Article Sidebar

A normative ethical analysis of Islamic unit-linked insurance using the Maqasid Shariah framework of Abu Zahrah
Submitted
April 23, 2025
Accepted
June 28, 2025
Published
June 29, 2025
Download
PDF Review Reports Originality Report
Statistic
Read Counter : 284 Download : 198

Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction
Islamic unit-linked insurance (IULI) products are widely offered in Indonesia as financial instruments that integrate Shariah-compliant protection and investment features. While these products formally adhere to legal Shariah contracts, growing concerns have emerged regarding their operational alignment with Islamic ethical principles, particularly justice. Previous studies have focused on the legal structure of Islamic insurance, but few have assessed whether their practices fulfill the higher objectives of Islamic law (maqasid shariah), especially from a normative ethical perspective.
Objectives
This study aims to evaluate the operational practices of Islamic unit-linked insurance in Indonesia through the lens of maqasid shariah as conceptualized by Abu Zahrah. It seeks to determine whether the structural compliance of IULI contracts also translates into ethical and social justice in practice, particularly in cost transparency, fund management, and participant equity.
Method
Using a normative qualitative approach, this study analyzed policy documents, fatwas issued by Indonesia’s Shariah authority, and cost structures of four major Islamic insurance providers. The analysis applied Abu Zahrah’s three-dimensional maqasid framework—spiritual integrity, justice, and public welfare—to assess the alignment between contract theory and actual implementation. Contractual, regulatory, and ethical aspects were examined in light of Islamic jurisprudence.
Results
The study found that while the IULI contracts were formally Shariah-compliant, operational practices exhibited major ethical inconsistencies. These include disproportionate acquisition costs, ambiguous fund classification, and vague contract disclosures. The clause allowing "additional agreed-upon conditions" in regulatory fatwas was frequently exploited to introduce unjustified fees. These practices compromised the ethical foundation of IULI and undermined the maqasid objectives of wealth protection and justice.
Implications
The findings highlight a justice deficit in IULI implementation, signaling the need for stricter governance, transparent disclosure, and ethical oversight. Structural compliance must be complemented by ethical substance to preserve public trust in Islamic finance. This study calls for the institutionalization of maqasid-based performance criteria and regulatory reforms to uphold the values of Shariah in financial products.
Originality/Novelty
This research contributes a novel evaluative framework rooted in Abu Zahrah’s maqasid to assess the ethical validity of Islamic unit-linked insurance. By shifting the evaluative focus from formal legality to ethical substance, the study offers critical insights into aligning Islamic financial practices with the true spirit of Shariah.

Keywords

Abu Zahrah ethical compliance Islamic insurance Islamic unit-linked insurance Maqasid Shariah Shariah governance transparency

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Nur Kholis

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Author Biography

Nur Kholis, Program Studi Ekonomi Islam (S1), Universitas Islam Indonesia, Kab. Sleman, Indonesia

Islamic economic

How to Cite
Kholis, N. . (2025). A normative ethical analysis of Islamic unit-linked insurance using the Maqasid Shariah framework of Abu Zahrah. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 11(1), 455–482. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss1.art18
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Abdeen, M., Jan, S., Khan, S., & Ali, T. (2019). Employing Takaful Islamic banking through state of the art blockchain: A case study. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(12), 648–654. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0101283

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0101283

  2. Abdul Rahim, M., Shaharuddin, N. ’Ain S., & Mohd Suki, N. (2023). Shariah governance disclosure and its effect on Islamic banks’ financial performance: Evidence from Malaysia and GCC countries. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 15(4), 619–642. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2021-0235

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2021-0235

  3. Abdurrahman, Z. (2020). Teori maqasid Al-Syatibi dan kaitannya dengan kebutuhan dasar manusia menurut Abraham Maslow [Al-Syatibi’s maqasid theory and its relation to Abraham Maslow’s basic human needs]. Jurnal Ushuluddin: Media Dialog Pemikiran Islam, 22(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.24252/jumdpi.v22i1.15534

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/jumdpi.v22i1.15534

  4. Abozaid, A. (2016). Critical shari’ah review of takaful structures: Toward a better model. In S. N. Ali & S. Nisar (Eds.), Takaful and Islamic cooperative finance: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 93–112). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785363368.00014

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785363368.00014

  5. Abozaid, A. (2020). Shortcomings and proposed reforms in the existing Shariah governance of Islamic banking. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Economics Research, 2(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijier.v2i1.3638

