Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 14, 2016
Accepted
August 3, 2016
Published
November 17, 2016
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 409 Download : 234

Main Article Content

Abstract

Sukuk  has  been  developed  rapidly  both  in  quality  and  quantity,  this  can  be  proved  by the  rapid  development  in  the  international  financial  landscape  and   is   also   regarded as   the   most   successful   financial   products   among   Islamic    financial  institutions  in  the  realm  of  the  world.  As  one  of  the  long-term  financing  instruments,  sukuk  has  become  an  alternative  funding  to  be  obtained for the investment and projects for governments and companies. In Indonesia, the SBSN development has an outstanding value of Rp 298 trillion, or  equal  with  13%  from  the  total  debt  securities  issued  by  the  government  in  September  2015  which  showed  the  value  of  Rp  2.306  trillion.  Sukuk  is  essentially certificate of ownership of an asset (real project) that can be used on a large scale to defray the construction of sukuk which are not included into buying and selling securities in secondary market, but a financing. Sukuk has assurance in the form of main asset (collateral assets) and serves as the basis for the issuance of sukuk to avoid riba by the prerequis its elements that be traded. The purpose of this article is to present a solution in optimizing the asset-based sukuk that are asset of utilization waqf endowments given in Indonesia which is  not  yet  optimal.  The  method  used  is  the  study  of  literature.  The  conceptis  generated in the form of waqf asset utilization as underlying assets for sukuk. Where  the  sukuk  was  issued  through  a  Special  Purpose  Vehicle  (SPV)  as  the  representative  body  nadzirin  this  Indonesian  Waqf  Board  (IWB)  to  be  leased  to  investors.  Sukuk  is  expected  to  support  the  optimization  of  endowment  assets  to  be  more  productive  as  well  as  a  challenge  to  change  consumption  patterns  and  preferences  with  their  moral  filter  in  the  form  of  awareness  of  social  solidarity.  As  a  result,  the  concept  of  Pareto  optimum  which  does  not  recognize the existence of a solution that does not require the sacrifice of the minority (wealthy) in order to improve the welfare of the majority (poor) do not apply anymore.

