Article Sidebar

Reciprocity and the value of maqasid sharia among transmigrant Muslim farmers from Java in strengthening the agricultural economy‎
Submitted
May 10, 2025
Accepted
August 2, 2025
Published
August 13, 2025
Download
PDF Review Reports Originality Report
Statistic
Read Counter : 332 Download : 67

Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction
The transmigration phenomenon has created new communities in various regions of Indonesia, including the transmigrant Muslim farming community from Central Java in South Sumatra. Facing the social and economic challenges of their new location, these farmers not only utilize their agricultural skills but also develop unique social relationships, such as reciprocity. As Muslims, Islamic values play a crucial role in the lives of farmers, including how they conduct their economic activities. The Maqasid sharia (objectives of sharia) , which encompass the protection of religion ( din ), life ( nafs ), intellect ( aql ), descendants ( nasl ), and property ( mal ), serve as the moral foundation for agricultural activities and social life.
Objectives
This study aims to examine how transmigrant Muslim farmers from Central Java apply the practice of reciprocity and the values of maqasid sharia in their daily lives, particularly in agriculture.
Method
This study uses a qualitative approach with a reciprocity approach and the values of maqasid sharia . Data collection was conducted through six months of fieldwork using participant observation and in-depth interviews . Interview ). Data analysis used three analysis models: domain analysis, componential analysis, and data analysis with triangulation. This is used to obtain the correct interpretation. Truth is the foundation that a researcher needs to understand.
Results
The research results show that the practice of reciprocity is an important part of the social and economic life of transmigrant Muslim farmers from Central Java. Some of the most common forms of reciprocity include mutual assistance during planting and harvesting, sharing agricultural produce, and exchanging tools and labor. These methods not only enhance social solidarity but also serve as collective economic strategies to overcome limitations in capital and access to resources. Furthermore, farmers' economic actions and decisions have been indirectly influenced by the principles of maqasid sharia . Thrift, honesty in trade, and fair management of agricultural produce are examples of the value of safeguarding wealth ( hifz). al -mal). The focus on children's education and family welfare shows the principle of protecting the soul and offspring.
Implications
The maqasid sharia and reciprocity values helped empower transmigrant Muslim farmers from Java, whose implementation of reciprocity and maqasid sharia values led to improved agricultural economics. While reciprocity creates social solidarity that helps farmers, maqasid sharia ensures economic justice by providing fair distribution of profits and avoiding usury (riba).
Originality/Novelty
This study contributes to the growing literature on Islamic business practices by highlighting the strategies and ethical considerations unique to the Muslim fashion industry. It offers insights into how businesses can balance innovation and tradition to foster sustainable growth.

Keywords

agricultural economy farmer maqasid sharia mukhabarah musaqah muzara’ah reciprocity transmigration

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Muharir Muharir, Syafiq Mahmadah Hanafi, Moh Soehadha

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Muharir, M., Hanafi, S. M. ., & Soehadha, M. . (2025). Reciprocity and the values of maqasid sharia among Muslim transmigrant farmers from Java in strengthening agricultural economics. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 11(2), 879–912. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss2.art9
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Abidin, M. Z., & Zaman, A. Z. (2024). Pengaruh ’urf dalam hukum peminangan dan akad nikah, studi komparasi KHI di Indonesia dengan Qānūn al-Ahwāl al-Shakhṣiyyah di Yaman [The influence of ’urf in the law of engagement and marriage contract, a comparative study of KHI in Indonesia and Qānūn al-Ahwāl al-Shakhṣiyyah in Yemen]. Mabahits : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 5(2), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.62097/mabahits.v5i02.1995

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.62097/mabahits.v5i02.1995

  2. Adinugraha, H. H., Shulhoni, M., & Achmad, D. (2023). Islamic social finance in Indonesia: Opportunities, challenges, and its role in empowering society. Review of Islamic Social Finance and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.20885/RISFE.vol2.iss1.art4

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/RISFE.vol2.iss1.art4

  3. Agus, N., Meriyati, & Nugraha, S. L. (2023). Comparative study of contemporary Islamic economic thoughts Muhammad Abdul Mannan and Monzer Kahf. Malia, 14(2), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.35891/ml.v14i2.3864

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35891/ml.v14i2.3864

  4. Ahmad, R., Nawaz, M. R., Ishaq, M. I., Khan, M. M., & Ashraf, H. A. (2023). Social exchange theory: Systematic review and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1015921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015921

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015921

  5. Akram, F. M. (2025). Koperasi sebagai pilar pemberdayaan ekonomi dan sosial: Tinjauan literatur sistematis [Cooperatives as pillars of economic and social empowerment: A systematic literature review]. Jurnal Ekonomis, 18(1), 1–17. https://jurnal.unai.edu/index.php/jeko/article/view/3958

