Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction
The global pursuit of sustainable development has intensified the need for innovative financing instruments capable of addressing environmental and social challenges while remaining ethically grounded. In Muslim-majority countries, green sukuk has emerged as a promising Islamic finance instrument designed to fund environmentally friendly projects in line with Shariah principles. Despite its growing relevance, scholarly discussion on how green sukuk operationalizes maqashid al-shariah within the framework of the Sustainable Development Goals remains limited, particularly from an integrated conceptual and stakeholder-based perspective.
Objectives
This study aims to develop and analyze a green sukuk concept based on maqashid al-shariah in achieving sustainable development. Specifically, it seeks to examine the alignment between green sukuk, maqashid al-shariah, and the Sustainable Development Goals; identify priority dimensions in green sukuk development; and assess key implications for investors, governance, and public policy in the Indonesian context.
Method
The study adopts a qualitative-descriptive approach combined with an Analytic Hierarchy Process. Data were collected from secondary sources, including official green sukuk allocation and impact reports, and primary data obtained through interviews and structured questionnaires involving key stakeholders. Content analysis was used to map green sukuk–financed projects to maqashid al-shariah and Sustainable Development Goals, while the Analytic Hierarchy Process was employed to determine priority dimensions in green sukuk development.
Results
The findings reveal a strong alignment between green sukuk, maqashid al-shariah, and the Sustainable Development Goals, particularly in environmental protection, social welfare, and economic resilience. Environmental and social dimensions emerge as the highest priorities, surpassing economic and governance considerations. However, the study identifies an imbalance in maqashid realization, with intellectual development receiving limited attention. Investor participation is largely driven by functional value considerations, while governance quality and transparency play a critical enabling role.
Implications
The results highlight the need for more holistic maqashid-based frameworks that integrate intellectual development, strengthen governance, and enhance sustainability reporting to improve the effectiveness and credibility of green sukuk.
Originality/Novelty
This study offers an integrated maqashid al-shariah–based conceptualization of green sukuk linked explicitly to the Sustainable Development Goals, combining content analysis with stakeholder prioritization to advance the discourse on Islamic sustainable finance.

Keywords

green finance green sukuk Islamic finance Maqashid al-Shariah stakeholder prioritization sustainable development sustainable development goals

Article Details

How to Cite
Izzati, A. N. ., Tumuyu, S. S. ., & Wardhana, Y. M. A. (2025). Reconceptualizing green sukuk through Maqashid al-Shariah for advancing sustainable development goals. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 11(2), 1833–1862. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss2.art22

References

  1. Abdullah, M. S., & Keshminder, J. S. (2022). What drives green sukuk ? A leader’s perspective. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(3), 985–1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1821339

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1821339
  2. Affandi, A., & Khanifa, N. K. (2022). Konsep harta: Penentuan keuntungan green sukuk pemicu impact investment SDGs [Asset concept: Determining the benefits of green sukuk as a trigger for SDG impact investment]. Journal of Economic, Management, Accounting and Technology, 5(2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.32500/jematech.v5i2.2684

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.32500/jematech.v5i2.2684
  3. Al Madani, H., Alotaibi, K. O., & Alhammadi, S. (2020). The role of Sukuk in achieving sustainable development: Evidence from the Islamic Development Bank. Banks and Bank Systems, 15(4), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(4).2020.04

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(4).2020.04
  4. Alam, A., Ratnasari, R. T., Jannah, I. L., & El Ashfahany, A. (2023). Development and evaluation of Islamic green financing: A systematic review of green sukuk. Environmental Economics, 14(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.14(1).2023.06

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.14(1).2023.06
  5. Alganad, A. M. N., Isa, N. M., & Fauzi, W. I. M. (2023). Why people do not purchase green cars in Malaysia: The influence of consumption values on consumers’ attitude towards green cars. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 12, 101007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101007

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101007
  6. Alhaq, K., Nursyamsiah, T., & Muthohharoh, M. (2023). Green sukuk development strategy in Indonesia: ANP-SWOT approach. IQTISHADIA, 16(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.21043/iqtishadia.v16i1.16312

