Article Sidebar

Digital Democracy vs Invisible Oppressions of Platform Partners Critical Understanding of Platform Economy in the Regime of Digital India
Submitted
January 21, 2026
Accepted
January 28, 2026
Published
January 30, 2026
Download
PDF Review Reports Originality Report
Statistic
Read Counter : 23 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper examines the emerging challenges of the digitalized economy with specific reference to ride-hailing and food delivery platform workers in India. It critically analyses the oppressive nature of the platform economy through the lens of worker rights, highlighting how algorithmic control, employment informality, and the absence of social and legal protection shape workers’ everyday experiences. A significant concern addressed in the study is the growing participation of youth in precarious platform work, often at the cost of discontinuing formal education. This trend raises serious long-term implications, including potential skilled labour shortages and increased workforce vulnerability. The paper therefore emphasizes the importance of understanding both the perspectives of young platform workers and the role of the state in regulating platform-based economy. It further interrogates the notion of “digital democracy,” arguing that while platform capitalism promotes economic growth and technological inclusion, it simultaneously fails to ensure democratic rights of the workers. This contradiction is examined through a critical analysis of the Social Security Code and its provisions for platform workers. Methodologically, the study adopts a focused group interviews method, content analysis, and participants observation method. Fieldwork was conducted among the workers of ride-hailing and food delivery platforms in Kolkata, West Bengal and in South Delhi. By foregrounding workers lived experiences, the paper contributes to ongoing debates on platform workers, youth employment, and the limitations of welfare provisions of workers in the digital economy.

Keywords

digital democracy food delivery platform invisible oppressions ride-hailing platform Social Security Code workers’ rights Digital India

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Dipika Nath

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Nath, D. . (2026). Digital Democracy vs Invisible Oppressions of Platform Partners: Critical Understanding of Platform Economy in the Regime of Digital India. Unisia, 44(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.20885/unisia.vol44.iss1.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Bajwa, U., Gastaldo, D., Di Ruggiero, E., & Knorr, L. (2018). The health of workers in the global gig economy. Globalization and Health, 14(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0444-8

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0444-8

  2. Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishers.

  3. Choudary, S. P. (2016, October 26). Role of big data in the platform economy [Video recording]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkaiFRR3Z7Y

  4. Cole, M. (2023). (Infra)structural discontinuity: Capital, labour, and technological change. Antipode, 55(2), 348–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12887

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12887

  5. Damioli, G., Van Roy, V., & Vertesy, D. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on labor productivity. Eurasian Business Review, 11(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-020-00172-8

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-020-00172-8

  6. Della Puppa, F., Dhar, D., & Montagna, N. (Eds.). (2025). Migrant labour in the gig economy: The intersection of migrant labour, platform capitalism, and resistance. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-91262-7

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-91262-7

  7. Dhal, S. (2020). Situating Digital India Mission in pursuit of good governance: A study of electronic governance initiatives in the Indian Province of Odisha. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 66(1), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019556120904034

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0019556120904034

  8. Elizabeth, S. (2025, December 29). Identity cards of delivery executives blocked by aggregator companies after they take part in strike [HTML]. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/bangalore/identity-cards-of-delivery-executives-blocked-by-aggregator-companies-after-they-take-part-in-strike/article70450224.ece

  9. Foucault, M. (1980). Body/power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (pp. 55–62). Pantheon Books.

  10. Frank, M. R., Autor, D., Bessen, J. E., Brynjolfsson, E., Cebrian, M., Deming, D. J., Feldman, M., Groh, M., Lobo, J., Moro, E., Wang, D., Youn, H., & Rahwan, I. (2019). Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(14), 6531–6539. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900949116

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900949116

  11. Fuchs, M. (2020). Does the digitalization of manufacturing boost a ‘smart’ era of capital accumulation? Zeitschrift Für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 64(2), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2019-0012

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2019-0012

  12. Ghosh, S. K. (2020). Circular economy in India. In S. K. Ghosh (Ed.), Circular Economy: Global Perspective (pp. 157–185). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1052-6_9

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1052-6_9

  13. Government of India. (2020). The Code on Social Security, 2020 (Act No. 36 of 2020). Ministry of Law and Justice.

  14. Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Wiley-Blackwell.

