Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction
Mobile banking has become an essential aspect of modern financial services, particularly among digitally literate populations such as Gen Z and Millennials. Despite the widespread adoption of mobile banking, understanding the factors influencing its use in specific cultural and demographic contexts remains underexplored. This study investigates the adoption of Bank Syariah Indonesia's (BSI) mobile banking services among Gen Z and Millennials in Yogyakarta using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) framework.
Objectives
The research aims to identify and analyze the key factors driving the decision to adopt mobile banking services, focusing on intrinsic motivators such as performance expectancy, effort expectancy, hedonic motivation, price value, and habit, as well as external factors like social influence and facilitating conditions.
Method
This study employed a quantitative approach, collecting data from 124 respondents through structured questionnaires. Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), the relationships between the UTAUT2 factors and mobile banking adoption were evaluated.
Results
The findings indicate that intrinsic factors, particularly habit, performance expectancy, and effort expectancy, significantly influence mobile banking adoption. Hedonic motivation and price value also play essential roles, whereas external factors such as social influence and facilitating conditions were found to have no significant impact.
Implications
The study underscores the importance of user-centered strategies that enhance functionality, ease of use, and emotional satisfaction. It suggests that financial institutions should focus on fostering habitual engagement and cost-effective services to drive adoption.
Originality/Novelty
This research contributes to the literature on digital financial services by offering insights into mobile banking adoption among Gen Z and Millennials in Indonesia, emphasizing the relevance of intrinsic motivators in a technologically advanced context.

Keywords

digital financial services Gen Z Millennials mobile banking adoption technology acceptance model UTAUT2 framework

Article Details

How to Cite
Fitriah , Y. N. ., & Garbo, A. (2024). Factors influencing the decision to use BSI Mobile Banking among Gen Z and Millennials in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 10(2), 1143–1168. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol10.iss2.art26

References

  1. Abdurrahman, A., Gustomo, A., & Prasetio, E. A. (2024). Exploring barriers, drivers, and routines of dynamic capabilities in Indonesian digital banking transformation: A qualitative study based on the TOE framework. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 90(6), e12329. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12329

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12329
  2. Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2017). Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: Extending UTAUT2 with trust. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.002

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.002
  3. Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., & Algharabat, R. (2018). Examining factors influencing Jordanian customers’ intentions and adoption of internet banking: Extending UTAUT2 with risk. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 40, 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.08.026

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.08.026
  4. Anjani, W., & Mukhlis, I. (2022). Penerapan model UTAUT (the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology) terhadap minat dan perilaku penggunaan mobile banking [Penerapan model UTAUT (the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology) terhadap minat dan perilaku penggunaan mobile banking]. Jurnal Ekonomi Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 21(1), 1–22. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JEAM/article/view/30570

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/jeam.v21i1.30570
  5. Aziz, S., & Afaq, Z. (2018). Adoption of Islamic banking in Pakistan an empirical investigation. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1548050. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1548050

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1548050
  6. Baabdullah, A. M., Alalwan, A. A., Rana, N. P., Kizgin, H., & Patil, P. (2019). Consumer use of mobile banking (M-Banking) in Saudi Arabia: Towards an integrated model. International Journal of Information Management, 44, 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.09.002

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.09.002
  7. Banna, H., Hassan, M. K., Ahmad, R., & Alam, M. R. (2021). Islamic banking stability amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of digital financial inclusion. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 15(2), 310–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-08-2020-0389

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-08-2020-0389
  8. Beik, I. S., Arsyianti, L. D., & Permatasari, N. (2023). Analysis on the determinant of millennials’ zakat payment through digital platform in Indonesia: A multinomial logistic approach. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(2), 541–572. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-09-2021-0313

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-09-2021-0313
  9. Berakon, I., Aji, H. M., & Hafizi, M. R. (2021). Impact of digital Sharia banking systems on cash-waqf among Indonesian Muslim youth. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 13(7), 1551–1573. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-11-2020-0337

  10. Bhatnagr, P., Rajesh, A., & Misra, R. (2024). A study on driving factors for enhancing financial performance and customer-centricity through digital banking. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 16(2), 218–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-09-2023-0141

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-09-2023-0141
  11. Bilgah, B., & Frimayasa, A. (2024). Analisis pendekatan model UTAUT 2 terhadap penerimaan penggunaan e-banking Livin pada Bank Mandiri (Studi kasus nasabah Bank Mandiri Jabodetabek) [Analysis of the UTAUT 2 model approach to the acceptance of the use of Livin e-banking at Bank Mandiri (Case study of Bank Mandiri Jabodetabek customers)]. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(4), 8492–8503. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i4.13035

