Main Article Content

Abstract

Lasem, Central Java, reflects a rich blend of Javanese and Chinese heritage, offering both opportunities and challenges in cultural tourism and preservation. This study explores how online customer feedback reveals visitor perceptions of Lasem’s architectural and cultural elements, particularly in relation to Batik and Peranakan architecture. Using data from 13 Google Maps-reviewed businesses, the study employs quantitative and qualitative methods, analyzing star ratings, review lengths, keyword frequency, and thematic patterns. Findings show that visitor satisfaction is closely tied to cultural authenticity. Positive reviews often emphasize appreciation for heritage experiences and the adaptive reuse of historic buildings, while lower ratings highlight infrastructure issues such as water and room quality. The results underscore the role of vernacular spaces in shaping meaningful tourist experiences and highlight the need to balance heritage preservation with the expectations of modern visitors. This research offers insights for improving heritage site management and supporting sustainable cultural tourism in small historic towns.

Keywords

batik and peranakan architecture cultural preservation customer satisfaction heritage tourism

Article Details

How to Cite
Odilia Renaningtyas Manifesty. (2025). Heritage, Space, and Satisfaction: Visitor’s Perceptions of the Businesses in the Old City of Lasem, Indonesia. Journal of Architectural Research and Design Studies, 9(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.20885/jars.vol9.iss2.art6

