Article Sidebar

Submitted
March 5, 2024
Accepted
July 31, 2024
Published
August 25, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 392 Download : 376

Main Article Content

Abstract

The use of social media in mainstream media has become commonplace in the digital age. This raises issues of copyright, quality, and exploitation of digital labour, such as low wages and high workloads. This research aims to reveal the practices of the digital labour in managing Suara.com's social media accounts based on Fuchs' digital labour theory. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study method. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with digital labour managing Suara.com's social media accounts, non-participant observation, and analysis of internal documents and related publications. Through the study of the results associated with Christian Fuchs' digital labour theory, the results show that the digital labours are exploited in terms of workload, the absence of boundaries between personal life and work, and equal recognition of work results. This practice reflects the aspects of the digital labour exploitation, namely coercion, alienation, and appropriation.

Keywords

Digital Journalism Digital Labour Online Media Social Media

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Aryo Subarkah Eddyono, Theresia Aprilie

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Aprilie, T., & Eddyono, A. S. (2024). Ditundukkan, Terasing, dan Imbalan Tak Setara: Praktik Pekerja Digital Media Sosial Suara.com . Jurnal Komunikasi, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol19.iss1.art3
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Adelia, O. (2019). Penggunaan Media Sosial Oleh Wartawan Jawa Pos Radar. Semarang Dalam Pembuatan Berita. Interaksi Online, 7(3). https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/interaksi-online/article/view/24156
  2. Adinda, B. G. (2019). Komodifikasi Tenaga Kerja: Eksploitasi Social Media Specialist dalam Agensi Digital. KAGHAS: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Sriwijaya, 1(1). http://kaghas.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/kaghas/article/view/1/1
  3. Ahmad, P. M., H., I., NFZ., B., & S, A. (2021). Digital Labour: Digital Capitalism and the Alienation of YouTube Content Creators. Journal of Asian Social Science Research, 3(2), 167–184.
  4. Aisah, S. & Nursatyo. (2024). Ragam Bentuk Pemanfaatan Media Sosial Oleh Situs Berita Online. Jurnal Netnografi Komunikasi, 2(2), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.59408/jnk.v2i2.23
  5. Alim, S., & Dharma, A. F. (2021). Youtube Sebagai Ruang Publik Alternatif Bagi Anak Muda. Expose: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.33021/exp.v4i1.1437
  6. Barker, C. (2015). Cultural Studies:Teori dan Praktik. Kreasi Wacana.
  7. Digital. (2023). We Are Social Indonesia. We Are Social Indonesia. https://wearesocial.com/id/blog/2023/01/digital-2023/
  8. Eddyono, A. S. (2013). Twitter: Kawan sekaligus Lawan bagi Redaksi Berita. Journal Communication Spectrum, 3(1), 47–65.
  9. Eddyono, A. S. (2019). Siasat Kompasiana dan Indonesiana dalam Memanfaatkan Raksasa Media Sosial demi Traffic. Jurnal Komunikasi, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol14.iss1.art5
  10. Eddyono, A. S. (2020). Jurnalisme Warga, Hegemoni, dan Rusaknya Keragaman Informasi. UBakrie Press.
  11. Eddyono, A. S. (2022). Media Siber dan Search Engine Optimization (SEO): Melacak Motif, Adaptasi untuk Cari Untung, dan Upaya Menjaga Kualitas Jurnalisme. Expose: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 5. http://e-journal.president.ac.id/presunivojs/index.php/EXPOSE/article/download/4346/1458
  12. Evanalia., S., AR., & Fatimah, S. (2023). Komodifikasi Pekerja dan Dampaknya pada Kualitas Pemberitaan di YouTube KompasTV. WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi, 22(1).
  13. Faucher, K. X. (2018). Social Capital Online: Alienation and Accumulation. University of Westminster Press.
  14. Fitria, C. D. (2016). Manajemen Redaksional Tribunpekanbaru.com dalam Menentukan Berita yang Layak. JOM FISIP, 3(2).
  15. Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital Labour and Karl Marx. Routledge.
  16. Fuchs, C., & Eran, F. (Eds.). (2015). Reconsidering Value and Labour in the Digital Age. Palgrave Macmillan.
  17. Fuchs, C., & Sevignani, S. (2013). What is Digital Labour? What is Digital Work? What’s their Difference? And why do these Questions Matter for Understanding Social Media? TripleC, 11(2), 237–29.
  18. Fuchs, C., & Sevignani, S. (2018). Mengenal Perbedaan Kerja-teralienasi Digital (Digital labour) dan Kerja-Umum Digital (Digital Work (H. Yosie, Trans.). Indo Progress.
