Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction
Governance failure in Islamic rural banking remains a critical challenge because weak implementation of prudential principles, ineffective oversight, and inadequate risk management can threaten institutional sustainability and ultimately result in the revocation of an operating license. Although governance has been extensively discussed in Islamic banking, comprehensive evidence explaining how governance violations, liquidity risk, and capital inadequacy jointly contribute to institutional failure remains limited, particularly among Sharia Rural Banks in Indonesia.
Objectives
This study aims to identify the types of governance violations that occurred at Sharia Rural Bank Saka Dana Mulia Kudus, analyze the implementation of good corporate governance and Islamic corporate governance, examine the relationship between governance failure, liquidity risk management, and minimum capital adequacy, and evaluate their impact on sustainable business growth.
Method
This study employed a qualitative approach using a single-case study design focusing on Sharia Rural Bank Saka Dana Mulia Kudus. Secondary data were collected from regulatory documents, banking publication reports, financial statements, official policies, media reports, and academic literature covering the period from 2020 to 2024. Document analysis, thematic coding, and source triangulation were applied to identify governance failures, liquidity risk, capital adequacy issues, and their consequences for banking performance and business continuity.
Results
The findings reveal that governance failure resulted from the ineffective performance of the board of directors and board of commissioners, weak implementation of prudential principles, inadequate liquidity risk management, failure to satisfy minimum capital adequacy requirements, and ineffective Sharia compliance oversight. These weaknesses caused severe deterioration in financial performance, reflected by extremely high non-performing financing, declining profitability, insufficient liquidity reserves, negative capital adequacy, and continuing operating losses. The resulting decline in depositor confidence, reduction in third-party funds, unsuccessful restructuring efforts, and worsening financial health ultimately led to the revocation of the bank’s operating license and significantly hindered business growth.
Implications
The findings emphasize the importance of strengthening governance structures, improving liquidity risk management, ensuring sustainable capital adequacy, enhancing the effectiveness of the Sharia Supervisory Board, and implementing more proactive regulatory supervision and early warning mechanisms to safeguard institutional stability and promote sustainable growth in Islamic rural banking.
Originality/Novelty
This study provides a comprehensive analytical framework integrating governance failure, liquidity risk management, minimum capital adequacy, and Islamic corporate governance to explain institutional failure in a Sharia Rural Bank. It offers practical early warning indicators for regulators and banking practitioners while demonstrating that Islamic institutional identity alone does not guarantee effective governance without substantive oversight, prudent management, and integrated risk control.

Keywords

business growth corporate governance Islamic corporate governance liquidity risk minimum capital adequacy Sharia Rural Banks Sharia Supervisory Board

Article Details

How to Cite
Sumarno, S., Yahya, M. ., El Junusi, R. ., Murtadho, A. ., Elizabeth, M. Z. ., & Abdullah, I. . (2026). Governance violations and their impact on business growth: A case study of Sharia Rural Bank Saka Dana Mulia Kudus. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol12.iss1.art28

References

  1. Abdulrahman, Z., Ebrahimi, T., & Al-Najjar, B. (2024). Exploring the nexus between Islamic financial institutions Shariah compliance disclosure and corporate governance: New insights from a cross-country analysis. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 29(4), 4590–4612. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2891

  2. Ahmed, H., & Chapra, M. U. (2002). Corporate governance in Islamic financial institution. The Islamic Research and Teaching Institute (IRTI). https://ideas.repec.org//p/ris/irtiop/0093.html

  3. Al Adawiyah, R. A., Adirestuty, F., Irsyad, S. M., Chazanah, I. N., Mulyani, Y. S., & Indrarini, R. (2025). Sustainability reporting and Sharia compliance in Islamic financial institutions: An empirical evaluation of emerging and developing countries. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-11-2023-0402

