Main Article Content

Abstract

Investigation of economic development and growth has been at the forefront of economic research (Denison 1962; Barro 1996). The idea of focusing on the industrial sector to drive economic growth has been a global phenomenon. The process of economic growth has been supplemented with several structural changes that an economy goes through. The mainstream literature predicts that the opening up of the economy increases the exports of commodities based on the economy’s comparative advantage. One of the principal questions that the paper attempts is to examine whether the openness of the Indian economy resulted in the expansion of the share of export-oriented industries and the reduction of import-competing industries' share in manufacturing output. The analysis uses rich granular-level data on the Indian formal manufacturing sector. Furthermore, the analysis of structural changes requires looking not only at the growth rate over a particular period but also at the cumulative increase in growth of the sector according to different activities which may be labour or capital-intensive. The paper using cluster-based analysis decomposes manufacturing growth into labour and capital-intensive activities and brings out important aspects on how the manufacturing output is been produced. The pattern of capital intensity of Indian manufacturing firms shows that firms have systematically witnessed an increase in capital intensity. Factors such as incentives in the form of subsidies, and reduction in tariffs on capital goods made access easier to adopt advanced technology. Also in today’s globalised world, the pressure on domestic firms to remain competitive both in the external and domestic markets created grounds for adopting the latest (more capital-intensive) techniques.

Keywords

capital intensity cluster analysis export orientation gross value added import competing

Article Details

How to Cite
Choudhry, S. . (2022). Unfolding Industrial Output: A Study of India’s Formal Manufacturing Sector. Unisia, 40(1), 225–256. https://doi.org/10.20885/unisia.vol40.iss1.art11

References

  1. Abbas, Q., & Mujahid-Mukhtar, E. (2000). The role of human capital in economic growth: A comparative study of Pakistan and India [with comments]. The Pakistan Development Review, 39(4), 451–473. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41260279

  2. Aggarwal, S., & Chakraborty, D. (2022). Which factors influence India’s intra-industry trade? Empirical findings for select sectors. Global Business Review, 23(3), 729–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919868343

  3. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (2007). Capital, innovation, and growth accounting. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(1), 79–93. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23606798

  4. Ahluwalia, I. J. (1992). Productivity and growth in Indian manufacturing. Oxford University Press.

  5. Amsden, A. (2001). The rise of “the rest”: Challenges to the west from late-industrializing economies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195139690.001.0001

  6. Bakht, Z., Yunus, M., & Salimullah, M. (2002). Machinery industry in Bangladesh (No. 4; IDEAS Series). Institute of Developing Economies-Japan External Trade Organization. https://www.ide.go.jp/English/Publish/Reports/Ideas/04.html

  7. Balakrishnan, P., Pushpangadan, K., & Babu, M. S. (2000). Trade liberalisation and productivity growth in manufacturing: Evidence from firm-level panel data. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(41), 3679–3682. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4409837

  8. Banerjee, K. (2012). Credit and growth cycles in India: An empirical assessment of the lead and lag behaviour (No. 22; RBI Working Paper Series). Reserve Bank of India. https://m.rbi.org.in/scripts/PublicationsView.aspx?id=13980

  9. Banerji, A. (1975). Capital intensity and productivity in Indian industry. Macmillan Company of India.

  10. Banga, R., & Goldar, B. (2007). Contribution of services to output growth and productivity in Indian manufacturing: Pre- and post-reforms. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(26), 2769–2777. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4419765

  11. Barro, R. J. (1999). Notes on growth accounting. Journal of Economic Growth, 4(2), 119–137. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40216002

  12. Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223–251. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2138606

  13. Berlemann, M., & Wesselhöft, J.-E. (2014). Estimating aggregate capital stocks using the Perpetual Inventory Method: — A survey of previous implementations and new empirical evidence for 103 countries. Jahrbuch Für Wirtschaftswissenschaften / Review of Economics, 65(1), 1–34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24369663

  14. Bhattacharjea, A. (2006). Labour market regulation and industrial performance in India: A critical review of the empirical evidence. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 49(2), 211-232,. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=954908

  15. Chandrasekhar, C. P., & Ghosh, J. (2007). Recent employment trends in India and China: An unfortunate convergence? Social Scientist, 35(3/4), 19–46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27644204

  16. Chaudhuri, S. (2013). Manufacturing trade deficit and industrial policy in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(8), 41–50. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23391232

