Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 26, 2018
Accepted
April 26, 2018
Published
June 1, 2017
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 380 Download : 1121

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to examine the effectiveness of involvement in arranging key performance indicator to decrease of resistance to change level towards performance target for management trainee in University X. The subject of this research is management trainee consisting of experiment group and control group. The experiment group comprised of 16 people while the control group consisted of 8 people. The subjects of this research have at least master degree, work contract, and medium to high level of resistance to change for
target performance. The research design used pretest posttest control group design. The data collection is conducted using scale of resistance to change for taget performance. The finding of this research indicated that the involvement in arranging key performance indicator is effective in decreasing the resistance to change level towards performance target for management trainee in University X.

Key words: resistance to change, involvement, key performance indicator

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Authors

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite
Fitriana, N., Sahrah, A., & Yuniasanti, R. (2017). Efektivitas Keterlibatan Penyusunan Key Perfomance Indicator dalam Menurunkan Tingkat Resistensi terhadap Perubahan Sasaran Kinerja. JIP (Jurnal Intervensi Psikologi), 9(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.20885/intervensipsikologi.vol9.iss1.art6
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Agocs, C. (1997). Institutionalized resistance to organizational change: Denial, inaction, and repression. Journal of Business Ethics. 16.9. 917-931
  2. Armstrong, M. (2003). Mengelola karyawan: Buku wajib bagi manajer lini. Diterjemahkan oleh Ramelan dan Dwi Prabaningtyas. Jakarta: PT Gramedia
  3. Azwar. S. (2010). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  4. Boohene, R. & Williams, A.P. (2012). Resistance to organizational change: A case study of Oti Yeboah Complex Limited.
  5. Bovey, W. H & Hede, A. (2001). Resitance to organizational change: the role of cognitive and affective processes. Leadership and Organization Development Journal. 22. (8). 372-382
  6. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, T. D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
  7. Cristensen, L. B. (2001). Experimental methodology. 4th edition. USA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc
  8. Cummings, T. G & Worley, C, G. (2005). Organization development and change. 9 edition. Canada: Cengange Learning
  9. Erwin, D, G. & Garman, A, N. (2010). Resistance to organizational change: Linking research and practice. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Development. 31. (1). 39-56.
  10. Freddy, C & Mbohawa, C. (2013). Ways to overcome employee resistance in change initiatives. International conferenceon law, entrepreneurship, and industrial engineering.
  11. Haynes, C. (2007). Experiential learning: learning by doing: 5 stepexperiential learning cycle definitions. Diakses dari kiolo002F tanggal 15 April 2017.
  12. Kanungo. R. N. (2012). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology. (76). 341-349
  13. Khattak, M., A; Nadeem, I; Urooj, S, F; & Bashir, F. (2012). Employee involvement and participation at work: a case study of OTCL after privatization. International journal of academic research and business and social csience. 2. (6)
  14. Kreitner, R & Kinicki, A. (2001). Organizational behavior: perilaku organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba empat
  15. Latipun. (2006). Psikologi eksperimen. Malang: UMM Press
  16. Luthans, F. (2005). Perilaku organisasi edisi 10. Andi: Yogyakarta
  17. Palmer, I., Dunford, R. & Akin, G. (2006). Managing organizational change: A multiple perspectives approach. 2nd edition.
  18. Moeheriono. (2012). Perencanaan, aplikasi, dan pengembangan indikator kinerja utama (IKU) bisnis dan publik. Cetakan Kedua. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
  19. Oebaidillah, S. (2017). Hadapi perubahan, perguruan tinggi harus siap berkompetisi. diakses dari http://www. mediaindonesia.com/news/read/91133/hadapi-perubahan-perguruan-tinggi-harus-siap-berkompetisi/ 2017-02-07tanggal 16 Maret 2017.
  20. Oreg, S. (2003). Resistensi terhadap perubahan: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 680-693.
  21. Palmer, I; Dunforn, R; & Akin, G. (2006). Managing organizational change. Singapore: Mc Graw Hill.
  22. Parmenter. D. (2007). Key performance indicator: Developing, implementing, and using winning KPI. New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.