Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 317 Download : 442

Main Article Content

Abstract

The advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has enabled the creation of music through deepfake methods that realistically mimic the voice, style, and characteristics of artists without their involvement or consent. While this innovation brings new possibilities to the music industry, it also raises significant legal issues, particularly regarding the recognition of AI as an author, the legal protection of AI-generated musical works, and the potential infringement of the original creator’s economic and moral rights. This study aims to examine the legal status and protection of musical works produced by AI using deepfake techniques under Indonesian Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright, and to compare it with the legal system of the United States. This research employs a normative juridical method, combining a descriptive-analytical and comparative law approach, with a focus on secondary data derived from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The findings show that neither Indonesia nor the United States currently recognizes AI as a creator. Copyright protection is only granted if there is a significant human contribution to the creation process. However, Indonesia lacks specific regulations addressing AI, deepfake technology, or objective standards to assess originality and the threshold of similarity, which creates legal uncertainty in enforcing copyright law for AI-generated music.

Keywords

Copyright Artificial intelligence Music Deepfake

Article Details

License

The works in this journal are openly licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).

This license grants readers the freedom to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially under the following conditions:

  1. Attribution
    Readers must give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and JIPRO, provide a link to the CC BY-SA 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/), and indicate if changes were made. Such credit must not imply endorsement by the licensor.

  2. ShareAlike
    If readers remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same CC BY-SA 4.0 license.

  3. No Additional Restrictions
    Readers may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from exercising the rights granted by the license.

