Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 10, 2023
Accepted
August 14, 2024
Published
August 16, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 101 Download : 49

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study analyzes the factors that cause the weakness of consumer empowerment in Indonesia and conducts a comparison to the other countries in order to strengthen the values of Consumer Protection Law based on the Prophetic Law. This study combines the normative and empirical legal research. The qualitative data used are from primary and secondary sources. The primary data are obtained through interviews with predetermined informants. Secondary data are collected through literature research. The results show that the lack of consumer empowerment is caused by the long distance between the institution implementing consumer protection and the consumer itself. As a result, it is difficult for consumers to access. On the other hand, the methods used to protect consumers are still non-formal. Second, strengthening the values of consumer protection law culture can be done through formal education based on Islamic prophetic values because with such a design, the intensity of consumer education can run in a programmed, organized, and systematic manner, and prophetic values can become the basis of energy to always fight for consumer rights through a critical attitude.

Keywords

Consumers Legal Culture Prophetic Law

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Musataklima, Adi Sulistiyono, M. Syamsudin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite
Musataklima, Adi Sulistiyono, & M. Syamsudin. (2024). A Prophetic Law Basis for Strengthening the Values of Indonesian Consumer Protection Law Culture. Prophetic Law Review, 6(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol6.iss1.art3
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Absori. Pemikiran Hukum Profetik: Ragam Paradigma Menuju Hukum Berketuhanan. Media Ruas, 2018. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=1BiJzwEACAAJ.

  2. Al-Azdi, Abu Daud Sulaiman ibn al-Asy’as al-Sijistani. Sunan Abi Daud. Vol. Juz 3. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turas al-‘Arabi, 1999.

  3. Auda, Jasser, ed. Maqasid Al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. London: The International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2008.

  4. Bashir, Sobia, Abdus Samad Khan, and Faisal Shahzad Khan. “The Role of Consumer Education in Strengthening Consumer Protection Laws.” Pakistan Journal of Social Research 5, no. 2 (June 30, 2023): 85–92. https://doi.org/10.52567/pjsr.v5i02.1170.

  5. Brotosusilo, Agus. Aspek- Aspek Perlindungan Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia. Jakarta: YLKI USAID, 1998.

  6. Dimyati, Khudzaifah, Absori Absori, Kelik Wardiono, and Fitrah Hamdani. “Morality and Law: Critics upon H.L.A Hart’s Moral Paradigm Epistemology Basis Based on Prophetic Paradigm.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 17, no. 1 (May 2, 2017): 23. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2017.17.1.823.

  7. Dinas Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Provinsi Jawa Timur. “Pentingnya Upaya Perlindungan Konsumen Untuk Mendorong Pemulihan Ekonomi Jawa Timur,” November 12, 2020. https://disperindag.jatimprov.go.id/post/detail?content=pentingnya-upaya-perlindungan-konsumen-untuk-mendorong-pemulihan-ekonomi-jawa-timur.

  8. Directorate of Consumer Empowerment: Directorate General of Consumer Protection and Orderly Commerce, Ministry of Trade. “Laporan Akhir Survey Keberdayaan Konsumen Di 34 Provinsi.” Jakarta Pusat: Kementrian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia, 2022. https://ditjenpktn.kemendag.go.id/secara-berkala/ditpk/likk.

  9. Eze, A.G. “Consumer Rights as Constitutional Rights-A Comparative Analysis of Some Selected Jurisdiction.” Nnamdi Azikiwe University Journal of International Law and Jurisprudence 2 (2011). https://www.ajol.info/index.php/naujilj/article/view/82403.

  10. Friedman, Lawrence M. Sistem Hukum: Perspektif Ilmu Sosial. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2019.

  11. Indonesia, Redaksi Sawit. “Kemendag Kampanyekan Masyarakat Melek Metrologi: Kinerja Tera Meningkat 124 Persen.” Kantor Berita Sawit, September 23, 2021. https://sawitindonesia.com/kemendag-kampanyekan-masyarakat-melek-metrologi-kinerja-tera-meningkat-124-persen/.

