Article Sidebar

Submitted
August 8, 2022
Accepted
December 30, 2022
Published
December 31, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 473 Download : 814

Main Article Content

Abstract

Children with moderate intellectual disabilities experiencing obstacles in academics, reading, and arithmetic, but can be educated to take care of themselves. One of the important adaptive behaviors for individuals to master is dressing skills and these skills can be improved by modifying behavior. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the application of the chaining technique in improving dressing skills in children with moderate mental retardation. The sampling technique in this study used purposive sampling with the criteria of children aged 6-11 years, experiencing problems in intellectual function in the IQ range of 35-55 (Binet's scale), inhibited in adaptive function, and unable to dress independently. Data collection techniques in this study used observation and interviews. The results indicate that there is a change in the level of dress skills in children with intellectual disabilities in the moderate category before and after applying the chaining technique.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rusli, R., Istiqomah, I., & Safitri, J. (2022). TEKNIK PERANTAIAN UNTUK KETERAMPILAN BERPAKAIAN PADA ANAK TUNAGRAHITA SEDANG. JIP (Jurnal Intervensi Psikologi), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/intervensipsikologi.vol14.iss2.art6
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder edition “DSM-5.” American Psychiatric Publishing.
  2. Amriliyanto, A. (2013). Pembelajaran chaining bermedia origami terhadap kemampuan motorik halus anak tunagrahita sedang. Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus, 3(3), 1–8. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/38/article/view/4167
  3. Apriyadi, A., Mohammad, E., & Sulthoni. (2017). Keefektifan metode backward chaining untuk meningkatkan keterampilan makan pada anak disabilitas intelektual limited. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Luar Biasa, 4(1), 37–44. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jppplb/article/download/4367/2431
  4. Basuni, M. (2012). Pembelajaran bina diri pada anak tunagrahita ringan. Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus, 9(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v9i1.6725
  5. Elmes, D. G., Barry, H. K., & Roediger, H. L. (2012). Research methods in psychology (9th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning. https://www.worldcat.org/title/research-methods-in-psychology/oclc/846513287
  6. Fitrya, N. R. (2016). Efektivitas penggunaan backward chaining untuk meningkatkan kemampuan bina diri siswa tunagrahita ringan [UNS]. https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/detail/56834/Efektivitas-Penggunaan-Backward-Chaining-Untuk-Meningkatkan-Kemampuan-Bina-Diri-Siswa-Tunagrahita-Ringan-Kelas-IC-Di-Slb-Negeri-Surakarta-Tahun-Ajaran-20152016
  7. Handayani, V. (2009). Melatih keterampilan berpakaian pada anak keterbelakangan mental ringan dengan menggunakan teknik total task presentation chaining. PSIKOmedia-Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Kristen Maranatha, 6(2), 19–28.
  8. Heward, W. L., Alber-Morgan, S. R., & Konrad, M. (2017). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (11th ed.). Pearson.
  9. Kauffman, J. M., & Hallahan, D. P. (2011). Handbook of special education. Routledge.
  10. Martin, G., & Joseph, P. (2015). Modifikasi perilaku makna dan penerapannya (edisi kese). Pustaka Pelajar.
  11. Miltenberger, R. G. (2012). Behavior modification principles and procedures (fifth edit). Premedia Global.
  12. Murtie, A. (2016). Anak berkebutuhan khusus. Maxima.
  13. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (Seventh Ed). Pearson. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3211488?origin=crossref
  14. Porsteinsson, H., & Zuilma, G. S. (2007). Backward chaining used to teach a woman with afasia to read compound words: A single case study. American Psychological Association, 2(3), 325–334.
  15. Safitri, J., Fauzia, R., & Sholihah, Q. (2014). Application of chaining therapy for improving fine motoric skills as self being basic skills in children with down syndrome. The European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 9(2), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.15405/ejsbs.124
  16. Sarafino, E. P. (2012). Applied behavior analysis, principles and procedures for modifying behavior. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  17. Seaman, J. E., & Allen, I. E. (2011). Not significant, but important? Know the pitfalls of p-values and formal hypothesis tests. Asq.Org. http://asq.org/quality-progress/2011/08/statistics- roundtable/not-significant-but-important.html
  18. Slocum, S. K., & Tiger, J. H. (2011). An assessment of the efficiency of and child preference for forward and backward chaining. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(4), 793–805. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-793
  19. Soemantri, S. (2012). Psikologi anak luar biasa. Refika Aditama.
  20. Suriadi, N. M., Dantes, N., & Marhaeni, A. A. I. N. (2013). Penerapan Metode Drill Untuk Meningkatkan aktivitas belajar dan kemampuan mengurus diri sendiri bagi anak tunagrahita. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Ganesha, 3(1), 1–11.
  21. Wardani, I. G. A. K. (2013). Pengantar pendidikan anak berkebutuhan khusus. Universitas Terbuka.
  22. We, A. Y., Novianti, R., & Risma, D. (2016). Efektivitas Penerapan Teknik Chaining Terhadap Keberhasilan Toilet Traning Pada Anak Usia 2-3 Tahun Di Tpa Ihsan Fikri Kecamatan Tampan Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Riau, 3(2), 1–12.