Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the spatial efficiency and sustainable site development of the Poltekkes Riau Tower, a vertical educational facility, using the Greenship New Building Version 1.2 framework established by the Green Building Council Indonesia (GBCI). It focuses on the Appropriate Site Development (ASD) category and assesses green area ratio, site selection, accessibility, transportation, landscape quality, microclimate control, and stormwater management. The building scored 5 out of 17 points (29.4%), indicating shortcomings in bicycle access, landscaping, and runoff mitigation. The evaluation process involves four key steps: (1) Scoring Analysis, which quantifies compliance with the Greenship criteria; (2) Spatial Mapping of green cover, access, and hydrology based on site plans and field data; (3) Gap Identification, which compares actual conditions with benchmarks; and (4) Recommendation Formulation to enhance sustainability through passive design, landscape optimization, and integrated stormwater systems. The findings provide insights for improving site sustainability in future vertical educational buildings located in tropical urban settings.

Keywords

green architecture greenship assessment land optimization site development vertical campus

Article Details

How to Cite
Kusumah, D. P. ., Tela, I. N. ., & Haryani. (2025). Spatial Efficiency and Site Optimization Analysis of a Vertical Educational Facility in Pekanbaru. Journal of Architectural Research and Design Studies, 9(2), 173–200. https://doi.org/10.20885/jars.vol9.iss2.art7

References

  1. Chansomsak, S., & Vale, B. (2009). The Roles of Architects in Sustainable Community Development The Roles of Architects in Sustainable Community Development บทบาทของสถาปนิ กในการพั ฒนาชุ มชนอย่ างยั ่ งยื น. http://www.tds.tu.ac.th/jars/download/jars/v6-3/06_The Roles of Architects in S Community Development_Sant.pdf
  2. GBCI. (2018). Greenship Panduan Teknis Rating Tools For New Building V 1.2.pdf. In Technical Manual Green Building Rating Tool For New Building (hal. 620). 2018. https://www.gbcindonesia.org/training/21818174790c4d09aaeeacaeeb5a252bwx2eeD6Hz7w
  3. Harputlugil, G. U., & Bedir, M. (2016). Effects of occupant behavior on the energy performance of dwellings: A sensitivity analysis. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 33(2), 159–178.
  4. Li, D., Zheng, Y., Liu, C., Qi, H., & Liu, X. (2016). Numerical analysis on thermal performance of naturally ventilated roofs with different influencing parameters. Sustainable Cities and Society, 22, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.02.004
  5. Liu, G., Xiao, M., Zhang, X., Gal, C., Chen, X., Liu, L., Pan, S., Wu, J., Tang, L., & Clements-Croome, D. (2017). A review of air filtration technologies for sustainable and healthy building ventilation. Sustainable Cities and Society, 32(April), 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.04.011
  6. Maryati, S. (2013). Challenge in Integrating Clean Water Infrastructure Provision in the Jabodetabek Metropolitan Area. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 17, 666–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.083
  7. Adi, A. R., & Ernawati, E. (2020). Kajian Penilaian Greenship GBCI Dalam Menunjang Pembelajaran Arsitektur Hijau. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Desain. https://doi.org/10.51170/jtd.v2i1.41
  8. Amalia, A. A., Amal, C. A., & Amin, S. F. A. (2018). Evaluasi Aspek Tepat Guna Lahan Pada Mall Nipah Makassar Dengan Menggunakan Greenship Rating Tools. December, C007-C014. https://doi.org/10.32315/sem.3.c007
  9. Andrian, F. (2024). Analisis Kinerja Bangunan Hijau dalam Konteks Kebutuhan Energi. Tugas Mahasiswa Program Studi Arsitek, 1–11. https://coursework.uma.ac.id/index.php/arsitek/article/view/635%0Ahttps://coursework.uma.ac.id/index.php/arsitek/article/download/635/482
  10. Ardhiansyah, I., & Azizah, R. (2020). Pengukuran Greenship New Building Ver. 1.2 pada Bangunan Baru Rumah Atsiri Indonesia (Final Assessment) (Vol. 15, hal. 79–86). https://doi.org/10.23917/sinektika.v15i2.9864
  11. Ayuthia, G. T., Dewi, O. C., & Panjaitan, T. H. (2020). The Role of Green Buildings in Supporting Green Buyer Behaviour Towards Green Users. E3s Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021101003
  12. Basten, V., Crévits, I., Latief, Y., & Berawi, M. A. (2019). Conceptual Development of Cost-Benefit Analysis Based on Regional, Knowledge, and Economic Aspects of Green Building. International Journal of Technology. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v10i1.1791
  13. Berawi, M. A., Miraj, P., Windrayani, R., & Berawi, A. R. B. (2019). Stakeholders’ perspectives on green building rating: A case study in Indonesia. Heliyon, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01328
  14. Erizal, Chadirin, Y., & Furi, I. M. (2019). Evaluasi Aspek Green Building Pada Gedung Andi Hakim Nasoetion Rektorat IPB. Jurnal Manejemen Aset Infrastruktur & Fasilitas. https://doi.org/10.12962/j26151847.v3i2.5888
  15. Kandita, K., Akmalah, E., & Irawati, I. (2018). KAJIAN KATEGORI TEPAT GUNA LAHAN DALAM PENERAPAN KONSEP GREEN BUILDING DI ITENAS. Potensi : Jurnal Sipil Politeknik, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.35313/potensi.v20i1.999
  16. Karimi, H., Adibhesami, M. A., & Bazazzadeh, H. (2023). Green Buildings: Human-Centered and Energy Efficiency Optimization Strategies. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093681
  17. Li, Y., Huan-bin, S., Sang, P., Chen, P., & Liu, X. (2019). Review of Critical Success Factors (CSFs) for Green Building Projects. Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.05.020
  18. Linggasari, D. (2020). Optimasi Biaya Pencapaian Predikat Bangunan Hijau Pada Bangunan Terbangun. Jurnal Muara Sains Teknologi Kedokteran Dan Ilmu Kesehatan. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmstkik.v3i2.5941
  19. Mauludi, A. F., Anisa, A., & Satwikasari, A. F. (2020). Kajian Prinsip Arsitektur Hijau pada Bangunan Perkantoran (Studi Kasus United Tractor Head Office dan Menara BCA). Sinektika: Jurnal Arsitektur, 17(2), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.23917/sinektika.v17i2.11629
  20. Ohueri, C. C., Enegbuma, W. I., & Habil, H. (2019). MyCREST Embedded Framework for Enhancing the Adoption of Green Office Building Development in Sarawak. Built Environment Project and Asset Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-10-2018-0127
  21. Prabowo Sulistiawan, A., Arif Maryanto, D., Ilham Aprizal, M., & Fathur Rachman, F. (2022). Penilaian Sumber dan Siklus Material Arsitektural dalam GBCI pada Gedung Kuliah Bersama Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB). Jurnal Arsitektur TERRACOTTA |, 3(2), 47–57.
  22. Pragati, S., Priya, R. S., Pradeepa, C., & Senthil, R. (2023). Simulation of the Energy Performance of a Building With Green Roofs and Green Walls in a Tropical Climate. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032