  17. Cherif, R., & Hasanov, F. (2019). Principles of true industrial policy. Journal of Globalization and Development, 10(1), 20190034. https://doi.org/10.1515/jgd-2019-0034

  18. Choudhury, U. D. R. (1988). New series on national accounts statistics: Some comments. Economic and Political Weekly, 23(30), 1527–1540. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4378791

  19. Clark, C. (1940). The conditions of economic progress (First edition). MacMillan and Co Limited.

  20. Cornwall, J., & Cornwall, W. (2002). A demand and supply analysis of productivity growth. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 13(2), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(01)00041-8

  21. Das, P., & Sengupta, A. (2015). Wages, productivity and employment in Indian manufacturing industry: 1998-2010. The Journal of Industrial Statistics, 4(2), 208–214. http://164.100.161.63/sites/default/files/reports_and_publication/NSS_Journals/6_jisvl4_2_sept2015.pdf

  22. Das, V. K. (2016). Agricultural productivity growth in India: An analysis accounting for different land types. The Journal of Developing Areas, 50(2), 349–366. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24737407

  23. Denison, E. F. (2012). The sources of economic growth in the United States and the alternatives before us. Literary Licensing, LLC. (Original work published 1962)

  24. Djidonou, G. R., & Foster-McGregor, N. (2022). Stagnant manufacturing growth in India: The role of the informal economy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.07.007

  25. Erumban, A. A., & Das, D. K. (2016). Information and communication technology and economic growth in India. Telecommunications Policy, 40(5), 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2015.08.006

  26. European Communities, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, United Nations, & World Bank. (2009). System of national accounts 2008. European Communities, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, United Nations and World Bank. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/sna2008.asp

  27. Feenstra, R. (2007). Globalization and its impact on labour (No. 44; Wiener Institut Für Internationale Wirtschaftsvergleiche Working Paper). The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies. https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/wiiwpaper/44.htm

  28. Feenstra, R. C., Markusen, J. R., & Zeile, W. (1992). Accounting for growth with new inputs: Theory and evidence. The American Economic Review, 82(2), 415–421. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2117437

  29. Fischer, S., & Rotemberg, J. J. (1994). Editorial, NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1994. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 9, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1086/654233

  30. Ghose, A. K. (2000). Trade liberalization, employment and global inequality. International Labour Review, 139(3), 281–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2000.tb00205.x

  31. Ghose, A. K. (2005). High wage-low productivity organised manufacturing and the employment challenge in India. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 48(2), 231–242.

  32. Ghose, A. K. (2016). Globalization, growth and employment in India. Indian Journal of Human Development, 10(2), 127–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973703016663536

  33. Goldar, B. (2002). Trade liberalization and manufacturing employment: The case of India [Employment Paper 2002/34]. Institute of Economic Growth. http://www.ilo.org/employment/Whatwedo/Publications/WCMS_142365/lang--en/index.htm

  34. Goldar, B. (2009). Trade liberalisation and labour demand elasticity in indian manufacturing. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(34), 51–57. https://www.epw.in/journal/2009/34/special-articles/trade-liberalisation-and-labour-demand-elasticity-indian

  35. Goldar, B. N. (1986). Productivity growth in Indian industry. Allied Publishers.

  36. Goldberg, P. K., Khandelwal, A. K., Pavcnik, N., & Topalova, P. (2010). Imported intermediate inputs and domestic product growth: Evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(4), 1727–1767. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40961017

  37. Greenaway, D., Morgan, W., & Wright, P. (1998). Trade Reform, Adjustment and Growth: What Does the Evidence Tell Us? The Economic Journal, 108(450), 1547–1561. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2566198

  38. Grossman, G., & Helpman, E. (1990). Hysteresis in the trade pattern (No. w3526; NBER Working Paper, p. w3526). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3526

  39. Harper, M. J. (1999). Estimating capital inputs for productivity measurement: An overview of U.S. concepts and methods. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique, 67(3), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.2307/1403709

  40. Hasan, R., Mitra, D., & Ramaswamy, K. V. (2007). Trade reforms, labor regulations, and labor-demand elasticities: Empirical evidence from India. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3), 466–481. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.3.466

  41. Hashim, S. R., & Dadi, M. M. (1973). Capital-output relations in Indian manufacturing, 1946-1964. Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda.