  4. Al-Fandawi, H. H. F., & Khiari, W. (2023). An empirical study to detect agency problems in listed corporations: The emerging market study. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 12(1, special issue), 208. https://virtusinterpress.org/An-empirical-study-to-detect-agency-problems-in-listed-corporations-The-emerging-market-study.html

  5. Ashik-Uz-Zaman, Abedin, Md. T., & Hossain, Md. S. (2025). Exploring risk resistant banking strategies: Implications for sustainable practices. Future Business Journal, 11(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00441-w

  6. Badaru, U. A., & Ibrahim, A. (2026). Liquidity management and financial performance of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria. Journal of Management Science and Entrepreneurship, 10(7), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.70382/bejmse.v10i7.051

  7. Ben Hamadou, F., Gharbi, O., & Boujelbène, M. (2026). Developing an ESG score for Tunisian banks: A quantile regression approach to assess its impact on financial performance with governance quality moderation. China Finance Review International, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-01-2025-0035

  8. Correia, S., Luck, S., & Verner, E. (2026). Bank failures: The roles of solvency and liquidity [Staff Reports]. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. https://doi.org/10.59576/sr.1181

  9. Dawes, J. G. (2026). Identifying the link between bank’s customer satisfaction scores and switching rates. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-11-2025-0911

  10. Diamond, D. W., & Rajan, R. G. (2001). Liquidity risk, liquidity creation, and financial fragility: A theory of banking. Journal of Political Economy, 109(2), 287–327. https://doi.org/10.1086/319552

  11. Egala, S. B., Boateng, D., & Mensah, S. A. (2021). To leave or retain? An interplay between quality digital banking services and customer satisfaction. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(7), 1420–1445. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-02-2021-0072

  12. Eltweri, A., Sawan, N., Al-Hajaya, K., & Badri, Z. (2024). The influence of liquidity risk on financial performance: A study of the UK’s largest commercial banks. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(12), 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17120580

  13. Fatawijaya, C., Joni, J., Martusa, R., & Prayogo, E. (2025). Political connected board of directors, sharia compliance and stock price synchronicity in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-01-2025-0040

  14. Fauziah, F., Atiqah, N., Kurniati, P., Prihantono, P., & Komaruddin, M. S. (2025). Corporate governance, risk management, and financial performance: The mediating role of risk governance in indonesia’s islamic banks. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business, 10(2), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.22515/shirkah.v10i2.858

  15. Financial Stability Institute. (2013). Basel III: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and liquidity risk monitoring tools. Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs238.htm

  16. Financial stability institute. (2013, January 7). Basel III: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and liquidity risk monitoring tools. https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs238.htm

  17. Financial Stability Institute. (2019). The capital buffers in Basel III - Executive Summary. Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/fsi/fsisummaries/b3_capital.htm

  18. Hamsyi, N. F., Rakhman, F., & Wijayana, S. (2025). The combined impact of ESG and Sharia compliance in mitigating stock price crash risk. Pacific Accounting Review, 37(4), 636–660. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-10-2024-0266

  19. Haq, M., Srivastava, N., & Wang, Z. (2026). Bank capital and liquidity risk: Influence of crisis and regulatory intervention. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 66(4), 1367–1409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-025-01433-1

  20. Hismendi, H., Raihan, R., Lianti, L., & Safaruddin, S. (2026). Analisis financial distress dan faktor yang mempengaruhinya pada Bank Perekonomian Rakyat Syariah di Provinsi Aceh. [Analysis of financial distress and Its influencing factors at Islamic People’s Economic Banks in Aceh Province]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe, 9(1), 101–110.

