Article Sidebar

Submitted
January 14, 2021
Accepted
January 22, 2021
Published
April 20, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 366 Download : 4283

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines, first, the application of diversion in narcotics crimes committed by children after the enactment of Perma No.4 of 2014 on Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion in the Juvenile Justice System (SPPA Law); second, the constraints on the application of diversion in narcotics crimes committed by children after the enactment of Perma No. 4 of 2014. This is a normative legal research supported by information from sources using statutory and conceptual approach and analyzes it from a perspective. The results of the study conclude that, first, the application of diversion in narcotics crime according to Perma No. 4 of 2014 has not been implemented. Based on the SPPA Law, the application of diversion can be carried out in cases where the threat is under 7 (seven) years while in Perma No. 4 of 2014 the application of diversion can be carried out for cases where the threat is more than 7 (seven) years but the charges are subsidarity, alternative, or cumulative. One of the charges is that there is a threat of diversion under 7 (seven) years. Second, law enforcers think that narcotics is a criminal offense that is highly charged even though the charges are alternative, where Perma No. 4 of 2014 requires diversion in criminal acts charged with alternative charges, this happens because law enforcers rarely use Perma No. 4 of 2014.

Keywords

Children diversion investigation

Article Details

Author Biography

Irwan Irwan, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta Indonesia

Pascasarjana Hukum
How to Cite
Irwan, I. (2021). Problematika Penerapan Diversi Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Lex Renaissance, 5(3), 525–538. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss3.art2
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Buku
  2. Achmad, Yulianto dan Mukti Fajar, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2010.
  3. Kusuma, Mulyana W, Hukum dan Hak-Hak Anak, CV. Rajawali, Jakarta, 1986.
  4. Marlina, Pengantar Konsep Diversi dan Restorative Justice, USU Press, Medan, 2010.
  5. _______, Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia (Pengembangan Konsep Diversi), Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2012.
  6. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta, 2016.
  7. Prodjodikoro, Wirjono, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia. PT. Eresco, Bandung, 1989.
  8. Sambas, Nandang, Pemberharuan Sistem Pemidanaan Anak di Indonesia, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta, 2010.
  9. Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Rajawali, Jakarta, 1985.
  10. Jurnal
  11. Yati Sharfina Desiandri, “Diversi Terhadap Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum di Tingkat Penyidikan”, USU Law Journal, Vol. 5 No. 1, Januari 2017.
  12. Website
  13. http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5475dd3e4d788/icjr, Aparat Hukum Belum Paham Arti Diversi. Diakses pada tanggal 28 Maret 2017 pukul 10.26
  14. http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt4e25360a422c2 Jecky Tengens, SH, Pendekatan Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Pidana Indonesia. Diakses pada tanggal 25 Oktober 2017 pukul 11.56
  15. Peraturan Perundang-undangan
  16. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)
  17. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)
  18. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana
  19. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1996 tentang Pengesahan Convention On Psychotropic Substance 1971 (Konvensi Psikotropika 1971)
  20. Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika
  21. Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak
  22. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman Pelaksaan Diversi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak
  23. Putusan Pengadilan
  24. PUTUSAN NOMOR : 6/PID.Sus.Anak/2015/PT.MDN.
  25. PUTUSAN NOMOR : 28/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/PN Smn.