Article Sidebar

Submitted
August 13, 2021
Accepted
January 28, 2022
Published
January 31, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 367 Download : 568

Main Article Content

Abstract

Indonesia began its BITs termination movement in early 2014 by calling off the Netherlands-Indonesia BIT 1992. As of today, 29/55 of the country’s BITs that are in force have been terminated. By adopting the normative research method and utilising statutory and conceptual approaches, this paper examines two issues: first, mapping the landscape of international investment law in Indonesia in the epilogue of its long-standing BITs regime hence the probable government’s deliberations behind the action; and second, in what way would the BITs termination movement truly serve Indonesia’s national interests and benefit its economic development while promoting and protecting foreign investments – particularly on the core element of the investors’ direct right to investment arbitration. At last, the paper concludes its discussion by offering two answers: first, two lifeboats are reserved for the protection of the country’s present foreign investment, the implementation of “Sunset Cause” contained within Indonesia’s BITs as well as protectionism provisions under the country’s national investment law and other relevant regulations; and for the second, two diverged roads are laid out to choose for the protection of future foreign investments in Indonesia, the country’s Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) containing investment provisions or its newly born model BIT which, needless to say, at least the latter must be formulated with delicate manner if the goal is to prevail Indonesia’s interests.

Key Words:  Bilateral Investment Treaties; foreign investors; investor-state contracts; new model BIT; Regional Trade Agreements; sunset clause

Abstrak

Indonesia memulai gerakan terminasi BIT-nya sejak awal tahun 2014 dengan membatalkan BIT Belanda-Indonesia 1992. Sampai hari ini, dari total 55 BIT negara tersebut yang masih berlaku, 29  di antaranya telah dihentikan. Dengan mengadopsi metode penelitian normatif dan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, tulisan ini mengkaji dua masalah: pertama, pemetaan lanskap hukum investasi internasional di Indonesia dengan berakhirnya rezim BIT yang sudah berlangsung lama juga analisa kemungkinan pertimbangan-pertimbangan pemerintah di balik tindakan tersebut; dan kedua, dengan cara apa gerakan terminasi BIT ini dapat benar-benar melayani kepentingan nasional Indonesia dan menguntungkan pembangunan ekonominya namun pada saat yang bersamaan juga mempromosikan dan melindungi investasi asing – terutama pada elemen inti yakti hak langsung investor untuk mengajukan arbitrase. Sebagai penutup, makalah ini mengakhiri diskusinya dengan menawarkan dua jawaban: pertama, dua sekoci disediakan untuk melindungi investasi asing negara saat ini, yaitu penerapan “Sunset Cause” yang terkandung dalam BIT Indonesia serta pasal-pasal pelindung dalam UU Investasi negara tersebut serta peraturan terkait lainnya; dan untuk yang kedua, dua pilihan jalan ditawarkan untuk melindungi investasi asing di Indonesia di masa depan, yaitu Regional Trade Agreement (RTA) negara tersebut yang mengandung bab investasi atau model BIT baru yang akan lahir yang, tentunya, paling tidak yang terakhir ini harus dirumuskan secara hati-hati jika tujuannya adalah untuk memenangkan kepentingan Indonesia.

Kata-kata Kunci:   Bilateral Investment Treaty; investor asing; perjanjian investor-negara; model BIT baru; Regional Trade Agreement; Sunset Clause

Keywords

Bilateral Investment Treaties foreign investors investor-state contracts new model BIT Regional Trade Agreements sunset clause