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21043/iqtishadia.v16i1.16312
  7. Ali, Q., Rusgianto, S., Parveen, S., Yaacob, H., & Zin, R. M. (2023). An empirical study of the effects of green Sukuk spur on economic growth, social development, and financial performance in Indonesia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(8), 21097–21123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03520-6

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03520-6
  8. Andriansyah, Y., Atmaja, F. F., Lana, R. I., Azmi, G. N., & Mešković, A. (2025). An exploratory comparative analysis of fiscal discipline in Islamic economics: Integrating ethical governance with sustainable financial practices. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 11(1), 645–666. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss1.art25

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss1.art25
  9. Anisa, L. N. (2025). Sustainable finance from the perspective of Maqashid Syariah. Al-Mabsut : Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial, 19(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.56997/almabsut.v19i1.2070

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.56997/almabsut.v19i1.2070
  10. Anwar, D. R., Wahab, A., & Waris, W. (2025). Maqasid syariah and sustainable development: Integrating Islamic objectives into economic planning. Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4(6), 2601–2618. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v4i6.269

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v4i6.269
  11. Araminta, D. V., Qudziyah, Q., & Timur, Y. P. (2022). The role of green sukuk in realizing the Sustainable Development Goals 2030 Agenda. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam (Journal of Islamic Economics and Business), 8(2), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.20473/jebis.v8i2.37531

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/jebis.v8i2.37531
  12. Arrazi, M. F. (2025). Maqasid al-Shariah and sustainable finance: Analyzing the impact of green sukuk allocation in Indonesia. Muslim Business and Economics Review, 4(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.56529/mber.v4i1.431

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.56529/mber.v4i1.431
  13. Arsyi, M. (2024). Maqasid Shariah implementation on Sukuk analysis. Journal of Islamic Economics Literatures, 4(2), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.58968/jiel.v4i2.338

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.58968/jiel.v4i2.338
  14. Avdukić, A., & Smolo, E. (2024). Promoting sustainable development through Islamic social finance. In E. Smolo & M. M. Raheem (Eds.), The future of Islamic finance: From Shari’ah law to Fintech (pp. 121–139). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83549-906-120241008

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83549-906-120241008
  15. Blewitt, J. (2017). Understanding sustainable development (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.9781315465852

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.9781315465852
  16. Campisi, D., Gitto, S., & Morea, D. (2018). Shari’ah-compliant finance: A possible novel paradigm for green economy investments in Italy. Sustainability, 10(11), 3915. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113915

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113915
  17. Canco, I., Kruja, D., & Iancu, T. (2021). AHP, a reliable method for quality decision making: A case study in business. Sustainability, 13(24), 13932. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413932

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413932
  18. Chiarini, A. (2019). Choosing action plans for strategic manufacturing objectives using AHP: Analysis of the path and pitfalls encountered – an exploratory case study. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(1), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-10-2017-0209

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-10-2017-0209
  19. Delle Foglie, A., & Keshminder, J. S. (2024). Challenges and opportunities of SRI sukuk toward financial system sustainability: A bibliometric and systematic literature review. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 19(10), 3202–3225. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-04-2022-0601

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-04-2022-0601
  20. Ebrahim, R., Abdulla, Y., & Kumaraswamy, S. (2021). Islamic finance and sustainable development goals in Bahrain. 2021 International Conference on Sustainable Islamic Business and Finance, 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEECONF53626.2021.9686329

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEECONF53626.2021.9686329
  21. Endri, E., Tahya Hania, B., & Ma’ruf, A. (2022). Corporate green Sukuk issuance for sustainable financing in Indonesia. Environmental Economics, 13(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.13(1).2022.04

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.13(1).2022.04
  22. Essiz, O., & Senyuz, A. (2024). Predicting the value‐based determinants of sustainable luxury consumption: A multi‐analytical approach and pathway to sustainable development in the luxury industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(3), 1721–1758. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3569

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3569
  23. Fahrozi, M., & Jakoto, J. (2025). The impact of Sharia green financing on sustainable development in Indonesia. Seriat Ekonomisi, 2(3), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.35335/re55pv70

