Article Sidebar

Marginalizing Local Government in COVID-19 Containment The Case of Kerala, India
Submitted
April 22, 2022
Accepted
December 30, 2022
Published
December 31, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 123 Download : 5

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Local governments (LGs) have an advantage in fighting pandemics compared to other levels of government. This is evident from the success stories of many local governments around the world. Because LGs are closer to the ground situation, they are able to act more contextually and flexibly. Pandemic containment measures like contact tracing, physical distancing, wearing of masks, quarantining,  encouraging vaccination, and social support are easier for local governments to undertake with a certain degree of ownership. This paper analyses the role of rural LGs known as panchayats in containing pandemics, particularly Kerala, which has the most empowered village-level panchayats in India and has experience in participatory planning for more than two decades. The paper discusses Kerala's gains in pandemic management and the areas where it lagged.

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 John S. Moolakkattu

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Moolakkattu, J. S. . (2022). Marginalizing Local Government in COVID-19 Containment: The Case of Kerala, India. Unisia, 40(2), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.20885/unisia.vol40.iss2.art11
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Abrori, F. (2021). The role of local governments in regional financial management for the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang, 4(2), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v4i2.10250

  2. Ahmad, E. (2022). Multilevel responses to risks, shocks and pandemics: Lessons from the evolving Chinese governance model. Journal of Chinese Governance, 7(2), 291–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2020.1813395

  3. Ahrens, T., & Ferry, L. (2020). Financial resilience of English local government in the aftermath of COVID-19. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 32(5), 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-07-2020-0098

  4. AmritKiran, M., Suresh, A., & Jayashree, S. (2018). A study on Kudumbashree in Kerala. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 118, 4195–4201. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333164090_A_Study_on_Kudumbashree_in_Kerala

  5. Anttiroiko, A.-V. (2021). Successful government responses to the pandemic: Contextualizing national and urban responses to the COVID-19 outbreak in East and West. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 10(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.20210401.oa1

  6. Billava, N. (2021). Role of Gram Panchayats in tackling COVID-19: A case study from Karnataka. Journal of Rural Development, 40(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd/2021/v40/i1/166504

  7. Blair, H. (2000). Participation and accountability at the periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries. World Development, 28(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00109-6

  8. Chathukulam, J., & John, M. S. (2002). Five years of participatory planning in Kerala: Rhetoric and reality. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(49), 4917–4926. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4412934

  9. Chathukulam, J., & Joseph, M. (2022). Management of the COVID-19 pandemic in Kerala through the lens of state capacity and clientelism (WIDER Working Paper 2022; WIDER Working Paper, Vol. 2022). UNU-WIDER. https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2022/191-4

  10. Chathukulam, J., & Tharamangalam, J. (2021). The Kerala model in the time of COVID19: Rethinking state, society and democracy. World Development, 137, 105207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105207

  11. Dutta, A., & Fischer, H. W. (2021). The local governance of COVID-19: Disease prevention and social security in rural India. World Development, 138, 105234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105234

  12. Green, D., & Loualiche, E. (2021a). State and local government employment in the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Public Economics, 193, 104321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104321

  13. Green, D., & Loualiche, E. (2021b). State and local government employment in the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Public Economics, 193, 104321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104321

  14. Gupta, S., Nguyen, T., Raman, S., Lee, B., Lozano-Rojas, F., Bento, A., Simon, K., & Wing, C. (2021). Tracking public and private responses to the COVID-19 epidemic: Evidence from state and local government actions. American Journal of Health Economics, 7(4), 361–404. https://doi.org/10.1086/716197

  15. Gurgel, A. do M., Santos, C. C. S. dos, Alves, K. P. de S., Araujo, J. M. de, & Leal, V. S. (2020). Government strategies to ensure the human right to adequate and healthy food facing the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 25, 4945–4956. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320202512.33912020

  16. Isaac, T., & Sadanandan, R. (2020). COVID-19, public health system and local governance in Kerala. Economic and Political Weekly, 55(21), 35–40. https://www.epw.in/journal/2020/21/perspectives/covid-19-public-health-system-and-local-governance.html

  17. Israelsen, S., & Malji, A. (2021). COVID-19 in India: A comparative analysis of the Kerala and Gujarat development models’ initial responses. Progress in Development Studies, 21(4), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934211030462

  18. Jacob, M., & John, J. (2016). Local governments and the public health delivery system in Kerala: Lessons of collaborative governance. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

  19. Jayalakshmi, R., & Suhita, C. (2017). Home-based palliative services under two local self-government institutions of Kerala, India: An assessment of compliance with policy and guidelines to local self-government institutions. Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 23(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.197947

  20. Kamara, F., Mokuwa, G. A., & Richards, P. (2022). Keeping Ebola at bay: Public authority and ceremonial competence in rural Sierra Leone. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 60(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X21000422

  21. Kodiyat MS, B. A., Siagian, A. H., & Andryan, A. (2020). The effect of centralistic political party policies in selection of regional heads in Medan City. Indonesian Journal of Education, Social Sciences and Research (IJESSR), 1(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.30596/ijessr.v1i1.4899

  22. Kodoth, P. (2021). How Kudumbasree forged a massive network of neighbourhood groups: Micro politics and the strategies of women in Kerala. Center for Development Studies. http://192.168.2.12:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/593

  23. Krishnakumar, R. (2020, March 22). Kerala model [HTML]. Frontline. https://frontline.thehindu.com/cover-story/article31130309.ece