Article Details

How to Cite
Mahardhika, N. G. (2022). An Epilogue To Bilateral Investment Treaties Regime And The Fate Of Foreign Investments Protection In Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 29(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss1.art5
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Books
  2. Dolzer, Rudolf and Christophe Schreuer, Principles of International Investment Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.
  3. Newcombe, Andrew and Lluis Paradell, Law and Practise of Investment Treaties, Kluwer, 2009.
  4. Schreuer, Christhophe and Matthew Weiniger, “A Doctrine of Precedent?”, in Peter Muchlinski et al (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law, Law-book, 2008.
  5. Shea, DR, The Calvo Clause, University of Minnesota Press, Minnesota, 1955.
  6. Journal
  7. Guzman, Andrew, “Why LDCs Sign Treaties that Hurt Them; Explaining the Popularity of Bilateral Investment Treaties”, Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 38, 2006.
  8. Crockett, Anthony, “Indonesia’s Bilateral Investment Treaties: Seeking an Equitable Climate for Investment?”, ICSID Review Vol. 30, No. 2, 2015.
  9. Dahlman, Christian, “The Function of Opinio Juris in Customary International Law”, Nordic Journal of International Law, Vol. 81, Issue 3, 2012.
  10. Price, David, “Indonesia’s Bold Strategy on Bilateral Investment Treaties”, Asian Journal of International Law, Vol. 7, No. 8, 2007.
  11. Root, Elihu, “The Basis of Protection to Citizen’s Residing Abroad”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 4, Issue 3, 1910.
  12. Kelsen, Hans, “The Principle of Sovereign Equality of States as A Basis of International Organisation”, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 53, 1944.
  13. Shihata, Ibrahim, “Towards a Greater Depoliticization of Investment Disputes: The Role of ICSID and MIGA”, ICSID Review, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1986.
  14. Salacuse, Jeswald W, “The Emerging Global Regime for Investment”, Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2010.
  15. Poulsen, Lauge, “Bounded Rationality and the Diffusion of Modern Investment Treaties”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 58, Issue 1, 2014.
  16. Poulsen, Lauge and Emma Asbett, “When the Claim Hits: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Bounded National Learning”, World Politics Vol. 65, No. 2, 2003.
  17. Ranjan, Prabash, “Indian Investment Treaty Program in Light of Global Experience”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 39, No. 45, 2010.
  18. Leal-Arcas, Rafael, “Proliferation of Regional Trade Agreements: Complementing or Supplanting Multilateralism?”, Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2011.
  19. Sefriani, “The New Model of Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) for Indonesia”, Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory, Vol. 21, Issues 1, 2018.
  20. United States Secretary of State, “Mexico-United States: Expropriation by Mexico of Agrarian Properties Owned by American Citizens”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 33, 1983.
  21. Elkins, Zachary, Andrew T Guzman and Beth A. Simmons, “Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960-2000”, International Organization, Vol. 60, No. 4, 2006.
  22. Articles, Reports, and Other Documents
  23. James H Mathis, “Regional Trade Agreements in the GATT/WTO: Article XXIV and the Internal Trade Requirement”, TMC Asser Press, 2002.
  24. Kevin Muhammad Haikal, “Foreign Investment Protection Post-Indonesia’s Bilateral Investment Treaties Regime”, Thesis, Tilburg University, 2017.
  25. Mark Beeson and Andrew Rosser, “The East Asian Economic Crisis: A Brief Overview of the Facts, the Issues and the Future” Working Paper No 86, Asia Research Centre, June 1998.
  26. OECD, “Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law”, Working Paper No 2004/03, OECD Working Paper on International Investment, 2004.
  27. Shujiro Hirata, “An ASEAN+6 Economic Partnership: Significance and Tasks”, Asia Research Report, Japan Centre for Economic Research, 2007.
  28. Stephen L Magiera, “International Investment Agreements and Investor-State Disputes”, Discussion Paper No 30, ERIA, January 2017.
  29. Indonesian Legislation
