Article Sidebar

Submitted
January 9, 2018
Accepted
January 9, 2018
Published
January 9, 2018
Download
Word(EN) PDF(ID)
Statistic
Read Counter : 233 Download : 1146

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine partial and simultaneous influence of interest rates on deposits, deposits of mudaraba, the price of state shari'a securities (SBSN), Rupiah exchange rate against US Dollar, and the Index of Industrial Production on the price of corporate Islamic bonds in Indonesia, for short-term or long-term period. Data are obtained from published reports of Bank Indonesia, Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS), ICAMEL library, Indonesian Capital Market Electronic Library during January 2010 to July 2015, and web support providing the price of Islamic bonds data. Corporations that become the objects of this research are PT. Listrik Negara (PLN), PT. Indosat, Tbk, and PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia. The results using Error Correction Model (ECM) at PT. Perusahaan Listrik Negara show that variables affecting the price of Islamic bonds in short-term period are Shari’a Securities (SBSN), Index of Industrial Production, shari’a securities (SBSN) and bond prices in the previous month, while in long-term period, variables that affect the price of Islamic bonds are shari’a securities (SBSN) and Index of Industrial Production. As for PT. Indosat, variables that affect price of Islamic bonds in short-term period is the profit share of deposits, while in long-term period, they are the interest rate of deposits and the Index of Industrial Production. As for PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia, variables that affect the price of Islamic bonds in short-term period is the deposits, the State Shari’a Securities, the previous price, and the previous deposit rates, while in the long-term period, they include the outcome of deposits, and state shari’a securities.

Article Details

References

  1. Amir, A. (2007). Pengaruh suku bunga SBI, IHSG, kurs, ROA, dan LEG1 harga obligasi terhadap harga obligasi konvensional dan syariah (Studi kasus PT. Bank Bukopin, Tbk Tahun 2003). Universitas Indonesia.
  2. Ayturk, Y., Asutay, M., & Aksak, E. (2017). What explains corporate sukuk primary market spreads? Research in International Business and Finance, 40, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIBAF.2017.01.002
  3. Hastin, M., Idris, & Aimon, H. (2013). Analisis pasar obligasi pemerintah di Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi, 1(2), 241–258. Retrieved from http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/ekonomi/article/view/750
  4. Koop, G. (2006). Analysis of financial data. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  5. Koop, G. (2013). Analysis of economic data (Fourth Ed.). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  6. Mohamed, H. H., Masih, M., & Bacha, O. I. (2015). Why do issuers issue Sukuk or conventional bond? Evidence from Malaysian listed firms using partial adjustment models. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 34, 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PACFIN.2015.02.004
  7. Nagano, M. (2016). Who issues Sukuk and when?: An analysis of the determinants of Islamic bond issuance. Review of Financial Economics, 31, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2016.05.002
  8. Naifar, N., Hammoudeh, S., & Al dohaiman, M. S. (2016). Dependence structure between sukuk (Islamic bonds) and stock market conditions: An empirical analysis with Archimedean copulas. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 44, 148–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INTFIN.2016.05.003
  9. Wafa, M. A. K. (2010). Analisa faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tingkat permintaan sukuk ritel-I (Periode Maret 2009-Juni 2010). La_Riba, 4(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.20885/lariba.vol4.iss2.art2