  21. Infobanknews.com. (2024). Lagi! OJK cabut izin usaha BPRS Saka Dana Mulia di Kudus. [Again! OJK revokes business licence of BPRS Saka Dana Mulia in Kudus]. https://infobanknews.com/lagi-ojk-cabut-izin-usaha-bprs-saka-dana-mulia-di-kudus

  22. Iqbal, Z., & Mirakhor, A. (2004). Stakeholders model of governance in Islamic economic system. Islamic Economic Studies, 11(2), 43–63. http://iesjournal.org/english/Docs/099.pdf

  23. Ismail, S., & Ahmed, E. (2023). The impact of liquidity risk, credit risk, and operational risk on financial stability in conventional banks in Jordan. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.3.006

  24. Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (2009). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. In R. S. Kroszner & L. Putterman (Eds.), The economic nature of the firm (3rd ed., pp. 283–303). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817410.023

  25. Jokipii, T., & Milne, A. (2011). Bank capital buffer and risk adjustment decisions. Journal of Financial Stability, 7(3), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2010.02.002

  26. Khairunnisak, Z., Purba, H., Barus, U. M., & Aprilyana, I. (2023). Good corporate governance in Sharia banking. Indonesian Journal of Business Analytics, 3(3), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijba.v3i3.4813

  27. Khan, I., & Zahid, S. N. (2020). The impact of Shari’ah and corporate governance on Islamic banks performance: Evidence from Asia. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 13(3), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-01-2019-0003

  28. Kim, Q. T. N. (2022). The effect of agency problem and internal control on credit risk at commercial banks in vietnam. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), 13(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJABIM.305114

  29. Ko, C., Lee, P., & Anandarajan, A. (2019). The impact of operational risk incidents and moderating influence of corporate governance on credit risk and firm performance. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 27(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-05-2017-0070

  30. Krüger, U., Roling, C., Silbermann, L., & Wong, L.-H. (2025). Bank’s strategic interaction, adverse price dynamics and systemic liquidity risk. Journal of Banking Regulation, 26(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-024-00240-3

  31. Kurniati, H., Saputra, K., & Tamza, F. B. (2022). Analisis pencabutan izin usaha dan likuidasi bank di indonesia. [Analysis of business license revocation and bank liquidation in Indonesia]. ASAS, 13(2), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.24042/asas.v13i2.11278

  32. Lestari, L. B., Yeni, A. A. P., & Ayu, A. Y. (2025). Determinants of non-performing financing of Islamic rural banks in Indonesia. Economics, Finance, and Business Review, 2(2), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.20885/efbr.vol2.iss2.art4

  33. Liu, J., & Xie, J. (2024). The effect of ESG performance on bank liquidity risk. Sustainability, 16(12), 4927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124927

  34. Madden, B. J., & Stevens, D. E. (2024). Michael Jensen’s contributions to the theory of the firm: A tribute in three acts. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 36(3), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12620

  35. Mafinanik, H., & Karman, A. (2025). Analisis peran OJK dalam penerapan manajemen risiko pada lembaga keuangan non-bank di Indonesia [Analysis of the role of the Financial Services Authority in implementing risk management in non-bank financial institutions in Indonesia]. MAMEN: Jurnal Manajemen, 4(4), 890–897. https://doi.org/10.55123/mamen.v4i4.4779

  36. Marakka, A. Y. R. D., & Oktaviana, U. K. (2023). Analysis of the effects of green banking, capital adequacy ratio on profitability growth with institutional ownership as a moderating variable. Malia: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 14(02), 217.

  37. Maulana, A., Dwita, M., Fitriyani, M., Sunaryo, D., & Adiyanto, Y. (2024). Risk management as a determinant of Indonesian banking financial performance: A systematic literature approach. Indo-Fintech Intellectuals: Journal of Economics and Business, 4, 2523–2537. https://doi.org/10.54373/ifijeb.v4i5.2120

  38. Minaryanti, A. A., Fitrijanti, T., Sukmadilaga, C., & Mihajat, M. I. S. (2024). The role of Sharia governance in minimizing credit risk in Islamic banking: A systematic literature review. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 17(2), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-11-2022-0301

  39. Mol-Gómez-Vázquez, A., Martínez-Sola, C., & Hernández-Cánovas, G. (2025). Financial constraints in lines of credit: The role of growth opportunities for vulnerable European SMEs. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 43(10), 2207–2228. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-01-2025-0038

