Article Sidebar

The Role of Religions in Education of Ethics of Diversity
Submitted
September 12, 2021
Accepted
May 1, 2023
Published
June 30, 2023
Download
PDF Review Reports Originality Report
Statistic
Read Counter : 51 Download : 5

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article explores the role of religions in fostering an ethos of respect for diversity and cultivating the ethics of constructive disagreement. Recognizing that diversity is an inherent trait of human existence, this study highlights the necessity of transcending conflict and cultivating harmony through a moral framework derived from religious principles. Using key religious texts and examples, the paper analyzes the doctrines and practices of Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, demonstrating their contributions to peacebuilding and intercultural understanding. Hinduism and Buddhism emphasize values of self-realization, meditation, and universal love, fostering the ability to transcend individual differences. Judaism advocates ethical principles, such as justice and integrity, while distinguishing between religious teachings and political ideologies. Christianity, particularly through its message of love and forgiveness, offers a model for reconciliation with one’s adversaries. Islam’s foundational principles, including equality, tolerance, and respect for freedom of belief, provide a legal and moral framework for coexistence and dialogue, epitomized by the Prophet Muhammad’s ethical treatment of diverse communities. Through these religious paradigms, the study addresses the challenges of ideological extremism, historical grievances, and structural inequalities that hinder peaceful coexistence. It proposes practical strategies for embedding the ethics of disagreement within educational, legal, and social institutions. The findings underline the urgency of interfaith collaboration and the application of shared values to overcome global crises of conflict and division, advocating for a collective moral responsibility that transcends cultural and theological boundaries. This discourse reaffirms the enduring relevance of religions in shaping a harmonious global society.

Keywords

diversity management ethical frameworks interfaith dialogue peaceful coexistence religious ethics

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Unisia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Monia, N. G. (2023). The Role of Religions in Education of Ethics of Diversity. Unisia, 41(1), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.20885/unisia.vol41.iss1.art4
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Ahmad, M. (2020). Human rights in Islam: Compatible and incompatible aspects. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 133402–133412. https://doi.org/10.61841/V24I8/400248

  2. Ahmed, A. (2018). Afterword: A reflection on the crucial importance of interfaith dialogue. The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 16(3), 114–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2018.1509277

  3. Al-Alwani, T. J. (1987). Adab al-ikhtilāf fī al-Islām [The literature of difference in Islam]. International Institute of Islamic Thought.

  4. Al-Badri, A. S. S. (2022). The impact of political and legal factors on promoting peaceful coexistence and building peace: Iraq as a model after defeat ISIS in 2017. Tikrit Journal For Political Science, 1(27), 95–125. https://doi.org/10.25130/tjfps.v1i27.168

  5. Al-Faqīr, M. ‘Īd. (2004). Risālat al-adyān kamā yurīduhā Allāh lil-insān [The message of religions as God wants it for man]. Dār Ṭalās lil-Dirāsāt wa al-Tarjamah wa al-Nashr.

  6. Alia, S., Ali, F., & Atif, M. (2020). Human rights violation and persecution of Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar. Perennial Journal of History, 1(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.52700/pjh.v1i1.22

  7. Al-Rukābī, Ṣādiq ‘Abd ‘Alī. (2007). Lamḥāt ‘an adyān al-‘ālam [Glimpses of world religions]. Maktabat Madbūlī.

  8. Al-Saḥmarānī, A. (1998). Al-Hindūsiyyah, al-Būdhiyyah, al-Sīkḥiyyah [Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism]. Dār al-Nafā’is.

  9. Al-Saḥmarānī, A. (2012). Turjumān al-adyān [Interpreter of religions] (Second edition). Dār al-Nafā’is.

  10. Al-Ṭayyib, A. (2018). Taqdim [Introduction]. In Al-Sharq wa al-Gharb naḥwa ḥiwār ḥaḍārī insānī: A‘māl liqā’ Fīlūrinsā: 21-22 Sha‘bān 1436 H/8-9 Yūniyu 2015 M [East and West towards a civilized and humane dialogue: Proceedings of the Florence Meeting: 21-22 Sha’ban 1436 AH/8-9 June 2015 AD] (Second edition). Dār al-Quds al-‘Arabī.

  11. Arbatli, C. E., Ashraf, Q. H., Galor, O., & Klemp, M. (2020). Diversity and conflict. Econometrica, 88(2), 727–797. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA13734

  12. Ariarajah, S. W. (1995). Al-Muqaddas wa mu’minū al-diyānāt al-ukhrā [The Holy and believers of other religions]. al-Maktabah al-Būlsiyyah.

