Main Article Content

Abstract

The use of the Password Protection Online Course as a Technological Protection Measure (TPM) then gives rise to various dynamics of pros and cons regarding the impacts. So in this case it is necessary to conduct a study regarding the dynamics of using Password Protection Online Courses as a Technological Protection Measure (TPM) and Efforts to Protect Copyright of Online Course Content against Illegal Takeover of Access Rights Through Password Protection. The type of research used is normative research with a normative juridical approach. The results of this research show that Technologies Protection Measures (TPM) is a technology that can be used to protect documents from digital works with copyright. Efforts to realize copyright protection are carried out by creators to protect their creations from piracy or text mining which may be carried out on the online course content they create. The use of password protection utilizes the use of security technology to protect copyright and economic rights as regulated in articles 52 and 53 of the Copyright Law. Thus, it can be concluded that collaborative efforts between security technology or TPM and the legal provisions in the Copyright Law, ITE Law, WIPO and Bern Convention on Corporate Rights are quite good and provide comprehensive protection. Regulating the use of security technology includes protecting the moral and economic rights of a work. This provides benefits for creators in protecting their creative works in digital form and their distribution, the regulations for which have been implemented in the Copyright Law.

Keywords

Hak Cipta Online Course Password Protection

Article Details

How to Cite
Pradika, Agun. 2024. “PASSWORD PROTECTION TPM LINDUNGI HAK CIPTA KONTEN ONLINE COURSE DARI PENGAMBILALIHAN ILEGAL”. JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.20885/jipro.vol7.iss1.art1.

References

  1. Thomas J. Smedinghoff, “Copyright in Digital Information”, Online Law The SPA’s Legal Guide To Doing Business on The Internet, New York: Addison-Wesley Developers Press. 2000.
  2. Viriginia Montecino, “Copyright and Internet”, http://wwmason.gmu.edu/montecin, 1996, hal. 2 dalam Yusran Isnaini, “Hak Cipta dan Tantangannya di Era Cyber Space”, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2008.
  3. Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, cet. 10, Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2007.
  4. Jessica Litman, “Digital Copyright and The Progress of Science, Joint Conference on Digital Libraries 2002”, Portland, Oregon, USA, July 14- 18, 2002.
  5. David Mann, “Digital Rights Management and People with Sight Loss”, INDICARE Monitor, Vol. 2, No 11, 27 January 2006.
  6. Christina J. Angelopoulos, “Modern Intellectual Property Legislation: Warm For Reform”, Ent. L.R. 2008.
  7. Severine Dusollier, “Exceptions and Technological Measures in the European Copyright Directive of 2001 - An Empty Promise”, I.I.C. 2003.
  8. Paola Magnani & Maria Lilla Montagnani, “Digital Rights Management Systems And Competition: What Developments Within The Much Debated Interface Between Intellectual Property And Competition Law?”, IIC 2008.
  9. Anne Klinefelter, “Copyright and Electronic Library Resources” , Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 2001.
  10. Heather A. Sapp, Note, “Garage Door Openers And Printer Cartridges: Why Congress Should Revisit The Anti-Circumvention Provisions of DMCA”, 3 Buff. Intell. Prop. L.J. 135 2005-2006.
  11. Simon Fitzpatrick, “Copyright Imbalance: U.S. And Australian Responses To The WIPO Digital Copyright Treaty”, E.I.P.R. 2000.
  12. Fred von Lohmann, “Measuring The Digital Millennium Copyright Act Against The Darknet: Implications For The Regulation Of Technological Protection Measures”, 24 Loyola Of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, 2004.
  13. Tim Lindsey, dkk., Hak Kekayaan Intelektual-Suatu Pengantar, Alumni, Bandung, 2006.
  14. Alana Maurushat, Technological Protection Measures: Tilting at the Copyright Windmill, 2005.
  15. Denise Rosemary Nicholson, “Digital Rights Management and Access to Information: A Developing Country’s Perspective,” Libres Journal (2009).
  16. Cornish, William. 2004. Intellectual Property: Omnipresent, Distracting, Irrelevant? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  17. Tim Lindsey (ed), Eddy Damian, Simon Butt, dan Tomi Suryo Utomo, 2003, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual – Suatu Pengantar, Penerbit Alumni Bandung dan Asian Law Group.
  18. Eddy Damian, Hukum Hak Cipta Menurut Beberapa Konvensi internasional. Undang- undang Hak Cipta 1997 dan Perlindungannya terhadap Buku serta Perjanjian Penerbitannya, Bandung : PT. Alumni, 1999.
  19. Carlos M. Correa, 2000, Intellectual Property Rights, the WTO and Developing Countries – The TRIPs Agreement and Policy Options, Zed Books dan Third World Network.
  20. Graeme B. Dinwoodie, William O. Hennessey, dan Shira Perlmutter, 2001, International Intellectual Property Law and Policy, LexisNexis.
  21. Anne Fitzgerald, 2002, Intellectual Property, LBC Nutshell second edition, Lawbook Co., NSW Australia.