References

  1. Atkinson, C. F. (2024). Cheap, quick, and rigorous: Artificial intelligence and the systematic literature review. Social Science Computer Review, 42(2), pp. 376-393.
  2. Bagheri, A., Saraee, M., & De Jong, F. (2013). Care more about customers: Unsupervised domain-independent aspect detection for sentiment analysis of customer reviews. Knowledge-Based Systems, 52, pp. 201-213.
  3. Borrego, Á., & Comalat Navarra, M. (2021). What users say about public libraries: an analysis of Google Maps reviews. Online Information Review, 45(1), pp. 84-98.
  4. Cahyani, I.P., Mardani, P.B. and Widianingsih, Y., 2023. Digital Storytelling in Cultural Tourism: A Sustainable Communication Approach at the Lasem Heritage Foundation. International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities, 6(1), pp.45-69.
  5. Chen, C. F., & Chen, F. S. (2010). Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions for heritage tourists. Tourism management, 31(1), pp. 29-35.
  6. Chen, D., 2023. How visitors perceive heritage value—A quantitative study on visitors’ perceived value and satisfaction of architectural heritage through SEM. Sustainability, 15(11), p.9002.
  7. Darmayanti, T. E., & Bahauddin, A. (2020). Understanding vernacularity through spatial experience in the peranakan House Kidang Mas, Chinatown, Lasem, Indonesia. Journal of the International Society for the Study of Vernacular Settlements, 7(3), pp. 1-13.
  8. Darmayanti, T. E., & Bahauddin, A. (2021). The Narrative of Indonesian Cultural Heritage: Peranakan Houses in Pecinan Lasem, Indonesia. International Journal of Design (INJUDES), 1, pp. 43-56.
  9. Fabbricatti, K., Boissenin, L., & Citoni, M. (2020). Heritage Community Resilience: towards new approaches for urban resilience and sustainability,'City, Territory and Architecture, 7 (1).
  10. Februandari, A. (2020). Authenticity in cultural built heritage: learning from Chinese Indonesians’ houses. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 38(2), pp. 262-278.
  11. Francaviglia, R. V., & Rapoport, A. (1969). House Form and Culture. Geographical Review, 59(4), pp. 632.
  12. Griñán Montealegre, M., & López Sánchez, M. (2019). Urban commerce and protected cultural landscape. Heritage, 2(1), pp. 72-85.
  13. Hananto, V. R. (2023). Implementation of Dynamic Topic Modeling to Discover Topic Evolution on Customer Reviews. Jurnal Online Informatika, 8(2), pp. 147-157.
  14. Huang, W., Xiong, G., Zhong, L., Li, K., Li, H., Skitmore, M., & Talebian, N. (2022). Research into satisfaction with industrial heritage renewal based on the SEM-IPA model: a case study of the Dongguan Jianyuzhou Park. Land, 11(3), pp. 403.
  15. Ijla, A., & Broström, T. (2015). The sustainable viability of adaptive reuse of historic buildings: The experiences of two world heritage old cities; Bethlehem in Palestine and Visby in Sweden. International Invention Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 2(4), pp. 52-66.
  16. Kapucu, N., Ge, Y., Rott, E., & Isgandar, H. (2024). Urban Resilience: Multidimensional Perspectives, Challenges and Prospects for Future Research. Urban Governance, 4(3), pp. 163-179
  17. Knapp, R. G. (2013). Chinese houses of Southeast Asia: The eclectic architecture of sojourners and settlers. Vermont:Tuttle Publishing.
  18. Knight, J., & Grab, S. W. (2024). Vulnerability of geoheritage sites in South Africa to climate change: Examples from the Eastern Cape Province. Geomorphology, 457, pp. 109246.
  19. Krishnan, A. (2023). Exploring the power of topic modeling techniques in analyzing customer reviews: a comparative analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.11520.
  20. Lestari, S. (2015, February 19). Toleransi Antar Etnis di “Kota cina kecil” Lasem. BBC News Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/berita_indonesia/2015/02/150219_lasem_toleransi
  21. Lin, Z., Yang, Z., & Yuan, J. (2024). Research on the design and image perception of cultural landscapes based on digital roaming technology. Heritage Science, 12(1), pp. 1-21.
  22. Luekveerawattana, R., 2025. Enhancing visitor experiences: a quantitative analysis of marketing strategies at historical and cultural national parks. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1), pp.2458066.
  23. Mandaka, M., Nuryanti, W., & Titisari, D. (2022). Exploring the potential tourism objects in the small city of heritage lasem. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 4(4), pp. 36-47.
  24. Manurung, P., Sastrosasmito, S., & Pramitasari, D. (2022). How to Reveal the Meaning of Space in Vernacular Architecture?. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 9(1), pp. 89-97.
  25. Mason, R. (2004). Fixing Historic Preservation: A Constructive Critique of" Significance"[Research and Debate]. Places, 16(1), pp. 64-71.
  26. Mathayomchan, B., & Taecharungroj, V. (2020). “How was your meal?” Examining customer experience using Google maps reviews. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 90, pp. 102641.
  27. Poria, Y., Butler, R. and Airey, D., 2006. Tourist perceptions of heritage exhibits: A comparative study from Israel. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 1(1), pp.51-72.
  28. Radityawati, R. D., Sulistiyono, S. T., & Susilowati, E. (2020). Changes in Spatial Planning and the Destruction of City Identity: Lasem Case during 1970-1991. Indonesian Historical Studies, 4(1), pp. 62-73.
  29. Riswanto, A. L., Kim, S., & Kim, H. S. (2023). Analyzing Online Reviews to Uncover Customer Satisfaction Factors in Indian Cultural Tourism Destinations. Behavioral Sciences, 13(11), pp. 923.
  30. Roziqin, A., Retnandari, N., Fajrina, A., Sihidi, I., & Kamil, M. (2021). The local government and creative industry: Experience from batik tulis Lasem industries. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), pp. 419-429.
  31. Sahagun, M. A., Flores, J., & Jocson, J. (2022). Utilizing Google Map Reviews and Sentiment Analysis: Knowing Customer Experience in Coffee Shops. The Quest: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 1(2), pp. 1-10.
  32. Sahoo, K., Samal, A. K., Pramanik, J., & Pani, S. K. (2019). Exploratory data analysis using Python. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(12), pp. 4727-4735.
  33. Santoso, C. and Gjerald, O., 2022. Guided discussion or immersive play? Influence of on-site presentation platform on visitor satisfaction in a heritage attraction. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 22(4-5), pp.393-410.
  34. Sari, S. N., & Syifauddin, M. (2022, December). Local Wisdom of the Lasem Community for Tolerance. In Forum Ilmu Sosial, 49(02), pp. 117-126).
  35. Sudarwani, M.M. and Rukayah, R.S., 2022. The Survival of Chinatown Architecture: Lasem Chinatown, Indonesia. ISVS e-journal, 9(2), pp.1-17.
  36. Sung, M., & Brooks, M. (2022). Urban heritage and its socioeconomic impacts in Seoul, South Korea: An empirical study using residential environmental satisfaction and housing price as indicators. Journal of People, Plants, and Environment, 25(3), pp. 311-328.
  37. Tiwari, S., & Vij, M. (2024). Adaption of Neo-Vernacular Architecture in the Contemporary Temples in India: Insights from Selected Case Studies. ISVS e-journal, 11-8, pp. 1-23
  38. Vong, F., 2013. Relationships among perception of heritage management, satisfaction and destination cultural image. Journal of tourism and Cultural Change, 11(4), pp.287-301.
  39. Wulandari, P. K., Baiquni, M., & Zubaidi, A. (2024). Preserving and Managing Chinese Settlement Heritage Tourism in Lasem, Indonesia. Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites, 55(3), pp. 1055-1065.
  40. Zahra, R. M. (2024). Digital humanities approaches to analyzing indonesian language texts as non-western languages. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(4), pp. 787-795.