  6. Al Jufri, K. A., Awang, M. S., & Sahid, M. M. (2021). Maqasid syariah menurut Imam al-Ghazali dan aplikasinya dalam penyusunan undang-undang Islam di Indonesia [Maqasid syariah according to Imam al-Ghazali and its application in the compilation of Islamic law in Indonesia]. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 9(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol9no2.315

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol9no2.315

  7. Alam, A., Ratnasari, R. T., Habibi, B., & Athief, F. H. N. (2022). A sharia economic collaboration model and its positive impact on developing of poor villages: A study in Indonesia. Public and Municipal Finance, 11(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.21511/pmf.11(1).2022.09

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/pmf.11(1).2022.09

  8. Alami, F. N., & Mohammad, W. (2024). Maqasid al-Sharia application on food security in Indonesia. Seriat Ekonomisi, 1(3), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.35335/vy3y6q03

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35335/vy3y6q03

  9. Allidina, S., Arbuckle, N. L., & Cunningham, W. A. (2019). Considerations of mutual exchange in prosocial decision-making. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1216. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01216

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01216

  10. Antonio, M. S., Laela, S. F., & Al Ghifari, D. M. (2020). Optimizing zakat collection in the digital era: Muzakki’s perception. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 7(2), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v7i2.16597

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v7i2.16597

  11. Anwar, A. Z., Susilo, E., Rohman, F., Santoso, P. B., Gunanto, E. Y. A., & Darwanto, D. (2021). Performance analysis of Islamic micro finance institutions on sustainable rural development in Indonesia. Journal of Finance and Islamic Banking, 3(2), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.22515/jfib.v3i2.2965

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22515/jfib.v3i2.2965

  12. Arsal, M., Arizah, A., Fuada, N., & Elfhita, R. V. (2023). Penguatan akuntabilitas pengelolaan syirkah [Strengthening the accountability of shirkah management]. JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri), 7(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.31764/jmm.v7i1.11781

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jmm.v7i1.11781

  13. Aulia, D., & Pimada, L. M. (2023). Why do people pay zakah, infaq, and sadaqah (ZIS) through donation-based crowdfunding? The influence of Technology Acceptance Model and Social Presence Theory. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 9(1), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol9.iss1.art10

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol9.iss1.art10

  14. Ayuniyyah, Q., Hafidhuddin, D., & Hambari, H. (2020). The strategies in strengthening the role of zakat boards and institutions in Indonesia. International Journal of Zakat, 5(3), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.37706/ijaz.v5i3.244

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.37706/ijaz.v5i3.244

  15. Azizah, H. N., Muchtar, N. E. P., & Putra, F. T. (2023). Pesantren as a pillar of Islamic civilization development in Indonesia. Academicus: Journal of Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.59373/academicus.v2i1.19

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.59373/academicus.v2i1.19

  16. Azizah, N., Siregar, R. A. S., & Putra, D. (2022). Analisis konsep al musaqah terhadap praktik perjanjian pengelolaan kebun karet di Desa Jambur Baru Kecamatan Batang Natal Kabupaten Mandailing Natal [Analysis of the concept of al musaqah on the practice of rubber plantation management agreements in Jambur Baru Village, Batang Natal Subdistrict, Mandailing Natal Regency]. Islamic Circle, 3(2), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.56874/islamiccircle.v3i2.1110

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.56874/islamiccircle.v3i2.1110

  17. Azwar, W., Mayasari, D., Winata, A., Garba, M. M., & Isnaini. (2024). Exploration of the Merariq Tradition in Sasak Lombok, Indonesia: Analysis in Islamic law and socio-cultural dynamics perspectives. IBDA` : Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Budaya, 22(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.24090/ibda.v22i1.10766

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24090/ibda.v22i1.10766

  18. Azzumi, A. R., & Aziz, J. A. (2023). Considering Dawam Raharjo as the foundation of Sharia digital business ethics. Money: Journal of Financial and Islamic Banking, 1(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.31004/money.v1i2.15991

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/money.v1i2.15991

  19. Bangash, A. U. J. (2020). Managing the agricultural sector through muzara’ah: Implementing an Islamic economic participatory mode of financing. International Journal of Islamic Business & Management, 4(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.46281/ijibm.v4i1.638

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.46281/ijibm.v4i1.638

  20. Beard, V. A. (2005). Individual determinants of participation in community development in Indonesia. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1068/c36m

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/c36m

  21. Belabes, A. (2019). Zakat as a pluridimensional concept. International Journal of Zakat, 4(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.37706/ijaz.v4i1.165

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.37706/ijaz.v4i1.165

  22. Bilo, C., & Machado, A. C. (2020). The role of Zakat in the provision of social protection: A comparison between Jordan and Sudan. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(3/4), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-11-2018-0218

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-11-2018-0218

  23. Bowen, J. R. (1986). On the political construction of tradition: Gotong Royong in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Studies, 45(3), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.2307/2056530

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2056530

  24. Bruce, A., Jackson, C., & Lamprinopoulou, C. (2021). Social networks and farming resilience. Outlook on Agriculture, 50(2), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727020984812

