Main Article Content

Abstract

Today, the most efficient slab construction method is the concrete-steel deck composite slab because there is no need to remove the deck after the concrete casting process. Nevertheless, reinforced concrete standard code (SNI 2847:2019) not emphasized a specific method to calculate the concrete-steel deck slab's nominal capacity. The code is embraced by the plastic method analysis, which is calculated the nominal capacity of the structure on the ultimate condition. However, several laboratory tests reveal a slip behavior between the concrete and steel deck before the slab reaches its ultimate condition. Therefore, alternative methods are needed to analyze the nominal capacity of concrete-steel deck slab. This study compares three different nominal capacity analysis methods to a laboratory test result. Those methods are ultimate, working stress, and SDI-ANSI (2017). The average error value of those three methods compared to laboratory test results in 35,57%, 9,48%, and -10,31% for ultimate, working stress, SDI-ANSI (2017) consecutively.it can be concluded the working stress method is the most accurate. However, SDI-ANSI (2017) is the conservative one, while the ultimate method is not recommended to analyze the concrete-steel deck slab's nominal capacity.

Keywords

Concrete-steel deck composite slab nominal capacity Ultimate Working Stress SDI-ANSI 2017

Article Details

Author Biography

Hariadi Yulianto, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Jurusan Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan Universiatas Islam Indonesia
How to Cite
Yulianto, H. (2021). KOMPARASI KAPASITAS NOMINAL LENTUR PELAT KOMPOSIT BETON-DEK BAJA ANTARA METODE ULTIMIT, TEGANGAN KERJA, DAN SDI-ANSI 2017. Teknisia, 26(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.20885/teknisia.vol26.iss1.art1

References

  1. Amalia, Z., Huzaim, dan S, B. (2014). "Analisis Perilaku Pelat Komposit Floor Deck Beton Ringan Busa dengan kuat tekan 25 MPa, 30 MPa, dan 35 MPa". Tugas Akhir. Universitas Syah Kuala Darussalam.
  2. Blue Scope Lysagth Indonesia. (2008). "SMARTDEK". Blue Scope Lysagth Indonesia. Bekasi.
  3. Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (2019). "Persyaratan Beton Struktural untuk Bangunan Gedung SNI 2847-2019". Badan Standarisasi Nasional (BSN). Jakarta.
  4. Fastaria, R. dan Putri, Y. E. (2014). "Analisa Perbandingan Metode Halfslab dan Plat Komposit Bondek Pekerjaan Struktur Plat Lantai Proyek Pembangunan Apartement De Papilio Tamansari Surabaya". Jurnal Teknik ITS, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 41-46.
  5. Irnada, C. R., Huzaim, dan Bermansyah, S. (2014). "Analisis Perilaku Pelat Lantai Komposit Floor Deck Beton Ringan Busa Mutu 35 MPa dengan Ketebalan 10 cm, 12 Cm, dan 14 cm". Tugas Akhir. Universitas Syah Kuala Darussalam.
  6. Kadir, A. M. dan Sudarmadi. (2008). "Perilaku dan Kekuatan Pelat Lantai Komposit Beton-Metal Deck Terhadap Beban Lentur". Majalah Ilmiah BPPT M.P.I, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 232-240.
  7. Muliater, M., Tarigan, J., dan Roesyanto. (2018). "Analisis Lendutan dan Slip Pada Pelat Komposit Veton-Metal Deck Berdasarkan Perilaku Uji Statik". Konferensi Nasional Teknik Sipil 12, (hal. 155-164). Batam.
  8. Widhiawati, I. A. R., Yana, A. A., dan Asmara, A. A. (2010). "Analisa Biaya Pelaksanaan Antara Pelat Konvensional dan Sistem Pelat Menggunakan Metal Deck". Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 20-27.
  9. SDI-ANSI. (2011). "C-2011- Standard For Composite Steel Floor Deck-Slabs". Steel Door Institute. Ohio.
  10. SDI-ANSI. (2017). "C-2017-2017 Standard For Composite Steel Floor Deck-Slabs". Steel Door Institute. Ohio.
  11. Segui, W. T. (2007). "Steel Design". Nelson. Toronto.
  12. Siregar, R. M. (2010). "Perbandingan Hasil Perancangan Pelat Beton Pracetak Dengan Pelat Beton Komposit Steel Deck Serta Tinjauan Balok Beton Pracetak Pada Gedung Rumah Sakit Akademik UGM". Program Swadaya Jurusan Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan Fakultas Teknik UGM. Yogyakarta.
  13. Widjaja, B. R. (1997). "Analysis And Design of Steeldeck-Concrete Composite Slab". Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Virginia.