  13. Bayot, M., Vermeulen, N., Kever, A., & Mikolajczak, M. (2020). Mindfulness and empathy: Differential effects of explicit and implicit Buddhist teachings. Mindfulness, 11(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0966-4

  14. Bhat, A. H., & Haq, I. U. (2023). Islam and the issue of human rights: Compatibility or contradiction. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(2), 599–612. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i2.2093

  15. Davie, G. (2022). The role of religious diversity in social progress. Ethnicities, 22(4), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968221085615

  16. Dupré, W. (2002). Al-Ḥiwār wa al-ḥaqīqah [Dialogue and truth]. In A. Bashta (Ed.), Al-‘aqīdah al-Masīḥiyyah fī liqā’ ma‘a al-Islām [Christian doctrine in encounter with Islam]. al-Maktabah al-Būlsiyyah.

  17. Durant, W. J. (1988). Qiṣṣat al-ḥaḍārah [The story of civilization]. al-Munazzamah al-‘Arabiyyah li-al-Tarbiyah wa al-Thaqāfah wa al-‘Ulūm.

  18. Fathil, F. (2019). Muslim Minority in China: A case of Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang. In N. Z. M. Sidek, R. Said, & W. N. W. Hasan (Eds.), Islamic Development Management: Recent Advancements and Issues (pp. 355–370). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7584-2_27

  19. Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2008). Assortative sociality, limited dispersal, infectious disease and the genesis of the global pattern of religion diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1651), 2587–2594. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0688

  20. Finley, J. S. (2021). Why scholars and activists increasingly fear a Uyghur genocide in Xinjiang. Journal of Genocide Research, 23(3), 348–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2020.1848109

  21. Fukuyama, F. (2006). The end of history and the last man (Reissue edition). Free Press.

  22. Gentry, C. E. (2016). Religion: Peace through non-violence in four religious traditions. In O. P. Richmond, S. Pogodda, & J. Ramović (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Disciplinary and Regional Approaches to Peace (pp. 168–180). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-40761-0_13

  23. Goethe, J. W. von. (2010). West-east divan: Poems, with “notes and essays”: Goethe’s intercultural dialogues (M. Bidney, Trans.; First printing edition). Global Academic Publishing.

  24. Hammad, J., & Tribe, R. (2020). Social suffering and the psychological impact of structural violence and economic oppression in an ongoing conflict setting: The Gaza Strip. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(6), 1791–1810. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22367

  25. Hobbes, T. (1983). De cive. The English version entitled, in the first edition, Philosophicall rudiments concerning government and society (H. Warrender, Ed.). Clarendon Press.

  26. Howard, V. R. (2018). Nonviolence in the dharma traditions: Hinduism, Jainism, and Buddhism. In A. Fiala (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Pacifism and Nonviolence. Routledge.

  27. Huntington, S. P. (2011). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Simon & Schuster.

  28. Ibn al-ʿArabī. (1966). Turjumān al-ashwāq [Interpreter of desires]. Dār Ṣādir.

  29. Ibn Hishām (with Rafīqayhi, M. al-Saqqā wa). (1955). Al-Sīrah al-Nabawiyyah [Biography of the Prophet]. Sharikat Maktabat wa Maṭba‘at Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī wa Awlādih.

  30. Ibn Khaldūn. (1992). Al-Muqaddimah [Prolegomena]. Dār al-Jīl.

  31. Khalīl, K. A. (1994). Jadaliyyat al-Qur’ān [The dialectic of the Qur’an]. Dār al-Fikr al-Lubnānī.

  32. King, E. B., Hebl, M. R., & Beal, D. J. (2009). Conflict and cooperation in diverse workgroups. Journal of Social Issues, 65(2), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01600.x

  33. Kondratieva, I. (2020). Religious values and human rights: Features of correlation. Sophia. Human and Religious Studies Bulletin, 15(1), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.17721/sophia.2020.15.4

  34. Lemon, E., Jardine, B., & Hall, N. (2023). Globalizing minority persecution: China’s transnational repression of the Uyghurs. Globalizations, 20(4), 564–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2022.2135944

  35. Lidén, K. (2009). Building peace between global and local politics: The cosmopolitical ethics of liberal peacebuilding. International Peacekeeping, 16(5), 616–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533310903303255

  36. MacLean, D. A. (1943). Global ethics and global peace. The Review of Politics, 5(4), 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500002643

  37. Mamat, A., Basir@Ahmad, A., Yabi, S., & Othman, F. M. (2020). The concept of inter-racial relationship from al-ta’arruf perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(12), 15–25. https://hrmars.com/index.php/IJARBSS/article/view/8211/The-Concept-of-Inter-Racial-Relationship-from-Al-Taarruf-Perspective

  38. Marsella, A. J. (2009). Diversity in a Global Era: The context and consequences of differences. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 22(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070902781535

