Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 19 Download : 10

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to analyze the factors that influence the improvement of non-communicable disease services for hypertension and the dynamics of BOK fund distribution in community health centers in Gunungkidul Regency.
Methods – The analysis method used in this study is sequential explanatory or a mixed method consisting of two stages of analysis, namely quantitative analysis of panel data followed by qualitative analysis of FGD.
Findings – The results of quantitative analysis using multiple regression show that the variables of human resources, compliance, and trained health workers have a significant effect, while the variable of BOK funds does not have a significant effect on hypertension patient services in Gunungkidul Regency.
Implication – The use of BOK funds is structured and aligned with the disease burden capacity covered by community health centers.
Originality – This study contributes to the management of BOK funds allocated to community health centers in Gunungkidul District.


Abstrak
Tujuan – Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi peningkatan pelayanan penyakit tidak menular, khususnya hipertensi, serta dinamika penyaluran dana BOK di puskesmas di Kabupaten Gunungkidul.
Metode – Metode analisis dalam penelitian ini menggunakan Sequential Explanatory atau metode campuran yang terdiri dari dua tahap analisis, yaitu analisis kuantitatif data panel dan dilanjutkan dengan analisis kualitatif melalui FGD.
Temuan – Hasil analisis kuantitatif menggunakan multiple regression menunjukkan bahwa variabel SDM, Patuh dan Nakes Diklat berpengaruh signifikan, sedangkan variabel dana BOK tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap pelayanan pasien hipertensi di Kabupaten Gunungkidul.
Implikasi – Pemanfaatan dana BOK perlu diarahkan secara terstruktur dan sesuai dengan kapasitas serta beban penyakit yang menjadi tanggungan puskesmas.
Orisinalitas – Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi terhadap manajemen kebijakan dana BOK yang dialokasikan ke Puskesmas di Kabupaten Gunungkidul.

Keywords

SDM Kepatuhan Nakes Diklat Dana BOK Hipertensi

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Ari Nurdhiyah, Nur Feriyanto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Nurdhiyah, A., & Feriyanto, N. (2026). Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi peningkatan pelayanan hipertensi di Puskesmas Kabupaten Gunungkidul. Jurnal Kebijakan Ekonomi Dan Keuangan, 5(1), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.20885/JKEK.vol5.iss1.art14
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Burnier, M., & Egan, B. M. (2019). Adherence in Hypertension: A Review of Prevalence, Risk Factors, Impact, and Management. Circulation Research, 124(7), 1124–1140. DOI:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313220
  2. Dieleman, L. A., van Peet, P. G., & Vos, H. M. M. (2021). Gender differences within the barriers to smoking cessation and the preferences for interventions in primary care a qualitative study using focus groups in The Hague, The Netherlands. BMJ open, 11(1), e042623. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042623
  3. Hikmah, Y. M. N., Kostini, N., & Arifianti, R. (2022). Evaluasi pelaksanaan kebijakan biaya operasional kesehatan di Puskesmas Santosa Kabupaten Bandung.Responsive,4(4),215. https://doi.org/10.24198/responsive.v4i4.34742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/responsive.v4i4.34742
  4. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2023). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan No. 37.
  5. Kuhlmann, E., Falkenbach, M., Brînzac, M. G., et al. (2024). Tackling the primary healthcare workforce crisis: time to talk about health systems and governance—a comparative assessment of nine countries in the WHO European region. Human Resources for Health, 22, 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-024-00965-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-024-00965-2
  6. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook Edition 3. SAGE Publications.
  7. Moleong, LJ. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  8. Nguyen, T., Rokhman, M. R., & Stiensma, I. (n.d.). Cost effectiveness of non communicable disease prevention in Southeast Asia: a scoping review.
  9. Nopel, P. (2022). Analisis pengelolaan dana Bantuan Operasional Kesehatan (BOK) di Puskesmas Sanggaran Agung, Kecamatan Danau Kerinci, Tahun 2020. (JAN Maha), 4(4), 63–71.
  10. Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
  11. Widarjono, Agus. (2013). Ekonometrika pengantar dan aplikasinya. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
  12. World Health Organization. (2016). Global strategy on human resources for health workforce 2030. Geneva.