  12. Bolton, R. N., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Cheung, L., Gallan, A., Orsingher, C., Witell, L., & Zaki, M. (2018). Customer experience challenges: Bringing together digital, physical and social realms. Journal of Service Management, 29(5), 776–808. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-04-2018-0113

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-04-2018-0113
  13. Chaidir, T., Ro’is, I., & Akhmad Jufri. (2021). Penggunaan aplikasi mobile banking pada bank konvensional dan bank syariah di Nusa Tenggara Barat: Pembuktian Model Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) [The use of mobile banking applications in conventional banks and Islamic banks in West Nusa Tenggara: Proving the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model]. Elastisitas - Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 3(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.29303/e-jep.v3i1.37

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/e-jep.v3i1.37
  14. Donner, J., & Tellez, C. A. (2008). Mobile banking and economic development: Linking adoption, impact, and use. Asian Journal of Communication, 18(4), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292980802344190

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01292980802344190
  15. El-Masri, M., & Tarhini, A. (2017). Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning systems in Qatar and USA: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2). Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 743–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9508-8

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9508-8
  16. Evan, I., Winarno, W. W., & Putro, H. P. (2021). Evaluasi tingkat penerimaan e-money di kalangan mahasiswa Yogyakarta menggunakan modifikasi UTAUT2 [Evaluation of the level of acceptance of e-money among Yogyakarta students using modified UTAUT2]. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 10(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.24843/EEB.2021.v10.i01.p02

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24843/EEB.2021.v10.i01.p02
  17. Fenu, G., & Pau, P. L. (2015). An analysis of features and tendencies in mobile banking apps. Procedia Computer Science, 56, 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.177

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.177
  18. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  19. Gąsiorkiewicz, L., Monkiewicz, J., & Monkiewicz, M. (2020). Technology-driven innovations in financial services: The rise of alternative finance. Foundations of Management, 12(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2020-0011

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2020-0011
  20. Hinduan, Z. R., Anggraeni, A., & Agia, M. I. (2020). Generation Z in Indonesia: The self-driven digital. In E. Gentina & E. Parry (Eds.), The new Generation Z in Asia: Dynamics, differences, digitalisation (pp. 121–134). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-220-820201012

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-220-820201012
  21. Hofstede, G. (1984). Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1(2), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01733682

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01733682
  22. Kim, G., Shin, B., & Lee, H. G. (2009). Understanding dynamics between initial trust and usage intentions of mobile banking. Information Systems Journal, 19(3), 283–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00269.x

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00269.x
  23. Lestari, D. (2019). Measuring e-commerce adoption behaviour among gen-Z in Jakarta, Indonesia. Economic Analysis and Policy, 64, 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2019.08.004

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2019.08.004
  24. Mahdzan, N. S., Zainudin, R., & Au, S. F. (2017). The adoption of Islamic banking services in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 8(3), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-08-2015-0064

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-08-2015-0064
  25. Mbama, C. I., Ezepue, P., Alboul, L., & Beer, M. (2018). Digital banking, customer experience and financial performance: UK bank managers’ perceptions. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 12(4), 432–451. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-01-2018-0026

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-01-2018-0026
  26. Mogaji, E. (2023). Redefining banks in the digital era: A typology of banks and their research, managerial and policy implications. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 41(7), 1899–1918. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-06-2023-0333

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-06-2023-0333
  27. Morosan, C., & DeFranco, A. (2016). It’s about time: Revisiting UTAUT2 to examine consumers’ intentions to use NFC mobile payments in hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 53, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.11.003

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.11.003
  28. Mufarih, M., Jayadi, R., & Sugandi, Y. (2020). Factors influencing customers to use digital banking application in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 897–907. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.897

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.897
  29. Nugraha, D. P., Setiawan, B., Nathan, R. J., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2022). Fintech adoption drivers for innovation for SMEs in Indonesia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4), 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040208

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040208
  30. Nugroho, A. P., Zulni, D. A., & Andriansyah, Y. (2023). Exploring the adoption of digital wallets among Islamic millennials in Yogyakarta, Indonesia using an extended UTAUT model: The role of Islamic consumption ethics. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 101(14), 5528–5540. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yuli-Andriansyah/publication/372823708_Exploring_the_Adoption_of_Digital_Wallets_among_Islamic_Millennials_in_Yogyakarta_Indonesia_Using_an_Extended_UTAUT_Model_The_Role_of_Islamic_Consumption_Ethics/links/64c94e4b862f8d299988c14a/Exploring-the-Adoption-of-Digital-Wallets-among-Islamic-Millennials-in-Yogyakarta-Indonesia-Using-an-Extended-UTAUT-Model-The-Role-of-Islamic-Consumption-Ethics.pdf