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/ijier.v2i1.3638

  6. Abozaid, A., & Khateeb, S. H. (2024). A proposed model for efficient Shariah governance of Islamic financial institutions. In A. M. S. Derbali (Ed.), Recent developments in financial management and economics (pp. 276–293). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2683-1.ch015

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2683-1.ch015

  7. Abu Zahrah, M. (1956). Uṣūl al-fiqh [Principles of Islamic jurisprudence]. Dar al‑Fikr al‑‘Arabi.

  8. Aini, I., Sugianto, S., & Marliyah, M. (2025). Risk management in wealth protection from an Islamic economic perspective. Journal of Modern Islamic Studies and Civilization, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.59653/jmisc.v3i01.1270

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.59653/jmisc.v3i01.1270

  9. Akhlaq, M., & Asif, M. (2024). The importance of Sharia compliance in Islamic finance. Tanazur, 5(1), 195–212. https://tanazur.com.pk/index.php/tanazur/article/view/304

  10. Akhter, W., Pappas, V., & Khan, S. U. (2017). A comparison of Islamic and conventional insurance demand: Worldwide evidence during the Global Financial Crisis. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 1401–1412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.079

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.079

  11. Al-Afghan, A. Y. K. (2012). Strategi pemasaran PT. Takaful Indonesia Cabang Yogyakarta Tahun 2011 [Marketing strategy of PT Takaful Indonesia Yogyakarta Branch 2011] [Bachelor’s thesis, Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/35527

  12. Al-Alwani, T. J. (2001). Maqāṣid al-sharīʿah [The Objectives of Islamic law]. Dar al-Hadi.

  13. Al-Fayrūzābādī, M. al-D. A. Ṭāhir M. ibn Y. (2005). Al-Qāmūs al-muḥīṭ [The Comprehensive dictionary] (8th ed.). Muʾassasat al-Risālah li-l-Ṭibāʿah wa-l-Nashr wa-l-Tawzīʿ.

  14. Alhalboni, M., Ebrahim, M. S., & Jatmiko, W. (2022). Chapter 27: Rationalizing the Takaful organizational form with institutional theory. In D. Nguyen (Ed.), Handbook of banking and finance in emerging markets (pp. 506–522). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800880900.00036

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800880900.00036

  15. Alhammadi, S. (2023). Expanding financial inclusion in Indonesia through Takaful: Opportunities, challenges and sustainability. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-05-2023-0256

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-05-2023-0256

  16. Ali, M. M., Hassan, R., & Hasan, S. M. (2014). An exploratory study of Shari’ah issues in the application of tabarru’ for Takaful. Global Review of Islamic Economics and Business, 1(3), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.14421/grieb.2014.013-01

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/grieb.2014.013-01

  17. Ali, S. N. (2017). Building trust in Islamic finance products and services. Society and Business Review, 12(3), 356–372. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-03-2017-0017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-03-2017-0017

  18. Ali, Z., Anjum, G. M., Iqbal, J., & Ahmad, I. (2024). The role of Islamic values in promoting social justice and community welfare. International Research Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 5(1), 575–585. https://irjmss.com/index.php/irjmss/article/view/276

  19. Al-Khādimī, N. al-D. ibn M. (2001). ʿIlm al-maqāṣid al-sharʿiyyah [The Science of the objectives of Islamic law]. Maktabat al-ʿUbaykān.

  20. Al-Kurdī, A. al-Ḥājjī. (1980). Al-Qawāʿid al-fiqhiyyah al-kulliyyah [The Universal principles of Islamic jurisprudence]. University of Damascus.

  21. Al-Raysūnī, A. (1992). Naẓariyyat al-maqāṣid ʿinda al-Imām al-Shāṭibī [The Theory of maqāṣid according to Imām al-Shāṭibī]. Al-Dār al-ʿĀlamiyyah lil-Kitāb al-Islāmī.

  22. Al-Raysūnī, A. (1999). Al-Fikr al-maqāṣidī: Qawāʿiduhu wa fawāʾiduhu [Maqāṣid-oriented thought: Its principles and benefits]. Manshūrāt Jarīdat al-Zaman.

