Article Sidebar

Submitted
March 8, 2025
Accepted
May 8, 2025
Published
January 31, 2025
Download
pdf (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 263 Download : 289

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the sub-districts that have the potential to be growth centers and hinterland areas in Kulon Progo Regency and to analyze the magnitude of the interaction between growth centers and supporting areas. This type of research is quantitative descriptive using scalogram analysis and gravity analysis methods. This study was processed using Microsoft Excel 2013. The results of the scalogram analysis study show that in 2020 there were three sub-districts as growth centers in Kulon Progo Regency, namely Wates District, Temon District, and Nanggulan District. In 2023, the three sub-districts will remain growth centers. The results of the gravity analysis revealed differences in distance between sub-districts which affect the magnitude of interaction between the growth center sub-districts and the Hinterland.

Keywords

Gravity Analysis Growth Center Hinterland Scalogram Analysis

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Jihan Hanifah, Unggul Priyadi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

PLAGIARISM CHECK

All manuscripts submitted to AJIE will be checked free of plagiarism elements. Manuscripts that do not meet the requirements will be returned to the author for further correction or will be rejected immediately.

The plagiarism check used by AJIE is Turnitin.

 

How to Cite
Hanifah, J., & Priyadi, U. . (2025). Analisis Pusat Pertumbuhan Wilayah dan Hinterland di Kabupaten Kulon Progo: Indonesia. AJIE (Asian Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship), 9(01), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.20885/ajie.vol9.iss1.art4
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Kulon Progo. (2024). Kabupaten Kulon Progo Dalam Angka 2024. Diakses pada 2 November 2024, dari https://kulonprogokab.bps.go.id/id/publication/2024/02/28/7a85f967bff5363dd4631b61/kabupaten-kulon-progo-dalam-angka-2024.html
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Kulon Progo. (2021). Kabupaten Kulon Progo Dalam Angka 2021. Diakses pada 2 November 2024, dari https://kulonprogokab.bps.go.id/id/publication/2021/02/26/010f2f6aa009128cde8d1cf0/kabupaten-kulon-progo-dalam-angka-2021.html
  3. Devi, I., Yunitasari, D., Priyono, T.H., Mahardiyanto, A., Amijaya, R.N.F., & Somaji, R.P. (2023). Penentuan Pusat Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Interaksi Spasial di Wilayah Kabupaten Blitar. E-Journal Ekonomi Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, Volume 10(2), 98–107.
  4. Gulo, Y. (2015). “Identifikasi Pusat Pertumbuhan dan Hinterland Dalam Pengembangan Wilayah Kabupaten Nias”. Widyariset, Volume 18 Nomor 1, Halaman 37-48.
  5. Handayani, S.A, Pratama, L. S., Simbolon, N.A, Amanda, D., Gaol, R. Y. L., & Siagian, A. P. (2024). Analisis Penentuan Hirarki Pusat Pelayanan Di Kabupaten Labuhanbatu Utara. The Journal of Multidisciplinary Research on Scientific and Advanced, 2(3), 239–246. doi:10.61579/future. v2i3.146
  6. Noviyanti, D., Emma Pravitasari, A., & Sahara, S. (2020). Analisis Perkembangan Wilayah Provinsi Jawa Barat Untuk Arahan Pembangunan Berbasis Wilayah Pengembangan. Jurnal Geografi, 12(01), 280. doi:10.24114/jg.v12i01.14799
  7. Panji Asmara, N., & Aprianti, Y. (2023). Analisis Pusat Pertumbuhan dan Wilayah Hinterland di Kota Samarinda. Agri Socioeconomic Journal, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.35791/agrsosek.v19i3.45749
  8. Priyadi, U., & Atmadji, E . (2017). Identifikasi Pusat Pertumbuhan dan Wilayah Hinterland di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Asian Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (AJIE), Vol.2(2), 193-219. doi: 10.20885/ajie.vol2.iss2.art9
  9. Putri, A. R., & Priyadi, U. (2024). Analysis of regional growth center and hinterland in Bantul regency. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 14(2), 224–236. doi:10.12928/optimum. v14i2.9974
  10. Rusda, D., Aziz, A., & Putra, D. A. W. (2020). Analisis Penentuan Pusat-Pusat Pertumbuhan (Growth Pole) dan Wilayah Belakang (Hinterland) Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah. Ecoplan, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.20527/ecoplan.v3i2.161
  11. Tarigan, R. (2005). Ekonomi Regional Teori dan Aplikasi. PT Bumi Aksara.
  12. Todaro, & Smith. (2006). Pembangunan Ekonomi . Erlangga.
  13. Utoyo, B. (2009). Geograsi Membuka Cakrawala Dunia. PT. Setia Purna Inves.
  14. Vevalemsa, V. S., & Rahmawati, F. (2022). Analisis Pusat Pertumbuhan dan Sektor Ekonomi dalam Mengurangi Ketimpangan Pendapatan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Terapan, Vol.19(1), 1-12. doi:10.30872/jakt. v19i1.10710