Article Sidebar

Submitted
March 13, 2020
Accepted
March 13, 2020
Published
March 13, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 284 Download : 1009

Main Article Content

Abstract

Bankruptcy regulation according to Article 12 point a of Law No. 2 of 2014 on Notary Positions lead to different interpretations and this article provide sanctions to Notaries by dismissing them disrespectfully if the Notaries has been declared bankrupt by a court decision. This disrespectful dismissal is a treatment that is not in accordance with the concept of bankruptcy that has been regulated in Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy. This study aims to determine and analyze bankruptcy regulation for Notaries based on Law No. 2 of 2014 on Notary Positions and Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy as well as the legal consequences of Notaries declared bankrupt. This is a type of normative legal research using the legislation and conceptual approach and analyze it using descriptive qualitative methods. This research uses primary and secondary legal materials. The results of this study conclude that the regulation of bankruptcy of a Notary Public based on Article 12 point a of the Notary Law is not to cause disrespectful dismissal from his position. Notary as a legal subject that represents an individual who has a debt. The legal consequences of a bankrupt notary based on the Bankruptcy Law only causes a person to lose the right to act freely on his assets but not lose the right to carry out his profession and position. Suggestions from this research are, the government needs to do a review in order to amend the regulation on bankruptcy for the Notary to avoid mis-interpretations.

Keywords

Bankruptcy legal consequence notary regulation

Article Details

Author Biography

Amanda Maylaksita, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Pascasarjana Hukum
How to Cite
Maylaksita, A. (2020). Problematik Interpretasi Pengaturan Kepailitan Terhadap Jabatan Notaris di Indonesia. Lex Renaissance, 4(1), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol4.iss1.art7
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Buku
  2. Adjie, Habib, Sanksi Perdata dan Administrasi Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik, Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2008.
  3. J. Satrio, Hukum Perikatan, Perikatan Yang Lahir Dari Perjanjian, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1995.
  4. J.Satrio, Hukum Perjanjian, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1992.
  5. Kansil, C.S.T. dan Christine S.T.Kansil, Pokok-Pokok Etika Profesi Hukum, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 1997.
  6. Kie, Tan Thong, Studi Notariat Beberapa Mata Pelajaran Dan Serba Serbi Praktek Notaris, PT. Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, Jakarta, 1994.
  7. Mertokusumo, Sudikno, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1993.
  8. Rosjidi Ranggawidjaya, Pengantar Ilmu Perundang-Undangan Indonesia, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 1998.
  9. Shubhan, Hadi, Hukum Kepailitan, Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2008.
  10. Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy, Hukum Kepailitan: Memahami Undang-Undang Kepailitan No.37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan, PT Pustaka Utama Grafiti, Jakarta, 2002.
  11. Jurnal
  12. Putri Pertiwi Santoso, “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pengangkatan Kembali Notaris Yang Telah Dinyatakan Pailit Oleh Pengadilan”, Jurnal, Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya Malang, Malang, 2015.
  13. Junita Sari Ujung, “Independensi Kurator Dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit”, Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia Depok, Jurnal, Depok, 2008.
  14. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
  15. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
  16. Undang-Undang Nomor 37 tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.
  17. Kode Etik Notaris Ikatan Notaris Indonesia (I.N.I) Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Jabatan Notaris