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35335/re55pv70
  24. Faisal, Y. A., Gunawan, I., Cupian, Hayati, A., Apriliadi, A., & Fajri, M. (2023). Examining the purchase intentions of Indonesian investors for green sukuk. Sustainability, 15(9), 7430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097430

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097430
  25. Faizi, F., Kusuma, A. S., & Widodo, P. (2024). Islamic green finance: Mapping the climate funding landscape in Indonesia. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 40(4), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-08-2023-0189

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-08-2023-0189
  26. Filippini, M., Leippold, M., & Wekhof, T. (2024). Sustainable finance literacy and the determinants of sustainable investing. Journal of Banking & Finance, 163, 107167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107167

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107167
  27. Fitrah, R., & Soemitra, A. (2022). Green sukuk for sustainable development goals in indonesia: A literature study. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 8(1), 231. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i1.4591

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i1.4591
  28. Genç, M. C., Ekinci, A., & Sakarya, B. (2022). The impact of output volatility on CO2 emissions in Turkey: Testing EKC hypothesis with Fourier stationarity test. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(2), 3008–3021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15448-3

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15448-3
  29. Goel, K., & Singh, S. (2023). Consumer choice behavior among non-governmental organizations: Structural effects of consumption values. Journal of Informatics Education and Research, 3(2), 2051–2072. https://doi.org/10.52783/jier.v3i2.348

  30. Grahesti, A., Nafii"ah, D. F., & Pramuningtyas, E. (2022). Green sukuk: Investasi hijau berbasis syariah dalam mewujudkan ketahanan terhadap perubahan iklim di Indonesia [Green sukuk: Sharia-based green investment in realizing climate change resilience in Indonesia]. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 8(3), 3374–3382. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i3.6443

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i3.6443
  31. Graneheim, U. H., Lindgren, B.-M., & Lundman, B. (2017). Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today, 56, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002
  32. Griffiths, J. (2018). Financing the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Development, 61(1–4), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-018-0178-1

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-018-0178-1
  33. Gundogdu, A. S. (2018). An inquiry into Islamic finance from the perspective of sustainable development goals. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(4), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n4p381

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n4p381
  34. Hariyani, H. F., Kusuma, H., & Hidayat, W. (2020). Green sukuk-based project on sustainable waste management in Indonesia. Al-Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah, 12(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v12i2.15129

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v12i2.15129
  35. Hickel, J. (2019). The contradiction of the sustainable development goals: Growth versus ecology on a finite planet. Sustainable Development, 27(5), 873–884. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1947

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1947
  36. Iskandar, E., & Sulaiman, E. (2025). Sharia business development: Integrating Islamic economic principles with SDGs goals. International Journal of Management, Economic, Business and Accounting, 4(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.58468/ijmeba.v4i1.131

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.58468/ijmeba.v4i1.131
  37. Keshminder, J. S., Abdullah, M. S., & Mardi, M. (2022). Green sukuk – Malaysia surviving the bumpy road: Performance, challenges and reconciled issuance framework. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 14(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-04-2021-0049

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-04-2021-0049
  38. Keshminder, J. S., Singh, G. K. B., Wahid, Z. AB., & Abdullah, M. S. (2019). Green Sukuk: Malaysia taking the lead. Malaysian Journal of Consumer and Family Economics, 22(S2), 1–22. https://www.majcafe.com/green-sukuk-malaysia-taking-the-lead/

  39. Khaliq, A. (2025). Ethical and sustainable finance: Integrating Islamic principles. In K. Ahmad & D. A. Berghout (Eds.), Islamic finance and sustainable development: Balancing spirituality, values and profit (pp. 113–141). Routledge.

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003505570-8
  40. Khan M. R., F. (2021). Socially responsible investing and sustainable indices: A sustainability agenda. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 14(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/09746862211045757

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09746862211045757
  41. Khan, T. (2019). Reforming islamic finance for achieving sustainable development goals. Journal of King Abdulaziz University Islamic Economics, 32(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.4197/Islec.32-1.1

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4197/Islec.32-1.1
  42. Kholil, A., Zuardi, M., Amrin, & Juryatina. (2025). Optimizing Islamic financial instruments in Indonesia to support SDGs: Maqashid Syariah perspective. Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam, 26(1), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v26i01.9217

