Main Article Content

Abstract

Abstract


Problems in the study: first, the dualism of authority checks Notary alleged violations of the code of
conduct? Second, the authority checks the code of conduct by the Regional Supervisory Council based
on the code of ethics? This research is empirical jurisdiction. The study concluded, first, the Regional
Supervisory Council and the WCA Board may conduct an examination of the alleged violations of the
code etik Notaris. Regional Supervisory Council code etik Notaris checks if the report from the public
and there is also a certain criteria of Notaries code violations that can be checked by the Supervisory
Council of Regions. Honorary Board area is not just waiting for reports received, but can process it if it
finds violations of the code of conduct, if the Honorary Board of the Regional found violations of the
Code, the Honor Council will call a notary in question to be fostered, because the function of the
Honorary Council of Regions in addition to overseeing the code of conduct, there is pembianaan also
against the Notary. Code violations that have been reported to the Regional Supervisory Council can
not be diverted report to the Council of Honor, and vice versa. Secondly, the provision of the code of
conduct by the inspection authority Regional Supervisory Council is not in accordance with the
characteristics of the code of professional conduct.


Keywords: Regional Supervisory Council, Notary.

Article Details

Author Biography

Muhammad Khalid, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Pascasarjana Hukum
How to Cite
Khalid, M. (2017). Dualisme Kewenangan Pemeriksaan Dugaan Pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris. Lex Renaissance, 2(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol2.iss1.art3