  31. Oktavianita, A. D., & Siregar, M. U. (2021). Pengaruh faktor model UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology) terhadap niat generasi Milenial dalam menggunakan mobile banking di Indonesia [The influence of UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology) model factors on Millennials’ intention to use mobile banking in Indonesia]. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis (EK&BI), 4(2), 649–660. https://doi.org/10.37600/ekbi.v4i2.414

  32. Parise, S., Guinan, P. J., & Kafka, R. (2016). Solving the crisis of immediacy: How digital technology can transform the customer experience. Business Horizons, 59(4), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.004

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.004
  33. Pemerintah Kota Yogyakarta. (2022, March 7). Pemkot Yogya peringkat satu Indeks Elektronifikasi Transaksi Pemerintah Daerah [Yogya City Government ranks first in Local Government Transaction Electronification Index] [HTML]. Portal Berita Pemerintah Kota Yogyakarta. https://warta.jogjakota.go.id/detail/index/19747

  34. Pohan, R. N. A., Rokan, M. K., & Syarvina, W. (2024). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penggunaan mobile banking pada layanan BSI Mobile dengan menggunakan Model Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) [Factors that influence the use of mobile banking on BSI Mobile services using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model]. Jurnal Manajemen Akuntansi (JUMSI), 4(3), 732–740. https://doi.org/10.36987/jumsi.v4i3.4025

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jumsi.v4i3.4025
  35. Prawira, S. S., & Ridanasti, E. (2024). An empirical analysis of factors affecting the intention of using digital wallet in Yogyakarta. Selekta Manajemen: Jurnal Mahasiswa Bisnis & Manajemen, 2(6), 234–246. https://journal.uii.ac.id/selma/article/view/35629

  36. Rachbini, W., Soeharso, S. Y., Wulandjani, H., Fathoni, M. A., & Rahmawati, E. (2024). From Boomers to Millennials: Unraveling the complexities of online shopping behavior in Indonesia. Innovative Marketing, 20(3), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.20(3).2024.12

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/im.20(3).2024.12
  37. Retno, I. E., Michael, C., Henilia, Y., Titik, A., & Regina Jansen, A. (2023). Digital bank channel distribution: Predictors of usage attitudes in Jakarta’s Gen Z. Journal of Distribution Science, 21(2), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.21.02.202302.21

  38. Sebayang, T. E., Hakim, D. B., Bakhtiar, T., & Indrawan, D. (2024a). The investigation of preference attributes of Indonesian mobile banking users to develop a strategy for mobile banking adoption. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(3), 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17030109

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17030109
  39. Sebayang, T. E., Hakim, D. B., Bakhtiar, T., & Indrawan, D. (2024b). What accelerates the choice of mobile banking for digital banks in Indonesia? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17010006

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17010006
  40. Shaikh, A. A., & Karjaluoto, H. (2015). Mobile banking adoption: A literature review. Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.05.003

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.05.003
  41. Simanjuntak, M. H. (2024, June 20). BI: Transaksi perbankan digital meningkat capai Rp5.570,49 triliun [BI: Digital banking transactions increase to Rp5,570.49 trillion] [HTML]. Antara News. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4160283/bi-transaksi-perbankan-digital-meningkat-capai-rp557049-triliun

  42. Susilowati, A., Rianto, B., Wijaya, N., & Sanny, L. (2021). Effects of UTAUT 2 model on the use of BCA Mobile Banking in Indonesia. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(3), 5378–5387. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i3.2183

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i3.2183
  43. Tam, C., & Oliveira, T. (2017). Literature review of mobile banking and individual performance. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 35(7), 1044–1067. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-09-2015-0143

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-09-2015-0143
  44. Upadhyay, P., & Jahanyan, S. (2016). Analyzing user perspective on the factors affecting use intention of mobile based transfer payment. Internet Research, 26(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2014-0143

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2014-0143
  45. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
  46. Vishnuvardhan, B., Manjula, B., & Lakshman Naik, R. (2020). A study of digital banking: Security issues and challenges. In K. S. Raju, A. Govardhan, B. P. Rani, R. Sridevi, & M. R. Murty (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (pp. 163–185). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1480-7_14

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1480-7_14
  47. Weber, R. H., & Darbellay, A. (2010). Legal issues in mobile banking. Journal of Banking Regulation, 11(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1057/jbr.2009.16

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jbr.2009.16
  48. Windasari, N. A., Kusumawati, N., Larasati, N., & Amelia, R. P. (2022). Digital-only banking experience: Insights from gen Y and gen Z. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(2), 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100170

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100170
  49. Zuhriyah, Q. A. (2022). The behavior of using digital money (e-money) in the Millennial Generation based on Islamic perspective. Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences, 5(5), 829–835. https://doi.org/10.37275/oaijss.v5i5.133

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.37275/oaijss.v5i5.133