  12. Jayasubramanian, and A Vaideke. “A Study on Consumer Awareness and Attitude Towards Consumer Protection Measures.” Indian Journal of Applied Research 1, no. 12 (October 1, 2012): 29–31. https://doi.org/10.15373/2249555X/SEP2012/10.

  13. Kuntowijoyo. Paradigma Islam: Interpretasi Untuk Aksi. 1st ed. Ujungberung, Bandung: Penerbit Mizan, 2008.

  14. “Laporan Akhir Pusat Pengkajian Perdagangan Dalam Negeri: Analisis Kelompok Konsumen (Consumer Group) Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Keberdayaan Konsumen.” Jakarta: Badan Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Kebijakan Perdagangan, Kementerian Perdagangan, August 2016. https://bkperdag.kemendag.go.id/pengkajian/hasilanalisis/view/eyJpZCI6IlZHVEd1RnVuNW1GNTlrOHI5dG9xd3c9PSIsImRhdGEiOiJ4QjRZIn0%3D.

  15. “Laporan Akhir Pusat Pengkajian Perdagangan Dalam Negeri: Analisis Pelaksanaan Pengawasan Barang Beredar Dan Jasa Paska Implementasi Uu No 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.” Jakarta: Badan Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Perdagangan Kementerian Perdagangan, March 2021.

  16. Law Number 23 of 2014 on Regional Government (n.d.).

  17. Lutfi, Mustafa, and Nur Asrul Ibrahim. “Reconstruction of Norm in Selection System of Constitutional Court Judge Candidates from the Perspective of the Paradigm of Prophetic Law.” Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 30, no. 1 (April 15, 2022): 116–30. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v30i1.20744.

  18. Mardani. Ayat-Ayat Dan Hadis Ekonomi Syariah. 1st ed. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2014.

  19. Mas’ud, Abdurrachman. Menuju Paradigma Islam Humanis. Yogyakarta: Gama Media, 2003.

  20. Nelken, David. “Using the Concept of Legal Culture.” Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, no. 29 (2004): 1–28.

  21. “Performance Report of the Directorate General of Consumer Protection and Orderly Commerce in 2022.” Jakarta: Directorate General of Consumer Protection and Orderly Commerce, 2022. https://ditjenpktn.kemendag.go.id/unduhan-file/3044eaca-0b64-4616-9d07-e70db68a787c.

  22. Pokja Penyusunan DPHN 2020. Dokumen Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Tahun 2020, Badan Pembangunan Hukum Nasional, Kementerian Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. 1st ed. Jakarta Timur: Percetakan Pohon Cahaya, 2020.

  23. Presidential Regulation Number 50 of 2017 on National Strategy for Consumer Protection (n.d.).

  24. Putra, Heddy Shri Ahimsa. “Paradigma Profetik, Mungkinkah? Perlukah?” Presented at the Seminar Nasional “Paradigma Profetik: Jalan Baru Ilmu Sosial Keindonesiaan”, Yogyakarta, September 7, 2016.

  25. R, Galuh Nashrullah Kartika Mayangsari, and H. Hasni Noor. “Konsep Maqashid Al-Syari’ah Dalam Menentukan Hukum Islam (Perspektif Al-Syatibi Dan Jasser Auda).” Al Iqtishadiyah Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Dan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 1, no. 1 (December 18, 2014): 50. https://doi.org/10.31602/iqt.v1i1.136.

  26. Rahardjo, Satjipto. Penegakan Hukum: Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2009.

  27. Rakhmawati, Yuliana. “Islamic Character Camp: Establishing Students Altruism Intelligence with Da’wa Communication.” Inferensi: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan 14, no. 1 (June 2, 2020): 25–48. https://doi.org/10.18326/infsl3.v14i1.25-48.

  28. Ruiz-Resa, Josefa Dolores. “Legal Culture on Justice and Truth: The Tribunals of Inquiry about Bloody Sunday.” The Age of Human Rights Journal, no. 15 (December 15, 2020): 73–104. https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v15.5777.

