Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 5, 2022
Accepted
March 9, 2023
Published
April 10, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1054 Download : 1676

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research seeks to explain the arena of political communication in Indonesia for civil society groups to use new media from 2010 to 2020. The context of this time shows the increasingly complex development of democracy and new media, including the presence of social media. The research was conducted using the case study method by exploring three cases of civil society groups, namely Remotivi, Combine Resource Institution, and Zero Kilometer Makassar. This study departs from the hypothesis that the use of new media by civil society groups can encourage a more democratic process of political communication. This study found that the presence of new media has not been able to encourage civil society to use the arena of political communication properly. Judging from the aspect of the arena, which consists of existence, regulation, relations, and public space, it turns out that it has not been able to encourage a democratic political communication process even though new media has been used in communication actions by civil society groups.This research seeks to explain the arena of political communication in Indonesia for civil society groups to use new media from 2010 to 2020. The context of this time shows the increasingly complex development of democracy and new media, including the presence of social media. The research was conducted using the case study method by exploring three cases of civil society groups, namely Remotivi, Combine Resource Institution, and Zero Kilometer Makassar. This study departs from the hypothesis that the use of new media by civil society groups can encourage a more democratic process of political communication. This study found that the presence of new media has not been able to encourage civil society to use the arena of political communication properly. Judging from the aspect of the arena, which consists of existence, regulation, relations, and public space, it turns out that it has not been able to encourage a democratic political communication process even though new media has been used in communication actions by civil society groups.

Keywords

arena civil society new media political communication

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Adiputra, W. M., Irawanto, B., & Kurnia, N. (2023). Arena Komunikasi Politik di Indonesia: Bagaimana Masyarakat Sipil Menggunakan Media Baru sebagai Komunikasi Politik . Jurnal Komunikasi, 17(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol17.iss2.art6
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Arief, Y., & Utomo, W. P. (Eds.). (2015). Orde Media: Kajian Televisi dan Indonesia Pasca-Orde Baru. Yogyakarta: Insist Press.
  2. Bennett, W. L., & Entman, R. M. (Eds.) (2001). Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
  3. Castells, M. (2004). The Power of Identity. Blackwell.
  4. Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell.
  5. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Polity Press.
  6. Castells, M. (2013). Communication Power. Oxford University Press.
  7. Cohen, I. (1989). Structuration Theory: Anthony Giddens and the Constitution of Social Life. Macmillan.
  8. Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1994). Civil Society and Political Theory. The MIT Press.
  9. Culla, A. S. (2006). Rekonstruksi Civil Society: Wacana dan Aksi Ornop di Indonesia. LP3ES.
  10. Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Second edition. SAGE Publications.
  11. Edwards, M. (2014). Civil Society. Polity Press.
  12. Flew, T. (2014). New Media: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.
  13. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Polity Press.
  14. Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Harrison, L. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Politik. Kencana.
  16. Hidayat, D. N., Gazali, E., Suwardi, H., & dan Ishadi, S. K. (Eds.). (2000). Pers dalam “Revolusi Mei”: Runtuhnya Sebuah Hegemoni. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  17. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York University Press.
  18. Louw, P. E. (2005). The Media and Political Process. SAGE Publications.
  19. Maryani, E. (2011). Media dan Perubahan Sosial: Suara Perlawanan Melalui Radio Komunitas. Rosda.
  20. McNair, B. (2003). An Introduction to Political Communication. Routledge.
  21. Mosco, V. (2009). The Political Economy of Communication. SAGE Publications.
  22. Nugroho, Y., & Syarief, S. S. (2012). Beyond Click-Activism? New Media and Political Processes in Contemporary Indonesia. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
  23. Perloff, R. M. (2014). The Dynamics of Political Communication: Media and Politics in a Digital Age. Routledge.
  24. Priyono, AE dan Usman Hamid (ed) (2014). Merancang Arah Baru Demokrasi: Indonesia Pasca-Reformasi. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
  25. Suparno, B. A. (2012). Reformasi dan Jatuhnya Soeharto. Kompas.
  26. Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of Case Study Research. SAGE Publications.