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v26i01.9217
  43. Lagoarde-Segot, T. (2020). Financing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 12(7), 2775. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072775

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072775
  44. Laldin, M. A., & Djafri, F. (2021). The role of Islamic finance in achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs). In M. K. Hassan, M. Saraç, & A. Khan (Eds.), Islamic finance and sustainable development: A sustainable economic framework for Muslim and non-Muslim countries (pp. 107–126). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76016-8_6

  45. Liu, F. H., & Lai, K. P. (2021). Ecologies of green finance: Green sukuk and development of green Islamic finance in Malaysia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(8), 1896–1914. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211038349

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211038349
  46. Lukšić, I., Bošković, B., Novikova, A., & Vrbensky, R. (2022). Innovative financing of the sustainable development goals in the countries of the Western Balkans. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 12(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-022-00340-w

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-022-00340-w
  47. Manap, A. (2025). Green sukuk as sustainable financing instruments: Socio-economic and environmental impacts in Southeast Asia. Journal of Scientific Insights, 2(3), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.69930/jsi.v2i3.360

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.69930/jsi.v2i3.360
  48. Mazza, P. I. (2021). Concepts of sustainable development; a literature review and a systematic framework for connecting the role of education with the sustainable development goals (SDGs). International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, 8(8), 106–112. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0808009

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0808009
  49. Meng, X., & Shaikh, G. M. (2023). Evaluating environmental, social, and governance criteria and green finance investment strategies using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy WASPAS. Sustainability, 15(8), 6786. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086786

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086786
  50. Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1653531. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531
  51. Munthafa, A. E., & Mubarok, H. (2017). Penerapan metode analytical hierarchy process dalam sistem pendukung keputusan penentuan mahasiswa berprestasi [Application of the analytical hierarchy process method in a decision support system for determining outstanding students]. Jurnal Siliwangi Seri Sains dan Teknologi, 3(2), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.37058/jssainstek.v3i2.355

  52. Musari, K. (2016). Economic sustainability for Islamic nanofinance through waqf - sukuk linkage program: Case study in indonesia. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 2(3), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.12816/0036630

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.12816/0036630
  53. Naeem, M. A., Mustafa Raza Rabbani, Karim, S., & Billah, S. M. (2023). Religion vs ethics: Hedge and safe haven properties of Sukuk and green bonds for stock markets pre- and during COVID-19. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 16(2), 234–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-06-2021-0252

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-06-2021-0252
  54. Ni’mah, I., Rokhim, A., & Musari, K. (2024). The role of circular economy in supporting sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Indonesia from an Islamic economic perspective. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 10(1), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol10.iss1.art22

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol10.iss1.art22
  55. Oktaviani, Y., Rangkuti, K., Surya, A. M. P. P., & Puspita, A. (2018). Financial solutions for biodiversity in contributing to the economic development in Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 74, 01007. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187401007

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187401007
  56. Paetzold, F., & Busch, T. (2014). Unleashing the powerful few: Sustainable investing behaviour of wealthy private investors. Organization & Environment, 27(4), 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614555991

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614555991
  57. Pirgaip, B., & Arslan-Ayaydin, O. (2024). Exploring the greenium in the green Sukuk universe: Evidence from the primary market. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 17(3), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-05-2023-0186

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-05-2023-0186
  58. Raeni, R., Thomson, I., & Frandsen, A.-C. (2022). Mobilising Islamic funds for climate actions: From transparency to traceability. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 42(1–2), 38–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2022.2066553

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2022.2066553
  59. Raimi, L., Abdur-Rauf, I. A., & Ashafa, S. A. (2024). Does Islamic sustainable finance support sustainable development goals to avert financial risk in the management of Islamic finance products? A critical literature review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(6), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17060236

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17060236
  60. Raimi, L., & Bamiro, N. B. (2025). Role of Islamic sustainable finance in promoting green entrepreneurship and sustainable development goals in emerging Muslim economies. International Journal of Social Economics. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-05-2024-0408

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-05-2024-0408
  61. Ramadhan, I. A. & Wirdyanigsih. (2020). Green Sukuk issuance as an investment instrument for sustainable development. Proceedings of the International Conference on Law, Governance and Islamic Society (ICOLGIS 2019), 95–98. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200306.189

