Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the barriers to the application of international trademark registration for MSME after the issuance of Presidential Regulation No. 92 of 2017 concerning Ratification of Madrid Protocols. Another purpose of this research is to find out the government's efforts in facing obstacles to international brand registration applications for MSMEs.This research is a normative legal research using primary data and secondary data. Primary data was collected through interviews with the guidelines of the interview, while secondary data obtained through the method of documentation with a study of the documentation and data analysis done qualitatively.The results of this study are: First, there are obstacles to the application of international trademark registration for MSMEs after the issuance of Presidential Regulation No. 92 of 2017 concerning the Ratification of the Madrid Protocol because of the lack of interest and insight of MSMEs on international trademark registration applications, general regulations, language difficulties, and the cost of expensive brand registration applications. Second, the efforts made by the government to face obstacles for MSMEs are by making rules for reducing the cost of applying for basic brand registration, the existence of a special team of the Madrid Protocol and increasing socialization of brands and applications for trademark registration using the Madrid Protocol.

Article Details

References

  1. Adi, Rianto. (2012). Sosiologi Hukum Kajian Hukum Secara Sosiologis. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.
  2. Ali, Zainuddin. (2009). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
  3. Azwar, Saifuddin. (1998). Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar
  4. Alfons, Maria. 2010. Implementasi Perlindungan Indikasi Geografis Atas Produk- Produk Masyarakat Lokal dalam Perspektif Hak Kekakyaan Intelektual. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya. p. 18.
  5. Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual, “Sosialisasi Pendaftaran Merek Internasional Madrid Protokol”. Desember 1, 2018. http://www.dgip.go.id/sosialisasi- pendaftaran-merek-internasional-madrid-protoco.
  6. Dhawy, Afif. (2018, September 25). Personal Interview.
  7. Hartono, Sri Redjeki. 1993. Aspek Hukum Perdata Perlindungan Hak Milik
  8. Intelektual. Semarang: Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Undip.
  9. Hastarini, Isabella Yudha. (2018, September 28). Personal Interview.
  10. Issetiabudi, David Eka. “Ini Dampak Protokol Madrid Bagi Konsultan & Pemilik Merek”. Maret 26, 2018. http://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20171003/16/695579/ini-dampak- protokol-madrid-bagi-konsultan-pemilik-merek.
  11. Jened, Rahmi. (2013). Hukum Merek : Trademark Law. Prenada Media.
  12. Kelsen, Hans. (1967). Pure Theory Of Law, Translation from the Secon German Edition. Translated by : Max Knight, Berkeley, Los Angeles. London : University of California Press.
  13. Kurniawan, Rasyid. (2018, November 3). Personal Interview.
  14. Kompas, “Paten Kopi Gayo Milik Belanda, Toraja Milik Jepang”. Desember 5, 2018. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2008/05/28/15421243/paten. kopi. gayo. milik. belanda. toraja. Milik. jepang.
  15. Nurhayati, Irna & Merdekawati, Agustina. (2008). “Relevansi Keikutsertaan Indonesia Dalam International Registration of Marks Madrid System Melalui Ratifikasi Madrid Protocol Terhadap Potensi Peningkatan Daya Saing Bangsa Indonesia di Bidang Perdagangan Internasional”, Mimbar Hukum, Vol.20 No. 3.
  16. Riswandi, Budi Agus. (2018, Oktober 21). Personal Interview.
  17. Setiawan, Arief. (2018, Oktober 25). Personal Interview.
  18. Setiawan, Arief. (2018, November 27). Personal Interview.
  19. Sumardjono & SW, Maria. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  20. Suryomurcito, Gunawan. (2007). “Accession to Madrid System Issues, Prospects and Expectations”, Seminar The Madrid Protocol for International Registration of Marks the Benefits and Challenges for Indonesia, Jakarta, 24 April 2007.
  21. Utomo, Tomi Suryo (2010). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) di Era Global: Sebuah
  22. Kajian Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
  23. UMKM Indonesia, “Sertifikat Merek”. Desember 4, 2018. https://www.ukmindonesia.id/baca- artikel/95.
  24. Waluyo, Sri Hadi. (2018, September 5). Personal Interview.
  25. Wuri, Lidwina . (2018, September 21). Personal Interview.
  26. World Intelectual Property Organization. Oktober 29, 2018. http:// www. wipo. int/ finance/ en/madrid. Html.
  27. World Intelectual Property Organization. Oktober 29, 2018. http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/.
  28. Kumparan, “UKM Daftarkan Merek Lewat Sistem Protokol Madrid Masih Sunyi”. Desember 4, 2018. https://kumparan.com/media-center-kementerian-hukum-dan-ham/ukm- daftarkan-merek-ke-luar-negeri-sistem-protokol-madrid-masih-sunyi 27431110790549847.
  29. Yudistira, Andra Bayu. BEKRAF, “Penandatanganan Perjanjian Kerja Sama Badan Ekonomi Kreatif (Bekraf) dengan Lembaga Pengelola Dana Bergulir – Koperasi dan Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah (LPDB – KUMKM). Desember 4, 2018. http://www.bekraf.go.id/berita/page/10/76-penandatanganan-perjanjian-kerja-sama-badan-ekonomi-kreatif-bekraf-dengan-lembaga-pengelola-dana- bergulir-koperasi-dan-usaha-mikro-kecil-dan-menengah-lpdb-kumkm.