the boundaries of a country.

Article Details

How to Cite
Walyoto, S. (2015). KERUGIAN NILAI BUDAYA ADAT SUKU ANAK DALAM PEMBANGUNAN PERKEBUNAN KELAPA SAWIT DI JAMBI. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol1.iss1.art3

References

  1. Ahmad Azhar Basyir, 1985, Citra Manusia Muslim, Fakultas Hukum UII, Yogyakarta.
  2. Balai Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam (BKSDA) Jambi. 2004. Taman Nasional Bukit Duabelas. Rencana Pengelolaan 2005 -2029. Jambi, Indonesia.
  3. Binger, B.R., Hoffman, E. 1998. Mikroeconomics With Calculus. New York: Addison-Wesley.
  4. Bernard Hasibuan. 2008. Analisis Nilai Rekreasi Kawasan Pelancongan Puncak Indonesia. Tesis. Program Doktor Falsafah Ekonomi Fakulti Ekonomi dan Perniagaan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
  5. BPS.2009. Beberapa Indikator Penting Sosial Ekonomi Indonesia.
  6. Fletcher, J.,Adamowicz,W.&Graham-Tomasi,T. 1990. The Travel Cost Model of Recreation Demand: Theoritical and Empirical Issues. Leisure Science. 12:119-147
  7. Gum, R. L. & Martin, W. E. 1975. Problems and solutions in estimating the demand for and value of rural outdoor recreation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57: 558-566.
  8. Gujarati, D. N. 2003. Basic econometric. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  9. Hanley, N. D. 1989. Valuing rural recreation benefits: an empirical comparison of two approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics . 40: 361-374.
  10. Jamal Othman & Anggi Rahajeng. 2009. Economic Valuation of Recreational Attributes: Case of Nature and Culture-Based Tourism In Malaysia and Indonesia. Jurnal of Torism and Hotels, Fayoum University, Egypt. Vol 4, No 1: 45-57.
  11. Jamal Othman & Redzuan Othman, 1998.Economic benefits of wetlands biodiversity: Case of fireflies recreation. Tropical Biodiversity 5 (1), 65-74
  12. Jamal Othman, 2000. Economic benefits of wetlands-based recreation: Case of Kuala Selangor fireflies and nature park. Malaysian Journal of Environmenral Management. (1). 41-54.
  13. Jamal. 2001. Estimating non-use values of environmental resources using. contingent valuation: case of Matang Mangroves. Dlm. Jamaluddin Jahi (pnyt.) Environmental management 2000, hlm. 214—222. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia: Center for Graduate Studies.
  14. Jamal Othman.,Basri Abadul Talib.,Redzuan Othman., 2004. Nilai Ekonomi Khidmat Rekreasi Taman Pertanian Malaysia, Shah Alam. IJMS 11 (1), 165-179
  15. KKI WARSI, 2004. Laporan pendataan Suku Anak Dalam (Orang Rimbo), Jambi Indnesia.
  16. Mitchell, R. & Carson, R. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Washington, D. C: Resources for the Future.
  17. Metwally. 1995. Teori dan Model Ekonomi Islam. Jakarta : PT. Bangkit Daya Insana.
  18. NOAA. 1993 Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Fed. Reg. 58: 4601 - 14 f
  19. Poster, L and Lee, J. 1998b. Oil Palm in Indonesia: its role in forest conversion and the fires of 1997/98. A report for WWF Indonesia Programme, Jakarta , Indonesia.
  20. Freeman III, A.M. 1994. The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. Washington, D.C.: Resource for the Future.
  21. Qardhawi, Yusuf. 1997. Daurul Qiyam wa al-Akhlak fi al-Iqtishad al-Islami (PeranNilai dan Moral dalam Perekonomian Islam), terj. Didin Hafidhuddin et al., Jakarta, Robbani Press
  22. Suib, A.,1991. Effects of time cost on recreational benefit estimation. Malaysian Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. (23):101-122.
  23. Willis,K., Garrod,G & Chee T. 1996. Valuation and analysis of consumer demand for forest recreation areas in Peninsula Malaysia. In S.Lee, D. May, I.Gauld and J. Bishop (Eds). Conservation, Mangement and Development of forest Resource. Proceedings of the Malaysia-UK Programme Workshop. Forest Research Institute Malaysia.
  24. Widyastini. 2012. Nilai-nilai Islam dalam kebudayaan Indonesia. Jurnal Filsafat UGM. http://jurnal.filsafat.ugm.ac.id/index.php/jf/article/viewFile/46/42 diakses 11/3/2012