Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 30, 2024
Accepted
November 22, 2024
Published
November 30, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 216 Download : 249

Main Article Content

Abstract

Miscommunication is common in text-based social media platforms like Twitter/X for a number of reasons. Misunderstandings may result from interactions that lack clear communication and tone of voice. As a result, tone indicators were created to represent the focus on tone in a text message. The aim of this research was to investigate the use of tone indicators and the effects they have on the audience. The analysis was conducted by investigating the audience's experience with tone indicators and the subsequent methods used to collect responses. The research employed a qualitative methodology. After using a purposive sampling strategy, seven informants were chosen. The study's findings demonstrated the value of tone indicators in social media communication on platforms like Twitter/X. When talking in a community, the audience or participants sense this tone indicator.

Keywords

tone indicator digital community twitter text- based interaction

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Raudhia Aulia Putri Nugroho, Ratna Permata Sari

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Nugroho, R. A. P. ., & Sari, R. P. . (2024). Penggunaan Tone Indicator dalam Pencegahan Miskomunikasi di Media Sosial Twitter/X. Jurnal Mahasiswa Komunikasi Cantrik, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/cantrik.vol4.iss2.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Alam, Md. K. (2020). A systematic qualitative case study: Questions, data collection, NVivo analysis and saturation. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-09-2019-1825
  2. Boren, R. (2023). Tone indicators. Stimpunks Foundation. https://stimpunks.org/glossary/tone-indicators/
  3. Cambridge Dictionary. (2024, May 10). Tone | English meaning—Definition of tone from the Cambridge academic content dictionary. Dictionary.Cambridge.Org. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/tone
  4. Carr, C. T. (2021). Computer-mediated communication: A theoretical and practical introduction to online human communication. Rowman & Littlefield.
  5. Dellantonio, S., & Pastore, L. (2021). Ignorance, misconceptions and critical thinking. Synthese, 198(8), 7473–7501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02529-7
  6. Diyora, N., & Mirzayev, A. (2023). The role of paralinguistic tools in the communication process. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7513328
  7. Christanti, M. F., Mardani, P. B., & Fadhila, K. A. (2022). Analysing the meaning of tone indicators by neurodivergent community in twitter. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v5i1.118
  8. Holtgraves, T. (2021). Understanding miscommunication: Speech act recognition in digital contexts. Cognitive Science, 45(10). https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13023
  9. Hu, T., Xu, A., Liu, Z., You, Q., Guo, Y., Sinha, V., Luo, J., & Akkiraju, R. (2018). Touch your heart. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173989
  10. Juditha, C. (2018). Hoax communication interactivity in social media and anticipation (interaksi komunikasi hoax di media sosial serta antisipasinya). Journal Pekommas, 3(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.30818/jpkm.2018.2030104
  11. Kang, I., Cui, H., & Son, J. (2019). Conformity consumption behavior and FoMO. Sustainability, 11(17), 4734. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174734
  12. Marcus, E., & O’Neill, S. (2020). Tone is hard to grasp online. Can tone indicators help? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/09/style/tone-indicators-online.html
  13. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  14. Rahman, A. F. (2022). Sejarah emoji, ikon yang sering dipakai berkomunikasi seantero dunia. Detikinet. https://inet.detik.com/inetgrafis/d-5076548/sejarah-emoji-ikon-yang-sering-dipakai-berkomunikasi-seantero-dunia
  15. Solomon, D., & Theiss, J. (2022). Interpersonal communication: Putting theory into practice (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  16. Wang, N., Yin, J., Ma, Z., & Liao, M. (2022). The influence mechanism of rewards on knowledge sharing behaviors in virtual communities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(3), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2020-0530
  17. Wijenayake, S., van Berkel, N., Kostakos, V., & Goncalves, J. (2020). Impact of contextual and personal determinants on online social conformity. Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 106302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106302
  18. Winans, M. D. (2021). Grammarly’s tone detector: Helping students write pragmatically appropriate texts. RELC Journal, 52(2), 348–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211010506
  19. Wu, R., Chen, J., Lu Wang, C., & Zhou, L. (2022). The influence of emoji meaning multipleness on perceived online review helpfulness: The mediating role of processing fluency. Journal of Business Research, 141, 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.037