  29. Saputra, Romi. “Forming a Paradigm of Prophetic Law from the Perspective of Arkanul Bai’ah.” Journal of Transcendental Law 3, no. 1 (October 14, 2021): 63–81. https://doi.org/10.23917/jtl.v3i1.15224.

  30. Setiawan, Adam. “Transformation of Prophetic Law in Pancasila Values Viewed from the Wadas Village Conflict.” Al Daulah Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan 11, no. 1 (June 2022): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.24252/ad.v1i2.28247.

  31. Shidarta. “Hukum Profetik: Antara Humanisasi, Liberasi, Dan Transendensi.” Business Law, May 2, 2019. https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2019/05/02/antara_humanisasi_liberasi_transendensi/.

  32. Shihab, M. Quraish. Tafsir Al-Qur’an al-Karim. Bandung: Pustaka Hidayah, 1999.

  33. Shihab, Muhammad Quraish. Tafsir Al-Mishbah Volume 1 : Pesan, Kesan Dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an. 1st ed. 1. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2012.

  34. “Strategic Plan of The Directorate General of Consumer Protection and Commercial Order 2020-2024.” Jakarta: Directorate General of Consumer Protection and Orderly Commerce, Ministry of Trade, November 2, 2020. https://ditjenpktn.kemendag.go.id/unduhan-file/f8b7f852-6515-4573-a95c-be34d6e1490a.

  35. Sunggono, Bambang. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. 9th ed. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.

  36. Susilowati, Sela Vitria, Mintasih Indriayu, and Sudarno. “Pengaruh Pendidikan Konsumen Dan Tingkat Pendapatan Orang Tua Terhadap Perilaku Konsumsi Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Ekonomi FKIP UNS.” BISE: Jurnal Pendidikan Bisnis Dan Ekonomi 4, no. 2 (2018): 159–71.

  37. Syamsudin, M., ed. Ilmu Hukum Profetik: Gagasan Awal, Landasan Kefilsafatan, Dan Kemungkinan Pengembangannya Di Era Postmodern. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum (PSH) FH UII kerja sama dengan FH UII Press, 2013.

  38. Tanya, Bernard L, Theodorus Yosep Parera, and Samuel F Lena. Pancasila Bingkai Hukum Indonesia. 1st ed. Bantul: Genta Publishing, n.d.

  39. The ASEAN Secretariat Jakarta. “The Report of ASEAN Consumer Empowerment Index 2020 Pilot Project.” Jakarta: Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), 2020. www.asean.org.

  40. Thontowi, Jawahir. “Paradigma Profetik Dalam Pengajaran Dan Penelitian Ilmu Hukum.” Unisia 34, no. 76 (January 25, 2012): 86–99. https://doi.org/10.20885/unisia.vol34.iss76.art7.

  41. Thontowi, Jawahir, and Erna Wati. “The Prophetic Law, Pancasila, and Indonesia’s Significant Role Toward International Law in Asia-Africa, ASEAN, and Global Context.” International Journal of Educational Review, Law and Social Sciences 3, no. 1 (2023): 312–22.

  42. Virahayu, Niluh, and Eny Sulistyowati. “Kesadaran Hukum Konsumen terhadap Pencantuman Label pada Kemasan Beras.” Novum: Jurnal Hukum 7, no. 1 (January 2020): 1–12.

  43. Wardiono, Kelik. Ilmu Hukum Profetik: Hamparan Basis Epistemologi Paradigmatik. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press, 2020.

  44. ———. Paradigma Profetik Pembaruan Basis Epistemologi Ilmu Hukum. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2016.

  45. Wittau, Franziska. “Consumer Education as Counselling? Teacher Beliefs about Consumption and (Social Science) Education.” Journal of Social Science Education 20, no. 3 (2021): 147–73. https://doi.org/10.11576/jsse3960.

  46. Ziegel, Jacob S. “The Future of Canadian Consumerism.” The Canadian Bar Review 51, no. 2 (1973): 192–206.