  39. Masood, M., Xiang, M., Skoric, M. M., & Ahmed, S. (2022). Trust in religious others: A three-way interaction model of religious bias, informational use of digital media, and education. International Journal of Communication, 16, Article 0. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/18636

  40. McWhinney, E. (2007). International law making in times of competing ideologies or clashing civilizations: Peaceful coexistence and Soviet-Western legal dialogue in the Cold War era. Canadian Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire Canadien de Droit International, 44, 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0069005800009073

  41. Melé, D., & Sánchez-Runde, C. (2013). Cultural diversity and universal ethics in a global world. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(4), 681–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1814-z

  42. Mīghūlīfskī, A. S. (2009). Asrār al-Ālihah wa al-diyānāt [Secrets of Gods and religions] (Ḥassān Mikha’īl Isḥaq, Trans.; Fourth edition). Dar ‘Alā’ al-Dīn li-al-Nashr wa al-Tawzī‘ wa al-Tarjamah.

  43. Mohajan, H. K. (2018). History of Rakhine State and the origin of the Rohingya Muslims. IKAT : The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 2(1), 19–46. https://doi.org/10.22146/ikat.v2i1.37391

  44. Norenzayan, A. (2016). Theodiversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 465–488. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033426

  45. Oumlil, A. (1993). Fī shar‘iyyat al-ikhtilāf [On the legitimacy of difference] (Second edition). Dār al-Ṭalī‘ah li-al-Ṭibā‘ah wa-al-Nashr.

  46. Pope Paul VI. (1965). Nostra Aetate: Declaration on the relation of the Church to non-Christian religions. https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_nostra-aetate_en.html

  47. Rane, H. (2022). Interfaith actor reception of Islamic covenants: How ‘new’ religious knowledge influences views on interreligious relations in Islam. Religions, 13(9), 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13090873

  48. Sayigh, Y. (1987). The politics of Palestinian exile. Third World Quarterly, 9(1), 28–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436598708419961

  49. Shavit, U. (2010). Is shura a Muslim form of democracy? Roots and systemization of a polemic. Middle Eastern Studies, 46(3), 349–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263200902917085

  50. Shaykhūn, M. S. (2004). Al-silm min usus al-taqaddum fī al-Islām [Peace is one of the foundations of progress in Islam]. A‘māl al-Nadwah al-Mawlidiyyah al-Duwaliyyah Afrīl 2004, Silsilah Ḥiwārāt, ‘Adad: 5CE [Proceedings of the International Mawlid Symposium, April 2004, Dialogue Series, No. 5].

  51. Singh, R. P. B., & Aktor, M. (2015). Hinduism and globalization. In S. D. Brunn (Ed.), The Changing World Religion Map (pp. 1917–1932). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_100

  52. The United States Institute of Peace. (2008). Dawrah mu’ahhilah li-nayl shahādah fī ḥall al-nizā‘āt bayna al-adyān [Certificate course in interfaith conflict resolution]. The United States Institute of Peace. https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/ETC-I/Online%20Courses/Interfaith_Conflic-final-11-25-08.pdf

  53. Toffler, A. (1984). Future shock (Reissue edition). Bantam.

  54. Veronese, G., Cavazzoni, F., Russo, S., & Ayoub, H. (2022). Structural violence and sources of resistance among Palestinian children living under military occupation and political oppression. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 15(4), 391–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2022.2102204

  55. Wildan, M. (2021). The persecution of Rohingya Muslims and the path to democratization in Myanmar. Studia Islamika, 28(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v28i1.11202

  56. Worthington, E. L., Rueger, S. Y., Davis, E. B., & Wortham, J. (2019). “Mere” Christian forgiveness: An ecumenical Christian conceptualization of forgiveness through the lens of stress-and-coping theory. Religions, 10(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10010044

  57. Zaqzūq, M. Ḥamdī. (2018). Al-Sharq wa al-Gharb wa ist‘ādat al-thiqah al-mafqūdah [East and West and restoring lost trust]. In Al-Sharq wa al-Gharb naḥwa ḥiwār ḥaḍārī insānī: A‘māl liqā’ Fīlūrinsā: 21-22 Sha‘bān 1436 H/8-9 Yūniyu 2015 M [East and West towards a civilized and humane dialogue: Proceedings of the Florence Meeting: 21-22 Sha’ban 1436 AH/8-9 June 2015 AD] (Second edition). Dār al-Quds al-‘Arabī.

  58. Zorrieh, M. J., Abyar, Z., & Arshad Riyahi, A. (2016). Global peace according to fixed ethical principles from the viewpoint of Hans Kung and Allameh Tabatabaei. Bioethics Journal, 6(19), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.22037/bj.v6i19.14080

No Related Submission Found