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727020984812

  25. Bulut, M., & Celik, H. (2022). Farmers’ perception and preference of Islamic banking in Turkey. Agricultural Finance Review, 82(5), 871–889. https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-02-2021-0022

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-02-2021-0022

  26. Chaplin, C. (2025). Religious authority in the urban mosque: Islamic activism and the ethics of “being present” in Eastern Indonesia. American Ethnologist, 52(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.13388

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.13388

  27. Chen, Q., Kong, Y., Niu, J., Gao, W., Li, J., & Li, M. (2019). How leaders’ psychological capital influence their followers’ psychological capital: Social exchange or emotional contagion. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1578. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01578

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01578

  28. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE.

  29. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

  30. DeSteno, D., Bartlett, M. Y., Baumann, J., Williams, L. A., & Dickens, L. (2010). Gratitude as moral sentiment: Emotion-guided cooperation in economic exchange. Emotion, 10(2), 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017883

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017883

  31. Diekmann, A. (2004). The power of reciprocity: Fairness, reciprocity, and stakes in variants of the dictator game. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48(4), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002704265948

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002704265948

  32. Fansuri, H. (2023). On the road of hijrah: Contesting identity through urban mobilities in contemporary Indonesian Muslims. Archipel, 105, 115–139. https://doi.org/10.4000/archipel.3485

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/archipel.3485

  33. Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(2), 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(04)00005-4

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(04)00005-4

  34. Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2002). Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature, 13(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-002-1012-7

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-002-1012-7

  35. Fitriyani, F., & Hendri, H. (2024). Mapparola dalam pernikahan adat Suku Bugis di Sulawesi Selatan perspektif sosiologi hukum Islam [Mapparola in traditional Bugis marriage in South Sulawesi from the perspective of sociology of Islamic law]. Al-Izzah: Jurnal Hasil-Hasil Penelitian, 19(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.31332/ai.v0i0.8988

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31332/ai.v0i0.8988

  36. Fujimoto, Y., & Ohtsuki, H. (2023). Evolutionary stability of cooperation in indirect reciprocity under noisy and private assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(20), e2300544120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2300544120

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2300544120

  37. Hadiwibowo, I., Jufri, A., & Andriani, A. (2025). The concept of syirkah in Indonesian culture: Exploring Islamic values and local wisdom. BIS Humanities and Social Science, 2, V225044. https://doi.org/10.31603/bishss.321

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31603/bishss.321

  38. Hakim, L., & Setyaningsih, A. I. (2022). Effectiveness of online zakat during the COVID-19 pandemic by amil zakat institutions in Boyolali, Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 8(2), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol8.iss2.art6

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol8.iss2.art6

  39. Herianingrum, S. (2014). Implementation of maqashid al Sharia as a model of economic development agriculture in East Java. Journal of Business and Economics, 5(9), 1701–1708. https://doi.org/10.15341/jbe(2155-7950)/09.05.2014/023

  40. Hutasuhut, Y. K., & Harahap, R. B. (2022). Pelaksanaan akad mukhabarah [Implementation of the mukhabarah contract]. Jurnal El-Thawalib, 3(3), 448–460. https://doi.org/10.24952/el-thawalib.v3i3.5643

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/el-thawalib.v3i3.5643

  41. Ichsan, I., Hanif, H., & Mursada, A. (2022). The effect of muzara’ah contract on welfare level of potato farmers (Case study in Permata District, Bener Meriah Regency). Journal of Economics Management and Business, 23(1), 148–161. https://ojs.unimal.ac.id/emabis/article/view/7228

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/e-mabis.v23i1.802

  42. Ihsandi, A. D. (2024). Differential impact of sharecropping on time allocation and risk transfer in farming: An Islamic economic perspective. Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis, 6(1), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v6i1.836

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v6i1.836

  43. Iqbal, M. N. M. (2018). Advancing social capital through participatory approaches. EMARA: Indonesian Journal of Architecture, 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29080/emara.v4i1.174

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.29080/emara.v4i1.174

  44. Jafarzadeh, M., Razmi, S. M., & Kazemi Golvardi, M. R. (2021). Studying the types, bases and features of sale from the perspective of Islamic jurists. Propósitos y Representaciones, 9(SPE3), e1156. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2021.v9nSPE3.1156

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2021.v9nSPE3.1156

  45. Janah, N., Medias, F., & Pratiwi, E. K. (2020). The intention of religious leaders to use Islamic banking services: The case of Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(9), 1786–1800. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2020-0012

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2020-0012

  46. Janjuha-Jivraj, S., & Spence, L. J. (2009). The nature of reciprocity in family firm succession. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 27(6), 702–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242609344252