  30. Undang-Undang No 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal [Law No 25 of 2007 on Investment] (Indonesia) art 1 [author’s trans]
  31. Treaties
  32. Agreement Between the Government of Australia and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia Concerning the Promotion and Protection of Investments, Australia-Indonesia, signed 17 November 1992, 1770 UNTS 301 (entered into force 29 July 1993).
  33. Agreement Between the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia on Promotion and Protection of Investments, Netherlands-Indonesia, signed 4 June 1994, 2240 UNTS 323 (entered into force 1 July 1995).
  34. Agreement Between the Government of Malaysia and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia for the Promotion and Protection of Investments, Malaysia-Indonesia, signed 22 January 1994, (entered into force 2 October 1999).
  35. Agreement Between the Government of the Republic of Indonesia and the Government of the Kingdom of Thailand for the Promotion and Protection of Investments, Indonesia-Thailand, signed 17 February 1998, 1489 UNTS 3 (entered into force 5 November 1998).
  36. Agreement Between the Government of the Republic of Singapore and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia on the Promotion and Protection of Investments, Singapore-Indonesia, signed 16 February 2005 (entered into force 21 June 2006).
  37. Agreement Between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia for the Promotion and Protection of Investments, United Kingdom-Indonesia, signed 27 April 1976, 575 UNTS 159 (entered into force 24 March 1977).
  38. Agreement Between Japan and the Republic of Indonesia for an Economic Partnership, Japan-Indonesia, signed 20 August 2007, WT/REG241 (entered into force 1 July 2008).
  39. Agreement Establishing the ASEAN-Australia- New Zealand Free Trade Area, ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand, signed 27 February 2009, WT/REG284/N/1 (entered into force 1 January 2010).
  40. Agreement on Economic Cooperation, The Netherlands-Indonesia, signed 7 July 1968, 1155 UNTS 243 (entered into force 17 July 1971)
  41. Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States, opened for signature 18 March 1965, 575 UNTS 159 (entered into force 14 October 1966).
  42. Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, opened for signature 15 April 1994, 1867 UNTS 3 (entered into force 1 January 1995) annex 2 (‘Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes’).
  43. Treaty for the Promotion and Protection of Investments (with Protocol and Exchange of Notes), Germany-Pakistan, signed 25 November 1959, 457 UNTS 24 (entered into force 28 November 1962).
  44. Decisions
  45. ADC Affiliate Ltd and ADC & ADMC Management Ltd v Republic of Hungary (Award) (ICSID Arbitral Tribunal) Case No ARB/03/16 (2 October 2006).
  46. Churchill Mining PLC and Planet Mining Pty Ltd v Republic of Indonesia (Jurisdiction) (ICSID Arbitral Tribunal) Cases No. ARB/12/14 and ARB/12/40 (24 February 2014).
  47. Emilio Agustín Maffezini v The Kingdom of Spain (Award) (ICSID Arbitral Tribunal) Case No ARB/97/7 (13 November 2000).
  48. Nusa Tenggara Partnership BV and PT Newmont Nusa Tenggara v Republic of Indonesia (Discontinued) (ICSID Arbitral Tribunal) Case No ARB/14/15 (August 2014).
  49. Oleovest Pte Ltd v Republic of Indonesia (Pending Jurisdiction) (ICSID Arbitral Tribunal) Case No ARB/16/26 (2016).
  50. Plama Consortium Ltd v Republic of Bulgaria (Award) (ICSID Arbitral Tribunal) Case No ARB/03/24 (27 August 2008).
  51. Permanent Sovereignty Over Natural Resources, GA Res. 1803 (XVII), UN GAOR, 28th sess, Supp No 17, UN Doc. A/5217 (14 December 1962).
  52. Siemes AG v The Argentine Republic (Jurisdiction) (ICSID Arbitral Tribunal) Case No. ARB/02/8 (3 Agustus 2004).
  53. Transparency Mechanism for Regional Trade Agreement, WTO Doc WT/L/671, 18 December 2006 (Decision of 14 December 2006).
  54. Others
  55. Joint Interpretative Instrument on the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada and European Union and Its Member States, Canada-EU, 27 October 2016, 13541/16 WTO 300 Services 28 FDI 23 CDN 24.
  56. UNCTC, BIlatral Investment Treaties, UN Doc No ST/CTC/65 (1988).
  57. Internet
  58. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, “About APEC”, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) < https://www.apec.org/About-Us/About-APEC > (last accessed 29 December 2021)
