Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 21, 2019
Accepted
October 13, 2020
Published
December 5, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 510 Download : 647

Main Article Content

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This study aims to determine the effect of the Empathic Caring
Consultation (ECC) program on Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) in
psychologists. This study involved seven psychologists. The research
sample was taken using purposive sampling method. The research
method used was one group pretest-post test design. ProQOL is measured
using the Professional Quality of Life Version V scale, while the
implementation of ECC training refers to the concept of Prawitasari.
Analysis using Wilcoxon signed-rank test with a significant value (p) =
0.340 (BO); 0.932 (STS); 0.496 (CS) (p> 0.05). The results of the study
showed that there was no effect of the ECC program on ProQOL on
psychologists. This is because there are several variations of the three
ProQOL components before and after treatment.

ABSTRAK

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh program
Empathic Caring Consultation (ECC) terhadap Professional Quality of
Life (ProQOL) pada psikolog. Penelitian ini melibatkan tujuh psikolog.
Pengambilan sampel penelitian menggunakan metode purposive
sampling. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah desain one group
prates-paskates. ProQOL diukur menggunakan skala Professional
Quality of Life Version V, sedangkan pelaksanaan pelatihan ECC
merujuk pada konsep Prawitasari. Analisis menggunakan wilcoxon
signed-rank test dengan nilai signifikan (p)=0.340 (BO); 0.932(STS);
0.496(CS) (p>0.05). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tidak terdapat
pengaruh program ECC terhadap ProQOL pada psikolog. Hal ini
terdapat beberapa variasi dari tiga komponen ProQOL sebelum dan
sesudah pemberian perlakuan.

Keywords

empathic caring consultation compassion satisfaction professional quality of life secondary trauma stress.

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite
Asbar, A., Khairani, M., & Mawarpury, M. (2020). Pengaruh Program Empathic Caring Consultation terhadap Professional Quality of Life Pada Psikolog. JIP (Jurnal Intervensi Psikologi), 12(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.20885/intervensipsikologi.vol12.iss2.art3
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Ardhiani, L. N. (2012). Mengenal potensi bidan. In Psikologi Terapan. Penerbit Erlangga.
  2. Berjot, S., Altintas, E., Grebot, E., & Lesage, F. X. (2017). Burnout risk profiles among french psychologists. Burnout Research, 7, 10–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burn.2017.10.001
  3. Burnett, H. J. (2015). The compassion fatigue and resilience connection: A survey of resilience, compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction among trauma responders. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health and Human Resilience, 17(1), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.4172/1522-4821.1000165
  4. Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2006). A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(2), 54–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00406.x
  5. Dehlin, M., & Lundh, L. G. (2018). Compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction among psychologists: Can supervision and a reflective stance be of help? Journal for Person-Oriented Research, 4(2), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.17505/jpor.2018.09
  6. Duarte, J., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Cruz, B. (2016). Relationships between nurses’ empathy, self-compassion and dimensions of professional quality of life: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 60, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.02.015
  7. Figley, C. R. (2012). Basics of compassion fatigue. Figley Institute.
  8. Gerdes, K. E., & Segal, E. A. (2011). Importance of empathy for social work practice: Integrating new science. Social Work, 56(2), 141–148.
  9. Gerdes, K., & Segal, E. (2009). A social work model of empathy. Advances in Social Work, 10(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-9-7
  10. Hansen, E. M., Eklund, J. H., Hallén, A., Bjurhager, C. S., Norrström, E., Viman, A., & Stocks, E. L. (2018). Does feeling empathy lead to compassion fatigue or compassion satisfaction? the role of time perspective. The Journal of Psychology, 152(8), 630–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2018.1495170
  11. Himpunan Psikologi Indonesia, (HPI). (2010). Kode etik psikologi indonesia. Pengurus Pusat Himpunan Psikologi Indonesia.
  12. Jenkins, B., & Warren, N. A. (2012). Concept analysis: Compassion fatigue and effects upon critical care nurses. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, 35(4), 388–395. https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0b013e318268fe09
  13. Khairani, M., & Prawitasari, J. . (2009). Peran program pelayanan empatik plus untuk dokter gigi-perawat gigi dalam meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi dengan pasien gigi-mulut di puskesmas [Thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada]. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  14. Lloyd, C., King, R., & Chenoweth, L. (2002). Social work, stress and burnout: A review. Journal of Mental Health, 11(3), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230020023642
  15. Nelson-Gardell, D., & Harris, D. (2003). Childhood abuse history, secondary traumatic stress, and child welfare workers. Child Welfare, 82(1), 5–26. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12641376
  16. Prawitasari, J. E., Hadiwirawan, O., Winarti, H. D. H. S., & Intriaty. (2010). Empathic caring consultation (ECC): Will it be able to improve the quality of care at the health centers? Anima Indonesian Psychological Journal, 26(1), 46–55.
  17. Putri, I. G., & Masykur, A. M. (2017). “Bertahan dalam dilema” (Studi fenomenologis menghadapi stres kerja pada psikolog klinis wanita). Empati; Vol 6, No 1 (2017): Januari 2017, 6(1), 239–245. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/empati/article/view/15081
  18. Sodeke-Gregson, E. A., Holttum, S., & Billings, J. (2013). Compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress in UK therapists who work with adult trauma clients. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 4(1), 21869. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.21869
  19. Stamm, B. (1997). Work-related secondary traumatic stress. PTSD Research Quarterly, 8(2), 1–6.
  20. Stamm, B. H. (2010). The concise PROQOL manual 2nd Ed. Pocatello PROQOL.org.
  21. Wagaman, M. A., Geiger, J. M., Shockley, C., & Segal, E. A. (2015). The role of empathy in burnout, compassion satisfaction, and secondary traumatic stress among social workers. Social Work, 60(3), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swv014
  22. Whitfield, N., & Kanter, D. (2014). Helpers in distress: Preventing secondary trauma. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 22(4), 59–61.