Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 26, 2018
Accepted
April 26, 2018
Published
June 1, 2017
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 477 Download : 670

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research was purposed to find out the effect of company profile booklet based on compensation and company profile booklet based on organizational support toward applicants attractiveness. Furthermore, this research alsofind out which company profile booklet that has more attractiveness between company profile based on compensation or company profile booklet based on organizational support. The subjects in this research were 60 students in last term who study in Yogyakarta. The data were collected through random sampling technique. Themethod of this research was ‘post test only’ experiment design and using attractiveness scale. Then, this reseacrh was analized using comparison test, Mann Whitney U analysis teqnique. The hypothesis was accepted if this research had significant score p < 0,05 , and the significant score of this research was 0,021, where company profile booklet based on organizational support had higher mean rank score which is 35,70%, meanwhile the mean rank score of company profile based on compensation was 25,30%. It also emphasized that company profile booklet based on organizational support more increase the attractiveness for applicants than company profile booklet based on compensation, and it proves that the hypothesis in this research was accepted.


Key Words: Attractiveness, Compensation, Organizational Support

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Authors

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite
Setiawan, D. F., & Kusumaputri, E. S. (2017). Kompensasi Dan Dukungan Organisasi terhadap Ketertarikan Pelamar Kerja: Efektifitas Pemberian Informasi. JIP (Jurnal Intervensi Psikologi), 9(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.20885/intervensipsikologi.vol9.iss1.art3
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Anthony, R.N. & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Sistem pengendalian manajemen. Jakarta: Salemba Empat
  2. Careernews. (2014). Kutu loncat tak banyak diminati perusahan. Diunduh dari: http://careernews.id/issues/view/2187-Kutu-Loncat-Tak-Banyak-Diminati-Perusahaan/ Tanggal 20 Februari 2016
  3. Eisenberger, R., & Stinglhamber, F. (2011). Perceived organizational support. Washington DC: American Psychological Asosiation
  4. Highhouse, S., Lievens, F., & Sinar, E. (2003). Measuring attraction to organizations. Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63 (6),986-1001
  5. Kompas.com. (2016). Pilih karyawan setia atau kutu loncat. Diunduh dari: http://www.kompas.com/tips/karir/pilih-karyawan-setia-atau-kutu-loncat-445/ Tanggal 20 Februari 2016
  6. Lievens, F.., Decaesteker, C., Coetsier, P., & Geirnet, J. (2001). Organizational attractiveness for perspective applicants: a person-organization fit perpective. Journal Applied Psychology 50 (1) 30-51
  7. Luthans, F. (2006). Organizational behavior 10th Edition.Yogyakarta; ANDI
  8. Milkovich, G., Newman, J., & Gerhart, B. (2011). Compensation. New York: Mc Graw hill
  9. Myers, A., & Hansen, C. (2002). Experimental psychology. USA: Wadsworth
  10. PortalHR.com. (2011). Gaji penyebab utama ketidakpuasan karyawan. Diunduh dari: http://portalhr.com /berita/gaji-penyebab-utama-ketidakpuasan-karyawan/ Tanggal 5 Oktober 2015
  11. Prabowo. (2014). Dampak buruk tingkat turnover karyawan yang tinggi. Diunduh dari: http://www.bestlife.co.id/lifestyle/the.good.life/dampak.buruk.tingkat.turnover.karyawan.yang.tinggi/004/001/251, tanggal: pada 10 Juni 2015
  12. Roades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armenli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: the contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825-836
  13. Roberson, Q.M., Collins, C.J., & Oreg, S. (2005). The effects of recruitment message specificity on applicant attraction to organizations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19 (3), 319-339
  14. Shanock, L.R., Baran, B.E., & Miller, L.R. (2012). Advancing organizational support theory into twenty-first century world of work. Journal Bus psycol (27), 123-147
  15. Turban, D. (2001). Organizational attractiveness as an employer on college campus: an examination of the applicant Population. Journal of vocational behavior 58, 203-312