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242609344252

  47. Jufri, A., Sahri, & Huzaini, M. (2022). Mukhabarah dan dampaknya terhadap kesejahteraan petani di Kecamatan Pujut Kabupaten Lombok Tengah [Mukhabarah and its impact on the welfare of farmers in Pujut District, Central Lombok Regency]. Journal of Economics and Business, 8(1), 60–82. https://doi.org/10.29303/ekonobis.v8i1.93

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/ekonobis.v8i1.93

  48. Kafaa, K. A. (2020). Social capital and multi-stakeholders cooperation as a foundation of corporate social responsibility. EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 3(3), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2019.v3.i3.4158

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2019.v3.i3.4158

  49. Kanafi, I., Dahri, H., Susminingsih, S., & Bakhri, S. (2021). The contribution of Ahlussunnah Waljamaah’s theology in establishing moderate Islam in Indonesia. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 77(4). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.6437

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.6437

  50. Kaslam, S. (2009). Governing Zakat as a social institution: The Malaysian perspective. Social and Management Research Journal, 6(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.24191/smrj.v6i1.5166

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/smrj.v6i1.5166

  51. Khamami, A. R. (2022). Nasionalis-cum-Nahdliyin: A new identity for nominal Javanese Muslims. Contemporary Islam, 16(2–3), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-022-00505-6

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-022-00505-6

  52. Khan, H. (2015). Gift exchange anomaly: Evidence from incentives vis-à-vis performance of Islamic insurance operators. Applied Economics Letters, 22(14), 1175–1178. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2015.1016202

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2015.1016202

  53. Khan, H. (2019). A nontechnical guide on optimal incentives for Islamic insurance operators. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(3), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12030127

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12030127

  54. Khan, S. N., & Achakzai, M. A. A. (2019). Hibah musha’ah aur ghair musha’ mein qabza [Possession in devisable and non-devisable gifts]. Rahat-Ul-Quloob, 3(2), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.51411/rahat.3.2.2019.73

  55. Kholil, S., Nurrohman, N., & Janwari, Y. (2025). Integration of Sharia Economic Philosophy and Pancasila Economics: A Perspective for Indonesia. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 4(6), 2897–2905. https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i6.1509

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i6.1509

  56. Kochuyt, T. (2009). God, gifts and poor people: On charity in Islam. Social Compass, 56(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768608100345

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768608100345

  57. Koopman, J. (2021). The restoration of gotong royong as a form of post-disaster solidarity in Lombok, Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 29(3), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2021.1966318

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2021.1966318

  58. Kudaedah, N. A. (2020). Maslahah menurut konsep al-Ghazali [Maslahah according to al-Ghazali’s concept]. DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, 18(1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v18i1.663

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v18i1.663

  59. Lestari, E., Wibowo, A., & Rahayu, P. (2021). Cultural transformation in the development of home industries in Karanganyar Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 316, 04002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131604002

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131604002

  60. Lestari, I., Ridhwan, R., & Rafiqi, R. (2024). Analysis of musaqah agreements in rubber land management in Sungai Bertam Village Jambi Luar Kota District. Money: Journal of Financial and Islamic Banking, 2(2), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.31004/money.v2i2.24097

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/money.v2i2.24097

  61. Ligery, F., Khasanah, N., & Subandi, S. (2022). Analisis praktek akad musaqah pada petani karet dalam tinjauan ekonomi Islam di Desa Cempaka Jaya [Analysis of the practice of musaqah contracts on rubber farmers in Islamic economic review in Cempaka Jaya Village]. Bulletin of Community Engagement, 2(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.51278/bce.v2i2.902

  62. Long, R. G., & Mathews, K. M. (2011). Ethics in the family firm: Cohesion through reciprocity and exchange. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201121217

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201121217

  63. Lubell, M., & Scholz, J. T. (2001). Cooperation, reciprocity, and the collective-action heuristic. American Journal of Political Science, 45(1), 160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669365

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2669365

  64. Mafiah, Y., & Hidayati, T. W. (2023). The significance of al-Ghazali’s maslahah concept to the development of usul fiqh and Islamic law. AN NUR: Jurnal Studi Islam, 15(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.37252/annur.v15i1.444

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.37252/annur.v15i1.444

  65. Maldonado-González, A. L., Cruz-Sánchez, G. E., Bello-Benavides, L. O., & González-Gaudiano, E. J. (2019). Shared commitments towards social resilience in populations vulnerable to extreme weather conditions. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education, 35(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajee.v35i1.3

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/sajee.v35i1.3

  66. Maman, U., Kusmana, K., & Supiandi, D. (2017). Al-musaqah and sharia agribusiness system: An alternative way to meet staple food self-sufficiency in contemporary Indonesia. HUNAFA Jurnal Studia Islamika, 14(2), 189–231. https://doi.org/10.24239/jsi.v14i2.448

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24239/jsi.v14i2.448.189-231

  67. Marx, J. (2016). Healthy communities: What have we learned and where do we go from here? Social Sciences, 5(3), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci5030044

