Main Article Content

Abstract

This legal research aims to first, identify the criteria to determine if a corporation causes land and forest fires, and second,  how would the corporate criminal liability answer for the crime in clearing the lands burning them aw well as the violation of the environmental quality standards due to the land and forest fires in accordance with Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management. This is a normative legal research, the use of legal materials includes primary and secondary legal materials through the collection of data from literature study. The method used to analyze the data is qualitative analysis. The reseach concluder fisrt, criteria for corporations committing criminal acts on land and forest fires is if the crime is committed by, for or on behalf of a business entity carried out by a person in a work relationship or other relationship within the scope of work of a business entity. Second, the form of corporate criminal liability in criminal acts on land and forest fires is criminal liability identification. Because there are errors in the corporation management (director) as the person in charge of the business whose business has the possibility/great impact on environmental damage and pollution such as land and forest fires fires and violating the environmental quality standards.

Keywords

Criminal liability corporate criminal act land and forest fires

Article Details

How to Cite
Fadhli, R. (2019). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Kebakaran Hutan dan Lahan. Lex Renaissance, 3(2), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol3.iss2.art3

References

  1. Buku
  2. Ali, Mahrus, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Raja Grafindo, Jakarta, 2013.
  3. Bohler, Michael, Principle of German Criminal Law, Oxford and Portland Hart Publishing, 2002.
  4. Huda, Chairul, Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan, Kencana, Jakarta, 2006.
  5. Moeljatno, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2008.
  6. Muhammad, Syahrul, Problematika Penerapan Deik Formil dalam Perspektif Penegakan Hukum Pidana Lingkungan di Indonesia (Fungsionalisasi Azas Ultimum Remidium sebagai Pengganti Azas Subsidaritas), Maju Mundur, Bandung, 2012.
  7. Muladi dan Dwidja, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Prenada Media, Jakarta, 2010.
  8. Muchtar, Masrudi, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan, Prestasi Pustaka, Jakarta, 2015.
  9. Remi, Sutan, PertanggungJawaban pidana Korporasi, Grafity Pers, Jakarta, 2007.
  10. Shofie, Yusuf, Tanggung Jawab Pidana Korporasi dalam Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen di Indonesia, Citra Aditya, Bandung, 2011.
  11. Siahaan, N.H.T., Hukum Lingkungan, Pancuran Alam, Jakarta, 2009.
  12. Tongat, Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, 2008.
  13. Hasil Penelitian/Tugas Akhir
  14. Catatan Hitam Pengelolaan Hutan dan Lahan di Riau, 2006-2016.
  15. Hanafi, Perkembangan Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dan Relevansi Bagi Usaha Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional, Tesis, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, 1997.
  16. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
  17. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 4 Tahun 2001 tentang Pengendalian kerusakan atau Pencemaran Lingkungan Hidup