Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the factors, weaknesses and components that affect the neutrality of the State Civil Apparatus (ASN) in the recent regional election. This research is a non-doctrinal legal research/socio-legal research/sociology of law study by using the statutory and case approaches in the recent elections in Surakarta City, Sragen Regency and Bantul Regency. The nature of this research is descriptive analysis which intends to provide an overview of the existing condition of the neutrality of ASN in carrying out tasks related to the operation of law in the community. The results of the study concluded that in Surakarta, Sragen, and Bantul, some ASN were not neutral with several contributing factors including personal loyalty, familiar relations, career ambitions, ambiguity of regulations, ineffective law enforcement and low awareness of the community in civilizing the law. The embodiment of the neutrality of ASN in the regional elections can be done by optimally involving the role of several related institutions, including the State Civil Apparatus Commission (KASN), Bureaucratic Leadership, Regional Inspectorate, the Regional Civil Service Agency, the Election Commission and the Election Supervisory Body.

Keywords

Neutrality ASN regional election

Article Details

Author Biography

Sutrisno Sutrisno, Fakultas Syariah IAIN Surakarta

Fakultas Syariah IAIN Surakarta
How to Cite
Sutrisno, S. (2020). Prinsip Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 26(3), 522–544. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss3.art5

References

  1. Buku
  2. Ali. M. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Unesa University Press. Surakarta, 2009.
  3. Dalim, Sudiman. Politisasi Birokrasi Netralitas dan Mobilitas PNS dalam Pilkada. Pena Abadi., Jakarta, 2010.
  4. Mahfud, Moh. Evaluasi Pemilukada dalam Perspektif Demokrasi dan Hukum. Dalam Demokrasi Lokal Evaluasi Pemilukada di Idonesia, Konstitusi Press, Jakarta, 2012.
  5. Supriyanto Didik.Penataan Kembali Sistem Pemilihan dalam Pemilukada. Dalam Demokrasi Lokal, Konpress, Jakarta, 2012.
  6. Usman, Sabian.. Dasar-dasar Sosiologi Hukum; Dilengkapi Proposal Penelitian Hukum (Legal Reseacht), Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2010.
  7. Warasih Esmi, Pranata Hukum Sebuah Telaah Sosiologis, Pustaka Magister, Semarang, 2014.
  8. Jurnal
  9. Firman, “Meritokrasi dan Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara dalam Pengaruh Pilkada Langsung”, Jurnal IJPA-The Indonesian Journal of Public Administration Vol. 3 No. 2, Desember 2017.
  10. Firnas, M. Adian, “Politik dan Birokrasi: Masalah Netralitas Birokrasi di Indonesia Era Reformasi” Jurnal Review Politik Vol 06 No. 01, Juni 2016.
  11. Hartini, Sri “Penegakan Hukum Netralitas Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PNS)” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol. 9. No. 3, September 2009.
  12. Nugraha, Harry Setya, “Politik Hukum Pengaturan Netralitas ASN dalam Pilkada Tahun 2018”, Jurnal Justisi Hukum ISSN2528-2638 Vol 3, No. 1, September 2018.
  13. Riri Nazriah, Implikasi Putusan MK Terhadap Netralitas PNS dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume. 6. Nomor 2, Juli 2008.
  14. Tatang Sudrajat. “Netralitas PNS dan Masa Depan Demokrasi dalam Pilkada Serentak 2015”, Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi. Volume XII, No. 3 Desember 2015.
  15. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
  16. Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN)
  17. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2015. Jo. UU Nomor 8 Tahun 2015. Jo. UU Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 tentang Pemilihan Kepala Daerah
  18. Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintah Daerah
  19. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 53 Tahun 2010 tentang Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil