Main Article Content
Abstract
Administrative judges can apply the AAPPL to examine validity of administrative decisions of state by means of connecting relevance substantive legal norms through deductive reasoning. There are two standards to qualify as to whether an administrative decision is in contradiction with the AAUPPL: written legal norms and unwritten legal norms in form of the AAUPPL. The AAUPPL is an effective means of control to examine administrative policies or decisions that are not touched upon by written laws, and, hence will reduce state policies and decisions that are legally immune. Keywords: administrative decisions, judges, control, validity.
Article Details
License
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Hamidi, J. (2012). Penerapan AAUPPL oleh Administrasi (Suatu Upaya Menuju “Clean and Stable Government”). Unisia, 30(66). https://doi.org/10.20885/unisia.vol30.iss66.art3