  40. Mufidah, S. (2025). Good corporate governance and sustainability principle in Islamic Banking in Indonesia (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 5778883). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5778883

  41. Nguyen, P. A., Tran, B. L., & Simioni, M. (2021). Optimal capital adequacy ratio: An investigation of vietnamese commercial banks using two-stage DEA. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1870796. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1870796

  42. Nguyen, Q. T. T., Ho, L. T. H., & Nguyen, D. T. (2023). Digitalization and bank profitability: Evidence from an emerging country. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 41(7), 1847–1871. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-03-2023-0156

  43. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017, January 3). Surat Edaran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 1/SEOJK.03/2017 tentang Kewajiban Penyediaan Modal Minimum dan Pemenuhan Modal Inti Minimum Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah [Financial Services Authority Circular Letter Number 1/SEOJK.03/2017 concerning the Obligation to Provide Minimum Capital and Fulfillment of Minimum Core Capital for Sharia Rural Financing Banks] [HTML]. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://ojk.go.id/id/kanal/perbankan/regulasi/surat-edaran-ojk/Pages/Surat-Edaran-Otoritas-Jasa-Keuangan-Nomor-1-SEOJK.03-2017.aspx

  44. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2018, December 10). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 24/POJK.03/2018 tentang Penerapan Tata Kelola bagi Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah ]Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 24/POJK.03/2018 concerning the Implementation of Governance for Sharia Rural Financing Banks] [HTML]. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Pages/Penerapan-Tata-Kelola-bagi-Bank-Pembiayaan-Rakyat-Syariah.aspx

  45. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2022a, July 18). Surat Edaran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 11/SEOJK.03/2022 Tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Perkreditan Rakyat dan Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah [Circular Letter of the Financial Services Authority of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11/SEOJK.03/2022 concerning Assessment of the Soundness Level of Rural Banks and Sharia Rural Banks] [HTML]. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Pages/Penilaian-Tingkat-Kesehatan-BPR-dan-BPRS.aspx

  46. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2022b, December 11). OJK dorong penerapan GRC terintegrasi di sektor jasa keuangan [The Financial Services Authority is encouraging the implementation of integrated Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) in the financial services sector] [HTML]. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/info-terkini/Pages/OJK-Dorong-Penerapan-GRC-Terintegrasi-di-Sektor-Jasa-Keuangan.aspx

  47. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2024, April 19). OJK cabut izin usaha PT BPRS Saka Dana Mulia [OJK revokes business license of PT BPRS Saka Dana Mulia] [HTML]. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/pengumuman/Pages/OJK-Cabut-Izin-Usaha-PT-BPRS-Saka-Dana-Mulia.aspx

  48. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2025a, March 11). Surat Edaran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 2/SEOJK.03/2025 tentang Kewajiban Penyediaan Modal Minimum dan Pemenuhan Modal Inti Minimum Bagi Bank Perekonomian Rakyat [Financial Services Authority Circular Letter Number 2/SEOJK.03/2025 concerning the Obligation to Provide Minimum Capital and Fulfillment of Minimum Core Capital for People’s Economic Banks] [HTML]. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Pages/SEOJK-20325-Kewajiban-Penyediaan-Modal-Minimum-dan-Pemenuhan-Modal-Inti-Minimum-Bagi-BPR.aspx

  49. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2025b, July 24). Siaran pers: OJK perkuat tata kelola melalui pengembangan SI GRC terintegrasi [Press release: The Financial Services Authority strengthens governance through the development of an integrated Governance, Risk, and Compliance Information System (SI-GRC)] [HTML]. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/siaran-pers/Pages/OJK-Perkuat-Tata-Kelola-Melalui-Pengembangan-SI-GRC-Terintegrasi.aspx