  23. AlZuBi, J. (2020). Asymmetric information and culture: Evidence from Takaful health insurance. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3626051

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3626051

  24. Anggraini, S., Luthfi, F., & Putra, W. (2024). Analisis hukum berinvestasi pada pelaksanaan asuransi jiwa syariah dengan basis unit link [Legal analysis of investing in the implementation of sharia life insurance on a unit-linked basis]. Prosiding Program Studi Ekonomi Islam 2024, 171–178. https://feb.untan.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/17.pdf

  25. Antony, J., Budi, H., & Sudaryanto, S. (2023). Determinants of insurance awareness and perceived value and their impact on unit linked insurance customer retention with the COVID-19 pandemic as moderator. Journal of Social Science, 4(2), 483–505. https://doi.org/10.46799/jss.v4i2.532

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.46799/jss.v4i2.532

  26. Asyiqin, I. Z. (2025). Ethical contracts vs. Commercial realities in Indonesian Sharia insurance. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 18(4), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v18no4.3635

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v18no4.3635

  27. Ayub, M. (2007). Understanding Islamic finance. Wiley.

  28. Azmat, S., & Subhan, M. (2022). Ethical foundations of the Islamic financial industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(2), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04882-5

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04882-5

  29. Baloch, B. A., & Chimenya, A. (2023). Ethical dimensions of Islamic finance and their relevance in contemporary business practices. International Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance Research, 11(2), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.46281/ijibfr.v11i2.2125

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.46281/ijibfr.v11i2.2125

  30. Baroroh, H. (2022). Comparative efficiency analysis of Sharia insurance and conventional insurance in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 8(3), 3182–3188. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i3.5952

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i3.5952

  31. Betawi, U. (2018). Maqashid al-syariah sebagai dasar hukum Islam dalam pandangan Al-Syatibi dan Jasser Audha [Maqashid al-syariah as the basis of Islamic law in the view of Al-Syatibi and Jasser Audha]. Jurnal Hukum Responsif, 6(6), 32–43. https://journal.pancabudi.ac.id/index.php/hukumresponsif/article/view/419

  32. Billah, M. M. (2019). An overview of Takaful products. In Islamic insurance products: Exploring Takaful principles, instruments and structures (pp. 3–27). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17681-5_1

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17681-5_1

  33. Dikko, M., & Abu Bakar, M. (2018). A comparative review of takaful frameworks in Nigeria, Malaysia and Pakistan. International Journal of Islamic Business, 3(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.32890/ijib2018.3.1.4

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.32890/ijib2018.3.1.4

  34. Dzulkepli, S., & Barom, M. N. (2021). Financial inclusion and the goal of distributive justice in Islamic economics. The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.33102/jmifr.v18i1.330

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33102/jmifr.v18i1.330

  35. Fahmi R, & Firdaus, F. (2024). Pemikiran Imam Al-Syhatibi tentang maqashid al-syariah [Imam Al-Shatibi’s thoughts on maqashid al-syariah]. I’tisham : Journal of Islamic Law and Economics, 3(2), 140–158. https://journal.iain-manado.ac.id/index.php/itisham/article/view/2164

  36. Galal, F. A., & Kabbashi, N. A. (2017). Islamic insurance in the global economy. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 6(6), 8–10. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20097.56160

  37. Habib, F. (2023). Islamic finance and sustainability: The need to reframe notions of Shariah compliance, purpose, and value. In Z. H. Jumat, S. Hafiz Khateeb, & S. Nazim Ali (Eds.), Islamic finance, fintech, and the road to sustainability: Reframing the approach in the post-pandemic era (pp. 15–40). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13302-2_2

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13302-2_2

  38. Hafkhair, T. F. F. (2016). Peran dewan pengawas syariah terhadap produk unit link di asuransi jiwa [The role of the sharia supervisory board on unit-linked products in life insurance] [Master’s thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta]. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/123456789/72640/1/Falah%20-%20Tesis%20Bab%201-5%20%28Final%29.pdf

  39. Halim, A., Ismail, T., & Mubarok, F. (2023). Exploring trust dynamics in Islamic insurance company. Al-Amwal : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syari’ah, 15(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.24235/amwal.v15i2.15267

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24235/amwal.v15i2.15267

  40. Hamzani, A. I., Widyastuti, T. V., Khasanah, N., & Rusli, M. H. M. (2023). Legal research method: Theoretical and implementative review. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(2), 3610–3619. https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i2.3191

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i2.3191

  41. Haroun, A. E. H., & Yusoff, M. E. (2019). Micro-Takaful as stimulus for financial inclusion: A key component towards sustainable development. Open International Journal of Informatics, 7(2), 43–55. https://oiji.utm.my/index.php/oiji/article/view/63