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci5030044

  68. Maulana, A., Manab, A., Sabania H., N. A., & Zaki, I. (2020). Issue of the application muzara’ah contract in Indonesia: A comprehensive analysis and proposed solution. INSLA E-Proceedings, 3(1), 596–608. https://insla.usim.edu.my/index.php/eproceeding/article/view/73

  69. Maulida, S., & Ali, M. M. (2023). Maqasid shariah index: A literature review. Maqasid Al-Shariah Review, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.58968/msr.v2i1.309

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.58968/msr.v2i1.309

  70. Mauss, M. (1990). The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. Whitney Museum of American Art.

  71. Miyaji, K., Tanimoto, J., Wang, Z., Hagishima, A., & Ikegaya, N. (2013). Direct reciprocity in spatial populations enhances R-reciprocity as well as ST-reciprocity. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e71961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071961

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071961

  72. Mohamed, M. I., & Shafiai, M. H. Mohd. (2021). Islamic agricultural economic financing based on zakat, infaq, alms and waqf in empowering the farming community. IQTISHADUNA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Kita, 10(1), 144–161. https://doi.org/10.46367/iqtishaduna.v10i1.334

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.46367/iqtishaduna.v10i1.334

  73. Moumtaz, N. (2025). Belonging’s belongings: Sunni waqf s and the limits of community in Beirut. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 48(1), e70001. https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.70001

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.70001

  74. Muhajir, A. (2024). Marsialap Ari sebagai tradisi gotong royong dan dinamika solidaritas sosial dalam masyarakat agraris Angkola-Mandailing [Marsialap Ari as a tradition of gotong royong and the dynamics of social solidarity in the Angkola-Mandailing agrarian community]. MUKADIMAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sejarah, Dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 8(1), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.30743/mkd.v8i1.8901

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/mkd.v8i1.8901

  75. Muhamad, S. F., Zain, F. A. M., Samad, N. S. A., Ab. Rahman, A. H., & Yasoa’, M. R. (2022). Measuring sustainable performance of Islamic banks: Integrating the principles of environmental, social and governance (ESG) and maqasid Shari’ah. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1102(1), 012080. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1102/1/012080

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1102/1/012080

  76. Mujiatun, S., Trianto, B., Cahyono, E. F., & Rahmayati. (2023). The impact of marketing communication and Islamic financial literacy on Islamic financial inclusion and MSMEs performance: Evidence from halal tourism in Indonesia. Sustainability, 15(13), 9868. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139868

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139868

  77. Muldoon, J., Singh, S., & Vidyarthi, P. R. (2019). Casting a long shadow: Leader–leader relationship and employee citizenship behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818764288

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818764288

  78. Mulyati, D. S., Nugraha, & Ajrina Febri Suahati. (2023). Empowerment of Islamic Boarding Schools Through Entrepreneur Development of Fish Cultivation. KnE Social Sciences, 5th Social and Humaniora Research Symposium (5th SoRes), 1504–1509. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i18.14366

  79. Muqit, A. (2022). Klasifikasi maqasid dalam tafsir maqasidi [Classification of maqasid in maqasidi tafsir]. Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an, Tafsir Dan Pemikiran Islam, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.58401/takwiluna.v3i1.593

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.58401/takwiluna.v3i1.593

  80. Murase, Y., & Hilbe, C. (2023). Indirect reciprocity with stochastic and dual reputation updates. PLOS Computational Biology, 19(7), e1011271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011271

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011271

  81. Musanna, K. (2022). Efektivitas kerja sama (syirkah) dalam bentuk akad musaqah [The effectiveness of cooperation (shirkah) in the form of a musaqah contract]. Al-Mustashfa: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 7(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.24235/jm.v7i1.9630

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24235/jm.v7i1.9630

  82. Muthoifin, Nuha, & Afiyah, I. (2024). The existence of Islamic law in Indonesia in the Millennial era in supporting the sustainable development goals (SDGs): Maqashid Sharia perspective. Demak Universal Journal of Islam and Sharia, 3(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.61455/deujis.v3i01.226

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.61455/deujis.v3i01.226

  83. Nainggolan, F. M. R., Subroto, T. Y. W., & Marsoyo, A. (2021). The value of gotong-royong in the mountainous settlement of Kepuharjo Village at Pagerjurang permanent shelter in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 8(3), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v8.n3.822

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v8.n3.822

  84. Nakamura, M., & Masuda, N. (2011). Indirect reciprocity under incomplete observation. PLoS Computational Biology, 7(7), e1002113. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002113

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002113

  85. Ninglasari, S. Y., Sulaeman, S., Supriani, I., & Himmawan, M. F. (2023). Nexus between financial inclusion and Islamic financing distribution: Evidence from Indonesian MSMEs. Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 9(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.20885/JEKI.vol9.iss2.art2

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/JEKI.vol9.iss2.art2

  86. Ningrat, R. G., & Nurzaman, M. S. (2019). Developing fintech and Islamic finance products in agricultural value chain. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 5(3), 491–516. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v5i3.1077