  50. Panjaitan, S. A., & Lisdiono, P. (2024). Evaluasi manajemen risiko likuiditas untuk resiliensi bank XYZ. [Evaluation of liquidity risk management for XYZ bank resilience]. Owner, 8(3), 2760–2770. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v8i3.2174

  51. Park, H., & Hur, W.-M. (2025). Unpacking social selling in financial services: The interplay of organizational support, social media self-efficacy and sales technology orientation. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 43(9), 1990–2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-09-2024-0538

  52. Putri, D. A. R., & Rachmawati, L. (2022). Analysis of the growth rate of Islamic banks in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomika Dan Bisnis Islam, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.26740/jekobi.v5n1.p1-12

  53. Quoc Trung, N. K. (2021). The relationship between internal control and credit risk – The case of commercial banks in Vietnam. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1908760. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1908760

  54. Rabbanie, R. A., Ilham, M., & Zharif, M. D. (2023). Artikel ilmiah: Sejarah, perkembangan dan tantangan bagi bank syariah. [Scientific article: History, development and challenges for Islamic banks]. Religion : Jurnal Agama, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 2(4), 860–867. https://doi.org/10.55606/religion.v1i4.514

  55. Rahmatika, D., Andriansyah, Y., & Qubbaja, A. (2024). Enhancing Sharia compliance: Evaluating supervisory roles in a rural Islamic bank in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 10(2), 1241–1264. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol10.iss2.art29

  56. Ramadhanti, C., Marlina, & Hidayati, S. (2019). The Effect Capital Adequacy, Liquidity and Credit Risk to Profitability of Commercial Banks. Journal of Economics, Business, and Government Challenges, 2(01), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.33005/ebgc.v2i1.66

  57. Respati, A. R., & Sukmana, Y. (2024, April 19). OJK cabut izin usaha BPR Syariah Saka Dana Mulia di Kudus [OJK revokes business license of BPR Syariah Saka Dana Mulia in Kudus] [HTML]. KOMPAS.com. https://money.kompas.com/read/2024/04/19/210300926/ojk-cabut-izin-usaha-bpr-syariah-saka-dana-mulia-di-kudus-

  58. Rizkyawan, R. I., Jamilah, L., & Suroyya, S. (2025). Peran dan implementasi regulasi Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dalam pengawasan tingkat kesehatan Bank Muamalat [The role and implementation of the Financial Services Authority’s regulations in supervising the health level of Bank Muamalat]. Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrih.v5i1.6506

  59. Rohman, M. A., Pramesti, N. P., Nurfitri, N. R., & Puspasari, E. Y. (2024). Analisis pelanggaran hukum pada kasus pencabutan izin usaha bank Pengkreditan Rakyat Persada Guna Pasuruan.[Analysis of legal violations in the case of revocation of the business license of the Persada Guna Pasuruan People’s Credit Bank]. Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, 1(4), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v1i4.647

  60. Sari, A. P. (2023). The urgency of applying banking prudential principles in the era of disruption to minimize financing risks. Al-Muhasib: Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance, 3(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.30762/almuhasib.v3i2.1100

  61. Sari, S. P., & Sholikhah, H. (2019). Liquidity risk disclosure: A review of corporate governance. Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 4(2), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v4i2.8723

  62. Sewanyina, M., Manyange, M., & Ongesa, T. (2025). Mitigating credit risk through corporate governance: An investigation into the causal pathways from board accountability to reduced non-performing loans in Uganda’s commercial banks. F1000Research, 14, 1113. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.171389.1

  63. Sihotang, E. (2021). Implementation of good corporate governance and prudential principles (Prudential banking regulations) in banking. Journal Equity of Law and Governance, 1(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.22225/elg.1.1.3239.10-16

  64. Sulistyandari, S., Afwa, U., Sutrisno, P. A., & Nordin, R. (2024). Implementation of prudential banking principles: State responsibility in combating banking crimes in Indonesia. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 7(2), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v7i2.12132

