Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 11, 2024
Accepted
October 21, 2025
Published
October 21, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 157 Download : 131

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to examine the following problems: First, how does the dissenting opinion influence the 2024 General Election Results Dispute decision on the Legitimacy of the Elected President-Vice President? Second, What are the implications of the dissenting opinion on the 2024 General Election Results Dispute decision on the legitimacy of the President-Vice President's office? This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory regulatory approach and a conceptual approach. The analysis technique is descriptive qualitative, interpretative, and heuristic. The study of this research is the Dissenting Opinion by three Constitutional Court Judges in Decision Number 1/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024 and Number 2/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024. The results of the study indicate the influence of dissenting opinion on the legitimacy of the elected President and Vice President, for a good democratic society, a desired national ideal. In addition, interpreting the dissenting opinion regarding the General Election Results Dispute (Pemilu) as a reference for improving future elections to be better. The dissenting opinion in this case provides a new perspective and interpretation of the election contestation in Indonesia. One of the most fundamental causes of the 2024 presidential and vice-presidential election was the incumbent's irregularities or interference in the election agenda. Furthermore, concerns were raised regarding the lack of neutrality of state civil servants, the distribution of social assistance funds leading up to the election and during the campaign period, and political ethics. Consequently, an imbalance occurred in the presidential and vice-presidential nomination process, creating new problems in resolving the 2024 election dispute.

Keywords

Dissenting Opinion Constitutional Court General Elections

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Arsyi Manggali Arya Putra, Ilham Dwi Rafiqi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:


a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Putra, A. M. A., & Rafiqi, I. D. (2025). Dissenting Opinion dalam Sengketa PHPU 2024 dan Legitimasi Presiden-Wakil Presiden Terpilih. Lex Renaissance, 10(1), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol10.iss1.art8
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Albab, Abid Ulil. “PROBLEM KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI MEMUTUS PERSELISIHAN HASIL PILKADA.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 48, no. 3 (5 Desember 2018): 542. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol48.no3.1745.

  2. Andryan, Andryan, dan Muhammad Kholis Harahap. “KONSTITUSIONALITAS MASA WAKTU SENGKETA PEMILIHAN PRESIDEN DI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI.” BULETIN KONSTITUSI 4, no. 2 (30 November 2023). https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/KONSTITUSI/article/view/17533.

  3. Argawati, Utami. “‘Dissenting Opinion’ Pertama dalam Sejarah Perkara PHPU Presiden di MK.” Jakarta: MKRI, 22 April 2024. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=20216&menu=2.

  4. Arrusadi, Fakhrurrozi. “Menakar Arah Demokrasi Konstalasi Partai Politik Dalam Proses Pemilihan Umum Pasca Reformasi.” Lex Renaissance 5, no. 4 (2020): 962–73. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss4.art14.

  5. Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Peradilan Etik dan Etika Konstitusi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.

  6. Bahri, Putri Rizkika, Sofwan Sofwan, dan Johannes Johny Koynja. “Analisis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 01/PHPU-Pres/XVII/2019 Terkait Sengketa Pemilihan Umum Presiden.” Jurnal Diskresi 1, no. 1 (21 Juni 2022). https://journal.unram.ac.id/index.php/diskresi/article/view/1310.

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/diskresi.v1i1.1310

  7. Christia, Adissya Mega, Lidya Christina Wardhani, Marsatana Tartila Tristy, dan Faizal Adi Surya. “Politik Hukum Eksekusi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Indonesia.” Lex Renaissance 9, no. 1 (24 Juli 2024): 62–84. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol9.iss1.art4.

  8. Christiani, Theresia Anita. “Normative and Empirical Research Methods: Their Usefulness and Relevance in the Study of Law as an Object.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 219 (2016): 201–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.006.

  9. EMedia DPR RI. “‘Dissenting Opinion’ Tiga Hakim MK Jadi Catatan Perlunya Kualitas Pemilu dan Pilkada.” DPR RI, 27 April 2024. https://emedia.dpr.go.id/2024/04/27/dissenting-opinion-tiga-hakim-mk-jadi-catatan-perlunya-perbaikan-kualitas-pemilu-dan-pilkada/.

  10. Firdaus, Sunny Ummul, Putri Anjelina Nataly Panjaitan, dan Rizky Kurniyanto Widyasasmito. “Peran Dissenting Opinion Hakim Konstitusi dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Nasional.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 1 (23 Maret 2020): 1. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.1-10.

  11. Hardjanto, Untung Sri. “Legitimasi Pemilihan Umum Di Indonesia Tahun 2019.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 2, no. 1 (11 Juni 2019): 106–12.

  12. Hasibuan, Hazizah, Irwansyah, ahmad Riski Halapangan, dan Sahru Ramdan Harahap. “DESAIN PERADILAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN UMUM PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN DI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI.” Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan 5, no. 8 (9 Juli 2024): 71–80. https://doi.org/10.3783/causa.v5i8.4466.

  13. Hasna, Fitra Mutiara Al. “Tinjauan Terhadap Penyebab Sengketa Perselisihan Tentang Hasil Pemilihan Umum Di Indonesia.” Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary 2, no. 1 (27 Januari 2024): 273–78. https://doi.org/10.61292/eljbn.129.

  14. Ibrahim, Ilham Fahrul R. “PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PEMILIHAN UMUM DAN LEGITIMASI PEMERINTAHAN DEMOKRASI.” LEX CRIMEN 10, no. 8 (23 Juli 2021). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/35307.