Keywords

sukuk underlying assets waqf

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Ima Maspupah, Shofia Mauizotun Hasanah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Maspupah, I., & Hasanah, S. M. (2016). The Reinforcement of Islam Philanthropy by Means of Waqf Optimizing based on Sukuk. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 2(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol2.iss2.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Abozaid, A., & Al-Jarhi, M. (2010). Reasons for failure of some sukuk issuances. In Islamic sukuk: Examination & revaluation. Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: International Fiqh Academy, IRTI & Islamic Economics Research Center.
  2. Al-Masri, R. Y. (2006). Renting an item to who sold it: Is it different from bay’ al-wafa’ contract? Journal of King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics, 19(2), 39–42. Retrieved from http://iei.kau.edu.sa/Files/121/Files/153883_IEI-VOL-19-2-07E-AlMasri.pdf
  3. Ambrose, A. H. A. A., Aslam, M., & Hanafi, H. (2015). The possible role of waqf in ensuring a sustainable Malaysian federal government debt. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01205-8
  4. Anderson, J. N. D. (1951). The religious element in Waqf endowments. Journal of The Royal Central Asian Society, 38(4), 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/03068375108731420
  5. Anwar, T. (2015). Islamic gift economy vis-Ã -vis waqf (endowment) as vehicles for social entrepreneurship. International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, 6(4), 386. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPEE.2015.075864
  6. Ayyub, M. (2007). Understanding Islamic finance. New Jersey, US: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  7. Azmat, S., Skully, M., & Brown, K. (2014). The Shariah compliance challenge in Islamic bond markets. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 28, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2013.11.003
  8. Bayinah, A. N. (2012). Exploring and empowering waqf invesment toward an acceleration of economic development in Indonesia. In Conference Proceedings: Annual International Conference on Islamic Studies (AICIS) XII (pp. 2681–2707). Surabaya, Indonesia: UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. Retrieved from http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/7531/
  9. Dusuki, A. W. (2010). Do equity-based Sukuk structures in Islamic capital markets manifest the objectives of Shariah?? Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 15(3), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1057/fsm.2010.17
  10. Fahruroji, & Arifin, J. (2015). Pengembangan harta wakaf di Singapura. Equilibrium, 3(1), 104–125. https://doi.org/10.21043/equilibrium.v3i1.1274
  11. Haji Mohammad, M. T. S. (2011). Towards an Islamic aocial (waqf) bank. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 2(5), 381–386. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJTEF.2011.V2.135
  12. Haji Mohammad, M. T. S. (2015). Theoretical and trustees’ perspectives on the establishment of an Islamic social (Waqf) bank. Humanomics, 31(1), 37–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/H-05-2013-0032
  13. Huda, M. (2012). Arah pembaruan hukum wakaf Indonesia. Ulumuna, 16(1), 125–142. Retrieved from http://ulumuna.or.id/index.php/ujis/article/view/107
  14. Huda, N., & Nasution, M. E. (2007). Investasi pada pasar modal syariah. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  15. Jusmaliani (Ed.). (2008). Investasi syariah impementasi konsep pada kenyataan empirik. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Kreasi Wacana.
  16. Kholid, M., Sukmana, R., & Hassan, K. A. K. (2009). Waqf through sukuk al-intifa’a: A proposed generic model. Gombak, Malaysia. Retrieved from https://islamicbanker.com/publications/waqf-through-sukuk-al-intifa
  17. Masyarakat Ekonomi Syariah (MES). (2015). Sharia economic outlook 2016. Jakarta, Indonesia: Masyarakat Ekonomi Syariah.
  18. Mohamad Suhaimi, F., Ab Rahman, A., & Marican, S. (2014). The role of share waqf in the socio-economic development of the Muslim community. Humanomics, 30(3), 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/H-12-2012-0025
  19. Nazar, J. K. (2011). Meningkatkan kesesuaian syariah sukuk. Iqtishodia: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam Republika, 25. Retrieved from http://ftp.unpad.ac.id/koran/republika/2011-01-27/republika_2011-01-27_025.pdf
  20. Omar, H. H., & Ab Rahman, A. (2013). Aplikasi sukuk dalam melestarikan aset wakaf: Pengalaman pemegang amanah wakaf terpilih. Jurnal Syariah, 21(2), 89–116. Retrieved from http://www.myjurnal.my/filebank/published_article/25925/01.pdf
  21. Osman, Z. (2012). Pengurusan wakaf: Pengalaman Singapura. In Seminar wakaf serantau tentang instrumen wakaf: Menjana pembangunan ekonomi dan tamadun ummah. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  22. Qahaf, M. (2004). Manajemen wakaf produktif. Jakarta, Indonesia: Khalifa.
  23. Rozalinda. (2015). Manajemen wakaf produktif. Jakarta, Indonesia: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  24. Saputra, B. (2007). Pasar modal syariah Indonesia: Alternatif instrumen investasi. Makassar: ADEI.
  25. Saripudin, K. N., Mohamad, S., Mohd Razif, N. F., Abdullah, L. H., & Rahman, N. N. A. (2012). Case study on Sukuk musharakah issued in Malaysia. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 12(2), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2012.12.2.1681
  26. Securities Commission Malaysia. (2009). Ijarah mawsufah fi zimmah (Forward lease). Malaysian ICM: Quarterly Bulletin of Malaysian Islamic Capital Market, 4(4), 2–7. Retrieved from https://www.sc.com.my/wp-content/uploads/eng/html/icm/0912_msianicm.pdf
  27. Stibbard, P., Russell, D., & Bromley, B. (2012). Understanding the waqf in the world of the trust. Trusts & Trustees, 18(8), 785–810. https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/tts087
  28. Wadjdy, F., & Mursyid. (2007). Wakaf & kesejahteraan umat: Filantropi Islam yang hampir terlupakan. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Pustaka Pelajar.
  29. Wahid, N. A. (2010). Sukuk: Memahami dan membedah obligasi pada perbankan syariah. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Ar-Ruzz Media.
  30. Yasir. (2009). Analisis tentang pembaharuan hukum perwakafan. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 7(1), 80–85. Retrieved from http://jurnaljam.ub.ac.id/index.php/jam/article/view/137
  31. Zulkhibri, M. (2015). A synthesis of theoretical and empirical research on sukuk. Borsa Istanbul Review, 15(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIR.2015.10.001