  19. Hasbuyanti. (2021). Proletariat Digital dalam Citizen Journalism: Kasus Kompasiana. JISPO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 11(2). https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/
  20. Indonesia. (n.d.). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja. Sekretariat Negara.
  21. Insani, C. N., Hidayat, D. R., & Zulfan, I. (2019). Pemanfaatan InstaStory Dalam Aktivitas Jurnalistik Oleh Majalah Gadis. Jurnal Kajian Jurnalisme, 3(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkj.v3i1.22453
  22. Jeharu, V. A. N. (2021). Digital Creative Labour: Prosumsi Desainer Grafis Kontributor dalam Platform Microstock Freepik. Jurnal Retorik, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.24071/ret.v9i2.3491
  23. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons.
  24. Kencana, W. K., Ilona, O. S., Meisyanti, K. J. R., & N, H. (2022). Penggunaan Media Sosial dalam Portal Berita Online. IKRA-ITH HUMANIORA : Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 6(2), 136–145.
  25. Marx, K. (2004). Das Kapital I. Hasta Mitra.
  26. Miller, M. (2017). Ogilvy Philippines confirms employee death. Campaign Asia. https://www.campaignasia.com/article/ogilvy-philippines-confirms-employee-death/434102#:~:text=Passing%20of%20Mark%20Dehesa%20reignites%20debate%20about%20industry%20work%20pressures.&text=The%20death%20Sunday%20of%20Mark,have%20contributed%20to%20his%20death.
  27. Mosco, V. (2009). The political economy of communication, The Political Economy of Communication. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279946.
  28. Noval, S. M. R. (2022). Evolusi Hak Pekerja di Era Digital (Prawacana Right to Disconnect di Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 6(2). https://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/
  29. Pan, D., Ammar, R. A. R., & Shahrul, N. S. (2023). Alienation of Digital Labour on Online Games among College Students in China. Migration Letters, 20, 825–843.
  30. Paramastri, N. A., & Gumilar, G. (2019). Penggunaan Twitter Sebagai Medium Distribusi Berita dan News Gathering oleh Tirto.Id. Jurnal Kajian Jurnalisme, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.24198/jkj.v3i1.22450
  31. Pattia, G., & Djujur, L. R. (2020). Strategi Manajemen Redaksi RadarDepok.com dalam Menghadapi Persaingan di Era Digitalisasi. Populis: Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 5(1), 130–138.
  32. Pembayun, E. C., & Ardian, I. Y. (2023). The conventional media’s political economy practices in the media convergence era: Case study of labor commodification in TV industry. Jurnal Informasi, 53(1), 55–68.
  33. Pratopo, W. M. (2017). Komodifikasi Wartawan di Era Konvergensi: Studi Kasus Tempo. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v6i2.8715
  34. Prawira, A. E. (2013). https://www.liputan6.com/health/read/775867/30-jam-tak-tidur-mita-diran-si-gadis-copywriter-meninggal-dunia
  35. Putranto, R. D., & Harvelian, A. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha dalam Transaksi Elektronik melalui Situs Internet di Tinjau dari Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. FOCUS: Journal of Social Studies, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.37010/fcs.v4i1.1153
  36. Robin, P. (2020). Buruh Media Massa Sebagai Penunjuk ke Arah “Independen dan Terpercaya”. Diakom: Jurnal Media dan Komunikasi, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.17933/diakom.v3i2.72
  37. Rohman, M. N. (2023). It is Hard for Journalists to Pray on Time: Commodification of Media Workers in the Digital Age. Kalijaga Journal of Communication, 5(1), 41-56,. https://doi.org/10.14421/kjc.51.03.2023
  38. Similarweb. (2024). https://www.similarweb.com/website/Suara.com/#competitors
  39. Suaracom. (2014). Tentang Kami. https://www.Suara.com/pages/tentangkami
  40. Sudarsono, A. B. (2018). Komodifikasi Pekerja Media dalam Industri Hiburan Televisi. Jurnal Oratio Directa, 1(2).
  41. Ulya, H. (2019). Komodifikasi Pekerja pada Youtuber Pemula dan Underrated (Studi Kasus YouTube Indonesia. Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(2). https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/interaksi
  42. Wijaya, S., & Eddyono, A. S. (2021). Pemanfaatan Media Sosial Instagram oleh Redaksi Kuninganmass. Expose: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(1). http://ejournal.president.ac.id/presunivojs/index.php/EXPOSE/article/view/1532
  43. Yin, R. K. (2015). Studi Kasus: Desain dan Metode. Rajawali Pers.
  44. Yunita, D., Widad, A., Yuliansyah, M. D., & Wita, F. (2021). Pembuatan Content Marketing sebagai Strategi Menumbuhkan Brand Awareness bagi Pelaku Usaha di Pandemi Covid-19. Sricommerce: Journal of Sriwijaya Communication Services, 2(2), 89–96.