  42. Harun, H. & Nurdianawati Irwani Abdullah. (2018). Socio-economic justice and protection of wealth via Malaysian Takaful operations: An analysis from material, immaterial effects and theoretical framework development. International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), 6(4), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1248789

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/6884

  43. Hasan, R., Ahmad, A. U. F., & Bt. Siraj, S. A. (2022). Building trust in waqf management—Implications of good governance and transparent reporting. The Singapore Economic Review, 67(1), 459–475. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217590820420059

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590820420059

  44. Hassan, H. A. (2019). Takaful models: Origin, progression and future. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 11(6), 1801–1819. https://doi.org/10.1108/jima-04-2018-0078

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-2018-0078

  45. Ibn Rabīʿah, A. al-ʿAzīz bin ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. (2002). ʿIlm maqāṣid al-Shāriʿ [The Science of the objectives of the Lawgiver ]. Abd al-ʿAzīz bin ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Ibn Rabīʿah.

  46. Ibrahim, N., & Markom, R. (2024). Embracing Maqasid al-Shariah and sustainable development goals in Takaful legal framework. Jurnal Undang-Undang Dan Masyarakat, 34(2), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.17576/juum-2024-3402-02

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/juum-2024-3402-02

  47. Iqbal, M. N., Arfa, F. A., & Waqqosh, A. (2023). Tujuan hukum Islam dalam perspektif maqashid al-syari’ah [The purpose of Islamic law in the perspective of maqashid al-syari’ah]. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 5(1), 4887–4895. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v5i1.11763

  48. Jum’an, J., & Sulastri, S. (2023). Analisis prospek dan pengembangan asuransi jiwa unit link sebagai instrumen investasi bagi masyarakat di Indonesia [Analyze the prospects and development of unit-linked life insurance as an investment instrument for people in Indonesia]. Jurnal Serambi Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 6(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.32672/jseb.v6i2.6544

  49. Kamaruddin, M. I. H., Hanefah, M. M., Shafii, Z., Salleh, S., & Zakaria, N. (2020). Comparative analysis on Shariah governance in Malaysia: SGF 2010, IFSA 2013 and SGPD 2019. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 10(1), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v10i1.16157

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v10i1.16157

  50. Khan, H. (2019). A nontechnical guide on optimal incentives for Islamic insurance operators. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(3), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12030127

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12030127

  51. Khasanah, S. T. (2017). Tinjauan hukum Islam terhadap produk asuransi berbasis unit link di PT. Zurich Topas Life Indonesia kantor cabang Purworejo [Islamic law review of unit link-based insurance products at PT Zurich Topas Life Indonesia Purworejo branch office] [Bachelor’s thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga]. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/29749/2/13380067_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf

  52. Kholis, N. (2020). Pengantar keuangan Islam [ Introduction to Islamic finance]. Universitas Islam Indonesia.

  53. Kouzo, I. & Falikhatun. (2023). The importance of compliance with accounting ethics standards issued by AAOIFI in activating the governance of Islamic banks: An analytical study. Berkala Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 8(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.20473/baki.v8i1.41766

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/baki.v8i1.41766

  54. Lewis, M. K. (2014). Principles of Islamic corporate governance. In M. K. Hassan & M. K. Lewis (Eds.), Handbook on Islam and economic life (pp. 243–267). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783479825.00021

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783479825.00021

  55. Masfuha, I. (2017). Pengelolaan dana asuransi pendidikan (Studi komparasi pada PT Asuransi Takaful Keluarga dan AJ Syariah Bumiputera Yogyakarta) [Management of education insurance funds (Comparative study on PT Asuransi Takaful Keluarga and AJ Syariah Bumiputera Yogyakarta)] [Bachelor’s thesis, Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/7079

  56. Minhat, M., & Dzolkarnaini, N. (2021). Regulating Islamic finance in the UK: Issues and possible solutions. In M. Minhat & N. Dzolkarnaini (Eds.), Ethical discourse in finance: Interdisciplinary and diverse perspectives (pp. 171–200). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81596-7_9

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81596-7_9

  57. Mitchell, M. (2022). Analyzing the law qualitatively. Qualitative Research Journal, 23(1), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-04-2022-0061

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-04-2022-0061

  58. Mohd Zain, F. A., Muhamad, S. F., Abdullah, H., Sheikh Ahmad Tajuddin, S. A. F., & Wan Abdullah, W. A. (2024). Integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles with Maqasid al-Shariah: A blueprint for sustainable takaful operations. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 17(3), 461–484. https://doi.org/10.1108/imefm-11-2023-0422