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v5i3.1077

  87. Ningsih, T. (2020). The Islamic character values of kupatan tradition in Bangkalan, Madura, East Java. IBDA` : Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Budaya, 18(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.24090/ibda.v18i2.3915

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24090/ibda.v18i2.3915

  88. Nirmalasari, S. A., & Putri, N. (2022). Peran perempuan dalam meningkatkan ekonomi rumah tangga perspektif maqashid syariah Jasser Auda (Studi kasus di Kecamatan Tengaran Kabupaten Semarang) [The role of women in improving the household economy from the perspective of maqashid syariah Jasser Auda (Case study in Tengaran District, Semarang Regency)]. Jurnal Magister Ekonomi Syariah, 1(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.14421/jmes.2022.011-04

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/jmes.2022.011-04

  89. Nugraha, A. L., Susilo, A., Huda, M., Athoillah, M. A., & Rochman, C. (2022). Waqf literacy: The dynamics of waqf in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 3(2), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.47700/jiefes.v3i2.5082

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.47700/jiefes.v3i2.5082

  90. Nurdiana, N., Muin, R., & Wahab, A. (2025). Fundamental principles of Islamic economic system: Justice, equity, and moral conduct. Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4(6), 2627–2646. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v4i6.271

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v4i6.271

  91. Nurlinda. (2023). Al-Ghazali’s views on the economy and development of the ummah. Journal of Nusantara Economy, 2(1), 25–35. https://juna.nusantarajournal.com/index.php/numy/article/view/88

  92. Oruç, E., Uzunöz, M., & Karadoğan, N. (2017). Rural women’s participation of local development: A case of the women shareholders of Vakifli Development Cooperative. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 17(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJAEES/2017/33435

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/AJAEES/2017/33435

  93. Pamungkas, A. D., & Arifin, R. (2019). Demokrasi dan kampanye hitam dalam penyelenggaraan pemilihan umum di Indonesia (Analisis atas black campaign dan negative campaign) [Democracy and black campaigns in Indonesian elections (An analysis of black campaigns and negative campaigns)]. DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 17(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v17i1.641

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v17i1.641

  94. Paramita, A. O., Partelow, S., Schlüter, A., & Buhari, N. (2023). Can the Indonesian collective action norm of Gotong-Royong be strengthened with economic incentives? Comparing the implementation of an aquaculture irrigation policy program. International Journal of the Commons, 17(1), 462–480. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1273

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1273

  95. Purwanti, P., Andari, A., Ansori, M., & Hadinata, F. (2023). Dynamics of pesantren formation: The origins of pesantren and institutional growth. Journal of Social Research, 2(11), 4155–4163. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i11.1599

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i11.1599

  96. Purwanto, M. R., Supriadi, S., Sularno, S., & Rokhimah, F. (2022). The implementation of maqasid al-Sharia values in economic transactions of the Java community. KnE Social Sciences, The 3rd International Conference on Advance&Scientific Innovation (ICASI), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i10.11351

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i10.11351

  97. QSR International. (2017). NVivo (Version 12) [Computer software]. QSR International. https://lumivero.com/

  98. Rabbani, M. R., Bashar, A., Nawaz, N., Karim, S., Ali, M. A. Mohd., Rahiman, H. U., & Alam, Md. S. (2021). Exploring the role of Islamic fintech in combating the aftershocks of COVID-19: The open social innovation of the Islamic financial system. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020136

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020136

  99. Rahayu, A., Shaleh, A. R., & Marliani, R. (2021). The effect of work-life and social media balances on Moslem family teachers in pandemic time. Psikis : Jurnal Psikologi Islami, 7(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.19109/psikis.v7i2.8247

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.19109/psikis.v7i2.8247

  100. Ramadhan, A. D., Azmi, M. A. M., Anisa, A., Aslamiah, S., Nazar, M., & Efendy, N. (2025). Menelusuri nilai-nilai Islam dalam adat Palangkahan [Tracing Islamic values in Palangkahan customs]. TASHWIR, 13(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.18592/jt.v13i01.14049

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18592/jt.v13i01.14049

  101. Ramadini, K. N., Hasanah, N., & Irfany, M. I. (2023). Business strategy in Islamic boarding school: A case study of Pesantren Hidayatullah Depok Indonesia. Bukhori: Kajian Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Islam, 3(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.35912/bukhori.v3i1.2282

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35912/bukhori.v3i1.2282

  102. Rand, D. G. (2017). Social dilemma cooperation (unlike Dictator Game giving) is intuitive for men as well as women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.013

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.013

  103. Rutte, C., & Taborsky, M. (2008). The influence of social experience on cooperative behaviour of rats (Rattus norvegicus): Direct vs generalised reciprocity. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62(4), 499–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0474-3

