Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 22, 2025
Accepted
January 22, 2026
Published
April 30, 2026
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 579 Download : 408

Main Article Content

Abstract

Studies have been exploring the processes of identity construction increasingly intertwined with the behaviors of netizens. The construction of self-identity is now entangled with global capitalism. The contribution of this article is the exploration of the Superego as a site of vulnerability in the age of social media. In the current media environment, this vulnerability of the Superego is observable through the figure of the prominent individual whose visibility, amplified by significant social capital, draws both admiration and hostility from followers. This paper introduces the concept of the Upper Subject to understand such figures. This study focuses on two political figures who can be categorized as Upper Subjects based on the number of followers they command on social media: Khofifah Indar Parawansa (the Governor of East Java) and Dedi Mulyadi (the Governor of West Java). Both serve as the primary subjects of this analysis. The study adopts a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) method to examine how these Upper Subjects are constructed and contested within digital discourse.

Keywords

CDA gender social media superego upper subjects

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Wening Udasmoro, Leo Marai, Aprillia Firmonasari

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Udasmoro, W., Marai, L. ., & Firmonasari, A. . (2026). The fragile upper subject: Gender, digital discourse, and superego collapse in contemporary Indonesian media. Jurnal Komunikasi, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol20.iss1.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Adarlo, S. (2025). Influencer sobs in front of TikTok headquarters after getting banned. The Byte. https://futurism.com/the-byte/influencer-tiktok-headquarters-banned
  2. Allen, S. (2019). Social media’s growing impact on our lives. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/members/content/social-media-research
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Barat. (2025). Jumlah penduduk menurut kelompok umur dan jenis kelamin di Provinsi Jawa Barat, 2025. https://jabar.bps.go.id
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Timur. (2025, February 23). Jumlah penduduk menurut kelompok umur dan jenis kelamin di Provinsi Jawa Timur, 2025. https://jatim.bps.go.id
  5. Bauman, Z. (1998). Postmodernity and its discontents. Polity Press.
  6. Bengtsson, S., & Johansson, S. (2022). The meaning of social media use in everyday life: Filling empty slots, everyday transformations, and mood management. Social Media + Society, October–December, 1–11.
  7. Berger, J., Werbach, K., Fader, P., & Yildirim, P. (2019). The impact of social media: Is it irreplaceable? Knowledge at Wharton. https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/impact-of-social-media/
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
  9. Dalomba, F. (2022). Pros and cons of social media. Brown Health. https://www.brownhealth.org/be-well/social-media-good-bad-and-uglyAdarlo, Sharon. 2025. Influencer sobs in front of Titok headquarters after getting banned. In The Byte https://futurism.com/the-byte/influencer-tiktok-headquarters-banned, 11 June at 01.01.
  10. Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and power. Longman.
  11. Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
  12. Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. SE, 18: 1-64.
  13. Freud, S. (1923). The Ego and the Id. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 19, pp. 1–66).
  14. Freud, S. (2023). The Ego and the id. https://www.sigmundfreud.net/the-ego-and-the-id-pdf-ebook.jsp
  15. Freud, A. (1936). The ego and the mechanisms of defense. International Universities Press, Inc.
  16. Hatmanto, R. (2023). Perjalanan TikTok masuk Indonesia hingga ambil kendali Tokopedia. BeritaSatu. https://www.beritasatu.com/ototekno/2786217/perjalanan-tiktok-masuk-indonesia-hingga-ambil-kendali-tokopedia
  17. Jesus, S. (2023). Freedom and anxiety: A psychoanalytic exploration of the superego in the postmodern era. Trends in Psychology, 13, 1–20.
  18. Kaptenseo. (2023). Statistik pengguna media sosial di Indonesia tahun 2019–2023. https://kaptenseo.com/statistik-pengguna-media-sosial-di-indonesia-tahun-2019-2023/
  19. Ketik Kabar. (2025). IPK 3,94 jago olimpiade, Zahran malah dihujat netizen. https://ketikkabar.com/2025/06/22/ipk-394-jago-olimpiade-zahran-malah-dihujat-netizen/
  20. Kristeva, J. (1982). Pouvoirs de l’horreur: Essai sur l’abjection. Éditions du Seuil.
  21. Marai, Leo. 2004. Anxiety and hopelessness in two South Pacific countries: Exploratory studies. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, Vol 32 (8), pp 723-230.
  22. McLeod, S. (2025). Id, ego, and superego. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/psyche.html
  23. Nursyecha, N. (2024). Sudah 14 tahun Instagram berdiri! RRI Digital. https://www.rri.co.id/iptek/1030957/sudah-14-tahun-instagram-berdiri
  24. Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2019). The rise of social media. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/rise-of-social-media
  25. Pungki. (2025). Wajah Asmirandah dibilang kayak nenek-nenek, psikolog minta jangan bawa-bawa agama!. Indopop. https://indopop.id/wajah-asmirandah-dibilang-kayak-nenek-nenek-psikolog-minta-jangan-bawa-bawa-agama
  26. Raju, G. (2025). Impact of social media: Advantages and disadvantages. Simplilearn. https://www.simplilearn.com/real-impact-social-media-article
  27. Rianto, P. (2025). Digital media research: Will it continue to be a trend in the future? Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 19(2), i–vii.
  28. Rubiah, H. (2025). Viral, remaja di Bekasi berani kritik Dedi Mulyadi imbas rumahnya digusur, berujung dihujat netizen. Tribun Jabar. https://jabar.tribunnews.com/2025/04/22/viral-remaja-di-bekasi-berani-kritik-dedi-mulyadi-imbas-rumahnya-digusur-berujung-dihujat-netizen
  29. Udasmoro, W. (2024). The upper subject: “Honor” dan praktik reproduksi sosialnya dalam masyarakat Indonesia kontemporer (Presentation). Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  30. Udasmoro, W. (2017). Destabilizing gender norm in contemporary Indonesian discourses. Mozaik Humaniora, 17(2), 291–303.
  31. Wahyuni, F. (2025). Awal mula polemik Dedi Mulyadi dan GRIB Jaya, Hercules ancam kerahkan 50 ribu orang ke Gedung Sate. Bangkapos. https://bangka.tribunnews.com/2025/05/02/awal-mula-polemik-dedi-mulyadi-dan-grib-jaya-hercules-ancam-kerahkan-50-ribu-orang-ke-gedung-sate
  32. Wike, R., Silver, L., Fetterolf, J., Huang, C., Austin, S., Clancy, L., & Gubbala, S. (2022). Views of social media and its impact on society. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2022/12/06/views-of-social-media-and-its-impacts-on-society-in-advanced-economies-2022/
  33. Ye, T. (2023). Social media and its impact: Individuals and society. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 624–646.
  34. Žižek, S. (1999). You may! London Review of Books, 21(6). https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v21/n06/slavoj-zizek/you-may