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200306.189
  62. Rozman, A. T., & Azmi, N. A. (2022). Green sukuk, environmental issues and strategy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1067(1), 012085. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1067/1/012085

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1067/1/012085
  63. Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—What it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
  64. Saied, G. M. A. A., Awang, M. D., & Ahmad, S. B. (2024). Hybrid sukuk and wealth preservation: Aligning with Maqasid al-Shariah principles in modern Islamic finance. International Journal of Religion, 5(12), 1487–1495. https://doi.org/10.61707/m3fpb331

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.61707/m3fpb331
  65. Santoso, I. R. (2020). Green sukuk and sustainable economic development goals: Mitigating climate change in Indonesia. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 10(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJAT072020-3

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.7187/GJAT072020-3
  66. Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8
  67. Siregar, R. (2025). ESG and Islamic accounting for sustainable Islamic finance: A qualitative study. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 13(3), 555–566. https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v13i3.3410

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v13i3.3410
  68. Subhan ZA, M. Ah., Ghazali, M. L., & Yasid, A. (2023). Maqashid Syariah: Kajian teoritis dalam pembentukan fatwa DSN Sukuk [Shariah objectives: A theoretical study in the formation of DSN Sukuk fatwa]. Akademika, 17(1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.30736/adk.v17i1.1531

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.30736/adk.v17i1.1531
  69. Sukmaningrum, L., Saputra, R., & Ariyanto, M. H. (2025). Exploring green investment interest in Islamic finance: The case of Indonesian Green Sukuk among university students. Kemakmuran Hijau: Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 2(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.61511/jekop.v2i1.2025.2269

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.61511/jekop.v2i1.2025.2269
  70. Suriani, S., Masbar, R., Agustina, M., & Khairul, A. D. (2024). Do global green sukuk affect on climate change? Evidence in issuing countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.14987

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.14987
  71. Suroso, D. S. A., Setiawan, B., Pradono, P., Iskandar, Z. S., & Hastari, M. A. (2022). Revisiting the role of international climate finance (ICF) towards achieving the nationally determined contribution (NDC) target: A case study of the Indonesian energy sector. Environmental Science & Policy, 131, 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.022

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.022
  72. Tanrikulu, C. (2021). Theory of consumption values in consumer behaviour research: A review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(6), 1176–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12687

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12687
  73. Tseng, P.-H., & Pilcher, N. (2019). Evaluating the key factors of green port policies in Taiwan through quantitative and qualitative approaches. Transport Policy, 82, 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.12.014

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.12.014
  74. Ulfah, I. F., Sukmana, R., Laila, N., & Sulaeman, S. (2024). A structured literature review on green sukuk (Islamic bonds): Implications for government policy and future studies. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 15(7), 1118–1133. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-10-2022-0255

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-10-2022-0255
  75. Waheed, R. (2023). Energy challenges, green growth, blue indicators, and sustainable economic growth: A study of Saudi Arabia. Evaluation Review, 47(6), 983–1024. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X221134653

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X221134653
  76. Wibisono, M. P. (2021). Green sukuk sebagai instrumen untuk mencapai sustainable development goals melalui pengelolaan sampah (PLTSA) [Green sukuk as an instrument to achieve sustainable development goals through waste management] [Bachelor’s thesis, Universitas Brawijaya]. https://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/188545/

  77. Yaniza, T., Rachmawati, Ramadhanti, D. C., & Bimo, M. A. (2022). Landasan hukum penerbitan green sukuk di Indonesia [Legal basis for the issuance of green sukuk in Indonesia]. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 10(2), 415–423. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPP/article/view/47197

  78. Zhan, J. X., & Santos-Paulino, A. U. (2021). Investing in the Sustainable Development Goals: Mobilization, channeling, and impact. Journal of International Business Policy, 4(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-020-00093-3

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-020-00093-3
  79. Ziolo, M., Filipiak, B. Z., Bąk, I., & Cheba, K. (2019). How to design more sustainable financial systems: The roles of environmental, social, and governance factors in the decision-making process. Sustainability, 11(20), 5604. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205604

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205604