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-11-2023-0422

  59. Muhamad. (2007). Produk asuransi unit link syariah; Tinjauan historis dan praktis (Studi pada PT. Asuransi Takaful Keluarga) [Sharia unit-linked insurance products; Historical and practical review (Study on PT. Asuransi Takaful Keluarga)] [Bachelor’s thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta]. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/123456789/8307/1/MUHAMAD-FSH.pdf

  60. Murad, J., Borahan, M. A., Sa’id, M. I., & Yahya, N. (2024). Untangling the knots: Navigating the complexities of Shari’ah compliance and governance in Islamic finance. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 9(37), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijlgc.937039

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35631/IJLGC.937039

  61. Parinduri, I. R., & Yusrizal, Y. (2023). Hukum berinvestasi pada asuransi jiwa syariah berbasis unit link pada PT. Prudential Life Asurance Binjai [The law of investing in unit link-based sharia life insurance at PT Prudential Life Asurance Binjai]. Jurnal Masharif Al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 8(2), 1355–1366. https://doi.org/10.30651/jms.v8i2.19467

  62. Paryadi, P. (2021). Maqashid syariah: Definisi dan pendapat para ulama [Maqashid Shariah: Definition and scholarly opinions]. Cross-Border, 4(2), 201–216. https://journal.iaisambas.ac.id/index.php/Cross-Border/article/view/742

  63. Permana, E. (2019). Analisis strategi pengembangan sumber daya manusia dan produk asuransi syariah dalam meningkatkan keunggulan kompetitif (Studi pada PT. Asuransi Jiwa Syariah Al Amin Bandar Lampung) [Bachelor’s thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung]. https://repository.radenintan.ac.id/7727/

  64. Pertiwi, L., & Abidah, A. (2021). Eksistensi Fatwa No. 21/DSN-MUI/X/2001 pada asuransi jiwa syariah di PT. Prudential Life Assurance Cabang Ponorogo [Existence of Fatwa No. 21/DSN-MUI/X/2001 on sharia life insurance at PT Prudential Life Assurance Ponorogo Branch]. Invest Journal of Sharia & Economic Law, 1(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.21154/invest.v1i1.2567

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21154/invest.v1i1.2567

  65. Purnamasari, D. R., & Alam, A. (2020). Level of understanding and reasons customers choose Sharia insurance products. Airlangga International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance, 3(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.20473/aijief.v3i1.19411

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/aijief.v3i1.19411

  66. Rahman, M. K., Hoque, M. N., Yusuf, S. N. S., Yusoff, M. N. H. B., & Begum, F. (2023). Do customers’ perceptions of Islamic banking services predict satisfaction and word of mouth? Evidence from Islamic banks in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE, 18(1), e0280108. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280108

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280108

  67. Raman, A. A., & Bukair, A. A. (2013). The influence of the Shariah supervision board on corporate social responsibility disclosure by Islamic banks of Gulf Co-Operation Council Countries. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 6(2), 65–104. https://ajba.um.edu.my/index.php/AJBA/article/view/2678

  68. Rangkuti, M. Y. (2023). Toward a holistic framework of Islamic business ethics: Insights from leadership, halal practices, and finance in a digital age. Sinergi International Journal of Islamic Studies, 1(3), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijis.v1i3.593

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.61194/ijis.v1i3.593

  69. Rohman, M. M., Mu’minin, N., Masuwd, M., & Elihami, E. (2024). Methodological reasoning finds law using normative studies (Theory, approach and analysis of legal materials). MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 4(2), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.47498/maqasidi.v4i2.3379

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.47498/maqasidi.v4i2.3379

  70. Santri, S. H., & Fauzi, W. (2023). Pengaturan perjanjian asuransi jiwa unitlink dalam kaitannya dengan perlindungan hukum pemegang polis [Regulation of unit-linked life insurance agreements in relation to the legal protection of policyholders]. UNES Law Review, 6(1), 3381–3389. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1131

  71. Shettima, U. (2020). Information asymmetry in the insurance market: A comparative study of conventional insurance and islamic insurance (Takaful) industry in Nigeria. Issues in Business Management and Economics, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15739/IBME.20.001