  42. Hsieh, C.-T., & Klenow, P. J. (2010). Development accounting. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(1), 207–223. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25760290

  43. Hulten, C. R. (1991). The measurement of capital. In E. R. Berndt & J. E. Triplett (Eds.), Fifty years of economic measurement: The jubilee of the conference on research in income and wealth. University of Chicago Press. https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapters/fifty-years-economic-measurement-jubilee-conference-research-income-and-wealth/measurement-capital

  44. Hummels, D., & Klenow, P. J. (2005). The variety and quality of a nation’s exports. American Economic Review, 95(3), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054201396

  45. International Labour Organization. (2014, April 1). Annual survey of industries 2005-2006: India, 2006—2007 [HTML]. ILOSTAT. https://www.ilo.org/surveyLib/index.php/catalog/216/variable/V35

  46. Jayanthakumaran, K. (2002). The impact of trade liberalisation on manufacturing sector performance in developing countries: A survey of the literature (Faculty of Business - Economics Working Papers No. 53). University of Wollongong; University of Wollongong Research Online (RO). https://ro.uow.edu.au/commwkpapers/53

  47. Kapoor, R. (2018). Understanding the performance of India’s manufacturing sector: Evidence from firm level data [Centre for Sustainable Employment Working Paper #2]. Azim Premji University. https://cse.azimpremjiuniversity.edu.in/publications/understanding-the-performance-of-indias-manufacturing-sector-evidence-from-firm-level-data-2/

  48. Kapoor, R. (2020). Technology, Jobs and Inequality: Evidence from India’s Manufacturing Sector. In S. C. Aggarwal, D. K. Das, & R. Banga (Eds.), Accelerators of India’s growth—Industry, trade and employment: Festschrift in honor of Bishwanath Goldar (pp. 301–321). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9397-7_14

  49. Kniivilä, M. (2007). Industrial development and economic growth: Implications for poverty reduction and income inequality. In Industrial development for the 21st century: Sustainable development perspectives (pp. 295–332). United Nations, Department of Social and Economic Affairs.

  50. Krueger, A. O. (1997). Trade policy and economic development: How we learn (No. w5896; NBER Working Paper). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w5896

  51. Kumar, J., Katyal, R. P., & Sharma, S. P. (1987). Estimates of fixed capital stock and consumption of fixed capital in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 22(47), 2003–2010. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4377758

  52. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1811581

  53. Kuznets, S. S. (1966). Modern economic growth: Rate, structure, and spread. Yale University Press.

  54. Lall, S. (1999). India’s manufactured exports: Comparative structure and prospects. World Development, 27(10), 1769–1786. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00084-4

  55. Lane, N. (2021). Manufacturing revolutions: Industrial policy and industrialization in South Korea. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3890311

  56. Lin, J. Y. (2011). From flying geese to leading dragons: New opportunities and strategies for structural transformation in developing countries (WPS 5702; Policy Research Working Paper). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5702

  57. Lloyd, P. J., & MacLaren, D. (2000). Openness and growth in East Asia after the Asian crisis. Journal of Asian Economics, 11(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-0078(00)00042-7

  58. Maiti, D. (2019). Trade, labor share, and productivity in India’s industries. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3374775

  59. Martin, L. A., Nataraj, S., & Harrison, A. E. (2017). In with the big, out with the small: Removing small-scale reservations in India. American Economic Review, 107(2), 354–386. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20141335

  60. Mazumdar, S. (2008). Investment and growth in India under liberalisation: Asymmetries and instabilities. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(49), 68–77. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40278268

  61. McMillan, M., & Rodrik, D. (2011). Globalization, structural change and productivity growth. In M. Bacchetta & M. Jansen (Eds.), Making globalization socially sustainable (pp. 49–84). International Labour Organization. http://www.ilo.org/global/publications/ilo-bookstore/order-online/books/WCMS_170968/lang--en/index.htm

  62. Miller, E. M. (1989). The definition of capital for Solow’s growth accounting formula. Southern Economic Journal, 56(1), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.2307/1059063

  63. Milner, C., & Wright, P. (1998). Modelling labour market adjustment to trade liberalisation in an industrialising economy. The Economic Journal, 108(447), 509–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00301

  64. Mueller, S. (2008). Capital stock approximation using firm level panel data: A modified perpetual inventory approach. Jahrbücher Für Nationalökonomie Und Statistik / Journal of Economics and Statistics, 228(4), 357–371. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23812527

  65. Naudé, W., Szirmai, A., & Lavopa, A. (2015). Industrialization and technological change in the BRICS: The role of foreign and domestic investment. In W. Naudé, A. Szirmai, & N. Haraguchi (Eds.), Structural Change and Industrial Development in the BRICS (pp. 324–351). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198725077.003.0012

  66. Nin-Pratt, A., Yu, B., & Fan, S. (2010). Comparisons of agricultural productivity growth in China and India. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 33(3), 209–223. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41770908

  67. Nübler, I. (2014). A theory of capabilities for productive transformation: Learning to catch up’. In J. M. Salazar-Xirinachs, I. Nübler, & R. Kozul-Wright (Eds.), Transforming economies: Making industrial policy work for growth, jobs and development (pp. 113–149). International Labour Organization.