  24. Kumar, D. V. (2020, February 2). Fight against non-communicable diseases gets a fillip in Kerala [HTML]. The New Indian Express. https://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/thiruvananthapuram/2020/Feb/02/fight-against-non-communicable-diseases-gets-a-fillip-in-kerala-2097872.html

  25. Kutty, V. R. (2000). Historical analysis of the development of health care facilities in Kerala State, India. Health Policy and Planning, 15(1), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/15.1.103

  26. Laochankham, S., Kamnuansilpa, P., & Lowatcharin, G. (2021). Locally driven action in pandemic control: The case of Khon Kaen Province, Thailand. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 43(1), 8–14. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/70/article/796889

  27. Mahapatra, R. (2020, April 24). Panchayati Raj Day: Pandemic and the panchayats [HTML]. Down To Earth. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/governance/panchayati-raj-day-pandemic-and-the-panchayats-70674

  28. Mardones, F. O., Rich, K. M., Boden, L. A., Moreno-Switt, A. I., Caipo, M. L., Zimin-Veselkoff, N., Alateeqi, A. M., & Baltenweck, I. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and global food security. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.578508

  29. Maya, C. (2016, May 11). Public health expenditure high in State [HTML]. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Thiruvananthapuram/public-health-expenditure-high-in-state/article8588010.ece

  30. Meckelburg, R. (2021). Indonesia’s COVID-19 emergency: Where the local is central. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 43(1), 31–37. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/70/article/796892

  31. Mohanty, S., Venkatarao, E., & Yasobant, S. (2020). Non-communicable disease care and physical activity promotion in India: Analysis of recent policies, guidelines and workplans. Family Medicine and Community Health, 8(2), e000206. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2019-000206

  32. Muthukumar, P., & Salini, R. (2021). Impact of COVID 19 on production and productivity of Kerala agriculture sector. IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, 8(6), 155–162. https://ijiset.com/vol8/v8s6/IJISET_V8_I06_16.pdf

  33. Nemec, J., & Špaček, D. (2020). The Covid-19 pandemic and local government finance: Czechia and Slovakia. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 32(5), 837–846. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-07-2020-0109

  34. OECD. (2020). COVID-19 and fiscal relations across levels of government (OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19)) [OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19)]. https://doi.org/10.1787/ab438b9f-en

  35. Ortega, F., & Béhague, D. (2022). Contested leadership and the governance of COVID-19 in Brazil: The role of local government and community activism. Global Public Health, 17(4), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2022.2028304

  36. Pandey, V., Singh, S., & Kumar, D. (2022). COVID-19, information management by local governments, and food consumption. Food Policy, 110, 102278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102278

  37. Parker, M., Hanson, T. M., Vandi, A., Babawo, L. S., & Allen, T. (2019). Ebola and public authority: Saving loved ones in Sierra Leone. Medical Anthropology, 38(5), 440–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2019.1609472

  38. Paul, S. K. (2022). Consequences of Covid–19 and role of Gram Panchayats in tackling the pandemic situation: Some highlights from West Bengal. NAVEIÑ REET: Nordic Journal of Law and Social Research, 12, 63–74. https://tidsskrift.dk/nnjlsr/article/view/135352

  39. Permanasari, V. Y., Nadjib, M., Sjaaf, A. C., Besral, & Anjani, A. A. (2022). The response of local governments in financing related to the COVID-19 pandemic: A literature review. Journal of Public Health Research, 11(2), jphr.2021.2620. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2021.2620

  40. Ramakumar, R., & Eapen, M. (2022). The legacy of public action and gender-sensitivity of the pandemic response in Kerala State, India. Economia Politica, 39(1), 271–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-021-00249-1

  41. Rao, S. P. R. (1993). Administration of primary health centres in India: A study from the three southern states. Mittal Publications.

  42. Resende, T. C., Paschoalotto, M. A. C., Peckham, S., Passador, C. S., & Passador, J. L. (2021). How did the UK government face the global COVID-19 pandemic? Revista de Administração Pública, 55, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220200418

  43. Richards, P. (2019, June 28). Ebola and chiefs in Sierra Leone [HTML]. Africa at LSE. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/africaatlse/2019/06/28/ebola-chiefs-sierra-leone-research/

  44. Sadanandan, R. (2020). Kerala’s response to COVID-19. Indian Journal of Public Health, 64(6), 99. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijph.IJPH_459_20

  45. Saigal, K. (2020, April 24). PM Modi inaugurates key rural schemes on National Panchayati Raj Day [HTML]. Invest India. https://www.investindia.gov.in/team-india-blogs/pm-modi-inaugurates-key-rural-schemes-national-panchayati-raj-day

  46. Sukhwani, V., Deshkar, S., & Shaw, R. (2020). COVID-19 lockdown, food systems and urban–rural partnership: Case of Nagpur, India. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5710. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165710

  47. Swain, S., & Patoju, S. K. S. (2024). Role of social enterprises in bridging healthcare sector gap: A case of ‘Santhwanam.’ Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, 10(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/23939575231210185

  48. Thakur, J. S., Paika, R., & Singh, S. (2020). Burden of noncommunicable diseases and implementation challenges of National NCD Programmes in India. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 76(3), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.03.002

  49. Venugopalan, M., Bastian, B. L., & Viswanathan, P. K. (2021). The role of multi-actor engagement for women’s empowerment and entrepreneurship in Kerala, India. Administrative Sciences, 11(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010031

  50. Wollmann, H. (2004). Urban leadership in German local politics: The rise, role and performance of the directly elected (chief executive) mayor. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(1), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00508.x

  51. Wright, C. (2020). Local government fighting Covid-19. The Round Table, 109(3), 338–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2020.1763017