  72. Syarifuddin, M. (2018). Maslahah sebagai alternatif istinbath hukum dalam ekonomi syari’ah [Maslahah as an alternative to istinbath law in shari’ah economics]. JURNAL LENTERA : Kajian Keagamaan, Keilmuan Dan Teknologi, 17(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.29138/lentera.v17i1.78

  73. Syarifudin, S., Sidarta, A. L., & Firdiansyah, F. A. (2021). Sharia investment literation by Sharia insurance agents on unit-linked products. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 4(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v4i1.1377

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v4i1.1377

  74. Syed Mohamad, S. F. (2020). Full fledged vs shared/outsourced takaful operators: A maqasid index approach. The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 17(2), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.33102/jmifr.v17i2.290

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33102/jmifr.v17i2.290

  75. Tahir, U., Rashid, A., & Khan, A. (2021). Evaluation of contemporary Takaful practices from the perspective of Maqasid al-Shariah. Journal of Islamic Business and Management (JIBM), 11(2), 314–329. https://doi.org/10.26501/jibm/2021.1102-005

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.26501/jibm/2021.1102-005

  76. Ullah, S., Harwood, I. A., & Jamali, D. (2018). ‘Fatwa repositioning’: The hidden struggle for Shari’a compliance within Islamic financial institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(4), 895–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3090-1

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3090-1

  77. Wegayanti, I. A. N. (2018). Implementasi maqasid syariah dalam mekanisme asuransi Takaful Keluarga Yogyakarta [Implementation of maqasid sharia in Takaful Family insurance mechanism Yogyakarta] [Bachelor’s thesis, Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/5489

  78. Wehr, H. (1971). A dictionary of modern written Arabic (J. M. Cowan, Trans.; 3rd ed.). Spoken Language Services.

  79. Wicaksono, A. T. S., & Trisasmita, R. (2019). Pelayanan asuransi jiwa syariah: Sudahkah sesuai harapan? [Islamic life insurance services: Has it lived up to expectations?]. Kordinat: Jurnal Komunikasi Antar Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam, 17(2), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.15408/kordinat.v17i2.9614

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/kordinat.v17i2.9614

  80. Wilson, R. (2009). Shari’ah governance for Islamic financial institutions. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 1(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.55188/ijif.v1i1.65

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.55188/ijif.v1i1.65

  81. Yaacob, S. F., Rahman, A. A., & Karim, Z. A. (2016). The determinants of liquidity risk: A panel study of Islamic banks in Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Issues and Thought, 6, 73–82. https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/JCIT/article/view/1073

  82. Yushadeni, Y. (2011). Aplikasi produk asuransi unit link syariah dan aspek hukumnya [Sharia unit-linked insurance product application and its legal aspects]. Az-Zarqa’: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Islam, 3(2), 303–326. https://doi.org/10.14421/cqz96s97

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/cqz96s97

  83. Yussof, S. A. (2020). The Islamic Financial Services Act, 2013: Malaysia’s model framework for Shariah-compliance and stability. ICR Journal, 4(3), 391–406. https://icrjournal.org/index.php/icr/article/view/454

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.12816/0009759

Optimizing financial management and reporting to increase accountability and transparency in Islamic boarding schools‎

Sayyidah Yasmin Zahirah, Wirawan Suhaedi
Abstract View : 538
Download :297
10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss1.art2
PDF Review Reports Originality Report

Strategy for settling claims for insurance company customers experiencing liquidity at AJB Bumiputera 1912 Medan Branch: Some notes from Islamic perspectives

Siti Saleha , Reni Ria Armayani Hasibuan, Laylan Syafina
Abstract View : 369
Download :562
10.20885/jielariba.vol9.iss1.art8
PDF Review Reports Originality Report

Determinants of the Effectiveness of the Islamic Insurance Industry Spin-Off Implementation in Indonesia with the Analytical Hierarchy Process Approach

Erny Arianty, Akhmad Khabibi
Abstract View : 469
Download :391
10.20885/jielariba.vol8.iss2.art7
PDF

Measuring Financial Efficiency of Insurance Companies in Indonesia Using Stochastic Frontier Analysis Approach

A Comparison Between Islamic and Conventional Insurances

Nur Kholis, Yunita Nur Afifah
Abstract View : 622
Download :544
10.20885/jielariba.vol8.iss1.art12
PDF

Comparative Analysis of Islamic and Conventional Banks Performance Using Sharia Maqasid Index and CAMEL

Gista Rismayani, Ulfa Luthfia Nanda
Abstract View : 601
Download :296
10.20885/jielariba.vol5.iss1.art3
PDF