Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to get an overview of the legal protection of traditional cultural expressions in the Yogyakarta that will maintain several cultures from ownership claims by other parties or other nations. For this reason, efforts are needed so that the culture can be preserved from destruction and loss of culture due to claims of ownership by other parties. This research is a normative juridical research that takes data in the field as primary material. The result of this study is to protect against traditional cultural expressions which are communal, which is very different from the general intellectual property regime such as song copyrights, marks, patents which are very individualistic. The regulation regarding its proper protection component is carried out by using preventive protection as practiced by the Department of Culture of the Yogyakarta Province and the Culture and Tourism Office of Sleman Regency, namely by conducting cultural inventory and documentation, as mandated in Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright especially Article 38. Recording of non-material cultural heritage is considered important because some elements of cultural heritage do not begin to be threatened with extinction or potentially claimed ownership by other countries. Until 2016, 444 intangible cultural works were registered as Indonesian Intangible Cultural Heritage managed by the Directorate General of Culture, Ministry of Education and Culture. While the Yogyakarta Department of Culture has attempted to carry out an inventory of several cultures in Yogyakarta. There are 22 (twenty-two) cultural works recorded in Yogyakarta that have been designated as intangible cultural heritage of Indonesia.

Article Details

References

  1. Asri, D. P. B. (2016). Implementasi Pasal 38 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 terhadap Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional di Kabupaten Sleman. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 23, (4).
  2. ---------------. (2014). Model Kebijakan Strategis Terhadap Pelestarian Kebudayaan Lokal “Merti Code” Sebagai Aset Daerah Untuk Meningkatkan Sektor Pariwisata Berbasis Budaya. Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Bappeda Pemerintahan Kota, 1.
  3. ---------------. (2012). Perlindungan Hukum Traditional Knowledge dalam Rangka Perlindungan Budaya Lokal di Kotagede Untuk Meningkatkan Pariwisata. Hasil Penelitian Pemerintahan Kota Yogyakarta.
  4. Ayu, Miranda Risang., Permata, Rika Ratna., & Rafianti, Laina. (2017). Sistem Perlindungan Sumber Daya Budaya Tak Benda di Palembang, Sumatera Selatan, Indonesia. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 29, 2.
  5. Badan Pusat Statisik (BPS) Nasional Tahun 2014, diakses tanggal 7 Mei 2015
  6. Hadjon, Phillipus M. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: PT. Bina Ilmu.
  7. Muchsin. (2003). Perlindungan dan Kepastian Hukum Bagi Investor di Indonesia, Surakarta. Tesis Magister Ilmu Hukum Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret.
  8. Perangin-angin, Reh Bungana Beru. (2017). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Tahunan Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Negeri Medan. e-ISSN: 2549-5976 p-ISSN: 2549-435X.
  9. Rafian, Laina., & Sabrina, Qoliqina Zolla. (2014). Perlindungan bagi 'Kustodian' Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Nadran Menurut Hukum Internasional danImplementasinya dalam Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (PJIH), 1, 3.
  10. Rahardjo, Satjipto. (1993). Penyelenggaraan Keadilan dalam Masyarakat yang Sedang Berubah. Jurnal Masalah Hukum.
  11. Riswandi, Budi Agus., & Syamsudin, M. (2005). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Budaya Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
  12. Sardjono, Agus. (2006). Hak Kekayaan lntelektual & Pengetahuan Tradisional. Bandung: PT. Alumni.
  13. Setyaningtyas, Ayu Citra dan Kawuryan, Endang Sri. (2016). Menjaga Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungai, 1, 1.
  14. Wedhatami, Bayangsari dan Santoso, Budi. (2014). Upaya Perlindungan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Dengan Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah. Jurnal Law Reform, 9, 2.
  15. Weerawit, Weeraworawit. (2003). Formulating an International Legal Protection for Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore: Challenges for The Intellectual Pro-pertysystem. Journal of International and Comparative Law, 769-783.