  65. Sup, D. F. A., Firdaus, M. I., & Bilhaq, A. M. (2023). The analysis of sharia compliance in the implementation of KPR Syariah iB Hebat product at BPRS Dana Amanah Surakarta. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 9(2), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol9.iss2.art1

  66. Sup, D. F. A., Firdaus, M. I., & Bilhaq, A. M. (2024). Prospects for the development of Sharia financing contract on KPR Syariah iB Hebat at BPRS Dana Amanah Surakarta. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 10(2), 771–794. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol10.iss2.art8

  67. Trinh, Q. D., Haddad, C., & Salameh, E. (2025). Do country institutions, banking system soundness and ownership structure influence the relationship between reporting quality and dividend payouts? Insights from Asian emerging markets. Asian Review of Accounting, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-02-2025-0045

  68. Umami, D. R., & Rani, L. N. (2021). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi non performing financing bank pembiayaan rakyat syariah periode 2015-2019. [Factors affecting non-performing financing of sharia rural banks for 2015-2019 period]. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori Dan Terapan, 8(4), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.20473/vol8iss20214pp483-495

  69. Utami, R. B., & Damayanti, C. R. (2024). Does corporate governance enhance bank performance? A meta-analysis of global islamic banking. El-Barka Journal of Islamic Economics and Business, 7(1), 27–61. https://doi.org/10.21154/elbarka.v7i1.8660

  70. Wahyuni, S., & Hayati, N. (2022). Analysis good corporate governance, internal control, and whistleblowing system and fraud. Journal of Business & Banking, 12(1), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.14414/jbb.v12i1.3260

  71. Wang, P., Shang, Y., & Bai, Z. (2026). From health to wealth: The impact of surviving a health crisis on individuals’ cryptocurrency investment. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 44(7), 1424–1446. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-04-2025-0261

  72. Widianti, T. (2024, April 19). Tindak lanjut cabut izin usaha PT BPRS Saka Dana Mulia.[Follow-up action to revoke the business license of PT BPRS Saka Dana Mulia]. https://lps.go.id/peng-35-sekl-2024-tentang-tindak-lanjut-cabut-izin-usaha-pt-bprs-saka-dana-mulia/

  73. Wijayanti, R., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Social reporting by Islamic banks: The role of Sharia Supervisory Board and the effect on firm performance. Sustainability, 14(17), 10965. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710965

  74. Yulfiswandi, Y., & Halim, R. S. (2024). Analisis risiko likuiditas pada bank umum syariah di Indonesia.[Analysis of liquidity risk in Islamic commercial banks in Indonesia]. Journal of Management : Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), 17(2), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.35508/jom.v17i2.17069

  75. Yuliyanti, A., & Cahyonowati, N. (2023). Pengaruh dewan direksi, dewan komisaris, komisaris independen, komite audit, kepemilikan manajerial, dan kepemilikan institusional terhadap kinerja keuangan.[The influence of the board of directors, independent commissioners, audit committee, managerial ownership, and institutional ownership on financial performance]. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 12(3). https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting/article/view/40175

  76. Zahrawani, D. R., & Sholikhah, N. (2021). Analisis Penerapan Good Corporate Governance (GCG) dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kinerja Lembaga Bank Syariah. [Analysis of the implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) and Its impact on the performance of Islamic Banks]. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 7(3), 1799–1818. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v7i3.3611

  77. Zakiya, W., Hamzah, & Adhan S., S. (2025). Evaluasi normatif pengaturan dan pengawasan OJK terhadap sektor perbankan berdasarkan prinsip good governance [Normative evaluation of the Financial Services Authority’s regulation and supervision of the banking sector based on the principles of good governance]. Al-Zayn : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(6), 8802–8807. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i6.2665

  78. Zhao, S., Hunjra, A. I., Roubaud, D., & Zhu, F. (2025). How does perception of economic policy uncertainty affect corporate greenwashing? International Journal of Bank Marketing, 44(5), 869–897. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-09-2024-0590