Article Sidebar

Submitted
August 28, 2023
Accepted
November 29, 2023
Published
November 30, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 491 Download : 372

Main Article Content

Abstract

In every crisis, questions almost always arise regarding the company's responsibility for victims resulting from the crisis. It also depends on how the media frames it. This research was conducted to determine the form of framing of news articles regarding Pertamina's responsibility for the victims of the Plumpang Depot fire. Analysis was carried out for news broadcasts by CNN Indonesia and Kompas.com. The framing analysis model used is Robert Entman. The news analyzed consisted of nine news stories from CNN Indonesia and ten news stories from Kompas.com. The research results found that these two media tend to present news from a point of view that is in line with the government, an aspect that is manifested through the prevalence of reporting that emphasizes clarification from accurate and trustworthy parties, especially from Pertamina's internal sources. The difference in reporting on CNN and Kompas lies in the focus of the reporting delivered. CNN focuses on Pertamina's accountability, while Kompas focuses on Pertamina's handling of victims affected by the Plumpang Depot fire.


 

Keywords

News Framing Entman Pertamina

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Indah Maharani, Adillah Ainul Jannah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Maharani, I., Ainul Jannah, A., & Sukmawati, A. I. . (2023). Ketika Krisis Siapa Bertanggung Jawab? Analisis framing Pertanggungjawaban Pertamina Terhadap Korban Kebakaran Depo Plumpang . Jurnal Mahasiswa Komunikasi Cantrik, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/cantrik.vol3.iss2.art6
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. CNN Indonesia. (2023a). Bos Pertamina Kembali Minta Maaf Insiden Kebakaran Depo Plumpang. Cnnindonesia.Com.
  2. CNN Indonesia. (2023b). Korban Kebakaran Depo Plumpang Tuntut Tanggung Jawab Pertamina. Cnnindonesia.Com.
  3. CNN Indonesia. (2023c). Kronologi Kebakaran Depo Pertamina Plumpang. Cnnindonesia.Com.
  4. CNN Indonesia. (2023d). Pemerintah Jamin Akses Pendidikan Anak-anak Korban Kebakaran Plumpang. Cnnindonesia.Com.
  5. CNN Indonesia. (2023e). Pertamina Tanggung Biaya Pengobatan Korban Kebakaran Depo Plumpang. Cnnindonesia.Com.
  6. CNN Indonesia. (2023f). Warga Plumpang Korban Kebakaran Ditawari Wisata Kapal Perang. Cnnindonesia.Com.
  7. Haryono, C. G. (2020). Ragam Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Komunikasi (D. E. Restiani (ed.); 1st ed.). CV Jejak, anggota IKAPI.
  8. Hill, S., & Lashmar, P. (2013). Online Journalism : The Essensial Guide. SAGE.
  9. Kompas.com. (2023a). 7 Hari Usai Kebakaran Depo Plumpang Warga Menanti Pertamina Ganti Rugi. Kompas.Com.
  10. Kompas.com. (2023b). 8 Hari Setelah Kebakaran Depo Plumpang Pertamina Masih Petakan Penerima. Kompas.Com.
  11. Kompas.com. (2023c). Korban Kebakaran Depo Plumpang Bisa Mengontrak Gratis 3 Bulan Pertamina. Kompas.Com.
  12. Kompas.com. (2023d). Pertamina Siap Tanggung Jawab Kebakaran Depo Plumpang, Dirut: Kami akan Beri Penanganan Terbaik. Kompas.Com.
  13. Leliana, I., Herry, H., Suratriadi, P., & Enrieco, E. (2021). Analisis Framing Model Robert Entman tentang Pemberitaan Kasus Korupsi Bansos Juliari Batubara di Kompas.com dan BBCIndonesia.com. Cakrawala - Jurnal Humaniora, 21(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.31294/jc.v21i1.10042
  14. Maha Rani, N. L. R. (2013). Persepsi Jurnalis dan Praktisi Humas terhadap Nilai Berita. Jurnal ILMU KOMUNIKASI, 10(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v10i1.155
  15. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, P. N. S. (2023). Hak Untuk Memperoleh Ganti Rugi dan Rehabilitasi Ganti Rugi. Www.Pn-Sarolangun.Go.Id.
  16. Muhammad, O. :, Reformansyah, A., Pratiwi, D., Widiarti, W., & Komunikasi, M. S. I. (2022). ANALISIS FRAMING ROBERT ENTMAN TENTANG BERITA KOMPAS.COM DAN DETIK.COM TENTANG KASUS “IDI KACUNG WHO” ROBERT ENTMAN’S FRAMING ANALYSIS ON KOMPAS.COM AND DETIK.COM NEWS ON “IDI KACUNG WHO” CASE. 306–314.
  17. Romli, A. (2014). Jurnalistik Online : Panduan Praktis Mengelola Media Online.
  18. Suciati, T. N., & Fauziah, N. (2020). Layak Berita Ke Layak Jual: Nilai Berita Jurnalisme Online Indonesia Di Era Attention Economy. Jurnal Riset Komunikasi, 3(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.24329/jurkom.v3i1.105
  19. Sukur, A. S. A., & Wahid, P. R. A. (2015). Berita Dalam Terjemahan Berita Dunia. Jurnal Pengajian Melayu, 26.