Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 320 Download : 338

Main Article Content

Abstract

Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW) (2018) stated that at least there were cases of corruption that have been convicted at least 254 cases which involving State administrators in Indonesia which caused state losses of IDR 133.6 billion. The eradication of corruption in Indonesia has been enshrined in the law number 20 of 2001 which consists of 45 chapters that explained about the consequences of corruption but the level of the cases in Indonesia is still high in the executive, legislative and judicial levels. This research aims to identify and analyze the reason why Indonesia administrators commit fraud depend on the perception of academics in North Sumatra. The research was conducted by using a qualitative approach with case study. The data were collected by means of direct interviews that analyzed by using a thematic analysis. The research results show that there were several factors why the perpetrators commit fraud, namely lack of procedure, lack of control environment, financial pressure, and also work-related pressure.

Keywords: Indonesia Administrator, Corruption, Abuse of Power, Pressure

Article Details

Author Biography

Muhammad Shareza Hafiz, Accounting Department, University of Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

 

How to Cite
Hafiz, M. S., & Halim, A. (2020). An Analysis the Reasons Why Indonesia Administrators Commit Fraud. Proceeding UII-ICABE, 1(1), 287–295. Retrieved from https://journal.uii.ac.id/icabe/article/view/14725
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Braun, Virginia dan Clarke, Victoria. 2006. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2). Pp. 77-101: 1478- 0887.
  2. Corruption Perception Index. 2019. Table ofCorruption Perception Index ofThe World. Accessed at 2nd January 2019.
  3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_Perceptions_Index
  4. Creswell, John W. 2015. Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantatif, dan Mixed. Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.
  5. Creswell, John W. dan Miller, Dana L. 2000. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice. 39, 124-130.
  6. Dadang. 2011. Indeks Persepsi Korupsi 2016, Indonesia Hanya Naik 1 Poin. 25 Januari 2017. Accessed at 15 July 2017.
  7. http://news.okezone.com/read/2017/01/25/337/1600848/indeks-persepsikorupsi- 2016-indonesia-hanya-naik-1-poin
  8. Hafiz, Muhammad Shareza. 2017. Analisis Pemanfaatan Jabatan Perpetrator Dalam Melakukan Korupsi (Studi Kasus Pada Opini Akademisi dan Praktisi di Sumatera Utara). Tesis. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Universitas Gadjah Mada
  9. Hamdani, Rizki., Kumalahadi, Dekar Urumsah. (2017). The Classification of Corruption in Indonesia: A Behavioral Perspective. SHS Web of Conferences, 10002(34). http://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173410002
  10. Hennink, Monique, Inge Hutter, dan Ajay Bailey. 2012. Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oak, California, Sage Publication.
  11. Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW). 2018. Indonesia Corruption Watch Annual Report 2018. https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/laporan_akhir_tahun_icw_2018.pdf Accessed at 15 December 2019.
  12. Kurniawan, Teguh. 2009. Peranan Akuntabilitas Publik dan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pemberandatan Korupsi di Pemerintahan. Bisnis dan Birokrasi. Jurnal Ilmu Aministrasi Dan Organisasi, 16(2), 116-121.
  13. Prabowo, Hendi Yogi, Rizki Hamdani, Zuraidah Mohd Sanusi. 2018. The New Face of People Power: An Exploratory Study on the Potential of Social Media for Combating Corruption in Indonesia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 12(3), 19-40.
  14. Republik Indonesia. 1999. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 1999 Tentang Penyelenggara Negara yang Bersih Dan Bebeas Dari Korupsi, Kolusi, Dan Nepotisme.
  15. ______. 2001. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
  16. ______. 2011. Peraturan Menteri Dalam negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pedoman Pemberian Hibah dan Bantuan Sosial Yang Bersumber Dari Anggaran Pendapatan Dan Belanja Daerah.
  17. Silverman, D. 2005. Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. Edisi Kedua. London. Sage. Transparency International. 2019. Corruption Perception Index For 2019. Berlin: Transparency
  18. International. https://www.transparency.org/search Accessed at 13 December 2019.
  19. Whittemore, R., Chase, S. K., dan Mandie, C. L. 2001. Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research. 11, 522-537.
  20. Yin, Robert. K. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Fifth Edition. California: Sage Publication, Inc.