Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the definition of cybersquatting and its legal protection in Indonesia. This is a normative research that uses conceptual and statutory approaches. The results of this study conclude that essentially the definition of cybersquatting has not been explicitly defined nor regulated in the laws and regulations in Indonesia. However, cybersquatting can be understood as the act of registering a domain name associated with someone else's company name and then trying to make a profit by selling it to that company. Legal protection against cybersquating is regulated in several laws and regulations, such as Article 23 and Article 38 of Law No. 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions, as well as Article 83, Article 100, Article 101, Article 102 of Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Brands and Geographical Indications. In addition, legal protection for brands’ domain names in regards to cybersquatting can be seen from the government's attempt by delegating responsibility to Indonesian Domain Name Manager (PANDI)

Keywords

Cybersquatting legal protection offences Cybersquatting legal protection offences

Article Details

Author Biography

Reva Amalia, Pascasarjana Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta Indonesia

Hukum Pidana
How to Cite
Amalia, R. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kejahatan Cybersquatting Di Indonesia. Lex Renaissance, 5(4), 780–791. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss4.art2

References

  1. Buku
  2. Nawawi Arief, Barda, Tindak Pidana Mayantara, Raja Grafindo, Jakarta, 2006.
  3. Pengelola Nama Domain Internet Indonesia, Laporan Tahunan 2019, Jakarta, 2020.
  4. Raharjo, Budi, Memahami Teknologi Informasi; Menyikapi dan Membekali Diri Terhadap Peluang dan Tantangan Teknologi Informasi, elekmedia Komputindo, Jakarta, 2002.
  5. Satria, Hariman, Anatomi Hukum Pidana Khusus, UII Press, Yogyakarta, 2014.
  6. Sunarso, Siswanto, Hukum Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2009.
  7. Tampubolon, Sabartua, Aspek Hukum Nama Domain di Internet, Tatanusa, Jakarta 2003.
  8. Tim penelitian di bawah pimpinan Suharyo, Penerapan Bantuan Timbal Balik dalam Masalah Pidana Terhadap Kasus-Kasus Cybr Crime, Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Jakarta, 2002.
  9. Wahid, Abdul, dan Mohammad Labib, Kejahatan Mayantara (Cyber Crime), Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2005.
  10. Jurnal, Skripsi, Makalah
  11. Alusyanti Primawati, “Etika It Di Indonesia Studi Kasus: Cybersquatting Pada Domain Pt. Mustika Ratu”, Jurnal SIMETRIS, Vol 7 No 1 April 2016 ISSN: 2252-4983, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
  12. Hardianto Djanggih, dan Nurul Qamar, “Penerapan Teori-Teori Kriminologi dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan Siber (Cyber Crime)”, Jurnal Pandecta, Universitas Negeri Semarang Volume 13. Number 1. June 2018,
  13. Komang Lugra Mega Triayuni Dewi, Ni dan Nyoman A. Martana, “Perlindungan hukum terhadap Pendaftaran Merek Nama Domain dalam Tindakan Cybersquatting di Indonesia”, Skripsi, Program Kekhususan Hukum Bisnis Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Udayana
  14. Muhammad Amirulloh, “Cybersquatting dan Typosquatting Sebagai Suatu Bentuk Pelanggaran Merek Dalam Kajian Filsafat Ilmu”, makalah, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Padjadjaran, 2009
  15. Saghara Luthfillah Fazari, “Perlindungan Nama Domain Merek Terkenal Terhadap Tindakan Cybersquatting di Internet Menurut Hukum Positif Indonesia”, Skripsi, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Brawijaya, 2014.
  16. Setia Dharma, “Perlindungan Merek Terdaftar Dari Kejahatan Dunia Maya Melalui Pembatasan Pendaftaran Nama Domain”, Jurna Cita Hukum, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Vol. II No. 2 Desember 2014.
  17. Internet
  18. Abi Jam’an Kurnia, “Perlindungan Hukum di Indonesia atas Tindakan Cybersquatting”, https://m.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/ cl6560/perlindungan-hukum-di-indonesia-atas-tindakan- icybersquatting-i/
  19. PANDI (Pengelola Nama Domain Indonesia), kebjakan Pendaftaran nama domain, https://www.pandi.or.id/sites/ default/files/u1/2.pdf