Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal status of implementing regulations for the Law after the Law gets annulled by the Constitutional Court, whether implementing the regulation still legally binding? This is a normative juridical legal research. The collection of legal materials is carried out through literature review, both primary and secondary legal materials. The results of this study conclude that the implementing regulations of the Law after the Law gets annulled by the Constitutional Court are no longer legally binding. This is because the Law, articles, or paragraphs that form the legal basis for the formation of the Implementing Regulations have been revoked or declared contradicting the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Therefore, implementing regulations which contain material to implement the Law properly are also deemed contradictory with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, it is on this basis that the Implementing Regulations are declared to no longer have binding legal force.

Keywords

Annuled implementing regulations legal status

Article Details

Author Biography

Tarwin Idris, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta Indonesia

Pascasarjana Hukum
How to Cite
Idris, T. (2021). Status Hukum Pemberlakuan Peraturan Pelaksana Undang-Undang Setelah Di Batalkannya Undang-Undang Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Lex Renaissance, 5(3), 607–625. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss3.art7

References

  1. Buku
  2. Achmad Rubaie, H., Putusan Ultra petita Mahkamah Konstitusi, perspektif filosofis, teoritis, dan yuridis, LaksBang PERSSindo, Yogyakarta, 2017.
  3. Bachtiar, Problematika Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Pada Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap UUD, Raih Asa Sukses, Jakarta, 2015.
  4. Darwis, Muhammad, “Review of Indonesian Constitutional Court Decision Number 21-22/Puu-V/2007 Based On The Inclusive Legal Theory”, Prophetic Law Review, Vol.1, Issue 1, 2019.
  5. Faisal Sulaiman, King, Teori Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dan Aspek Pengujiannya, Thafa Media, Yogyakarta, 2017.
  6. Farida Indrati S., Maria, Ilmu Perudang-Undangan “Proses dan Teknik Pembentukannya”, Kansius, Yogyakarta, 2006.
  7. Fajar ND., Mukti, & Yulianto Achmad, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empris, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2017.
  8. Huda, Ni’matul, Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, FH.UII PRESS, Yogyakarta, 2018.
  9. Huda, Ni’matul, et.al., “Legal Status of Ratified International Treaty under Indonesian Hierarchy of Law”, Conference Proceedings, 8th Asian Constitutional Law Recent Developments and Trends, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, 2019.
  10. Kelsen, Hans, Teori Umum Tentang Hukum dan Negara, Terjemahan Buku General Theory of Law and State, Nusa Media, Bandung, 2016.
  11. Lailam, Tanto, Teori dan Hukum Perundang-undangan, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2017
  12. Martitah, Mahkamah Konstitusi Dari Negative Legislature Ke Positive Legislature, Konpres, Jakarta, 2013.
  13. Rasyid Tahlib, Abdul, Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Implikasinya dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Cita Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2006.
  14. Jurnal
  15. Ikhsan Fatah Yasin, “Keadilan Substantif Dalam Ultra Petita Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Islamica, Volume 15, No. 1 Juni Tahun, 2018.
  16. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
  17. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
  18. Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.
  19. Undang-Undang 7 Tahun 2004 Tentang Sumber Daya Air.
  20. Undang-Undang 17 Tahun 2019 Tentang Sumber Daya Air.
  21. Putusan Pengadilan
  22. Putusan MK-RI No. 058-059-060-063/PUU-II/2004 dan No. 008/PUU-III/2005 Tentang PUU No. 07 Tahun 2004 Tentang Sumber Daya Air.
  23. Putusan MK-RI No. 85/PUU-XI/2013 Tentang PUU No 07 Tahun 2004 Tentang Sumber Daya Air
  24. Putusan MK-RI No. 28/PUU-XI/2013 Tentang PUU No. 17 Tahun 2012 tentang Perkoperasian.
  25. Putusan MK-RI No 001-021-022/PUU-I/2003 Tentang PUU No 20 Tahun 2002 tentang Ketenagalistrikan