  59. Bagus BT Saragih, “SBY Frets Over International Arbitration”, The Jakarta Post < http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2012/06/29/sby-frets-over-int-l-arbitration.html > (last accessed 29 December 2021)
  60. Department of Economic Affairs, “Model Text for the Indian Bilateral Investment Treaty”, Government of India < https://www.mygov.in/sites/default/files/master_image/Model%20Text%20for%20the%20Indian%20Bilateral%20Investment%20Treaty.pdf > (last accessed 29 December 2021)
  61. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, “Indonesia-Australia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement Outcomes”, Australian Government < https://dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/not-yet-in-force/iacepa/Pages/ia-cepa-key-outcomes-for-australia.aspx > (last accessed 29 December 2021)
  62. Government of Indonesia, “Letter of Intent”, International Monetary Fund < https://www.imf.org/external/np/loi/1113a98.htm > (last accessed 29 December 2021)
  63. Indonesia Investments, “What Are the Biggest Oil and Gas Companies in Indonesia?”, Indonesia-Investments < https://www.indonesia-investments.com/news/todays-headlines/what-are-the-biggest-oil-gas-companies-in-indonesia/item9000? > (last accessed 29 December 2021)
  64. Jamil Maidan Flores and Jun Abad, “ASEAN At 30”, Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) < http://asean.org/?static_post=the-founding-of-asean > (last accessed 29 December 2021)
  65. John Lumbantobing, “Renegotiating the Bite of Our BITs”, Jakarta Post < http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/05/18/renegotiating-bite-our-bits.html > (last accessed 29 December 2021)
  66. Kingdom of the Netherlands, “Termination Bilateral Investment Treaty”, Embassy of the Netherlands < http://indonesia.nlembassy.org/organization/departments/economic-affairs/termination- bilateral-investment-treaty.html > (last accessed 5 November 2018)
  67. Leon E Trakman and Kunal Sharma, “Why is Indonesia Terminating Its Bilateral Investment Treaties?”, Kluwer Arbitration < http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2014/08/21/indonesias-termination-of-the-netherlands-indonesia-bit-broader-implications-in-the-asia-pacific/ > (last accessed 29 December 2021)
  68. Minister for Foregin Affairs Republic of Indonesia, “Annual Press Statement (2015)”, The Ministry of Foreign Affairs Republic of Indonesia < https://www.kemlu.go.id/Documents/PPTM%202015/PPTM%202015%20ENG%20FINAL%20PDF.pdf > (last accessed 5 November 2018)
  69. Norton Rose Fulbright, “Indonesia Signals Intention to Terminate More than 60 Bilateral Investment Treaties”, Norton Rose Fulbright < http://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/knowledge/publications/116101/indonesia-signals-intention-to-terminate-more-than-60-bilateral-investment-treaties > (last accessed 5 November 2018)
  70. Ganjar Nugroho, “An Overview of ASEAN States’ RTA Strategy”, Waseda Universtiy Japan < https://www.waseda.jp/inst/oris/assets/uploads/2015/10/i2-3.pdf > (last accessed 29 December 2021)
  71. Roeline Knotterus and van Oss, Roos, “The Netherlands: A Gateway to ‘Treaty Shopping’ for Investment Protection”, International Institute for Sustainable Development < https://www.iisd.org/itn/2012/01/12/ > (last accessed 5 November 2018)
  72. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), “Indonesia Bilateral Investment Treaties”, Investment Policy Hub < http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/IIA/CountryBits/97 > (last accessed 5 November 2018)
  73. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), “Indonesia Investment Related Instruments (IRIs)”, Investment Policy Hub < http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/IIA/CountryIris/97 > (last accessed 5 November 2018)
  74. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), “Indonesia-Netherlands BIT 1994”, Investment Policy Hub < http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/IIA/mostRecent/treaty/1988 > (last accessed 5 November 2018)
  75. World Trade Organisation, “List of All RTAs, Including Accessions to RTAs”, World Trade Organisation (WTO) < https://rtais.wto.org/UI/PublicAllRTAList.aspx > (last accessed 5 November 2018)