Main Article Content

Abstract

As a buffer zone for the new National Capital (IKN), Balikpapan City is experiencing rapid population growth accompanied by increasing waste generation. In 2023, the city produced 528.87 tons of waste per day, an increase of 2.74% from the previous year. Projections indicate that the Manggar Landfill will reach full capacity by 2026, rendering it unable to accommodate additional waste. To address this issue, in 2017 the Balikpapan City Government, in collaboration with the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (KLHK) and JICA, implemented a 3R-based waste management program through the integration of Material Recovery Facilities (MRF), Integrated Waste Processing Facilities (TPST), and the Waste Bank Program. This study aims to analyze the factors influencing the sustainability of the waste management system at the MRF, TPST Kota Hijau, and Kota Hijau Waste Bank, and to formulate appropriate development strategies. The research applies Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) with the RAPFISH approach combined with SWOT analysis. The results show that the Kota Hijau Waste Bank has the highest sustainability status, supported by financial independence and strong community participation, and is classified as fairly sustainable. The MRF is also considered fairly sustainable but remains highly dependent on the municipal budget. Meanwhile, the TPST Kota Hijau records the lowest sustainability level due to operational-technical challenges and limited community involvement. Overall, the three infrastructures fall within the fairly sustainable category. To advance their status to sustainable or highly sustainable, several strategic measures are required, including the optimization of local policies and regulations, program synchronization across stakeholders, strengthening institutional and human resource capacities, diversifying funding sources, enhancing community engagement, and improving technical-operational performance.

Keywords

Sustainability analysis Strategic analysis Waste management infrastructure RAPFISH SWOT

Article Details

How to Cite
Khairunisa, K., & Widyarsana, I. M. W. W. (2025). Analisis Keberlanjutan Sistem Pengelolaan Sampah Berbasis 3R (Studi Kasus MRF, TPST Kota Hijau, dan Bank Sampah Kota Hijau Balikpapan): Indonesia. AJIE (Asian Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship), 9(03), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.20885/ajie.vol9.iss3.art6

References

  1. Afandi, Y. V., Sunoko, H. R., & Kismartini, K. (2014). Status Keberlanjutan Sistem Pengelolaan Air Limbah Domestik Komunal Berbasis Masyarakat di Kota Probolinggo. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 11(2), 100. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.11.2.100-109
  2. Anschutz, J., IJgosse, J., & Scheinberg, A. (2004). Putting Integrated Sustainable Waste Management into Practice 'Using the ISWM Assessment Methodology'. The Netherlands: UWEP.
  3. Arikunto, S. (1991). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Balikpapan. (2024). Balikpapan Dalam Angka, 2024. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Balikpapan
  5. Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2008). SNI 3242-2008 tentang Pengelolaan Sampah di Permukiman
  6. Cinelli, M., S. Coles, and K. Kirwan. 2014. Analysis of the potentials of multicriteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment. Ecological Indicator, 46: 138-148 dalam Fauzi A. (2019). Teknik Analisi Keberlanjutan. Jakarta. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama
  7. Dahniar Nur, Nurfadilah Syawal Ibraya, & Nur Riswandy Marsuki. (2024). Dampak Sosiologi Digital Terhadap Perubahan Sosial Budaya Pada Masyarakat Masa Depan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial (JUPENDIS), 2(2),123–135. https://doi.org/10.54066/jupendis.v2i2.1518
  8. Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Kota Balikpapan. (2023). Kajian Penyusunan Masterplan Infrastruktur Persampahan Kota Balikpapan Tahun 2023
  9. Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya. (2014). Tata Cara Penyelenggaraan Umum Tempat Pengolahan Sampah 3R Berbasis Masyarakat di Kawasan Pemukiman. Jakarta: Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum.
  10. Enri, D., & Padmi, T. (2018). Pengelolaan Sampah Terpadu. Bandung: Penerbit ITB
  11. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). (2017). The Project for Capacity Development of Central and Local Governments for 3R and Solid Waste Management in The Republic of Indonesia Project Completion Report November 2017
  12. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2024, Juni 9). SIPSN. Retrieved from SIPSN: https://sipsn.menlhk.go.id/sipsn/public/data/timbulan
  13. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. (2017). Petunjuk Teknis TPS 3R. Jakarta: Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat.
  14. Khoirudin, U., Hidayat, M., & Cahyono, R. B. (2021). Feasibility Analysis and Design Projection of Waste Management System In Balikpapan. ASEAN Journal of Systems Engineering, 5(2), 39. https://Doi.Org/10.22146/Ajse.V5i2.72021
  15. Nugraheni, A. P., & Widjonarko, W. (2019). Keberlanjutan Tempat Pengolahan Sampah Terpadu di Desa Tawangsari, Kabupaten Boyolali. Teknik PWK, 209-216.
  16. Pemerintah Kota Balikpapan. (2022). Peraturan Daerah Kota Balikpapan No. 4 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Daerah Nomor 13 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pengelolaan Sampah Rumah Tangga dan Sejenis Rumah Tangga
  17. Pemerintah Kota Balikpapaan, (2022, Juni 9). Retrivied from Data Balikpapan: https://data.balikpapan.go.id/dataset/jumlah-timbulan-sampah-dan-sampah-ditangani-tahun 2022
  18. Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2017). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 97 Tahun 2017 tentang Kebijakan dan Strategi Nasional Pengelolaan Sampah Rumah Tangga dan Sampah Sejenis Sampah Rumah Tangga
  19. Ragawidya, P. S. (2023). Penilaian Tingkat Keberlanjutan Instalasi Pengolahan Air Limbah (Ipal) Domestik Komunal Tegalsari Semarang, IPAL Komunal Pedalangan Semarang, dan IPAL Komunal Podorejo Semarang. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/44894
  20. Setiawati, E., Notodarmojo, S., Soewondo, P., Effendi, A. J., & Otok, B. W. (2013). Infrastructure Development Strategy for Sustainable Wastewater System by Using SEM Method (Case Study Setiabudi and Tebel District, South Jakarta). Procedia Environmental Sciences, 17, 685-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.085
  21. Singarimbun, M., & Efendi. (1995). Metode Penelitian Survey. Jakarta: PT Pustaka LP3ES.
  22. Srihayati, B. V., Budastra, I., & Murtiadi, S. (2022). Kajian Keberlanjutan serta Kelayakan TPS 3R dengan Metode AHP dan SWOT di Kabupaten Lombok Tengah. Binawakya, 16(9), 7455-7464
  23. Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
  24. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung:
  25. CV. Alfabeta
  26. Suttibak, S., & Nitivattananon, V. (2008). Assessment of factors influencing the performance of solid waste recycling programs. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53(1–2), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.09.004
  27. Sukwika, T., & Noviana, L. (2020). Status Keberlanjutan Pengelolaan Sampah Terpadu di TPST-Bantargebang, Bekasi: Menggunakan Rapfish dengan R Statistik. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 18(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.18.1.107-118