  15. Hein, A., Schreieck, M., Riasanow, T., Setzke, D. S., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020). Digital platform ecosystems. Electronic Markets, 30(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00377-4

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00377-4

  16. Inamdar, N. (2026, January 19). India’s online delivery platforms face a year of reckoning [HTML]. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx20qlglgw5o

  17. Kulkarni, S. (2025, December 3). New gratuity rules decoded: Are permanent employees also eligible for gratuity after 1 year of service under new labour code? [HTML]. The Economic Times. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/wealth/save/new-gratuity-rules-are-permanent-employees-also-eligible-for-gratuity-after-1-year-as-per-new-labour-law-code/articleshow/125632046.cms?from=mdr

  18. Laskar, M. H. (2023). Examining the emergence of digital society and the digital divide in India: A comparative evaluation between urban and rural areas. Frontiers in Sociology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1145221

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1145221

  19. Laxmikanth, M. (2025). Courseware on Indian polity. McGraw Hill.

  20. Muldoon, J., & Raekstad, P. (2023). Algorithmic domination in the gig economy. European Journal of Political Theory, 22(4), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851221082078

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851221082078

  21. Nath, D. (2025). Changing nature of capitalism in the era of globalization through YouTube: A perspective of consumerism. Jurnal Perpajakan Dan Keuangan Publik, 3(2), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpkp.v3i2.40930

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/jpkp.v3i2.40930

  22. Ness, I., Ovetz, R., Roque, I., Swidler, E.-M., & Zwick, A. (2022). The Routledge handbook of the gig economy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003161875

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003161875

  23. NITI Aayog. (2022). India’s Gig and Platform Economy: Future of Work Perspectives and Recommendations. National Institution for Transforming India (NITI Aayog). https://policycommons.net/artifacts/2478617/indias-booming-gig-and-platform-economy/3500789/

  24. Norozpour, S., & Safaei, M. (2020). An overview on game theory and its application. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 993(1), 012114. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/993/1/012114

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/993/1/012114

  25. O’Connor, E. (1999). Minding the workers: The meaning of `human’ and `human relations’ in Elton Mayo. Organization, 6(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050849962004

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/135050849962004

  26. Raman, U., Arora, P., & König, R. (2023). The tangled web of women in work: A feminist account. In P. Arora, U. Raman, & R. König (Eds.), Feminist futures of work: Reimagining labour in the digital economy (pp. 17–26). Routledge.

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048556892-003

  27. Sarkar, S. H. (2023). Selfie culture in social media age: Understanding racism in democratic populism. Journal of Historical Archaeology & Anthropological Sciences, 8(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.15406/jhaas.2023.08.00267

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/jhaas.2023.08.00267

  28. Scott, J. C. (2008). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale University Press.

  29. Shen, Y., & Zhang, X. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on employment: The role of virtual agglomeration. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 122. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02647-9

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02647-9

  30. Sindakis, S., & Showkat, G. (2024). The digital revolution in India: Bridging the gap in rural technology adoption. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00380-w

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00380-w

  31. Singh, A., & Bhardwaj, P. (2025). Digital India program optimisation: Harnessing guidelines and contracts. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 17(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2025.148162

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2025.148162

  32. Singh, D. A., & Kumar, D. R. (2025). Digital India Initiative and its impact on sustainable development. Siddhanta’s International Journal of Advanced Research in Arts & Humanities, 3(1), 345–356. https://sijarah.com/index.php/sijarah/article/view/190

  33. Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. W. Strahan and T. Cadell. https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00043218

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00043218

  34. Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity.

  35. Täuscher, K., & Laudien, S. M. (2018). Understanding platform business models: A mixed methods study of marketplaces. European Management Journal, 36(3), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.06.005

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.06.005

  36. Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. Harper.

  37. Van Der Aalst, W., Hinz, O., & Weinhardt, C. (2019). Big digital platforms: Growth, impact, and challenges. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(6), 645–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00618-y

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00618-y

  38. Vidal, M. (2019). Contradictions of the labour process, worker empowerment and capitalist inefficiency. Historical Materialism, 28(2), 170–204. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-00001792

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-00001792

  39. Wang, B., & Li, X. (2017). Big data, platform economy and market competition: A preliminary construction of plan-oriented market economy system in the information era. World Review of Political Economy, 8(2), 131–161. https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.8.2.0138

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.8.2.0138

  40. Woodcock, J. (2021). The fight against platform capitalism: An inquiry into the global struggles of the gig economy. University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1ktbdrm

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1ktbdrm
No Related Submission Found