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0474-3

  104. Saleh, S. (2017). Analisis data kualitatif [Qualitative data analysis]. Pustaka Ramadhan.

  105. Santos, R. F., Oliveira, M., & Curado, C. (2023). The effects of the relational dimension of social capital on tacit and explicit knowledge sharing: A mixed-methods approach. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 53(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-05-2020-0094

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-05-2020-0094

  106. Saputro, J. D., Jumino, J., & Hendrianto, H. (2024). Islamic economic law as fiqh muamalah iqtishadiyyah, not from conventional economic science. Saqifah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 9(1), 11–19. https://journals.fasya.uinib.org/index.php/saqifah/article/view/441

  107. Sari, M. (2022). Tinjauan sistem kerja sama (mukhabarah) di bidang pertanian dalam perspektif Islam [A review of the cooperation system (mukhabarah) in agriculture in an Islamic perspective]. Jurnal Al-Kharaj: Studi Ekonomi Syariah, Muamalah, Dan Hukum Ekonomi, 2(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.30863/alkharaj.v2i1.2747

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.30863/alkharaj.v2i1.2747

  108. Sari, Y. I., & Cokrohadisumarto, W. B. M. (2019). Modelling a sustainability model of Islamic microfinance institutions. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 5(4), 713–740. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v5i4.1127

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v5i4.1127

  109. Sariyatun, S. (2021). Gotong royong as the core principle of Pancasila and its relevance as peace education in social studies learning. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHEs): Conference Series, 4(4), 262. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v4i4.50619

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v4i4.50619

  110. Sasaki, T., Okada, I., & Nakai, Y. (2017). The evolution of conditional moral assessment in indirect reciprocity. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 41870. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41870

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41870

  111. Sayuti, R. H., Taqiuddin, M., Evendi, A., Hidayati, S. A., & Muttaqin, M. Z. (2023). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the existence of social solidarity: Evidence from rural-urban communities in Lombok Island, Indonesia. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1164837. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1164837

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1164837

  112. Schmid, L., Ekbatani, F., Hilbe, C., & Chatterjee, K. (2023). Quantitative assessment can stabilize indirect reciprocity under imperfect information. Nature Communications, 14(1), 2086. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37817-x

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37817-x

  113. Selim, M., & Farooq, M. O. (2020). Elimination of poverty by Islamic value based cooperative model. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(5), 1121–1143. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2018-0125

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2018-0125

  114. Shaleh, K., Fitri Sukmawati, & Silviana. (2024). Leadership, social capital and village finance: Development capital for village sustainability. KRISNA: Kumpulan Riset Akuntansi, 15(2), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.22225/kr.15.2.2024.212-219

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22225/kr.15.2.2024.212-219

  115. Sidiq, S. (2017). Maqasid syari‟ah & tantangan modernitas: Sebuah telaah pemikiran Jasser Auda [Maqasid shari’ah & the challenges of modernity: An examination of the thought of Jasser Auda]. IN RIGHT: Jurnal Agama Dan Hak Azazi Manusia, 7(1), 140–161. https://doi.org/10.14421/inright.v7i1.1461

  116. Sihotang, D. M., Purwandari, B., Eitiveni, I., Putri, M. F., & Hidayanto, A. N. (2023). Factors influencing village information systems adoption in Indonesia: A qualitative study. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 89(5), e12271. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12271

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12271

  117. Speranza, C. I. (2013). Buffer capacity: Capturing a dimension of resilience to climate change in African smallholder agriculture. Regional Environmental Change, 13(3), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-012-0391-5

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-012-0391-5

  118. Sudiati, L. E., Susandi, G. P., Haryani, N., & Puryono, D. A. (2023). Building design Mlatiharjo Urban Village PKK administration governance system East Semarang Sub-District. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(12), 4843–4854. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i12.6770

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i12.6770

  119. Sugden, R. (2011). Mutual advantage, conventions and team reasoning. International Review of Economics, 58(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-011-0114-0

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-011-0114-0

  120. Sumarmi, S., Untari, S., & Meiji, N. H. P. (2022). Desa Pancasila: The implementation of gotong royong values as social capital in Indonesia. Komunitas, 14(2), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v14i2.27789

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v14i2.27789

  121. Suryani, I., Muhtar, M. H., Rahman, Y. M., Mega Jaya, B. P., & Khalaf, A. A. (2023). Integration of Islamic law in regional development in Indonesia. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 22(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v22i1.8770

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v22i1.8770

  122. Susanti, D. O., & Putri, A. S. (2024). Pengaturan akad mukhabarah bil mudharabah dalam kerja sama pertanian tebu di Indonesia perspektif epistemologi [Regulation of mukhabarah bil mudharabah contracts in sugarcane farming cooperation in Indonesia from an epistemological perspective]. Jurnal Supremasi, 14(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v14i1.3417

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v14i1.3417

  123. Syahputra, A., & Mukhtasar, M. (2021). Digitizing zakat collection through the E-payment system. Al-Amwal : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syari’ah, 13(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.24235/amwal.v13i1.7962

