Main Article Content

Abstract

Efficient management of the concrete supply chain is essential for minimizing project delays, reducing costs, and maintaining construction quality. However, the interdependence among batching plants, transportation fleets, and construction sites introduces nonlinear and dynamic challenges that make scheduling optimization highly complex. This study proposes the Artificial Satellite Search Algorithm (ASSA), a novel metaheuristic inspired by the orbital motion and trajectory control of artificial satellites, to optimize concrete material logistics in construction projects. ASSA models the exploration–exploitation process as a dynamic orbital adjustment, enabling adaptive transitions between global search and local refinement. The optimization aims to minimize total logistics cost and delivery delay while adhering to capacity and time constraints. Comparative experiments conducted using both benchmark datasets and real project conditions show that ASSA outperforms Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Genetic Algorithm (GA), achieving a 10.2% cost reduction and a 14.7% improvement in convergence speed. The results demonstrate that ASSA provides a robust and efficient alternative for optimizing material supply chain scheduling in construction management.

Keywords

Supply chain optimization Concrete materials Metaheuristic Construction management Artificial satellite search algorithm

Article Details

How to Cite
Sholeh, M. N., Wibowo, M. A., & Fauziyah, S. (2026). Optimization of concrete material supply chain in construction projects using the artificial satellite search algorithm. Teknisia, 31(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.20885/teknisia.vol31.iss1.art6

References

  1. Awaad, S., Mansour, D. M., Mahdi, I., & Abdelrasheed, I. (2024). Impact of material supply chain on the productivity optimization for the construction of roads projects. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 3294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53660-6
  2. Chen, Q., de Soto, B. G., & Adey, B. T. (2021). Supplier-contractor coordination approach to managing demand fluctuations of ready-mix concrete. Automation in Construction, 121, 103423. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103423
  3. Cheng, M.-Y., & Sholeh, M. N. (2025). Artificial satellite search: A new metaheuristic algorithm for optimizing truss structure design and project scheduling. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 143, 116008. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2025.116008
  4. Cheng, M.-Y., Sholeh, M. N., & Poetra, B. A. (2025). Predicting the construction cost-time tradeoff using optimized hybrid deep learning for risk preference decision making. International Journal of Construction Management, 1-27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2025.2574070
  5. Hatmoko, J. U. D., Wibowo, M. A., Astuty, M. D., Arthaningtyas, D. R., & Sholeh, M. N. (2019). Managing risks of precast concrete supply chain: a case study. MATEC Web of Conferences,
  6. Ismail, Z.-A. B. (2021). Hybrid intelligent vehicle system for managing construction supply chain in precast concrete building construction projects. World Journal of Engineering, 18(4), 538-546. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/WJE-08-2020-0361
  7. Kanso, A., & Smaoui, N. (2009). Logistic chaotic maps for binary numbers generations. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 40(5), 2557-2568. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2007.10.049
  8. Koutsokosta, A., & Katsavounis, S. (2024). Stochastic transitions of a mixed-integer linear programming model for the construction supply chain: chance-constrained programming and two-stage programming. Operational Research, 24(3), 46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-024-00856-3
  9. Liu, H., & Yang, S. (2025). Application of particle swarm optimisation in collaborative scheduling of logistics and supply chain. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 33(1), 67-86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNVO.2025.149629
  10. Okika, M. C., Vermeulen, A., & Pretorius, J. H. C. (2025). A systematic approach to identify and manage supply chain risks in construction projects. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 30(1), 42-66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-09-2023-0057
  11. Pham, V. H. S., Trang, N. T. N., & Dat, C. Q. (2024). Optimization of production schedules of multi-plants for dispatching ready-mix concrete trucks by integrating grey wolf optimizer and dragonfly algorithm. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(11), 4602-4624. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2022-1176
  12. Rehman, M. A. U., Chaabane, A., & Khan, S. A. (2025). A novel decision support system for integrating supply chain and project management decisions to optimize multiple project performance: a case study in building renovation. International Journal of Construction Management, 1-25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2025.2506804
  13. Sarkar, D., Gohel, J., & Dabasia, K. (2021). Optimization of ready mixed concrete delivery for commercial batching plants of Ahmedabad, India. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(10), 1024-1043. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1602582
  14. Sholeh, M. N., & Elizar, E. (2026). A systematic review of the mountain gazelle optimizer: methodological variants and application domains. Evolutionary Intelligence, 19(3), 79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-026-01196-1
  15. Xie, L., Chen, Y., & Chang, R. (2021). Scheduling optimization of prefabricated construction projects by genetic algorithm. Applied Sciences, 11(12), 5531. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125531
  16. Zhang, Y., & Wang, L. (2024). A dynamic scheduling method for logistics supply chain based on adaptive ant colony algorithm. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 17(1), 198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-024-00606-5