  68. Orr, S. (2019). Productivity dispersion, import competition, and specialization in multi-product plants [HTML]. Forum for Research in Empirical International Trade. https://www.freit.org/RMET/2019/SubmittedPapers/Scott_Orr44.pdf

  69. Patnaik, P. (2009). A perspective on the growth process in India and China (The IDEAs Working Paper Series No. 05/2009). International Development Economics Associates. https://www.networkideas.org/working/jun2009/wp17_05_2009.htm

  70. Rodrik, D. (1997, October 24). Globalization, social conflict and economic growth [Lecture]. 8th Raúl Prebisch Lecture, Geneva. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/prebisch8th.en.pdf

  71. Schott, P. K. (2003). One size fits all? Heckscher-Ohlin specialization in global production. American Economic Review, 93(3), 686–708. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322157043

  72. Schott, P. K. (2004). Across-product versus within-product specialization in international trade. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2), 647–678. https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553041382201

  73. Sen, K. (2008). Trade policy, inequality and performance in Indian manufacturing (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203894378

  74. Shafaeddin, M. S. (2005). Trade policy at the crossroads: Recent experience of developing countries. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-64373-8

  75. Shafaeddin, M. S. (2006). Trade liberalization and economic reform in developing countries: Structural change or de-industrialization? In A. Paloni & M. Zanardi (Eds.), The IMF, World Bank and policy reform (pp. 155–182). Routledge.

  76. Spatafora, N., Anand, R., & Mishra, S. (2012). Structural transformation and the sophistication of production (No. 2012/059; IMF Working Papers). International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/31/Structural-Transformation-and-the-sophistication-of-Production-25746

  77. Srinivas, S. (2014). Demand and innovation: Paths to inclusive development. In S. V. Ramani (Ed.), Innovation in India: Combining economic growth with inclusive development (pp. 78–104). Cambridge University Press.

  78. Szirmai, A. (2013). Manufacturing and economic development. In A. Szirmai, W. Naudé, & L. Alcorta (Eds.), Pathways to industrialization in the twenty-first century: New challenges and emerging paradigms (pp. 53–75). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199667857.003.0002

  79. Tejani, S. (2016). Jobless growth in India: An investigation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(3), 843–870. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24915753

  80. Thirlwall, A. P. (2006). Growth & development: With special reference to developing economies (8th edition). Palgrave Macmillan.

  81. Trivedi, P. K. (1970). Inventory behaviour in U.K. manufacturing 1956-67. The Review of Economic Studies, 37(4), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296482

  82. Trivedi, P. K. (1975). Time series versus structural models: A case study of Canadian manufacturing inventory behavior. International Economic Review, 16(3), 587–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525998

  83. Trivedi, P. K., Lakshmanan, L., Jain, R., & Gupta, Y. K. (2011). Productivity, efficiency and competitiveness of the Indian manufacturing sector [Development Research Group Studies Series]. Reserve Bank of India. https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/PublicationsView.aspx?id=13366

  84. Viswanath, J., Reddy, K. L. N., & Pandit, V. (2009). Human capital contributions to economic growth in India: An aggregate production function analysis. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(3), 473–486. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27768219

  85. Weiss, J. (2002). Industrialization and globalization: Theory and evidence from developing countries (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203450765

  86. Yu, K. M., Geoff Gottlieb,Gee Hee Hong,Sung Eun Jung,Jochen M. Schmittmann,Jiangyan. (2016). China’s changing trade and the implications for the CLMV (No. 2016/010; Departmental Paper). International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Departmental-Papers-Policy-Papers/Issues/2016/12/31/China-s-Changing-Trade-and-the-Implications-for-the-CLMV-43679

  87. Yunus, M., & Yamagata, T. (2014). Bangladesh: Market force supersedes control. In T. Fukunishi & T. Yamagata (Eds.), The garment industry in low-income countries: An entry point of industrialization (pp. 77–104). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383181_3

No Related Submission Found