  15. Indonesia, Themis, dan Yayasan Dewi Keadilan Indonesia. “Peta Politik Gentong Babi Menjelang Pemilu sebagai Kecurangan Kebijakan Pemerintahan Joko Widodo,” 2024. https://themis.id/laporan-hasil-penelitian-peta-politik-gentong-babi-menjelang-pemilu-sebagai-kecurangan-kebijakan-pemerintahan-joko-widodo/.

  16. Jurdi, Fajlurrahman, dan Ahmad Yani. “Legitimacy of Non-Formal Constitutional Reforms and Restrictions on Constitutionalism: Legitimasi Perubahan Konstitusi Non-formal dan Pembatasannya dalam Paham Konstitusionalisme.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 2 (1 Juni 2023): 238–56. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2024.

  17. Mahfud, Moh. Politik Hukum di Indonesia. 7 ed. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2017.

  18. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.

  19. MKRI, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. 1 ed. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2010.

  20. Najah, Savinatun, Dewi Ayu Marchela Putri, Ike Zhiana Huzaini, dan Hayat. “Analisis Dampak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum (PHPU) Pilpres 2024 Terhadap Kualitas Demokrasi Indonesia.” Idarotuna : Journal of Administrative Science 5, no. 1 (30 Mei 2024): 85–97. https://doi.org/10.54471/idarotuna.v5i1.91.

  21. Nugraha, Harry Setya. “Perselisihan Hasil Pemilu Serentak Tahun 2024: Tantangan dan Alternatif Gagasan.” Dalam Menyongsong Pemilu Serentak 2024, 362. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2023.

  22. Rahardjo, Satjipto. Membedah hukum progresif. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2006.

  23. Rahmani, Nadia Putri. “Pelajaran berharga dari putusan PHPU Pilpres 2024.” Jakarta: ANTARA, 27 April 2024. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4077900/pelajaran-berharga-dari-putusan-phpu-pilpres-2024.

  24. Rahmawati, Nurlaili, dan Sigit Nurhadi Nugraha. “Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Serentak dalam Perspektif Keadilan.” AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (30 April 2023): 55–66. https://doi.org/10.47776/alwasath.v4i1.661.

  25. Rishan, Idul. Hukum dan Politik Ketatanegaraan. 1 ed. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2020.

  26. Rusdi, Muhammad. “Implikasi Dissenting Opinion Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat.” Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian Dan Penelitian Hukum 1, no. 1 (1 Februari 2019): 89–107. https://doi.org/10.37631/widyapranata.v1i1.257.

  27. Siahaan, Maruarar. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. 2 ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

  28. Silalahi, Wilma. “KESIAPAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN SERENTAK TAHUN 2024.” Jurnal Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau 4, no. 2 (15 Desember 2022): 171–85. https://doi.org/10.55108/jbk.v4i2.208.

  29. Simbolon, Rasji Ezra Zesika, dan Veren Kasslim. “PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HASIL PEMILIHAN PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN TAHUN 2024 DI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI.” Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Dan Riset Sosial Humaniora 4, no. 2 (30 April 2024): 48–54.

  30. Suat, Muammad Saleh. “PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI YANG DISERTAI DENGAN PENDAPAT HAKIM BERBEDA (DISSENTING OPINION) DALAM PEMENUHAN PRINSIP-PRINSIP KEADILAN | Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Keagamaan” 20, no. 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.53515/qodiri.

  31. Subiyanto, Achmad Edi. “Pemilihan Umum Serentak Yang Berintegritas Sebagai Pembaruan Demokrasi Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 2 (19 Agustus 2020): 355–71. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1726.

  32. Sulistowati, dan Dewi Nadya Maharani. “Tantangan dan Evaluasi Sengketa Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum.” Dalam Menyongsong Pemilu Serentak 2024, 362. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2023.

  33. Sumadi, Ahmad Fadlil, Achmad Edi Subiyanto, dan Anna Triningsih. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi: perkembangan dalam praktik. Cetakan ke-1. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2019.

  34. Tuloli, Syafrul Achmad Ramadhan. “TINJAUAN YURIDIS MEKANISME PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILU OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI.” LEX ADMINISTRATUM 7, no. 3 (2019). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/administratum/article/view/27560.

  35. Winata, Muhammad. “Judicial Restraint dan Constitutional Interpretation Terhadap Kompetensi Mengadili Pelanggaran Pemilihan Umum Terstruktur, Sistematis, dan Masif.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 17 (30 Desember 2020): 423–36. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i4.663.

  36. Yozami, M. Agus. “Putusan Sengketa PHPU Pilpres Amanatkan Sejumlah Pekerjaan Rumah.” Hukum Online, 12 April 2024. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/putusan-sengketa-phpu-pilpres-amanatkan-sejumlah-pekerjaan-rumah-lt66289f8809cc7/?page=all.

  37. Zaman, Nurus. “Peran Dissenting Opinion dalam Putusan  Mahkamah Konstitusi: Perspektif Hakim dan Penafsiran Hukum.” Jurnal Konstitusi 21, no. 3 (1 September 2024): 482–500. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2138.

  38. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. 

  39. Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2004 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. 

  40. Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2015 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, dan Walikota Menjadi Undang-Undang.

  41. Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan Ketiga atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.

  42. Putusan Nomor 15/PUU-XX/2022.

  43. Putusan Nomor 1/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024.

  44. Putusan Nomor 2/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024.