Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 7, 2019
Accepted
October 7, 2019
Published
October 7, 2019
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 636 Download : 1846

Main Article Content

Abstract

Corruption is an endless problem in Indonesia. Judging from its practice, corruption is often identified with the abuse of authority or power for personal gain. The issues raised in this study are, first, how is the revocation of the rights to be elected in the perspective of laws and regulations? Second, how is the effectiveness of revocation of the rights to be elected in eradicating corruption? This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the law of revocation of the rights to be elected against corruptors in eradicating corruption. The analysis is described through the statutory approach and conceptual approach. This study concludes, first, revocation of the rights to be elected against corruptors is one of criminal sanctions and an effective effort in eradicating corruption and does not constitute a violation of human rights. Criminal law, human rights law and the Corruption Act provide legitimacy to revoke the rights to be elected against corruptors. Second, the effectiveness of the law on revocation of such rights has a deterrent and prevention effects. Revocation of selected rights has become a necessity for judges to make revocation of chosen rights as a standard imposing sanctions for corruptors in the context of eradicating corruption.

Corruption is an endless problem in Indonesia. Judging from its practice, corruption is often identified with the abuse of authority or power for personal gain. The issues raised in this study are, first, how is the revocation of the rights to be elected in the perspective of laws and regulations? Second, how is the effectiveness of revocation of the rights to be elected in eradicating corruption? This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the law of revocation of the rights to be elected against corruptors in eradicating corruption. The analysis is described through the statutory approach and conceptual approach. This study concludes, first, revocation of the rights to be elected against corruptors is one of criminal sanctions and an effective effort in eradicating corruption and does not constitute a violation of human rights. Criminal law, human rights law and the Corruption Act provide legitimacy to revoke the rights to be elected against corruptors. Second, the effectiveness of the law on revocation of such rights has a deterrent and prevention effects. Revocation of selected rights has become a necessity for judges to make revocation of chosen rights as a standard imposing sanctions for corruptors in the context of eradicating corruption.

Keywords

Effectivity law revocation of the rights to be elected corruption eradication

Article Details

How to Cite
Hamdi, B. S. (2019). Efektivitas Hukum Pencabutan Hak Dipilih terhadap Koruptor Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi. Lex Renaissance, 3(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol3.iss2.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Buku
  2. Chatrine, Darul Rosikah dan Dessy Marliani Listianingsih, Pendidikan Anti Korupsi: Kajian Antikorupsi Teori dan Praktik, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2016.
  3. H.S., Salim dan Erlis Septiana Burbani, Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Tesis dan Desertasi, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2013.
  4. K.M., Smith dan Rhona, dkk., Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, PUSHAM UII, Yogayakarta, 2008.
  5. Kasim, Azhar, Pengukuran Efektifitas Dalam Organisasi, Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 2000.
  6. Kelsen, Hans, Teori Hukum Murni: Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif, Nusamedia & Nuansa, Bandung, 2007.
  7. Marzuki, Suparman, To Promote: Membaca Perkembangan Wacana Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia, PUSHAM UII, Yogyakarta, 2012.
  8. Nawawi, Arief Barda, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Citra Aditya, Bandung, 2013.
  9. O.S., Hiariej, dan Eddy, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana, Cahaya Atma Pustaka, Yogyakarta, 2018.
  10. Praja, Juhaya S., Teori Hukum dan Aplikasinya, Pustaka Setia, Bandung, 2014.
  11. Sianturi, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia Dan Penerapannya, Alumni Ahaem-Petehaem, Jakarta, 1996.
  12. Syamsuddin, Aziz, Tindak Pidana Khusus, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2016.
  13. Jurnal
  14. Muharosa, Haliva, “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pencabutan Hak Politik Bagi Terpidana Korupsi Di Indonesia”, Jurnal JOM Fakultas Hukum, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2016.
  15. Samekto, FX Adji, “Menggugat Relasi Filsafat Postivisme Dengan Ajaran Hukum Doktrinal” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 12 No. 1, 2012.
  16. Yanto Oksidelfa, “Efektifitas Putusan Pemidanaan Maksimal Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Rangka Pengentasan Kemiskinan”, Syaih Kuala Law Jurnal, Vol. 1 No. 2, 2017.
  17. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
  18. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
  19. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14-17/PUU-V/2007.
  20. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
  21. Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.
  22. Internet
  23. “KPK: Hak Politik Dicabut 2013-2017”, https://nasional.kompas.com/read/ 2018/09/18/13252541/kpk-hak-politik-26-koruptor-dicabut-sepanjang-2013-2017, diakses tanggal 2 Februari 2018.
  24. “KPK Harap Hakim Pikirkan Pentingnya Pencabutan Hak Politik Koruptor”, https:nasional.kompas.com/read/2017/01/06/09374441/kpk.harap.hakim.pikirkan.pentingnya.pencabutan.hak.politik.koruptor, diakses tanggal 2 Februari 2019.
  25. “Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Extraordinary Crime”, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322789917_TINDAK_PIDANA_KORUPSI_SEBAGAI_EXTRAORDINARY_CRIME, diakses tanggal 10 Februari 2019.
  26. “Terbukti Korupsi, Ini 8 Pejabat Yang dicabut Hak Politiknya”, https://news.okezone.com/read/2018/03/30/337/1879995/terbukti-korupsi-ini-8-pejabat-yang-dicabut-hak-politiknya, diakses tanggal 2 Februari 2019.