How to Cite
Latifatunnisa, Raihani, Ahmad M. Ramli, and Ranti Fauza Mayana. 2024. “PEMANFAATAN MUSIK BUATAN AI MELALUI DEEPFAKE: STUDI HUKUM KOMPARATIF INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT”. JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property 7 (2):188-211. https://doi.org/10.20885/jipro.vol7.iss2.art5.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta
  2. Copyright Law of the United States (Copyright Acts of 1976).
  3. Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices
  4. Tennessee Ensuring Likeness Voice and Image Security (ELVIS Act)
  5. Ahmad M. Ramli, Lagu-Musik dan Hak Cipta, Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2022.
  6. Ahmad M. Ramli dan Tasya Safiranita Ramli, Hukum sebagai Infrastruktur Transformasi Indonesia: Regulasi dan Kebijakan Digital, Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2022.
  7. Eddy Damian, Hukum Hak Cipta, Bandung: PT Alumni, 2019.
  8. Emi Sita Eriana dan Afrizal Zein, Artificial Intelligence, Eureka Media Aksara, Jawa Tengah, 2024.
  9. OK. Saidin, Aspek Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (Intellectual Property Rights), Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2019.
  10. Ranti Fauza Mayana (et.al), Hak Cipta dan Artificial Intelligence, Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2024.
  11. Ranti Fauza M dan Tisni Santika, Kekayaan Intelektual & Kesehatan Masyarakat, Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2021.
  12. Rika Ratna Permata (et.al), Hak Cipta Era Digital dan Pengaturan Doktrin Fair Use di Indonesia, Bandung: PT Refika Aditama, 2022.
  13. Adya Paramitha Prabandari, “Komparasi Pengaturan Hak Cipta di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat”, Jurnal Universitas Diponegoro, 2021, hlm. 167
  14. ’Aisy, Firsta Rahadatul. “Efektivitas Perjanjian Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Lisensi Merek Dagang Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Impresi Indonesia 1, no. 12 (2022): 1266–72. https://doi.org/10.58344/jii.v1i12.1302.
  15. Ana Ramalho, “Will Robots Rule the (Artistic) World? A Proposed Model for the Legal Status of Creations by Artificial Intelligence Systems”, Forthcoming in the Journal of Internet Law, 2017, hlm. 5.
  16. Ari Juliano Gema, “Masalah Penggunaan Ciptaan Sebagai Data Masukan Dalam Pengembangan Artificial Intelligence Di Indonesia”, Technology and Economics Law Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, hlm. 1-14.
  17. Asma Karim, “Legal Standing Pemegang Hak Merek Terdaftar yang Belum Dimohonkan Perpanjangan”, Jurnal Yudisial, Vol. 13 No. 1 April 2020.
  18. Clianta Manuella Kondoahi (et.al), “Regulasi Hukum Terhadap Perlindungan Karya Cipta Lagu Yang Dihasilkan Oleh Teknologi Artificial Intelligence”, Lex Administratum, Vol. 12 No. 5, 2024.
  19. Eka Nanda R. dan Lintang Yudhantaka, “Artificial Intelligence Sebagai Subjek Hukum: Tinjauan Konseptual dan Tantangan Pengaturan di Indonesia”, Notaire, Vol. 5 No. 3, 2022.
  20. Elsa Amalia Wear (et.al.), “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengguna Suara penyanyi dalam Pembuatan Karya Seni Musik Menggunakan Kecerdasan Buatan”, KANJOLI Business Law Review, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2024.
  21. Ghaesany Fadhila dan U. Sudjana, “Perlindungan Karya Cipta Lagu dan/atau Musik yang Dinyanyikan Ulang (Cover Song)”, Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan dan ke- PPAT-an, Vol. 1 No. 2, 2018.
  22. Marcelina Sutanto, Skripsi: Perlindungan Hukum atas Ciptaan yang Dihasilkan oleh AI, Makassar: Unhas, 2021, hlm. 101.
  23. Rafly Nauval Fadillah, “Perlindungan Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual Artificial Intelligence (AI) dari Perspektif Hak Cipta dan Paten”, Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum dan Masyarakat, No. 2, 2024.
  24. Rahmadi Indra Tektona (et.al), “Quo Vadis Undang-Undang Hak Cipta di Indonesia: Perbandingan Konsep Ciptaan Artificial Intelligence di Beberapa Negara”, Jurnal Negara Hukum, Vol. 12 No. 2, 2021.
  25. Rayhan Atthallah Malik Agustiar dan Wardani Rizkianti, “Perbandingan Aturan Hukum Antara Indonesia Dengan Amerika Serikat Mengenai Plagiarisme Karya Cipta Lagu”, Proceeding: 5th National Conference on Law Studies, 2024.
  26. Ranti Fauza Mayana, (et.al), “Legal Issues of Artificial Intelligence – Generated Works: Challenges on Indonesian Copyright Law”, Law Reform, 20(1), 2024.
  27. Rika Ratna Permata dan Tasya Safiranita Ramli, “Regulasi Doktrin Fair Use Terhadap Pemanfaatan Hak Cipta Pada Platform Digital Semasa dan/atau Pasca Pandemi Covid-19”, Dialogia Iuridica, Vol. 13 No. 1, 2021.
  28. Tasya Safiranita Ramli (et.al), “Aspek Hukum Atas Konten Hak Cipta Dikaitkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2020.
  29. Ahmad M. Ramli, “Argumen “Fair Use” Startup atas Pro-Kontra AI dan Industri Musik”, Oleh Kompas.com, https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2024/08/07/110242165/argumen- fair-use-startup-atas-pro-kontra-ai-dan-industri-musik?page=all, 2024, diakses pada 19 September 2024.
  30. Ahmad M. Ramli, “Bagaimana Seharusnya Artificial Intelligence (AI) Dikembangkan?”, https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2024/05/11/103516865/bagaimana- seharusnya-artificial-intelligence-ai-dikembangkan?page=all, diakses pada 18 Maret 2024.
  31. Ahmad M. Ramli “Pentingnya Bangsa Ini Mulai Adaptif Dengan Industri 5.0”, https://www.republika.co.id/berita/qynv2n371/pentingnya-bangsa-ini- mulai-adaptif-dengan-industri-50, 2021, diakses pada 14 September 2024.
  32. Ahmad M. Ramli, “Pro-Kontra Penggunaan AI dalam Industri Musik”, oleh Kompas.com https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2024/08/05/13160207/pro- kontra-penggunaan-ai-dalam-industri-musik?page=all, 2024, diakses pada 16 September 2024.
  33. Amstrong Teasdale LLP, “Tennessee’s ELVIS Act Becomes Law”, https://www.armstrongteasdale.com/thought-leadership/artificial- intelligence-and-copyrights-tennessees-elvis-act-becomes-law/, diakses pada 24 maret 2024.
  34. Harvard Law Today, “AI created a song mimicking the work of Drake and The Weeknd. What does that mean for copyright law?”, https://hls.harvard.edu/today/ai-created-a-song-mimicking-the-work-of- drake-and-the-weeknd-what-does-that-mean-for-copyright-law/, diakses pada 24 Maret 2024.
  35. International Trademark Association (INTA), “Right of Publicity: What Is Right of Publicity”, https://www.inta.org/topics/right-of-publicity/, diakses pada 24 Maret 2024.
  36. Rachel Metz, “AI Startup Suno Says Music Industry Suit Aims to Stifle Competition”, https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2024/08/02/786747.ht m, diakses pada 18 Maret 2024.
  37. RIAA, “ELVIS Act Becomes Law as Tennessee Leads the Nation”, https://www.riaa.com/elvis-act-becomes-law-as-tennessee-leads-the- nation/, diakses pada 24 Maret 2024.
  38. Strathmore University: Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Technology Law, “The Copyright Conundrum: AI-Generated Works and the Question of Authorship”, https://cipit.org/the-copyright-conundrum-ai-generated- works-and-the-question-of-authorship/, diakses pada 21 Maret 2024.
  39. U.S. Copyright Office, “A Report of the Register of Copyrights: Copyright and Artificial Intelligence”, July 2024, https://www.copyright.gov/ai/Copyright- and-Artificial-Intelligence-Part-1-Digital-Replicas-Report.pdf, diakses pada 24 Maret 2024.