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24235/amwal.v13i1.7962

  124. Tarmizi, T. (2020). The concept of maslahah according to Imam al-Ghazali. Jurnal Al-Dustur, 3(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.30863/jad.v3i1.642

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.30863/jad.v3i1.642

  125. Tian, A. W., Cordery, J., & Gamble, J. (2016). Returning the favor: Positive employee responses to supervisor and peer support for training transfer. International Journal of Training and Development, 20(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12066

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12066

  126. Trybou, J., Gemmel, P., & Annemans, L. (2011). The ties that bind: An integrative framework of physician-hospital alignment. BMC Health Services Research, 11(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-36

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-36

  127. Tumiran, M. A., Ponari, M. H. A., Mohamad, S. P., & Mohamed, Z. I. (2025). Integrating sustainable agriculture and maqasid al-Shariah principles for ethical and environmental stewardship. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(3), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i3.654

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i3.654

  128. Vanni, K. M., & Wijayanti, R. (2020). Comparative study of development and performance evaluation Sharia microfinance institutions in Indonesia. AL-ARBAH: Journal of Islamic Finance and Banking, 2(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.21580/al-arbah.2020.2.2.7229

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21580/al-arbah.2020.2.2.7229

  129. Wahyudi, H., Tubarat, C. P. T., Rodliyah, N., Kusnadi, A., & Leny, S. M. (2024). The nexus of crowdfunding and e-wakaf to Islamic fintech in Indonesia in the Era of Industrial Revolution 5.0. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(1), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i1.4657

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i1.4657

  130. Wicaksana, F. G., Trihatmoko, R. A., Suhardjanto, D., & Murtini, H. (2019). The regulation on village governance in Indonesia: Efficient contracting in agency theory. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 9(2), 110–137. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v9i2.14812

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v9i2.14812

  131. Wijaya, H. (2018). Analisis data kualitatif ilmu pendidikan teologi [Qualitative data analysis of theological education]. Sekolah Tinggi Theologia Jaffrai.

  132. Winarno, W. (2018). Eksistensi mahar dalam perkawinan menurut abu hanifah: Sebuah pendekatan hukum melalui kerangka metodologi ushul fiqh [The existence of dowry in marriage according to abu hanifah: a legal approach through the framework of ushul fiqh methodology]. Asy Syar’iyyah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Perbankan Islam, 3(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.32923/asy.v3i2.693

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.32923/asy.v3i2.693

  133. Yunita, Y., Satya, M. T., Pratama, M. N. A., Amalia, H., & Pohan, A. B. (2024). Rancang bangun Sistem Informasi Bersih Bersama [Design of Bersih Bersama information system]. IMTechno: Journal of Industrial Management and Technology, 5(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.31294/imtechno.v5i1.2409

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31294/imtechno.v5i1.2409

  134. Yusuf, M. Y., Fadhil, R., Bahri, T. S., Maulana, H., & Firmansyah, J. (2022). Design of Islamic agricultural insurance model: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(8), 2375–2384. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.170804

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.170804

  135. Zaprulkhan, Z. (2018). Maqāṣid al-Shariah in the contemporary Islamic legal discourse: Perspective of Jasser Auda. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 26(2), 445–472. https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.26.2.3231

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.26.2.3231

  136. Zonca, J., Folsø, A., & Sciutti, A. (2021). Dynamic modulation of social influence by indirect reciprocity. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 11104. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90656-y

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90656-y

  137. Zuhri, A. F., & Sakdan, M. F. (2024). The impact of the muzara’ah product sharing system in the cultivation of coffee lands in Kerinci Regency, Indonesia. Al Dzahab, 5(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.32939/dhb.v5i1.3586

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.32939/dhb.v5i1.3586

  138. Zulfiar, M. H., Harsoyo, Y. A., Nurjanah, A., Febrianto, A. J., Hakim, L., & Prabowo, F. Y. (2023). Improving the capacity of mutual cooperation through construction and OHS management training in Krebet community. Proceeding International Conference of Community Service, 1(2), 348–355. https://doi.org/10.18196/iccs.v1i2.233

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/iccs.v1i2.233

  139. Zuzanti, Z. (2024). Interdisciplinary drivers of fiqh muamalah: Social, economic, and technological perspectives. Sinergi International Journal of Islamic Studies, 2(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijis.v2i2.604

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.61194/ijis.v2i2.604

Most read articles by the same author(s)

A normative ethical analysis of Islamic unit-linked insurance using the Maqasid Shariah framework of Abu Zahrah

Nur Kholis
Abstract View : 282
Download :194
10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss1.art18
PDF Review Reports Originality Report

Comparative Analysis of Islamic and Conventional Banks Performance Using Sharia Maqasid Index and CAMEL

Gista Rismayani, Ulfa Luthfia Nanda
Abstract View : 601
Download :296
10.20885/jielariba.vol5.iss1.art3
PDF