Article Sidebar

Submitted
3 January 2026
Accepted
18 May 2026
Published
31 May 2026
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 13 Download : 1

Main Article Content

Abstract

The vulnerability of market buildings in active seismic zones, such as North Bengkulu which is surrounded by the Sumatran subduction zone and active faults presents a critical research challenge due to the lack of integrated soil-structure seismic assessments for commercial infrastructure. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of earthquakes on the Purwodadi Market Building through the integration of soil response analysis and structural dynamics. The methods employed involved calculating soil response based on historical earthquake records of the 2007 Bengkulu–Mentawai Earthquake (subduction, Mw 8.4) and the 1952 Ketahun Earthquake (active fault, Mw 6.8), followed by structural modelling using the Finite Element Method (FEM). The main quantitative results show that the local clay layer significantly amplifies ground motion, with a Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) at the surface of 0.485 g for the subduction earthquake and 0.389 g for the fault earthquake. The amplification factors at the surface are 1.95 and 1.73, respectively. Structural simulations recorded a substantial increase in internal forces; for example, the bending moment in beam B1 increased from 0.82 kNm to 61.01 kNm, and the shear force at the head of the pile cap PC increased from 2.15 kN to 65.12 kN. Nevertheless, all structural components maintained stress ratios below 1.0, confirming that the building meets the safety standards of SNI 1726:2019. It is concluded that the integration of site-specific ground response with FEM-based structural dynamics is crucial for improving seismic resistance assessment. This study recommends the continued application of this combined method for buildings in earthquake-prone areas and the expansion of earthquake data coverage to improve future risk mitigation strategies.

Keywords

Seismic resistance Soil response Finite element method Earthquake engineering Structural dynamics

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Danu Anugrah Juniarto, Lindung Zalbuin Mase, Khairul Amri, Rena Misliniyati, Fepy Supriani

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Under the following term:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Anugrah Juniarto, D., Lindung Zalbuin Mase, Khairul Amri, Rena Misliniyati, & Fepy Supriani. (2026). Analysis of earthquake impact on market buildings in North Bengkulu using the soil response and finite element method. Teknisia, 31(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.20885/teknisia.vol31.iss1.art5
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Bowles, J. E. (1989). Sifat-sifat Fisik & Geoteknis Tanah.
  2. Hajian, M., & Attarnejad, R. (2022). Non-Uniform Relationship for Soil-Foundation Reaction. Civil and Project Journal, 4(5), 11–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22034/CPJ.2022.349082.1145 Civil
  3. Handayani, N. R., Mase, L. Z., Nugroho, S. H., Supriani, F., Misliniyati, R., & Amri, K. (2025). Evaluation of Building Performance Against Large Subduction Earthquakes Incorporating Ground Response and Structural Dynamics Analysis. Engineering Journal, 29(6), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2025.29.6.59
  4. Hasanah, P., Misliniyati, R., Amri, K., Zalbuin, L., Hadi, A. I., Fadli, D. I., & Unib, U. B. (2024). Mikrozonasi kerentanan seismik di kawasan Kabupaten Lebong Provinsi Bengkulu berdasarkan data uji mikrotremor Microzoning of seismic vulnerability in Lebong Regency , Bengkulu Province based on microtremor test data. 13(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.24815/jacps.v13i3.39485
  5. Hukama, R. D., & Erizal. (2023). Analisis Kekuatan Struktur Pada Bangunan 8 Lantai Berdasarkan Respon Spektrum SNI 03-1726-2019 Menggunakan SAP2000. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Dan Lingkungan, 8(03), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.29244/jsil.8.03.127-136
  6. Mase, L. Z. (2020). Seismic Hazard Vulnerability of Bengkulu City, Indonesia, Based on Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 38(5), 5433–5455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01375-6
  7. Mase, L. Z. (2022). Local seismic hazard map based on the response spectra of stiff and very dense soils in Bengkulu city, Indonesia. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 13(6), 573–584. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2022.05.003
  8. Mase, L. Z., Gustina, D., Zahara, A., Supriani, F., Chaiyaput, S., & Syahbana, A. J. (2025). The Joint Method of Ground Response and Structural Dynamic Analyses for Building Inspection Under a Large Megathrust Earthquake. In Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology (Vol. 12, Issue 1). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-024-00480-w
  9. Mase, L. Z., & Likitlersuang, S. (2021). Implementation of Seismic Ground Response Analysis in Estimating Liquefaction Potential in Northern Thailand. Indonesian Journal on Geoscience, 8(3), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.17014/ijog.8.3.371-383
  10. Mase, L. Z., Sugianto, N., & Refrizon. (2021). Seismic hazard microzonation of Bengkulu City, Indonesia. Geoenvironmental Disasters, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-021-00178-y
  11. Mase, L. Z., Wahyuni, M. S., Hardiansyah, & Syahbana, A. J. (2024). Prediction of Damage Intensity Level Distribution in Bengkulu City, During the Mw 8.6 Bengkulu-Mentawai Earthquake in 2007, Indonesia. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 11(2), 769–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-023-00306-1
  12. Mavrouli, M., Mavroulis, S., Lekkas, E., & Tsakris, A. (2023). The Impact of Earthquakes on Public Health: A Narrative Review of Infectious Diseases in the Post-Disaster Period Aiming to Disaster Risk Reduction. Microorganisms, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020419
  13. Pribadi, K. S., Abduh, M., Wirahadikusumah, R. D., Hanifa, N. R., Irsyam, M., Kusumaningrum, P., & Puri, E. (2021). Learning from past earthquake disasters: The need for knowledge management system to enhance infrastructure resilience in Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 64(July), 102424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102424
  14. Qodri, M. F., Anggorowati, V. D. A., & Mase, L. Z. (2022). Site-Specific Analysis to Investigate Response and Liquefaction Potential during the Megathrust Earthquake at Banten Province Indonesia. Engineering Journal, 26(9), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2022.26.9.1
  15. Silva, A. B. F. De, Parisi, A. P. F., & Silvestri, S. S. F. (2021). Numerical simulation of the seismic response and soil – structure interaction for a monitored masonry school building damaged by the 2016 Central Italy earthquake. In Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering (Vol. 19, Issue 2). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00980-3
  16. Swasdi, S., Chub-Uppakarn, T., Chompoorat, T., & Sae-Long, W. (2024). Numerical study on the influence of embedment footing and vertical load on lateral load sharing in piled raft foundations. Geomechanics and Engineering, 36(6), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2024.36.6.545
  17. Syed, E. U., & Manzoor, K. M. (2022). Analysis and design of buildings using Revit and ETABS software. Materials Today: Proceedings, 65, 1478–1485. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.463
  18. TİMURAĞAOĞLU, M. Ö. (2024). Kinematic interaction analysis of individual soil-pile model within multi-block system. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 179, 108523. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108523
  19. Vucetic, & Dobry. (1991). Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. 118(5), 836. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(91)90820-c